IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 6 >  
Closed TopicStart new topic
> /dev/grrl's development..., Because we don't want to thread-steal from a publication announcem
Lionhearted
post Mar 27 2013, 05:01 PM
Post #76


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,930
Joined: 9-April 05
From: Scandinavian Union
Member No.: 7,310



Picador, Kat O' Nine tales
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowJackal
post Mar 27 2013, 05:12 PM
Post #77


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 215
Joined: 16-October 11
Member No.: 40,831



QUOTE (bannockburn @ Mar 27 2013, 05:01 PM) *
The point was: There have been tons of strong female character in SR. There have also been female authors. There may be an oversight, due to percentages but there is no agenda to put women in their place.
You specified badass.
Badass can be standing up to your loremaster.
Badass can be wtfmurdering everyone who's in your way.
Badass can be being a working mother.
Badass can ALSO be working in an executive role and as vice president. The nipples thing is embarassing, though, but at least in my environment it's people laughing at bad writing rather than an otherwise very strong character.

The scale has been largely weighted to the male side for a long while there. The point is that from my (female) perspective, Shadowrun canon and the fandom has largely become very male dominated and has not allowed women to play on the same field. Women make up half of the population yet in a post-modern society where gender roles shouldn't matter anymore, current canon is pushing out female roles over and over again.

Sure, being badass can and is all of the above but the writers have the power to allow a woman in game have and be all that a man can just like the fans SHOULD do.

Many female characters have been named in this thread and the majority of them are pretty trite and contrived as far as female characters go. The male perspective can be very different on gender and equality, especially when you haven't lived as a women. So being someone who's been in the body of a female for quite a few years, from my perspective, I don't like them. They're banal and transparent. Dev's storyline could be greatly improved if she did choose an agressive lifestyle. But that's merely my 2 cents.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Patrick Goodman
post Mar 27 2013, 05:16 PM
Post #78


Tilting at Windmills
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,636
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Amarillo, TX, CAS
Member No.: 388



Can I throw one of my own characters in, just for shits and giggles? Lydia Bowden (based on one of the strongest women I've ever known). And one that's not mine but that I've adopted? Hannibelle (who was created by one of the women who write for this game).

You don't have to like them, but writing them off as if they didn't exist because some of them are written by guys? That's a cheap shot.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lionhearted
post Mar 27 2013, 05:18 PM
Post #79


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,930
Joined: 9-April 05
From: Scandinavian Union
Member No.: 7,310



*put palms under cheek* then pray tell, what's a believable not contrived female character supposed to be like?
It's quite poignant to point out that there's quite a few characters in shadowrun that are quite transparent but they fill their role...
Like Slamm-0 being the dastardly manchild,
Clockwork being the ... uh, xenophobic techfreak?


I agree with Patrick though, It's quite annoying to be accused of certain things just because we're male.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bannockburn
post Mar 27 2013, 05:19 PM
Post #80


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,647
Joined: 22-April 12
From: somewhere far beyond sanity
Member No.: 51,886



So, a good friend and someone who's been in the body of a female for quite a few years recently complemented SR on its strong female characters. She didn't find them trite, banal or transparent, and in fact, I can name two other women who started playing SR since they felt it was rather cool to its female characters. One of them because of Miss Nipples.

I'm not trying to gang up on you here and I think your original point was a valid one.
A character shouldn't have problems with killing someone because she's a girl, it should be because it's a profound act to take someone's life, regardless of gender.

I disagree with your assessment of SR not having strong AND believable characters.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Patrick Goodman
post Mar 27 2013, 05:22 PM
Post #81


Tilting at Windmills
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,636
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Amarillo, TX, CAS
Member No.: 388



You know someone who got into the game because of Nadja Daviar? Really? Those novels are a lot to overcome....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bannockburn
post Mar 27 2013, 05:23 PM
Post #82


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,647
Joined: 22-April 12
From: somewhere far beyond sanity
Member No.: 51,886



QUOTE (Patrick Goodman @ Mar 27 2013, 06:22 PM) *
You know someone who got into the game because of Nadja Daviar? Really? Those novels are a lot to overcome....

Yeah, I groaned, too.
She found it awfully funny, though. Those glorious ... well, I digress.
She's been a fan of the woman ever since.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mach_Ten
post Mar 27 2013, 05:26 PM
Post #83


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,113
Joined: 24-January 13
From: Here to Eternity
Member No.: 70,521



I'd also like to add that I don't want ALL of the runners in the fluff to be Stone Cold Killers !

I see no reason for /dev/grrl to put herself in the position to "kill or be killed" ... in a fight or flight situation, flight every time.

and most of the players I have ever games with even the most Troll-esque IRL have portrayed quite adequately women PCs.

not trying to be BADASS all the time is the key, but being BADASS when it counts and actually dealing with the humanity of your actions.

it just adds a whole lot to the RP and the game IMHO.

if the whole SR universe was full of folks who were down with being serial killers ... I'd reconsider my gaming choice
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowJackal
post Mar 27 2013, 05:28 PM
Post #84


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 215
Joined: 16-October 11
Member No.: 40,831



QUOTE (Lionhearted @ Mar 27 2013, 05:18 PM) *
I agree with Patrick though, It's quite annoying to be accused of certain things just because we're male.

Welcome to the life of a female. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

I'm not writing off every single female character. I'm sorry, I do speak in absolutes more than I should. The vast majority I find to be very banal and trite. I don't doubt it possible for a male to be able to write a female but it is a lot like art, you'll find many more anatomical errors when drawing the opposite gender. It's simply a point of fact.

There are those talented enough to be able to create another gender realistically, and I don't mean to be offensive. I simply find the male characters in current canon to be far more interesting and realistic than the female ones, especially runners. Even when you look at SR art it's gone from really awesome Prescott girls to T&A in many cases.

Here's an example, the SR 5th cover Vs the SR 5th box set cover. The 5th has huge anatomical issues and a tarted out girl all over the place. Created by a man as far as I was informed (I'll eat my words if not), the box set cover has two bad ass chicks kicking butt and they are drawn properly and dressed properly. That cover was drawn by a woman.

So I'm very sorry for speaking in absolutes, it's a major flaw of mine. Not every last female in SR is horrible but a lot are, and it's an area that could benefit from some work. IMHO.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bannockburn
post Mar 27 2013, 05:34 PM
Post #85


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,647
Joined: 22-April 12
From: somewhere far beyond sanity
Member No.: 51,886



QUOTE (ShadowJackal @ Mar 27 2013, 06:28 PM) *
Here's an example, the SR 5th cover Vs the SR 5th box set cover. The 5th has huge anatomical issues and a tarted out girl all over the place. Created by a man as far as I was informed (I'll eat my words if not), the box set cover has two bad ass chicks kicking butt and they are drawn properly and dressed properly. That cover was drawn by a woman.

Props to Echo Chernik, but ... Did you take a look at some of her other work? Taking one example of 'chicks' being drawn fully dressed from an artist that very much uses T&A in her work is a bit ... choosy.
Also, there _are_ anatomical errors on that picture. Interesting hip on that sniper and funny leg syndrome in the lower right corner.

In regards to the cover by Komarck ... Wearing a tank top and having bare arms is 'tarted out'?

HOWEVER!
I found out what happened to the Gingerbread Man (who is, btw a braggart and loudmouth and all his business is being run by his female first mate and he's just the pretty face (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) ).
Seems he got into the Tempo trade after being king of the Bermuda triangle for a while.
He's still alive (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowJackal
post Mar 27 2013, 05:47 PM
Post #86


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 215
Joined: 16-October 11
Member No.: 40,831



QUOTE (bannockburn @ Mar 27 2013, 05:34 PM) *
Props to Echo Chernik, but ... Did you take a look at some of her other work? Taking one example of 'chicks' being drawn fully dressed from an artist that very much uses T&A in her work is a bit ... choosy.
Also, there _are_ anatomical errors on that picture. Interesting hip on that sniper and funny leg syndrome in the lower right corner.

In regards to the cover by Komarck ... Wearing a tank top and having bare arms is 'tarted out'?


It's the position in the Komarck cover and the over extension of the back that is a major issue. The pose and position are for the effect of sexualization.

I am familiar with Echo's work (I even got a badass dragon drawn on me by her during Scramble last year!) . I've always really enjoyed her SR art EXCEPT the Attitude cover. I never liked that. I've always felt that her work shows women that are in power and confident. She does do T&A but as far as her SR art it is believable to me.

Before we get way off topic Echo's work is VERY good as far as digital art and anatomy. I had a big long rant in the SR Cover Art thread but safe to say, her "errors" are pretty minor at best.

Now I need to get back to work (Joys of being self employed). Sorry for dragging this so far off topic. On an on topic note, I simply think that Dev should be able to shoot people, shoot people in the face for money, or choose to raise a family without having her motives and emotions questioned. That was my only point.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bannockburn
post Mar 27 2013, 05:49 PM
Post #87


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,647
Joined: 22-April 12
From: somewhere far beyond sanity
Member No.: 51,886



QUOTE (ShadowJackal @ Mar 27 2013, 06:47 PM) *
I simply think that Dev should be able to shoot people, shoot people in the face for money, or choose to raise a family without having her motives and emotions questioned. That was my only point.

And I agree (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lionhearted
post Mar 27 2013, 05:52 PM
Post #88


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,930
Joined: 9-April 05
From: Scandinavian Union
Member No.: 7,310



But exploring a bratty corp kid being faced with reality is... intriguing.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
X-Kalibur
post Mar 27 2013, 06:02 PM
Post #89


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,579
Joined: 30-May 06
From: SoCal
Member No.: 8,626



There are also plenty of strong women who are comfortable with their sexuality and don't mind showing it off. Is the artwork disproportionate? Maybe, but at least fromt he SR4 artwork I don't feel like the women have been hyper-sexualized.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pepsi Jedi
post Mar 27 2013, 06:21 PM
Post #90


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,139
Joined: 31-March 10
From: UCAS
Member No.: 18,391



QUOTE (ShadowJackal @ Mar 27 2013, 11:20 AM) *
It's rather pathetic that this thread inevidably questions her ability to emotionally handle a first kill when this question would have never been brought to light for a male character.


I don't see it as a gender thing at all. If it was 'Dev/boi' instead of Dev/grrl, and I liked that NPC, I'd feel the same. For me at least it's not a gender thing.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pepsi Jedi
post Mar 27 2013, 06:24 PM
Post #91


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,139
Joined: 31-March 10
From: UCAS
Member No.: 18,391



QUOTE (Lionhearted @ Mar 27 2013, 12:18 PM) *
*put palms under cheek* then pray tell, what's a believable not contrived female character supposed to be like?
It's quite poignant to point out that there's quite a few characters in shadowrun that are quite transparent but they fill their role...
Like Slamm-0 being the dastardly manchild,
Clockwork being the ... uh, xenophobic techfreak?


I agree with Patrick though, It's quite annoying to be accused of certain things just because we're male.


To be fair, Clockwork does stuff for metahumans. he's just a Technomancer bigot and racist who activly tries to turn them over to corps and works with corps on destroying them. (( A lil gem hidden in Corp Guide.))
I loathe the guy, but I hate him for what he is. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pepsi Jedi
post Mar 27 2013, 06:32 PM
Post #92


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,139
Joined: 31-March 10
From: UCAS
Member No.: 18,391



QUOTE (Mach_Ten @ Mar 27 2013, 12:26 PM) *
I'd also like to add that I don't want ALL of the runners in the fluff to be Stone Cold Killers !

I see no reason for /dev/grrl to put herself in the position to "kill or be killed" ... in a fight or flight situation, flight every time.


Not putting too fine a point on it, but that's not up to 'you' most times. Runs that get in, get out, and noone knows your there are the best ones. Thats usually 'the plan' (Unless the run is supposed to cause destruction etc.) but yeah.. that's the plan. Few people or runners purposefully put themselves in the position to kill or be killed. It's when that situation comes up if you like it or not. Often you aren't able to 'fly' unless you FIGHT to get out. If you're deep in a corp Zero-Zero zone and it hits the fan, you very likely can't just throw your hands over your head and run away. And that's mostly the point. If you are a Runner and you go into the field and you take the big runs. Not just milk runs. Sooner or later something untold and unplanned for is going to happen and it's going to be "Shoot the SecGuard or the SecGuard shoots you" (( or Knight Errant, or Lone star, or gang members, or whatever)).

QUOTE (Mach_Ten @ Mar 27 2013, 12:26 PM) *
if the whole SR universe was full of folks who were down with being serial killers ... I'd reconsider my gaming choice


More like multiple murderers. Serial killers have different qualities. Not every shadowrunner leaves a bloody swath of corpses behind them, but few and far between are the shadowrunners that don't have a number of deaths attributed to their hands. Even deckers fry brains and what not, and deckers that go into the field, sooner or later end up being forced into combat.

That might not be the plan, but when the combat comes to you.... *Shrugs*

Seriously think back to characters that have been played more than one game. More than 3 or 4. How many of those characters have never killed anyone. Or been with a group that hasn't killed anyone. Again if you're on the run and your two buddies kill, that blood is on your hands too even if you didn't pull the trigger or turn the knife.

I doubt very many people can claim that after 5 full runs or gaming sessions, noone's died. I'm guessing the body count after 5 gaming sessions is in the double digits for most groups. If not triple.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pepsi Jedi
post Mar 27 2013, 06:33 PM
Post #93


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,139
Joined: 31-March 10
From: UCAS
Member No.: 18,391



QUOTE (ShadowJackal @ Mar 27 2013, 12:28 PM) *
Welcome to the life of a female. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

I'm not writing off every single female character. I'm sorry, I do speak in absolutes more than I should. The vast majority I find to be very banal and trite. I don't doubt it possible for a male to be able to write a female but it is a lot like art, you'll find many more anatomical errors when drawing the opposite gender. It's simply a point of fact.

There are those talented enough to be able to create another gender realistically, and I don't mean to be offensive. I simply find the male characters in current canon to be far more interesting and realistic than the female ones, especially runners. Even when you look at SR art it's gone from really awesome Prescott girls to T&A in many cases.

Here's an example, the SR 5th cover Vs the SR 5th box set cover. The 5th has huge anatomical issues and a tarted out girl all over the place. Created by a man as far as I was informed (I'll eat my words if not), the box set cover has two bad ass chicks kicking butt and they are drawn properly and dressed properly. That cover was drawn by a woman.

So I'm very sorry for speaking in absolutes, it's a major flaw of mine. Not every last female in SR is horrible but a lot are, and it's an area that could benefit from some work. IMHO.


I'm not sure if I've seen the SR 5th Box set cover. Do you have a link?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bannockburn
post Mar 27 2013, 06:36 PM
Post #94


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,647
Joined: 22-April 12
From: somewhere far beyond sanity
Member No.: 51,886



http://sirdoomsbadcompany.files.wordpress....o-cerniksr5.jpg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pepsi Jedi
post Mar 27 2013, 06:47 PM
Post #95


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,139
Joined: 31-March 10
From: UCAS
Member No.: 18,391



QUOTE (bannockburn @ Mar 27 2013, 01:36 PM) *


Ahh thank you! I had not seen that one as of yet.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Mar 27 2013, 09:02 PM
Post #96


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



QUOTE (ShadowJackal @ Mar 27 2013, 11:20 AM) *
It's rather pathetic that this thread inevidably questions her ability to emotionally handle a first kill when this question would have never been brought to light for a male character.
OK then, how do you think The Spawn Of Slamm-0! would handle killing someone at this point in his development?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ChromeZephyr
post Mar 27 2013, 09:06 PM
Post #97


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 869
Joined: 8-March 02
Member No.: 2,252



Daddy's probably already got SoS-0!'s Trolling skill up to 3, so he could probably get some easily-enraged person on the Matrix to have an aneurysm. I could see it. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/grinbig.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Mar 27 2013, 09:07 PM
Post #98


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



QUOTE (ShadowJackal @ Mar 27 2013, 11:49 AM) *
On topic, there are not nearly enough females in Shadowrun that are in any way "Bad Ass" which makes me sad. I'm mildly interested in Dev's storyline but personally I find her to be trite. What CGL could really use is a female writer or two to introduce some strong female characters into current canon. That's a personal peeve of mine though.
You must have been reading different novels than I have... There are a lot of positive female role models in Shadowrun ranging from Kane-level sociopaths all the way to Peg (the Paralyzed Decker!)

Also, a good deal of the artwork in Shadowrun demonstrates women in positive roles, while wearing outfits ranging from "Stripperific" to "Bland but protective". Men are also portrayed in this manner.

Men are also shown as victims, as are women. Shadowrun is pretty gender neutral when it comes to dealing with issues, and always has been.

So, /dev/grrl and killing has been talked to DEATH, what else does anyone have to say?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cochise
post Mar 27 2013, 10:26 PM
Post #99


Mr. Quote-function
***

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 1,316
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Somewhere in Germany
Member No.: 1,376



QUOTE (CanRay @ Mar 27 2013, 10:07 PM) *
So, /dev/grrl and killing has been talked to DEATH, what else does anyone have to say?


Since putting Dikote™ on ally spirits is still not an option ... Can I dikote /dev/grrl ?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hermit
post Mar 27 2013, 10:31 PM
Post #100


The King In Yellow
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,922
Joined: 26-February 05
From: JWD
Member No.: 7,121



QUOTE (Cochise @ Mar 27 2013, 11:26 PM) *
Since putting Dikote™ on ally spirits is still not an option ... Can I dikote /dev/grrl ?

No, she is an SR4 character, so Dikote™'s effects are already included in her stats. Sorry.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

6 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 6 >
Closed TopicStart new topic

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th May 2025 - 04:56 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.