![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#351
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 1,973 Joined: 4-June 10 Member No.: 18,659 ![]() |
That would be true if the capability of Device A was based on its connection speed with Device B (even if either device is a metahuman brain). It's not. I'm not trying to be insulting here, but I am honestly confused as to what in the wide world of sports you think you are talking about here. We are discussing the idea that a wireless connection is going to be faster than a hardwired one, which is one of the points the wireless bonuses for SR5 is based on. This is a flawed premise because the basic laws of physics don't actually conform to that model. At all. Capability of a device is measured by device ratings. We're talking intercommunication between devices, which is absolutely based on connection speed between devices. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#352
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,962 Joined: 27-February 13 Member No.: 76,875 ![]() |
We are discussing the idea that a wireless connection is going to be faster than a hardwired one, which is one of the points the wireless bonuses for SR5 is based on. This is a flawed premise because the basic laws of physics don't actually conform to that model. At all. I'm curious: Who actually said that was the basis? Chem seal activating faster, for example, has nothing to do with connection speed - the rules assumption is that you are otherwise activating it manually. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#353
|
|
Horror ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,322 Joined: 15-June 05 From: BumFuck, New Jersey Member No.: 7,445 ![]() |
I'm curious: Who actually said that was the basis? Chem seal activating faster, for example, has nothing to do with connection speed - the rules assumption is that you are otherwise activating it manually. So for some reason, a direct neural link interface (DNI,) which has been working for four whole editions (SR 1, 2, 3, and 4) to do things such as issue commands to your smartgun, or operate your cyberlimb, or command a piece of worn equipment which is wired into you through some means, now requires you expose your gear to the wireless Matrix for it to work. I declare bollocks and shenanigans upon that! |
|
|
![]()
Post
#354
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,431 Joined: 3-December 03 Member No.: 5,872 ![]() |
Focussed concentration question. If I take it at rank 1 able to sutain spells of force 1 without a penalty. What happens if I cast a force 1 spell but use edge to break the limits? This isn't something you will liekly be casting more than once a day after all so using edge here is just awesome given the "new and improved" rates of edge return.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#355
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 1,973 Joined: 4-June 10 Member No.: 18,659 ![]() |
I'm curious: Who actually said that was the basis? Chem seal activating faster, for example, has nothing to do with connection speed - the rules assumption is that you are otherwise activating it manually. Actually, it isn't. The writing assumption is that is how it is working, but in the rules as written the assumption is that it is working faster because it is connected to the Matrix, full stop. Many of the gear writers, as noted upthread, seem to share your assumption rather than the one the rules make explicit, and I don't blame them as the one the rules make explicit makes no sense. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#356
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 5,088 Joined: 3-October 09 From: Kohle, Stahl und Bier Member No.: 17,709 ![]() |
I'm curious: Who actually said that was the basis? Chem seal activating faster, for example, has nothing to do with connection speed - the rules assumption is that you are otherwise activating it manually. Fun fact: The "repeat a lie a thousand times and it becomes the truth" statement which you apparently take as a motivation was never actually said. So even if you reiterate that lie (after being told you are wrong 20 times it became kinda obvious that you are misrepresenting on purpose) another 200 times ignoring all corrections, it will not work. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#357
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,039 Joined: 23-March 05 From: The heart of Rywfol Emwolb Industries Member No.: 7,216 ![]() |
So for some reason, a direct neural link interface (DNI,) which has been working for four whole editions (SR 1, 2, 3, and 4) to do things such as issue commands to your smartgun, or operate your cyberlimb, or command a piece of worn equipment which is wired into you through some means, now requires you expose your gear to the wireless Matrix for it to work. I declare bollocks and shenanigans upon that! Heh, Back in the 2050's an partly through the 2060's an astral Mage could shove a spell down through a foe's focus or even an astrally perceiving for himself for fun effects all around (instant ground zero for that fireball- good times. Kept the astral Peeping Toms in line). But then things changed... some say the barrier between worlds got thicker, others say the laws of magic themself underwent a revision.. no one knows, but grounding a spell like that simply didn't work anymore. Maybe what we are seeing here is a similar alteration of the physical properties of the materials used, maybe even tied to the rising mana levels, some quantum effect in the solid wire/fibreglass connection itself degrading their performance to unstable levels. We have already seen some nuclear devices act quirky since the Awakening, so who can say? Thank the Sun Lion we still have the wifi to fall back on otherwise you would be totally boned. So basically you have your gear using leftover Xbox One processors. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) *ducks* |
|
|
![]()
Post
#358
|
|
Mr. Johnson ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,148 Joined: 27-February 06 From: UCAS Member No.: 8,314 ![]() |
So for some reason, a direct neural link interface (DNI,) which has been working for four whole editions (SR 1, 2, 3, and 4) to do things such as issue commands to your smartgun, or operate your cyberlimb, or command a piece of worn equipment which is wired into you through some means, now requires you expose your gear to the wireless Matrix for it to work. Where in the book does it say that a cyberlimb or a smartgun can't be used except wirelessly? I think there's some confusion here about the difference between a wireless bonus and normal operation. A smartgun with wireless off still increases the Accuracy of the weapon it's on, and since cyberlimbs don't have a bonus, there's no real reason to have the wireless on when in a tactical situation, and they work fine without it. And in response to the cacophony of "but my +2 dice!" calls, when SR4 changed the smartgun from -2 TN to +2 dice, its efficiency dropped by over a hundred percent, and I don't recall the level of complaint we're getting today. In SR5, the bonus is still there for anyone who has the guts to play on a new battlefield; anybody who's not sure how to protect their devices should open up a new thread on how to protect devices from hackers in SR5, and I'm sure the collective cleverness of Dumpshock will pour into it and we'll have a list of best practices by Gen Con. Additionally, I think there's also some confusion between time and attention. Take the chemical seal (or the bipod, or the smuggling compartment, etc.). Have you ever used a bread machine? They're awesome. You just put all the ingredients in and the machine handles the kneading, rising, whatever that second kneading step is called, and the baking. Then bam, you have bread. In the meantime, you've been reading, playing video games, or posting on Dumpshock. Your bread needed less attention than it would have had you not had the machine, even though it baked in approximately the same amount of time. And yeah, a new edition's going to introduce new rules. But like the pop-fly rule, or the forward pass, or the zone defense rule, the game's not going to vaporize over it. Not if the turnout at Origins is anything to gauge by. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#359
|
|
Prime Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,803 Joined: 3-February 08 From: Finland Member No.: 15,628 ![]() |
And in response to the cacophony of "but my +2 dice!" calls, when SR4 changed the smartgun from -2 TN to +2 dice, its efficiency dropped by over a hundred percent, and I don't recall the level of complaint we're getting today. Well the massive difference is that while it might not have been as mechanically effective as before it atleast still performed it's base function witch is to make hitting a target easier, in SR5 it doesn't do that at all without being connected to matrix. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#360
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 5,088 Joined: 3-October 09 From: Kohle, Stahl und Bier Member No.: 17,709 ![]() |
Well the massive difference is that while it might not have been as mechanically effective as before it atleast still performed it's base function witch is to make hitting a target easier, in SR5 it doesn't do that at all without being connected to matrix. Given that guns have a base Acc of 4 and most people will have a physical limit >=4, +2 Acc equates a significantly increased chance to hit... |
|
|
![]()
Post
#361
|
|
Mr. Johnson ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,148 Joined: 27-February 06 From: UCAS Member No.: 8,314 ![]() |
Well the massive difference is that while it might not have been as mechanically effective as before it atleast still performed it's base function witch is to make hitting a target easier, in SR5 it doesn't do that at all without being connected to matrix. One who argued that limits make hitting targets harder (and I'm not saying the person quoted above is one of those people; I'm too lazy to look it up just now) must concede that raising that limit makes hitting targets easier. So there's that. One of the design principles specified from Day One (and mentioned early on in Mr. Hardy's interviews) was that the ability to do stuff, including shoot people right in the face for money, must come predominantly from the character, and not from his or her gear. By that principle, the smartlink should only increase Accuracy and never offer dice. The wireless bonus mechanic allows a mechanism by which the dice pool bonus can be preserved in SR5 while adhering to that principle. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#362
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Validating Posts: 2,283 Joined: 12-October 07 Member No.: 13,662 ![]() |
Focussed concentration question. If I take it at rank 1 able to sutain spells of force 1 without a penalty. What happens if I cast a force 1 spell but use edge to break the limits? This isn't something you will liekly be casting more than once a day after all so using edge here is just awesome given the "new and improved" rates of edge return. I actually had a very similar thought I forgot to ask in one of the other threads. Rather than focused concentration it involved a sustaining focus instead though. If I get a rating 3 sustaining focus... i cast the spell into it and edge it to break the limits. Now do I effectively have the higher effective spell in the lower rated focus. Why rating 3... because 1 and 2 point BGC's are reasonably common... and walking through one will dispel a force 1 spell by reducing it's force to 0... even if you're using focused concentration I would think. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#363
|
|
Prime Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,803 Joined: 3-February 08 From: Finland Member No.: 15,628 ![]() |
Given that guns have a base Acc of 4 and most people will have a physical limit >=4, +2 Acc equates a significantly increased chance to hit... You should read the word target in my post to mean just that a simple paper shooting target, of hitting witch smartlink no longer helps one bit and that is just utterly ridiculous. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#364
|
|
Old Man Jones ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 4,415 Joined: 26-February 02 From: New York Member No.: 1,699 ![]() |
You should read the word target in my post to mean just that a simple paper shooting target, of hitting witch smartlink no longer helps one bit and that is just utterly ridiculous. Well, not unless you activate the Matrix connection to get the Expose Your Ass bonuses. At least it appears that you can buy one comm device with super high ratings and slave your other stuff to it. That way you can get the bonus but a hostile hacker has to get past the chokepoint device to hack you. -k |
|
|
![]()
Post
#365
|
|
Tilting at Windmills ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,636 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Amarillo, TX, CAS Member No.: 388 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#366
|
|
Douche ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 1,584 Joined: 2-March 11 Member No.: 23,135 ![]() |
Wait, are corporate combat deckers even a thing, anyway? Is Lone Star going to send a squad of 4 guys plus a mage plus a decker?
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#367
|
|
Mr. Johnson ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,148 Joined: 27-February 06 From: UCAS Member No.: 8,314 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#368
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 525 Joined: 20-December 12 Member No.: 66,005 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#369
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 598 Joined: 12-October 05 Member No.: 7,835 ![]() |
The speed of light through air is 99.7% of the speed of light in a vacuum. On March 24, 2013, just three months ago tomorrow, Nature Photonics published research on a new, hollow fiber optic cable that will allow that same speed as opposed to the 31% speed reduction of modern glass fiber optic cables.
Towards high-capacity fibre-optic communications at the speed of light in vacuum The signal speed down insulated copper cable is only 66% of the speed of light in a vacuum. Speed of elecricity "Depending on the type of fiber, the neural impulse travels at speed ranging from a sluggish 2 miles per hour to, in some myelinated fibers, a breackneck 200 or more miles per hour. But even this top speed is 3 million times slower than the speed of electricity through a wire." -- Myers, David G. Psychology 4th Edition.New York:Worth Publishers Inc,1995: 43. Speed of Nerve Impulses And radio communication has the benefit of being in an absolute straight line, therefore minimal distance. Not to mention some people's predictions regarding ubiquitous computing in the future. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#370
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 732 Joined: 5-April 08 From: Ottawa, Canada Member No.: 15,847 ![]() |
Don't forget they've also been able to teleport information in modern experiments, which could be duplicated or at least advanced by 2070, allowing information to go from point A to point B without going between these points.
Lag? What lag? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#371
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 5,088 Joined: 3-October 09 From: Kohle, Stahl und Bier Member No.: 17,709 ![]() |
Some do, but not all guns have a base acc of 4. You should stop spreading that piece of propaganda; it's false. I didn't mean that each gun has an Accuracy of 4, but that four is the baseline from which guns go up or down. Which is what the combat preview stated, so if that is propaganda you might want to check the political reliability of the freelancer pool (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) @Shemhazai: Nope, radio waves used in mobile comms usually bounce back and fourth a little. And even if it were a straight line, if a signal travels at speed X to the radio tower 200 m away and back, it's still slower than signal traveling through 1 m of FO cable at 1% of that speed... And besides all that, propagation delay is not the limiting factor in distributed computing. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#372
|
|
Douche ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 1,584 Joined: 2-March 11 Member No.: 23,135 ![]() |
The speed of light through air is 99.7% of the speed of light in a vacuum. On March 24, 2013, just three months ago tomorrow, Nature Photonics published research on a new, hollow fiber optic cable that will allow that same speed as opposed to the 31% speed reduction of modern glass fiber optic cables. Towards high-capacity fibre-optic communications at the speed of light in vacuum The signal speed down insulated copper cable is only 66% of the speed of light in a vacuum. Speed of elecricity "Depending on the type of fiber, the neural impulse travels at speed ranging from a sluggish 2 miles per hour to, in some myelinated fibers, a breackneck 200 or more miles per hour. But even this top speed is 3 million times slower than the speed of electricity through a wire." -- Myers, David G. Psychology 4th Edition.New York:Worth Publishers Inc,1995: 43. Speed of Nerve Impulses And radio communication has the benefit of being in an absolute straight line, therefore minimal distance. Not to mention some people's predictions regarding ubiquitous computing in the future. This all in record, I can come up with some fairly reality-based reasons why much of your internal cyberware might be wireless and need to broadcast. I just wish the writers had. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#373
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,431 Joined: 3-December 03 Member No.: 5,872 ![]() |
Hasn't that how it's always been? A concern I have which I think Aaron says is dealt with, but not how is how a team of deckers can show up in the matrix to dogpile a team with active matrix devices. A rational defense would be to send a team of deckers to check things out whenever an alarm is raised if they can interact with the targets from the matrix. The lone combat decker with a squad isn't an issue for me and seems kind of normal, but 20 deckers showing up and creaming the opposition does seem screwed up. It is one of the reasons I don't like the idea of being able to command a spirit from the astral, similar issues can arise and you have to rely on the rarity of security mages as an excuse to keep the runners alive. I don't think security deckers have the same level of rarity as an excuse. Also how bricked are we talking here? Game mechanic wise a character can be dropped in a single shot and recover in a few hours with magic/first aid, total bricking of my gear might take in and out of game months to recover from, very close to the make a new character level of issues. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#374
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 598 Joined: 12-October 05 Member No.: 7,835 ![]() |
@Shemhazai: Nope, radio waves used in mobile comms usually bounce back and fourth a little. And even if it were a straight line, if a signal travels at speed X to the radio tower 200 m away and back, it's still slower than signal traveling through 1 m of FO cable at 1% of that speed... And besides all that, propagation delay is not the limiting factor in distributed computing. I was talking about from the ball of your foot to your brain. I suppose you could be some meters from an access point. Your tower example sounds like something from the early part of this century. I'm not sure what you mean by "bounce back and fourth a little." I was referring to a signal traveling through the non-straight contours of a human body as opposed to the straight line a radio signal would travel. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#375
|
|
Douche ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 1,584 Joined: 2-March 11 Member No.: 23,135 ![]() |
A concern I have which I think Aaron says is dealt with, but not how is how a team of deckers can show up in the matrix to dogpile a team with active matrix devices. A rational defense would be to send a team of deckers to check things out whenever an alarm is raised if they can interact with the targets from the matrix. The lone combat decker with a squad isn't an issue for me and seems kind of normal, but 20 deckers showing up and creaming the opposition does seem screwed up. It is one of the reasons I don't like the idea of being able to command a spirit from the astral, similar issues can arise and you have to rely on the rarity of security mages as an excuse to keep the runners alive. I don't think security deckers have the same level of rarity as an excuse. Also how bricked are we talking here? Game mechanic wise a character can be dropped in a single shot and recover in a few hours with magic/first aid, total bricking of my gear might take in and out of game months to recover from, very close to the make a new character level of issues. By 2075, all site security is handled by a small team of deckers each commanding a squadron of drones, from the relative safety of corporate HQ, and backed up by a mage in the same room but out on astral overwatch with a couple summoned spirits in tow. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 5th June 2025 - 11:11 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.