![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#426
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,331 Joined: 1-September 11 From: Seattle Member No.: 37,075 ![]() |
I would say that he's technically correct that he didn't have anything to do with the abduction; the ransom note turns out to be a separate element that is piggybacking on the extraction.
Mato is detached enough that he doesn't really care about the fate of the decker. He's more concerned about Bobby going full Dark Side. A little Dark Side is an asset, but too much becomes a liability. As for the traffic cameras, yes, but the issue with that was always the brute force needed to hack and scour them all. And even if we identify it, how are we going to track it down? It appears we're not on the clock as far as ransom is concerned, but we need to move quickly before the trail goes cold. We might be up for a bar brawl after all. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#427
|
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,926 Joined: 18-September 13 From: Germany Member No.: 154,444 ![]() |
My main concern is securing the deck for AM - it's a neat upgrade and I'd hate for this guy to trace us back through his old hardware.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#428
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,331 Joined: 1-September 11 From: Seattle Member No.: 37,075 ![]() |
Yes, no objections there. Although AM always seemed emotionally attached to her Erika - perhaps due to the sacrifices she had to make to acquire it - so I would wonder if a purely mechanical upgrade would appeal to her or not.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#429
|
|
jacked in ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 9,466 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 463 ![]() |
@Gilga: The Hardpan observation was already mentioned here:
http://forums.dumpshock.com/index.php?s=&a...t&p=1369221 Bye Thanee |
|
|
![]()
Post
#430
|
|
jacked in ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 9,466 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 463 ![]() |
My main concern is securing the deck for AM - it's a neat upgrade and I'd hate for this guy to trace us back through his old hardware. Maybe those things also have a way to "reset to factory settings". (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Bye Thanee |
|
|
![]()
Post
#431
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,331 Joined: 1-September 11 From: Seattle Member No.: 37,075 ![]() |
Well, sure, but canonically the "factory settings" would have the manufacturer as the owner until someone buys the device and ownership is transferred.
I don't mind the concept of Ownership and trying to discourage players from looting everything in sight, but how ownership works - both mechanically and narratively - is just so underbaked. I wonder if it got any better in 6E. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#432
|
|
jacked in ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 9,466 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 463 ![]() |
Oh, I see. I havn't really looked into that in detail.
Looks like this is the way then... QUOTE You can illegally change a device’s owner with a Hardware toolkit and an Extended Hardware + Logic [Mental] (24, 1 hour) test. A glitch on that test results in the item sending report to the authorities. Bye Thanee |
|
|
![]()
Post
#433
|
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,926 Joined: 18-September 13 From: Germany Member No.: 154,444 ![]() |
That's what Bobby would have gone for - Using analyse device to gain enough bonus dice to crack the ownership
@gilga Are you sure about that? That guy nearly fucked over a (relatively) innocent person - also his gear is worth over 100.000 Nuyen. That's pretty substantial considering we might miss our payday due to his interference. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#434
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,331 Joined: 1-September 11 From: Seattle Member No.: 37,075 ![]() |
Well let's be open to the possibility that AM's IC opinion may not perfectly align with Gilga's OOC opinion.
I would say that the decker's actions have been nothing personal (in terms of SIS). It would be poor form to execute anyone and everyone who inconveniences us, or who has a toy that we want. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#435
|
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,926 Joined: 18-September 13 From: Germany Member No.: 154,444 ![]() |
Execution is already off the table - we are now talking about robbing him or letting him off without any repercussions.
Because if we are not taking his gear, Bobby will destroy it. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#436
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,109 Joined: 12-June 16 From: Israel Member No.: 200,423 ![]() |
Wellsince SIS is a visible buissness with SINner employees... I dont think we want the notoriety of stealing gear or destroying it for that manner.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#437
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,331 Joined: 1-September 11 From: Seattle Member No.: 37,075 ![]() |
If we're trying to avoid this guy having a 10-year vendetta against us, like he does against Falcone, then not destroying the gear would be the way to go.
If there's a concern about him being an immediate complication due to his gear, then let's brick it with Matrix damage. The book's description of Matrix damage is fairly dramatic, but the mechanics of the rules make it relatively easy to repair. So we'd covering our departure, but not severely inconveniencing him. The broken window on the Phoenix might be a bigger hassle to fix. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#438
|
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,926 Joined: 18-September 13 From: Germany Member No.: 154,444 ![]() |
Him warning the Black Cats is another problem - but yeah bricking his gear is the way to go.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#439
|
|
jacked in ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 9,466 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 463 ![]() |
Hmm...
If AM's concern is that the decker might come after you legally, if you take his deck away, what is the difference in destroying it for that purpose? Might as well keep it. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) Bye Thanee |
|
|
![]()
Post
#440
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,109 Joined: 12-June 16 From: Israel Member No.: 200,423 ![]() |
AM has offered to turn the decker and deck to Hafiz so that they can take legal action against a man that harmed them. I think her last suggestion is compatible with her idea of not getting us in troubles. It took me (as a player) a few days to have the attention to think what makes sense as we moved from murder to theft to vandalism.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#441
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,331 Joined: 1-September 11 From: Seattle Member No.: 37,075 ![]() |
AM brings up a point that I was thinking about over the weekend, which was, "Have the parameters of the job changed?"
The original task was to find the target and bring him back unharmed. Okay, that's still on the To Do list. But one of Falcone's primary motivations was the ransom note that said that the victim would be executed and the results publicized if the ransom were not paid. That would obviously be a detriment to Falcone's reputation, so much so that he hired us to neutralize the threat. Now, that threat has been eliminated. So while the extraction is still embarrassing, it doesn't seem to be the existential threat that Falcone initially feared. I'll be curious to hear what Hafiz and Falcone have to say. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#442
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,109 Joined: 12-June 16 From: Israel Member No.: 200,423 ![]() |
AM brings up a point that I was thinking about over the weekend, which was, "Have the parameters of the job changed?" The original task was to find the target and bring him back unharmed. Okay, that's still on the To Do list. But one of Falcone's primary motivations was the ransom note that said that the victim would be executed and the results publicized if the ransom were not paid. That would obviously be a detriment to Falcone's reputation, so much so that he hired us to neutralize the threat. Now, that threat has been eliminated. So while the extraction is still embarrassing, it doesn't seem to be the existential threat that Falcone initially feared. I'll be curious to hear what Hafiz and Falcone have to say. AM thinks in similar lines, I mean I am not sure we have any lead how to find these cats right now. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#443
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,331 Joined: 1-September 11 From: Seattle Member No.: 37,075 ![]() |
The Hardpan is our lead right now. It's hard to imagine it resulting in anything but a bar brawl, but that's the job.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#444
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,331 Joined: 1-September 11 From: Seattle Member No.: 37,075 ![]() |
GM, do you need anything from us before we proceed? I think we're waiting on a response from Hafiz and/or Falcone before heading to the Hardpan.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#445
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,331 Joined: 1-September 11 From: Seattle Member No.: 37,075 ![]() |
Mato references AM's backstory. I don't know for sure that she's shared that with the rest of the team - I think she omits the Big Regret about her boyfriend - but I'm presuming it has come up over the last few months of working and living together.
If that's not the case, just let me know and I'll edit the reference. Mato's suggestion will be the same regardless. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#446
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,109 Joined: 12-June 16 From: Israel Member No.: 200,423 ![]() |
I think AM shared her backstory with Mato, and I feel like I should buy that big regret given how much she changed since the beginning of the story and gained confidence and made peace with who she is.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#447
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,331 Joined: 1-September 11 From: Seattle Member No.: 37,075 ![]() |
I was thinking Physical Mask instead of Fashion, as Fashion would only affect AM's clothes. But thinking about it further, Fashion + Makeover would largely accomplish the same things, and perhaps be better as Permanent spells rather than a Sustained one.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#448
|
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,926 Joined: 18-September 13 From: Germany Member No.: 154,444 ![]() |
Happy Holidays, everyone (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#449
|
|
jacked in ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 9,466 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 463 ![]() |
Hope you guys had some nice holidays.
AM is going inside trying to get the attention of the owner. Is Mato still going to the bar? With Bobby accompanying him? Bye Thanee |
|
|
![]()
Post
#450
|
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,926 Joined: 18-September 13 From: Germany Member No.: 154,444 ![]() |
Yes, all three are going in together
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th May 2025 - 06:18 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.