![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10 Joined: 28-September 07 From: Wausau, WI Member No.: 13,446 ![]() |
Hey everyone,
Now I am a noob Gm to this game and I'm looking at things in both Arsenal and the Core book. I'm looking at the weapons and I see the new sniper rifles and new assault cannons and I wonder why whould you take an assault cannon over a sniper rifle. The sniper rifle and the Assault Cannons can be used at similar ranges and can do about same amount of damage give or take a few points. The difference is the sniper rifle can fire more often, takes more ammo, can be hidin, and finally can use differnt ammo to make it an insanely powerful gun while the assault cannon can only fire one type of ammo and you take terrible recoil (in the case of the thundershock) if fired more then once. So then I ask why bother with assault cannons? Is there something Im missing? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 259 Joined: 2-September 07 From: In the AGS, underwater Member No.: 13,049 ![]() |
I'd say the short answer is: Style.
The long answer: The assault cannon is a remnant from old editions when it was also still feasible to run with a pink mohawk. Nowadays where all shadowrunners have inconspicuous black hair and wear trenchcoats, there is indeed no more room for a little panther besides the mighty Ranger Arms. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,925 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 948 ![]() |
Well, the Phanter Assault Cannon is a military man portable anti-tank weapon and that's why it is still in the book.
Sure, a runner would go with a portable sniper rifle but a ten man team of soldiers might have a sniper rifle and a AC. Book Stats aside they serve two different functions as the they might have a similar damage code but i would bet money that the AC have a far higher intimidation factor and makes bigger holes. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 691 Joined: 27-February 08 From: Pismo Beach, CA Member No.: 15,715 ![]() |
There's always the intimidation factor to consider. A hit using an assault cannon makes an impression, while a hit done with a Barrett Model 121 makes you just another sniper. I'm fairly new to the game myself, but from what I've seen shadowrun makes it possible to do the same thing a number of different ways.
You can use a Barrett with EX-Explosive ammo to get the same damage code, AP, and recoil compensation as a Panther Cannon, and do it quietly with semi-auto fire and a built in smartgun system and silencer for 9,140 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nuyen.gif) , counting the ammo. Or you can grab a Panther Cannon for 6,175 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nuyen.gif) (counting ammo) and do things loud and cheap. For an extra 700 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nuyen.gif) , you can slap on a firing selection mod and an external smartgun system, and get virtually the same performance: Minus the silencer, but plus one ammo capacity, all for 2,265 less than a Barrett 121 with Ex-Ex. If your GM is the "RAW over reality" type, you might even convince him to let you add a silencer for another 200 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nuyen.gif) (400 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nuyen.gif) as an internal modification)--neither the BBB nor Arsenal actually says you can't silence an assault cannon. Likewise, while the fluff text builds up the image of assault cannons as recoil monsters, I can't find anything that actually gives a number other than the standard rules. The Thunderstruck is still an early model, and the Vigourus Assault Cannon is more a stripped-down budget model than an improvement, while none of the other sniper rifles can match the Panther Cannon's damage code, no matter what ammo you use. Different weapons for different approaches, omae. The question is: A) How much do you want to spend? and B) Do you want them to crap their pants before or after you shoot them? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
Prime Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,803 Joined: 3-February 08 From: Finland Member No.: 15,628 ![]() |
I think the main reason for using assault cannons is that Heavy weapons skill covers more usefull stuff (grenade launcers,machineguns etc.) than long arms skill.
And ofcource some times you just need that 10P -6/-9AP damage code offered by assault cannon loaded with AV-ammo. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/grinbig.gif) Also with right mods the assault cannon has a SA firing mode and can be deassembled to parts that fit in to carry back. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#6
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 325 Joined: 24-February 06 From: Kansas Member No.: 8,304 ![]() |
1. and primary as stated above, Style, after all what good is power with out style,
2. becouse like the green mohawk it will never go out of style, After all not all teams are black ops (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) and not all teams do things quietly, Some times a statement must be made, some times you want a mess, and hey, there are always people that want to higher you to leave a message, and what better delivery boy then a cannon (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#7
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,321 Joined: 31-December 06 Member No.: 10,502 ![]() |
Actually per the errata EX-EX is toned down to +1DV -1AP (regular explosive just gives +1 DV) They messed with flechet too.
http://www.shadowrun4.com/resources/sr4/sr4_errata_v15.pdf Therefore the assault cannon still hits just a little bit harder. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#8
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,192 Joined: 6-May 07 From: Texas - The RGV Member No.: 11,613 ![]() |
They're probably a hold-over from the old WWI anti-tank rifles. These weapons seem to be getting mad love from game designers starting way back in the early 80s. A 20mm man-portable cannon was also in the original Cyberpunk RPG and those FASA guys, by golly, weren't going to be left in a rut by skimping out in this area when they put out SR 1st a year later.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#9
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,358 Joined: 2-December 07 From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Member No.: 14,465 ![]() |
If you're looking for rules and stats, it's because Assault Cannons use Heavy Weapons instead of Longarms. That's about it.
If you're looking for Role Playing reasons, as above, style. Assault Cannons are the "BIG STICK" to pull out. Yes, they're noisy, they have insane recoil, and they have a massive muzzle flash, and that's exactly what you're paying for! A sniper rifle is big, intimidating, and can kill you across a few football fields (CFL ones, too!). An Assault Cannon can make people drek their pants just by opening your Two-Body Trunk of the Armoured Americar and showing them what will happen if they frag with you. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#10
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 259 Joined: 2-September 07 From: In the AGS, underwater Member No.: 13,049 ![]() |
I think the main reason for using assault cannons is that Heavy weapons skill covers more usefull stuff (grenade launcers,machineguns etc.) than long arms skill. Though OTOH, you get Longarms for cheap if you take the firearms group (shotguns aren't what they used to be though without houserules (IMG:style_emoticons/default/frown.gif) ). I prefer it personally in my games because 90% of the time, something bigger than an assault rifle is carried on the run, the associated skill to fire it, will be gunnery. Concerning intimidation, there's indeed a difference between a rifle which will put a nice clean hole in the victim's head, a shotgun, which will splatter his brains all across the room and an assault cannon with a barrel big enough it could fire whole babies at you. Certainly a situation in which as a GM I'd think about using my freedom to apply random +/- 1-3 mods to rolls. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#11
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 691 Joined: 27-February 08 From: Pismo Beach, CA Member No.: 15,715 ![]() |
Actually per the errata EX-EX is toned down to +1DV -1AP (regular explosive just gives +1 DV) They messed with flechet too. http://www.shadowrun4.com/resources/sr4/sr4_errata_v15.pdf Therefore the assault cannon still hits just a little bit harder. I'm aware of that. Barrett Model 121: Damage: 9P, AP: -4, Mode: SA, RC: (2), Ammo: 14( c ), Availability: 18F, Cost: 9,000 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nuyen.gif) Add +1 DV +1 AP from ex-ex, and you match the pather assault cannon's damage code of 10P -5 AP exactly. As I said, no other sniper rifle can do this, regardless of it's ammo. Hmm, availability might be a factor too, come to think of it... >checks< 18F for the Barrett, 20F for the Panther Cannon, and a four point difference on the ammo. (16F for assault cannon rounds, 12F for ex-ex) So using an assault cannon also says you know somebody. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#12
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 944 Joined: 19-February 03 Member No.: 4,128 ![]() |
I think SR has always cheated the Assault cannon by just treating it like an extra-large elephant gun.
I think the The Barrett Firearms XM109 is a much better model for an assault cannon. I think it would be better modeled as a grenade launcher with sniper rifle ranges. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#13
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,321 Joined: 31-December 06 Member No.: 10,502 ![]() |
Stupid arsenal......
Anyway Sniper rifles and the assault cannon are possibly convergent technologies. I.e. you're building up to 25mm sniper rifles with high explosive ammo compared to the assault cannon which is likely patterned after a 25mm anti tank cannon and uses explosive ammo. Older editions required you to be a troll or have a gyromount for stuff like that. Any rules like that around now? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#14
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 6,640 Joined: 6-June 04 Member No.: 6,383 ![]() |
They're probably a hold-over from the old WWI anti-tank rifles. These weapons seem to be getting mad love from game designers starting way back in the early 80s. A 20mm man-portable cannon was also in the original Cyberpunk RPG and those FASA guys, by golly, weren't going to be left in a rut by skimping out in this area when they put out SR 1st a year later. Well, anti-tank rifles ARE t3h pwn. Even if they don't really affect tanks. But look on the bright side...you could sneak up behind a BMP and fire through the rear doors. I'll bet that'd work. And you'd probably kill some of the passengers. Anyway, that being said, the whole entire point of the assault cannon in SR is to imitate the big old rifles they had in Robocop. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#15
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,192 Joined: 6-May 07 From: Texas - The RGV Member No.: 11,613 ![]() |
Well, anti-tank rifles ARE t3h pwn. Even if they don't really affect tanks. But look on the bright side...you could sneak up behind a BMP and fire through the rear doors. I'll bet that'd work. And you'd probably kill some of the passengers. Anyway, that being said, the whole entire point of the assault cannon in SR is to imitate the big old rifles they had in Robocop. Good call! And those were Plain Jane Barret Light 50s (M82A1 for your military types). |
|
|
![]()
Post
#16
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 664 Joined: 3-February 08 Member No.: 15,626 ![]() |
If your GM is the "RAW over reality" type, you might even convince him to let you add a silencer for another 200 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nuyen.gif) (400 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nuyen.gif) as an internal modification)--neither the BBB nor Arsenal actually says you can't silence an assault cannon. That would be a very BIG silencer [img]http://www.silencertests.com/albums/Oddities/Haubitzenschalldaempfer.jpg[/img] |
|
|
![]()
Post
#17
|
|
MechRigger Delux ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Retired Admins Posts: 1,151 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Hanger 18, WPAFB Member No.: 1,657 ![]() |
I think the problem here is that AV rounds are whack.... the assault cannon should be seen as an anti material rifle, and should thus have big bgi bgi penetration on vehicles. The top end sniper rifle will be a .50 cal, and the base assault cannon would be a 20mm round. I think my overall opinion on the matter is that regular AV rounds are overpowered, and they should all follow a -1/-3 or upping the AC AV rounds to -4/-6 to reflect their nature and use.
They should also expand assault cannons to have burst weapondry like real 20 and 30mm rounds currently used, but this would become one of those "real" firearms threads fast if it went that way (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rotfl.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#18
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 1,755 Joined: 5-September 06 From: UCAS Member No.: 9,313 ![]() |
Why an Assault Cannon?
BOOM......BOOM....waves hand through smoke...squints...BOOM...BOOM.........BOOM. Don't ya love it at this range they look like ants running all crazy like when they hear the boom and one of em blows up he hehe. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#19
|
|
Prime Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,803 Joined: 3-February 08 From: Finland Member No.: 15,628 ![]() |
I think the problem here is that AV rounds are whack.... the assault cannon should be seen as an anti material rifle, and should thus have big bgi bgi penetration on vehicles. The top end sniper rifle will be a .50 cal, and the base assault cannon would be a 20mm round. I think my overall opinion on the matter is that regular AV rounds are overpowered, and they should all follow a -1/-3 or upping the AC AV rounds to -4/-6 to reflect their nature and use. Well the AC AV round actually adds to AP of the cannon, normal AV rounds replace the AP value of the gun. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#20
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,537 Joined: 27-August 06 From: Albuquerque NM Member No.: 9,234 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#21
|
|
MechRigger Delux ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Retired Admins Posts: 1,151 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Hanger 18, WPAFB Member No.: 1,657 ![]() |
Wow, ok, that is a bit of semantics there I never noticed...
QUOTE ( P. 35 @ ARS) AV rounds have an AP of -4 against people, -6 against vehicles and Barrier ratings (see p. 157, SR4) vs the AC AV QUOTE ( p. 36 @ ARS) AV Assault Cannon Rounds have an additional AP of -1 against people, -3 against vehicles emphasis mine Makes APDS and AV rounds in an AC the same then |
|
|
![]()
Post
#22
|
|
Prime Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,803 Joined: 3-February 08 From: Finland Member No.: 15,628 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#23
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 62 Joined: 29-June 08 Member No.: 16,095 ![]() |
Aren't assault cannons AoE too?
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#24
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,300 Joined: 6-February 08 From: Cologne, Germany Member No.: 15,648 ![]() |
The assault cannon is a remnant from old editions when it was also still feasible to run with a pink mohawk. HERETIC!!! Or you can grab a Panther Cannon for 6,175 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nuyen.gif) (counting ammo) and do things loud and cheap. For an extra 700 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nuyen.gif) , you can slap on a firing selection mod and an external smartgun system, and get virtually the same performance Also with right mods the assault cannon has a SA firing mode and can be deassembled to parts that fit in to carry back. Except for actually, you can't. ACs fire non-standard ammunition and therefore cannot be modded to fire in another mode. Sniper rifles, on the other hand, can easily be beefed up to FA. Which makes the Barret-121 the best man-portable firearm in the entire game. By RAW, the only thing that can be said in favour of ACs is the fact that Gunnery is more flexible than longarms, allowing you to use MGs, grenade and missile launchers. Which is why assault cannons rightfully aren't as good as sniper rifles- otherwise, there'd be no mechanical need for the longarms skill. As it is, you have the choice between being a heavy weapons generalist or a maximized damage output specialist. Yes, i know, you can also simply take the Firearms skill group which makes you even more versatile and also includes longarms. But an entire skillgroup is even more expensive than, say, taking both Gunnery and Automatics, and it is capped at 4 at chargen. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#25
|
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,664 Joined: 21-September 04 From: Arvada, CO Member No.: 6,686 ![]() |
Except for actually, you can't. ACs fire non-standard ammunition and therefore cannot be modded to fire in another mode. The rule isn't against ammo. Arsenal, 151, "Th is modification is not available for weapons using unusual loading mechanisms or exotic ammunition, like the Sakura Fubuki or Pain Inducer." Panthers use neither, thus, would be valid for this mod. Sniper rifles, on the other hand, can easily be beefed up to FA. Which makes the Barret-121 the best man-portable firearm in the entire game. Wrong again. Barret, 9P base. 18P for full auto. Ares Vigorous, 10P, 19P for full auto. Sure, you only get one full auto out of it, but its gonna hurt. By RAW, the only thing that can be said in favour of ACs is the fact that Gunnery is more flexible than longarms, allowing you to use MGs, grenade and missile launchers. Which is why assault cannons rightfully aren't as good as sniper rifles- otherwise, there'd be no mechanical need for the longarms skill. As it is, you have the choice between being a heavy weapons generalist or a maximized damage output specialist. Yes, i know, you can also simply take the Firearms skill group which makes you even more versatile and also includes longarms. But an entire skillgroup is even more expensive than, say, taking both Gunnery and Automatics, and it is capped at 4 at chargen. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 16th May 2025 - 03:37 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.