IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

13 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 6 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Mr. Unpronouncea...
post Sep 4 2008, 03:09 PM
Post #76


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 829
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 770



Congrats - you've just proved my point.

Ultrasound is an eye-mod.
Echolocation isn't.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tarantula
post Sep 4 2008, 03:22 PM
Post #77


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,664
Joined: 21-September 04
From: Arvada, CO
Member No.: 6,686



QUOTE (Mr. Unpronounceable @ Sep 4 2008, 09:09 AM) *
Congrats - you've just proved my point.

Ultrasound is an eye-mod.
Echolocation isn't.


Except, that echolocation + vocal range extender + hearing amp functions as a true ultrasound system, and references that page he quoted. Guess what that means, it turns into visual, as soon as you get it with the other goodies. Why? Because the book says so. This is why it should get errataed to say "functions as a true ultrasound system, but is still not visual". or somesuch.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DireRadiant
post Sep 4 2008, 03:24 PM
Post #78


The Dragon Never Sleeps
*********

Group: Admin
Posts: 6,924
Joined: 1-September 05
Member No.: 7,667



QUOTE (Mr. Unpronounceable @ Sep 4 2008, 10:09 AM) *
Congrats - you've just proved my point.

Ultrasound is an eye-mod.
Echolocation isn't.


p. 64 Augmentation
"If combined with the vocal range enhancer (p. 67) and
hearing enhancement (p. 65) implants (or their cyberware equivalents),
with a little training this augmentation functions like a true
ultrasound system (p. 324, SR4)."

Just what's in the book.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mr. Unpronouncea...
post Sep 4 2008, 03:28 PM
Post #79


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 829
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 770



And what eye-modification is included in "vocal range enhancer" and "hearing enhancement"?

No eye-mod, no real overlay - just an example of how-to-handle.

Is it really that hard to grasp?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tarantula
post Sep 4 2008, 03:38 PM
Post #80


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,664
Joined: 21-September 04
From: Arvada, CO
Member No.: 6,686



QUOTE (Mr. Unpronounceable @ Sep 4 2008, 09:28 AM) *
And what eye-modification is included in "vocal range enhancer" and "hearing enhancement"?

No eye-mod, no real overlay - just an example of how-to-handle.

Is it really that hard to grasp?


Except that it says " functions like a true ultrasound system". Which means it IS either overlayed or replaces. This is why I say the book needs to correct that, to say that it is NOT visual based. Because the way it is worded now, it is.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
WearzManySkins
post Sep 4 2008, 04:13 PM
Post #81


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,159
Joined: 12-April 07
From: Ork Underground
Member No.: 11,440



Has anyone suggested that if it is connected/wired into the Visual Cortex of the brain in question it is visual aspect and can be used for spell targeting, it not then it can not be?

WMS
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tarantula
post Sep 4 2008, 04:21 PM
Post #82


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,664
Joined: 21-September 04
From: Arvada, CO
Member No.: 6,686



QUOTE (Tarantula @ Sep 3 2008, 03:25 PM) *
Microphones's in the implant pick up audio reflections, interpret it, and transmit it to your brain's optical center. As they are not (meta)human eyes, what they pick up cannot be used to classify what is considered "Visible Light", but the rules make it quite clear that they function as metahuman eyes, and when paid for with Essence, can be used for spell targeting.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KCKitsune
post Sep 4 2008, 04:32 PM
Post #83


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,188
Joined: 9-February 08
From: Boiling Springs
Member No.: 15,665



QUOTE (Mr. Unpronounceable @ Sep 4 2008, 08:40 AM) *
Can you produce a cite that SR's dolphins can target with sonar?

It's not like they don't have functioning eyes. (Just like bats - poor eyesight for sonar-using animals is a myth.)


OK, I'm sorry but I could not find any links for Dolphins using Biosonar to target for spells, but I did find this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_echolocation#Bats

QUOTE
Microbats use echolocation to navigate and forage, often in total darkness.


This to me means that a bat can use biosonar to see by using sound.

============================================================

Anyways, back on topic: I can see why bioware mods could not be used (I don't agree, but I won't argue with Synner), but with SURGE it's completely natural for the Changeling. It's biology gone a little screwy.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wesley Street
post Sep 4 2008, 04:39 PM
Post #84


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,851
Joined: 15-February 08
From: Indianapolis
Member No.: 15,686



QUOTE (WearzManySkins @ Sep 4 2008, 11:13 AM) *
Has anyone suggested that if it is connected/wired into the Visual Cortex of the brain in question it is visual aspect and can be used for spell targeting, it not then it can not be?

I tried. Synner says "no go." I won't argue with him as he's a dev though I do disagree with his reasoning.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moon-Hawk
post Sep 4 2008, 04:50 PM
Post #85


Genuine Artificial Intelligence
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,019
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,715



QUOTE (KCKitsune @ Sep 4 2008, 11:32 AM) *
QUOTE
Microbats use echolocation to navigate and forage, often in total darkness


This to me means that a bat can use biosonar to see by using sound.

No, that means that a bat can accurately perceive their environment by using sound. That doesn't make it "seeing". But whenever we encounter a sense we don't have we always describe it using a visual metaphor, because we're primarily visual animals. Have you seen (again with the visual metaphor) how much real estate our visual system uses in our brains?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
WearzManySkins
post Sep 4 2008, 04:54 PM
Post #86


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,159
Joined: 12-April 07
From: Ork Underground
Member No.: 11,440



QUOTE (Wesley Street @ Sep 4 2008, 10:39 AM) *
I tried. Synner says "no go." I won't argue with him as he's a dev though I do disagree with his reasoning.

Well since this is worse than a "Soup Sandwich".

I have no issue with arguing with him. But since they are way behind on the current list of errata, I do not hold much hope for a resolution to this issue or the many others.

Saying it has to be wired into the visual cortex reduces the number of loopholes etc.

WMS
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
darthmord
post Sep 4 2008, 05:05 PM
Post #87


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,245
Joined: 27-April 07
From: Running the streets of Southeast Virginia
Member No.: 11,548



QUOTE (Doctor Funkenstein @ Sep 3 2008, 03:42 PM) *
Except, you know, that optical versions are available, and that optical modifications work just fine for line of sight. By that ridiculous statement, a pair of normal binoculors don't work either since they don't have rods and cones. Hell, even a pair of reading glasses render you unable to cast spells because they don't use rods and cones either.

Look at this way. You can have your eyes (cyber or not) and every optical nerve in your brain literally plucked from your skull and it would have -zero- impact on Echolocation. Still going to argue that it's a form of sight? Are you really going to go there?


It really depends on what part of the brain is doing the processing. If the processing of the Echolocation is being done by the optical center of the brain, then it should count as a form of vision.

If it's being processed elsewhere and then piped to the optical center, then no it should not work.

It's really a matter of whether or not a given frequency is perceivable by the optical center of the brain. All sounds, light, IR, UV, and RF are simply various forms of radiation that are transmitted on different frequencies. A certain range of which we call visible light.

As an aside, most people grasp the concept they can perceive UV under certain conditions. Namely, eliminate all visible light and turn on a UV light source. You'll still be able to see. What most people DON'T grasp is you can do the same with IR as well.

How I'd rule it?

Simple. If the Essence is paid for and the processing is done by the meat, then it counts. If the processing is done by the machine, it doesn't count.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mäx
post Sep 4 2008, 05:11 PM
Post #88


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,803
Joined: 3-February 08
From: Finland
Member No.: 15,628



QUOTE (Tarantula @ Sep 4 2008, 06:22 PM) *
Except, that echolocation + vocal range extender + hearing amp functions as a true ultrasound system, and references that page he quoted. Guess what that means, it turns into visual, as soon as you get it with the other goodies.


Could you please explain how expanding the range of sounds you can hear and emit, turns an acoustig sense in to a visual sense?

Oh right nothing.

Well the biggest problem is at least IMO the fact that the writer desided to preference the Ultrasound vision, becouse even with those exra mods it can not work like the cyber version.
Considering that the character is emitting ultrasound from her mouth, it can't exacly be allways on like the the cyber ultrasound vision.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moon-Hawk
post Sep 4 2008, 05:24 PM
Post #89


Genuine Artificial Intelligence
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,019
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,715



QUOTE (darthmord @ Sep 4 2008, 12:05 PM) *
All sounds, light, IR, UV, and RF are simply various forms of radiation that are transmitted on different frequencies. A certain range of which we call visible light.

I don't think this came across quite how you meant it. Visible light, IR, UV, and RF are different frequencies of the same thing. Sound is a fundamentally different thing from all those others.

edit: Not trying to be nitpicky, but it did seem like you were saying that sound was part of the electromagnetic spectrum. You can't say that, there are kids here, man. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tarantula
post Sep 4 2008, 06:05 PM
Post #90


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,664
Joined: 21-September 04
From: Arvada, CO
Member No.: 6,686



QUOTE (Mäx @ Sep 4 2008, 11:11 AM) *
Could you please explain how expanding the range of sounds you can hear and emit, turns an acoustig sense in to a visual sense?

Oh right nothing.

Well the biggest problem is at least IMO the fact that the writer desided to preference the Ultrasound vision, becouse even with those exra mods it can not work like the cyber version.
Considering that the character is emitting ultrasound from her mouth, it can't exacly be allways on like the the cyber ultrasound vision.

Yeah, the book says it functions as a true ultrasound system, so that makes it work as a visual sense. This is why I say the book needs errata. It should not be visual, but the book says it is.

QUOTE (Moon-Hawk @ Sep 4 2008, 11:24 AM) *
I don't think this came across quite how you meant it. Visible light, IR, UV, and RF are different frequencies of the same thing. Sound is a fundamentally different thing from all those others.

edit: Not trying to be nitpicky, but it did seem like you were saying that sound was part of the electromagnetic spectrum. You can't say that, there are kids here, man. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)

No, but by that line of reasoning, you should be able to use radar sensors instead then, as it is in the EM spectrum, and cybereyes work, why wouldn't radar?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moon-Hawk
post Sep 4 2008, 06:13 PM
Post #91


Genuine Artificial Intelligence
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,019
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,715



QUOTE (Tarantula @ Sep 4 2008, 01:05 PM) *
No, but by that line of reasoning, you should be able to use radar sensors instead then, as it is in the EM spectrum, and cybereyes work, why wouldn't radar?

*shrug* Maybe whatever carried the spell-targeting requirement only works over certain wavelengths. Maybe the "current"-gen radar system require too much processing and that destroys the component necessary for targeting. Maybe because having magicians able to target enemies through walls all the time would ruin the game, so all we need is a pseudo-plausible explanation so that we can have a reasonably consistent world in which to play a fun game.
I don't really care either way, I'm not part of the echolocation-as-spell-targeting argument. I was just saying that sound doesn't belong in the same family as EM radiation. You're talking spell targeting, I'm talking physics. I want no part of this mess. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tarantula
post Sep 4 2008, 06:15 PM
Post #92


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,664
Joined: 21-September 04
From: Arvada, CO
Member No.: 6,686



QUOTE (Moon-Hawk @ Sep 4 2008, 12:13 PM) *
*shrug* Maybe whatever carried the spell-targeting requirement only works over certain wavelengths. Maybe the "current"-gen radar system require too much processing and that destroys the component necessary for targeting. Maybe because having magicians able to target enemies through walls all the time would ruin the game, so all we need is a pseudo-plausible explanation so that we can have a reasonably consistent world in which to play a fun game.
I don't really care either way, I'm not part of the echolocation-as-spell-targeting argument. I was just saying that sound doesn't belong in the same family as EM radiation. You're talking spell targeting, I'm talking physics. I want no part of this mess. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)


But physically, theres on reason the radar system couldn't function as cybereyes that emit their own light (you know, like eye-light systems). Emit, receive, link established. Should work.

I do agree radar would be overpowerful. What would echolocation targetting do... let makes target things easier in smoke. And let them target invisible people without astrally perceiving. Neither of which I think is game breaking.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moon-Hawk
post Sep 4 2008, 06:26 PM
Post #93


Genuine Artificial Intelligence
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,019
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,715



QUOTE (Tarantula @ Sep 4 2008, 01:15 PM) *
I do agree radar would be overpowerful. What would echolocation targetting do... let makes target things easier in smoke. And let them target invisible people without astrally perceiving. Neither of which I think is game breaking.

It would let you MANABOLT UNBORN BABIES! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/grinbig.gif)
And, realistically, with enough computer power behind it ultrasound should let you see through a lot of non-sound-proof walls. With distortion, of course, since the sound will change speed and refract (or is that diffract, I always confuse those two. Both, I think) as it passes through different materials. But I don't think the SR description of ultrasound includes anything about any of that.

KILLING BABIES!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Skip
post Sep 4 2008, 06:38 PM
Post #94


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 127
Joined: 26-February 02
From: West of House
Member No.: 524



Just so I have it correctly:

Tarantula noticed that three items of essence-paid 'ware works like another eye-mod in the RAW. None of the three items is itself an eye-mod. He wanted to know if a mage could cast with the combo.

I understand all the real world and logical explainations why it should not work, and personally I don't think it should.

But as a GM I might be willing to allow it without a rule or errata to the contrary. Why? Because you paid essence for three bits of 'ware, and the benefit is minimal.

As a parent, I'd give some of you a time out. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif) No one is calling anyone's mother an ork. A little civility on everyone's part goes a long way.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rotbart van Dain...
post Sep 4 2008, 07:00 PM
Post #95


Hoppelhäschen 5000
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,807
Joined: 3-January 04
Member No.: 5,951



QUOTE (Skip @ Sep 4 2008, 08:38 PM) *
Tarantula noticed that three items of essence-paid 'ware works like another eye-mod in the RAW.

No, it's not Eyeware anymore.

Both Ultrasound and Radar Sensor are Headware.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ravor
post Sep 4 2008, 07:03 PM
Post #96


Cybernetic Blood Mage
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,472
Joined: 11-March 06
From: Northeastern Wyoming
Member No.: 8,361



And that is the real reason that mages can't use Ultrasound/Radar to target spells.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tarantula
post Sep 4 2008, 07:05 PM
Post #97


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,664
Joined: 21-September 04
From: Arvada, CO
Member No.: 6,686



QUOTE (Ravor @ Sep 4 2008, 12:03 PM) *
And that is the real reason that mages can't use Ultrasound/Radar to target spells.


QUOTE (Synner @ Feb 21 2008, 06:37 AM) *
Both radar sense and ultrasound produce computer generated composite representations of the feedback from non-visual sensor arrays. These replace/overlay the normal visual sensorium and do not allow/constitute a visual link to target for spellcasting purposes.



That is why radar/ultrasound don't work.

Obviously bio ultrasound can't use a computer generated composite representation, as there is no computer. Which is why it should work with the way the books are worded now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ravor
post Sep 4 2008, 07:17 PM
Post #98


Cybernetic Blood Mage
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,472
Joined: 11-March 06
From: Northeastern Wyoming
Member No.: 8,361



No, that is just the justification that Synner used on these boards.

Oh, and even the bit of Synner's post that you quoted still does not support the idea that echolocation can be used to target spells because it isn't the computer processing that frags spell targeting, it's the fact that they use a non-visual sense in the first place.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wesley Street
post Sep 4 2008, 07:18 PM
Post #99


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,851
Joined: 15-February 08
From: Indianapolis
Member No.: 15,686



QUOTE (Moon-Hawk @ Sep 4 2008, 02:26 PM) *
KILLING BABIES!

And kittens! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/frown.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ol' Scratch
post Sep 4 2008, 07:30 PM
Post #100


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Validating
Posts: 7,999
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,890



QUOTE (Ravor @ Sep 4 2008, 02:17 PM) *
Oh, and even the bit of Synner's post that you quoted still does not support the idea that echolocation can be used to target spells because it isn't the computer processing that frags spell targeting, it's the fact that they use a non-visual sense in the first place.

But but but it references the rules for ultrasound VISION. See, it has VISION in the word, so it must be eyesight. Nevermind that Echolocation starts and ends as an acoustic sense for spatial perception. Nevermind that it only uses those rules when you improve your voice and your hearing. It still auto-magically becomes SIGHT because it references the rules for ultrasound VISION! Which is an EYE mod (even though it's not, and simply housed in a cybereye to make projecting the acoustical data easier for you rather than completely rewiring your brain to accept the new spatial perception like Echolocation does)! So, you see, it's clearly a VISION enchancement in your EYES for improving your line of SIGHT. It's a flawless argument (if you ignore everything else, including common sense)!

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/ohplease.gif)

It's like arguing with an ostrich.

I also love the new argument. "Well, it's not unbalanced to allow it, so I'm cool with it." It's not unbalanced to let hearing, taste or even smell to target spells either, yet those aren't valid methods for determining line of sight. Hell, it's not even unbalanced to let electronic magnification or goggles with low-light vision or thermographic vision from working either. But, shockingly enough, they're not valid forms of line of sight, too.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

13 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th May 2025 - 07:51 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.