IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
jklst14
post Feb 16 2009, 03:43 AM
Post #1


CosaNostra Deliverator
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 346
Joined: 29-January 05
From: Philadelphia, PA
Member No.: 7,034



Hey all,
I'm trying to cut down the rolls in combat and was thinking about implementing this tweak from SR4 p69:

QUOTE
To cut down on dice rolling during combat, you could drop Damage Resistance Tests entirely, reducing combat to a single Opposed Test. In this case, Armor would deduct directly from the attack's DV.


Has anyone tried this? And if so, does it work?

thanks,

jkl
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Warlordtheft
post Feb 16 2009, 03:50 AM
Post #2


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,328
Joined: 2-April 07
From: The Center of the Universe
Member No.: 11,360



It over powers armor IMHO, as all but the most leathal attacks (AKA sniper rounds and higher) would bounce off. You would have to drop some of the armor values to make it work.

Case in point-heavy pistol base damage does not exceed the armor of a an armor jacket (even after the armor mods).

An assault rifle and smg on SA is in the same boat.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KCKitsune
post Feb 16 2009, 04:19 AM
Post #3


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,188
Joined: 9-February 08
From: Boiling Springs
Member No.: 15,665



Even worse when you stack in FFBA. I have a combat mage with 10/7 armor... on a human combat mage. Think of what a troll sammy with bone lacing, orthoskin, and then armor on top of that... you need cannons (TANK cannons) to even hurt the slot... that rule WAAAAAAY to over powers armor.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BlueMax
post Feb 16 2009, 04:25 AM
Post #4


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,336
Joined: 25-February 08
From: San Mateo CA
Member No.: 15,708



QUOTE (jklst14 @ Feb 15 2009, 07:43 PM) *
Hey all,
I'm trying to cut down the rolls in combat and was thinking about implementing this tweak from SR4 p69:



Has anyone tried this? And if so, does it work?

thanks,

jkl


I have tried it for a few nights. It's very reminiscent of First Edition Shadowrun and makes things faster as proclaimed. However, I find it lacking. So, for me it was a no go.

A good bastard half breed is to keep the Body part of the roll that would be applied if there was anything left after the auto armor. Then it would really remind me of first ed.

As the game system cannot possibly be designed and tested for every variant, we play as close to the rules as we can.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mäx
post Feb 16 2009, 07:10 AM
Post #5


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,803
Joined: 3-February 08
From: Finland
Member No.: 15,628



QUOTE (jklst14 @ Feb 16 2009, 05:43 AM) *
Hey all,
I'm trying to cut down the rolls in combat and was thinking about implementing this tweak from SR4 p69:



Has anyone tried this? And if so, does it work?

thanks,

jkl

My Sasha would love to play in a game using that rule, then she wouldn't have to worry about anything smaller then a sniper rifle with APDS ammo.(14/11 armor)
And she's a dryad. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/cyber.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Glyph
post Feb 16 2009, 09:41 AM
Post #6


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,116
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,449



The biggest potential problem that I see with that rule is that it essentially makes armor three times as powerful. Before, you could soak, on average, one point of damage per three points of armor. Now, you soak damage on a one-for-one basis. You can already make tanks in SR4, and with the stackable armor options in Arsenal, even relatively normal characters can still have 10+ points of ballistic armor to soak with.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fuchs
post Feb 16 2009, 11:26 AM
Post #7


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,328
Joined: 28-November 05
From: Zuerich
Member No.: 8,014



One could change it so that armor + body is used for buying successes, either at 4-1 or 3-1 rate - that gives a value one can directly subtract from DV.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eugene
post Feb 16 2009, 04:33 PM
Post #8


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 199
Joined: 16-September 03
From: Massachusetts
Member No.: 5,625



QUOTE (Fuchs @ Feb 16 2009, 06:26 AM) *
One could change it so that armor + body is used for buying successes, either at 4-1 or 3-1 rate - that gives a value one can directly subtract from DV.


That's definitely the way to go, since it goes with the assumption that 1/3 of your dice will succeed. There'll be no "yeah! I just took a panther cannon to the face and felt nothing!" moments nor "a light pistol just did what?" moments, and combat will go a little faster. 'Course, everyone will start tweaking Body, armor, and spells for that magic threshold, and Toughness et al. would have to be repriced...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 7th May 2025 - 02:20 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.