IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Shifting archtypes due to increased attribute costs, FBR viable now? Bio-adepts no longer top dogs?
Ol' Scratch
post Aug 21 2009, 07:20 PM
Post #26


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Validating
Posts: 7,999
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,890



People have problems with this because SR4 made the (in my opinion anyway) colossal mistake of making Attributes equal to Skill when it comes to most tests. Unless you make the cost of Attributes grotesque, they're always going to be a better investment than Skill, despite them being exactly equal in most tests. Even at Rank*5, they're still a better investment than even a Skill Group... and it's damn near impossible to truly balance it due to the vast difference in the usefulness of various skills. Pistols vs. Artisan, for instance.

Previous editions had their flaws, too, but the philosophy was sound. Attributes should be different than Skills. If I had a hand in designing the system, I'd have balanced it around the concept of Attributes providing the random element in the test (ie, the number of dice) and Skill providing a solid modifier due to it actually being your skill rather than your natural aptitude... which is what Attributes essentially represent in these tests. In this scenario, Skills would be more coveted despite covering a smaller group of tests. You could probably even have both of them cost about the same during character creation and advancement due to that fact; Attributes may apply to more tests, but Skill has a bigger impact on your level of success.

Heck, it even has the benefit of giving characters with a Skill of 1 a nice advantage over those without any Skill at all. Whereas in the current system that's just not the case most of the time. A dice pool of 10 is a dice pool of 10 whether you have Attribute 5/Skill 5 or Attribute 9/Skill 1. Which is pretty darn goofy in my book.

Unfortunately with the way SR4 is set up, there's no real way to create a set of house rules using that kind of mentality without completely reworking everything else. Which is a major disappointment.

EDIT: To get back on track somewhat, I do think you're mistaking "archetypes" with "min-max concepts." A bio-adept isn't an archetype; it's a term that describes something you can do with the rules. Archetypes include things like bodyguards, paranormal hunters and street shaman. What they do rather than how they do it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kerenshara
post Aug 22 2009, 03:08 AM
Post #27


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,894
Joined: 11-May 09
Member No.: 17,166



QUOTE (Totentanz @ Aug 20 2009, 09:27 PM) *
While I agree with you that attributes can represent well, I have to disagree with your examples. People decide to change these fundamental qualities every day, and do.

Sure they do, that's why you can upgrade them at all.

QUOTE
Strength: People get stronger every day just by going to the gym. They measure themselves objectively by their ability to do more reps and lift increased weight. Training programs these days cover toning, bulking, core work, balance, yadda yadda. Honestly I can't think of a stat it should be easier to raise, given time. Better yet, the game gives us a rough yardstick for strength in terms of deadlift capacity. It's definitely got a bit of hero physics built in, but the objective measurement is there.

Body: Same as above. While the stat does represent pain resistance, I think we can all agree that limiting purchasing Body for want of an efficient pain-resistance training system is silly. It's also logical to argue that people who suffer through muscle-rending workouts are, in effect, training themselves to resist pain. Cardio work means their lung capacity is increased, and all sorts of studies support the idea that people in good physical shape fight off diseases better. They can always go on a strict diet and add in vitamin supplements for the health part.

Agility and Reaction: Easily increased by video games and playing sports. Occupational therapists use video games for just that sort of thing. Martial arts can also train both Reaction and Agility, as can gymnastics.

For all of these, I agree in principle but you misunderstand I think just how difficult it is to achieve a meaningful increase in the stat, especially as you approach higher leves. If you are a 2, simply exercising and "getting in shape" will lead to a relatively quick progress to level 3 - Average. But to go to progressively higher levels, look at the amount of time it takes serious athletes to get themselves signifcantly better. We're talking YEARS of work to go from a 5 - Superior to a 6 - Maximum Unaugmented. We're talkng about the difference between an Olympic competitor and a World-class champion. That kind of improvement takes literally YEARS of grueling physical training. If anything, subjectively, the costs are still low. The activities that help may be "easy" but the amount of effort required and time needed are daunting.

QUOTE
Charisma: Start taking better care of your appearance, read books on social interaction/sales/psychology, spend a lot of time in social situations getting to know the ins and outs of meeting people and growing relationships. Study cultural and racial etiquette so you know what not to do. Play poker and read books on bluffing to get better at lying. Everybody knows at least one person who isn't attractive at all that has loads of friends and dates. Personally I know several. There is an entire industry built around improving relationship building/networking/sales skills. Anyone who is in sales or sarges (same difference, I guess) will tell you that developing self confidence will get you about 50% of the way to persuading anyone.

This one is harder. Sure, some of what you're saying will help you pull a sub-par score to normal or even help teach some of the tricks and techniques to get you to an above average score. But getting to 5 or 6? That's a fundamental shift in outlook, not just behavior. A shocking percentage of our communications is entirely non-verbal, and bear also in mind the one "hidden" aspect of CHArisma in the 6th World: force of personality vis-à-vis Magic especially. Those two later items are VERY hard to improve.

The other mental stats are more easily increased in terms of activities than CHArisma, but again, it's a serious and devoted effort to excell if you're going for levels beyond the ordinary.

QUOTE
Now, of course this sort of training only takes you so far. However, the system uses Aptitude to represent true raw talent. It's logical within the rules to say given time people can increase all of their attributes at least a little. It might take several years to earn that 5th point of Charisma, but if you put in the karma, the time, and the RP, it's yours.

No argument on this point. I want to be clear: I have no problem with increasing the base stats. I specifically meant to state that compared to imrpoving a single skill (or linke group of skills), raising a core attribute SHOULD be much harder to achieve both objectively (Karma and time) and subjectively (role play and development).

QUOTE
As for the increased costs, I used to play a lot of WW so the cost doesn't bother me. It might make the pools a little smaller, but most of the threats in SR are using the rule, too.

If the BP costs aren't changed, then it rewards players for loading up on attributes at start and rounding out with skills later. Some games might like the image of starting Runners as talented but relatively untrained folk. Others might not enjoy the ramifications for character diversity. I would be one of the latter, simply because I want flexibility at chargen, and for me that means the rules need to not push me in a certain direction.

Kgen sidesteps that particular issue neatly. However, it will only increase the incentive to play races with large stat bonuses in Kgen. Even if they change it to make people pay for race, the costs will still out-weigh the benefits. Poor humans.

Ok, in reverse order, the increased costs only make it HARDER to take a high-stat race if you don't max things out at CharGen; The price to max out just went through the roof. This is something I have said before, though I don't know it it's been in a discussion specifically with you: I don't buy the stat at CharGen; I buy the description. Sure, an Orc starts with a minimum BODy stat and STRength stat that look like high human normal, but to anybody looking at them, it's going to be clear that they're the "runt of the litter", and will react accordingly. More to the point, the character should react accordingly. So unless I have a REASON (conceptually) for a stat to below average, I automatically buy all stats to base+2 for whatever race I am actually playing. If I have a REASON to go higher on a stat, THEN I buy it up. Do you have to do that? No, of course not. But if you really look at the character AS COMPARED TO THEIR METATYPE, they are going to be weak if you don't buy up. Put another way: A starting elf has "average" human CHArisma. But if you don't buy that up to 5, when people interact with you, though you won't be overtly penalized, there's going to be the "wow, that was a homely/unpleasant/rough elf" reaction from those who are accustomed to dealing with most elves being a 5.

Does that part make sense?

As to the first part, yes, it does reward "attribute" loading, but then, the system ALWAYS rewarded/encouraged that if we're willing to be honest about it. This just pushes the envelope a bit. So, either you're a "Talented Amateur" (which actually makes a drekload of sense, since you phrased it like that) or a relatively pedestrian but highly experienced professional with lots more time in grade who suddenly has to start significantly working to improve their level of basic performance on a new field.

I don't understand your comment in reference to flexibility at CharGen or getting forced into a particular path. I need a bit more to work with before I can discuss that part meaningfully with you. But we use KarmaGen, where there IS no more "front loading" because the prices are always the same.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Falconer
post Aug 22 2009, 03:30 AM
Post #28


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Validating
Posts: 2,283
Joined: 12-October 07
Member No.: 13,662



QUOTE (Ancient History @ Aug 19 2009, 09:20 PM) *
Attributes apply directly to tests for multiple skills, attribute-only tests, and secondary character traits like Initiative. Anybody with half a brain who has the option of raising an attribute vs. raising a skill when the cost is equal or better will raise the attribute. To encourage players away from making a bunch of Olympic athletes at CharGen, the cost of raising attributes is raised. You can still use augmentations et al., natch, and that'll be more attractive since attributes cost more.


Actually exactly the opposite... the increase in cost means.

1. buy a metatype... humans suck. (they get not only freebie attribute ranks, but also enhanced ratings caps!! on a bargain deal from points NOT LIMITED BY HALF BP/karma)
2. Make damn well sure you spend half the remaining on attributes... Not doing so will cost you bigtime in karma later.

This was the reason to me that karmagen was such a disappointment. I'm fully behind the cost change, but the attribute bits were completely FUBAR (F'ed Up Beyond All Repair).


Since costs are fixed at chargen (BP)... there's even MORE incentive to make olympians and save on karma later w/ narrowly focused professional + skills.

The system actively discourages putting 1 or 2 points in tihs skill and another 1 or 2 in this one. It generally points you at buying either 1 rank (because defaulting is bad) or 4(6).



Funkenstein:
I don't see how that works in the least w/o variable target numbers. And that's one thing I'm glad that SR4 got rid of.

Quite frankly, even there, there's been limited discussion. I tried to start a thread maybe about a month ago about the game effects of changing skills to go from 1-12, or simply counting skill ranks double (and halving the contribution from attributes).
EG: agility 4, pistol 4 == 2 dice attribute + 8 dice skill.

It got next to zero interest... so it dropped off.

Any changes of this nature are very deep into the system, and affect a lot of things, and the rule of unintended consequences has a lot of room to wreak havoc.
EG: attribute dice are a different color than skill dice. Attribute dice have a TN of 6, while skill dice have a TN of 3. (if you're assuming a 6/6 split the number of net hits stays actually close to the same as 12 dice on TN4, but there are a lot of implications).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kerenshara
post Aug 22 2009, 03:32 AM
Post #29


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,894
Joined: 11-May 09
Member No.: 17,166



QUOTE (Dr. Funkenstein @ Aug 21 2009, 02:20 PM) *
People have problems with this because SR4 made the (in my opinion anyway) colossal mistake of making Attributes equal to Skill when it comes to most tests. Unless you make the cost of Attributes grotesque, they're always going to be a better investment than Skill, despite them being exactly equal in most tests. Even at Rank*5, they're still a better investment than even a Skill Group... and it's damn near impossible to truly balance it due to the vast difference in the usefulness of various skills. Pistols vs. Artisan, for instance.

*snip*

Unfortunately with the way SR4 is set up, there's no real way to create a set of house rules using that kind of mentality without completely reworking everything else. Which is a major disappointment.

Untrue (that no house rules can fix the problem). As I went into great detail elsewhere, using all the optional caps suggested in main text or sidebar together bring the focus squarely back onto skill and also serve to significantly discourage game-start over-focus to the point the system as designed starts to break under the weight of your Dice Pool.

Specifically, I'll lay them out again (and these only apply to Skill Tests, not Damage Resistance or Drain or the like):

1st: Hits limited to 2x Skill (or 1 when defaulting), like Spellcasting Hits are limitd to spell Force, and it's Hits, not Net Hits. This ensures that overly talented people can NOT achieve wildly powerful results (without the use of EDGe, which tosses all limits out the lock anyhow, but is a limited resource). So Mr. 7 Stat with 1 Skill is capped at 2 Hits, while the 3 Stat 3 Skill can go to 6 Hits; andreember how quickly modifiers can contribute to those rolls, so it's NOT just Skill + Stat.
2nd: Limit DP modifiers to no more than [Skill + Stat]. There is a limit to how much you can take advantage of what's there for you without sufficient native ability. If you lack that ability, leave it to the Pilot program, which can probably do it better than you in that case.
3rd: Limit total DP to no more than 20 after all modifiers. The system's tables top out at 5 Hits in every category. At 20 DP you can BUY 5 hits if the GM is allowing it. There is literally NO POINT in having a higher DP than this, and to do so begins to push things into an upward spiral that just winds up getting silly, whereupon a lot of people say "see! It's broken now!" Well, no drek Sherlock. If you stand there and bend it till it snaps, of course it's going to be broken when you're done.

My current group is playing with just the first rule, and we haven't yet run across a single dice roll that would require the other two because of it, but we're implementing them immediately. (Why push for a higher DP when you can only keep 2 Hits anyway?)

It's amazing. Seriously. We're in line with expectations in the modules. Security guards aren't a total pushover, reaction teams are scarry motherslotters, and nearly every basic threat in the book is a challenge of some kind. Yes, we still usualy come out on top, but if we didn't, it wouldn't be fun. The trick it to keep it CHALLENGING, and we haven't seen a situation yet that we just waved at and greased on out; When we blow it out, it's because of lucky rolls, not simply squishing the opposition casually. (We just made it LOOK easy, as they say.)

Many people had to rebuild after the GM first really explained the cap and what it meant and then ran a little mock combat to demonstrate. And now, a couple people have one stat maxed (their focus) but mostly we see 4's and 3's across the board. As to skills, out of 5 full-time and 1 part-time PC we have exactly 0 characters with any skills at 6+, 3 characters with a single 5 (2 gotten through a Quality or 'ware/adept ability), and most core skills at 4 with a huge variety of secondary skills at 3 and 2. What does that make us, according to the descriptions in the Skills section? Realistic (no laughter, please) lower-level 'runners with room to grow but enough capability in our primary areas of expertise to usually beat the opposition. We fit in with the fluff, and usually get by more with creative uses of what we DO have than the force of our gynormous Dice Pools.

Maybe you don't think it would work for your group, but trust me: these people at our table are amongst the most gifted Min-Maxers and Mega-Munchkins in the world at what they do (objective, not subjetive, based on some organizations they belong to and participate in). If a simple cap to enforce how important Skill is over raw Talent (Stat), then I think there's a good chance it can work for your group, too. Our GM is absolutely floored at the diferece in emphasis and behavior this has made, compared to older campaigns where he didn't use that cap (or even our pre-cap builds for this campaign). Take a look at it for what it is; It's not a limit on how good you can be or become, it's a limit on how far raw talent can carry you. With that in place, it's amazing how quickly the one serious weakness of SR4 that Doc F quite accurately pointed out fades away into the backgroun and the game move on smoothly.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tyro
post Aug 24 2009, 05:12 PM
Post #30


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,768
Joined: 31-October 08
From: Redmond (Yes, really)
Member No.: 16,558



@Kerenshara: I really, really like that. I've seen (and usually liked) similar fixes in the past, but I think the rules you stated are the best of their kind that I've seen.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Totentanz
post Aug 24 2009, 11:41 PM
Post #31


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 73
Joined: 1-August 09
From: ATX
Member No.: 17,457



QUOTE (Kerenshara)
3rd: Limit total DP to no more than 20 after all modifiers. The system's tables top out at 5 Hits in every category. At 20 DP you can BUY 5 hits if the GM is allowing it. There is literally NO POINT in having a higher DP than this, and to do so begins to push things into an upward spiral that just winds up getting silly, whereupon a lot of people say "see! It's broken now!" Well, no drek Sherlock. If you stand there and bend it till it snaps, of course it's going to be broken when you're done.


There is still a reason to have more than a 20 DP unmodified: because you still want those 5 hits when modifiers slap you upside the head. SR is modifier heaven, and having your "badass" 20 DP reduced to "wimp" 7 DP when you need it most will suck nice and hard.

Now that I think about it, there is one more. The new fangled extended test rules with the cumulative -1 definitely encourages maxing certain DP's. If you enforce the 20 DP cap, any dice above it serve as a cushion for that modifier.

Other than that, you are right on target. I think the rule is great so long as everything in the world is limited in a similar fashion.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toturi
post Aug 25 2009, 02:19 AM
Post #32


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



QUOTE (Kerenshara @ Aug 22 2009, 11:32 AM) *
1st: Hits limited to 2x Skill (or 1 when defaulting), like Spellcasting Hits are limitd to spell Force, and it's Hits, not Net Hits. This ensures that overly talented people can NOT achieve wildly powerful results (without the use of EDGe, which tosses all limits out the lock anyhow, but is a limited resource). So Mr. 7 Stat with 1 Skill is capped at 2 Hits, while the 3 Stat 3 Skill can go to 6 Hits; andreember how quickly modifiers can contribute to those rolls, so it's NOT just Skill + Stat.
2nd: Limit DP modifiers to no more than [Skill + Stat]. There is a limit to how much you can take advantage of what's there for you without sufficient native ability. If you lack that ability, leave it to the Pilot program, which can probably do it better than you in that case.
3rd: Limit total DP to no more than 20 after all modifiers. The system's tables top out at 5 Hits in every category. At 20 DP you can BUY 5 hits if the GM is allowing it. There is literally NO POINT in having a higher DP than this, and to do so begins to push things into an upward spiral that just winds up getting silly, whereupon a lot of people say "see! It's broken now!" Well, no drek Sherlock. If you stand there and bend it till it snaps, of course it's going to be broken when you're done.

1) Capping hits simply changes the onus to whatever you use to cap the hits with. In this case, skill. I get that the intent of the rule is to shift emphasis to skills. But you have to consider that skills are now more easily improved and it does not address the fact that at the start, your PC has no karma, hence not likely to be on the radar, with survival(as dictated largely by Attributes) more important than being that damn good. In fact, it does not address the likelihood that anyone with low skill is not going to have it as his main schtick - for example, a Cha 1 and Etiquette 1 PC is not likely to be looking to talk down the Don, he is more likely to simply prevent himself from being screwed over socially - 1+1+6(mods from equipments/powers) = 8, to buy 2 hits, limited to 2 hits(hey look at that, just right)
2) Limiting DP mods to Skill+Stat is similar to limiting dice pool to 2*(Skill+Stat). It does not address that at the upper limits, you are still looking at a boatload of dice.
3) Limiting DP to 20 after mods simply means that people would be talking trash to the Don, or sneaking around with Day-Glo Orange jumpsuits with a boom-box blaring on their shoulder. After a certain point, your PCs would be looking for negative mods, because their positive mods are pushing them over the limit. It also means that no matter how good you are, no matter how powerful you become, some hotshot can have a decent chance of beating you. Remember that if you want to use some of the really powerful protagonists NPCs like Harlequin - they too should have a limit of 20 dice, it is only fair right?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Aug 25 2009, 02:37 AM
Post #33


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



Why would you ever pit your characters agains Harlequin?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Glyph
post Aug 25 2009, 02:56 AM
Post #34


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,116
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,449



QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ Aug 24 2009, 06:37 PM) *
Why would you ever pit your characters agains Harlequin?

He's a mime (and an annoying wangsty Mary Sue GMPC). Why wouldn't you attack him on sight?


toturi has a point, though. If you let a PC's mods and stats count for nothing beyond a certain point, then that same arbitrary cutoff needs to apply to the NPCs.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Omenowl
post Aug 25 2009, 03:00 AM
Post #35


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 473
Joined: 11-May 09
From: Fort Worth, TX
Member No.: 17,167



If you have a problem with the attributes being more important than skills then use the optional rules given under page 69 (p75 sr4a) for limiting the number of hits based upon the skill.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
StealthSigma
post Aug 25 2009, 04:08 PM
Post #36


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,536
Joined: 13-July 09
Member No.: 17,389



QUOTE (Falconer @ Aug 21 2009, 11:30 PM) *
1. buy a metatype... humans suck. (they get not only freebie attribute ranks, but also enhanced ratings caps!! on a bargain deal from points NOT LIMITED BY HALF BP/karma)


That's one of the nice things about karma gen, it makes humans more appealing.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but those racial modifiers apply prior to calculating the cost of improving the attribute.

So an elf costs 5*25 (135) Karma to improve charisma 5 points. That human costs 5*20 (100) Karma to improve charisma 5 points. Using BP, they both cost 65 BP. There's a very low incentive to playing a human in BP, and it is basically edge and the BP you save by not choosing another metatype.

I think it brings the races more in balance.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toturi
post Aug 26 2009, 12:23 AM
Post #37


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



QUOTE (StealthSigma @ Aug 26 2009, 12:08 AM) *
That's one of the nice things about karma gen, it makes humans more appealing.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but those racial modifiers apply prior to calculating the cost of improving the attribute.

So an elf costs 5*25 (135) Karma to improve charisma 5 points. That human costs 5*20 (100) Karma to improve charisma 5 points. Using BP, they both cost 65 BP. There's a very low incentive to playing a human in BP, and it is basically edge and the BP you save by not choosing another metatype.

I think it brings the races more in balance.

Unless there has been a published errata, race is still free in karma gen. If anything, it aggravates the race issue and makes humans less appealing.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Glyph
post Aug 26 2009, 01:42 AM
Post #38


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,116
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,449



It might be because everything was overpowered in karmagen, but humans were more appealing to me. Mainly because when you are stuck with a hard cap of 200 to spend on Attributes, a metahuman's Attribute bonuses are a lot more noticeable. Karmagen balances out, because you have a human with a 6, and a mix of 4's and 5's, compared to, say, an elf who has a higher Agility and Charisma, but correspondingly less to spend on active skills. Sure, if you only take the minimums for your Attributes with bonuses, you get more points than a human, but Attributes are important and you have plenty of points to spend, so you're shooting yourself in the foot to get those "free" points. As much grief as karmagen gets over free metatype, humans are still a lot more viable under it than they are with build points.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toturi
post Aug 26 2009, 02:19 AM
Post #39


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



QUOTE (Glyph @ Aug 26 2009, 09:42 AM) *
It might be because everything was overpowered in karmagen, but humans were more appealing to me. Mainly because when you are stuck with a hard cap of 200 to spend on Attributes, a metahuman's Attribute bonuses are a lot more noticeable. Karmagen balances out, because you have a human with a 6, and a mix of 4's and 5's, compared to, say, an elf who has a higher Agility and Charisma, but correspondingly less to spend on active skills. Sure, if you only take the minimums for your Attributes with bonuses, you get more points than a human, but Attributes are important and you have plenty of points to spend, so you're shooting yourself in the foot to get those "free" points. As much grief as karmagen gets over free metatype, humans are still a lot more viable under it than they are with build points.

There is a cap for Attributes for karmagen and worse it is tied to the racial cost. So the more expensive the race, not only do you get it for free, you could spend more on your Attributes as well. You do not need to get the absolute minimums for those Attributes with bonuses, all you need to do is to buy them up to a functional rating. For example, Elves get +2 to Charisma and +1 Agility, that means a minimum of Cha 3 and that is already a functional Attribute rating and for Agility buy the Agility to, say, 4 (again functional).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Aug 27 2009, 03:38 AM
Post #40


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (toturi @ Aug 25 2009, 08:19 PM) *
There is a cap for Attributes for karmagen and worse it is tied to the racial cost. So the more expensive the race, not only do you get it for free, you could spend more on your Attributes as well. You do not need to get the absolute minimums for those Attributes with bonuses, all you need to do is to buy them up to a functional rating. For example, Elves get +2 to Charisma and +1 Agility, that means a minimum of Cha 3 and that is already a functional Attribute rating and for Agility buy the Agility to, say, 4 (again functional).



But an Elf with a 3 Charisma is just as looked down upon by other Elves as uncouth, as a Troll with a 5 Strength is looked down upon by other Trolls as being whimpy... They are the "runts" of the racial pool at that point...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
McCummhail
post Aug 27 2009, 04:13 AM
Post #41


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 388
Joined: 30-July 09
From: Charlotte, NC
Member No.: 17,452



It is utterly astounding how many times this discussion
about racial balance and karmagen has been trotted out.
In internet years this mutt of a 'debate' (debacle?)
is long in the tooth and ready to be shot before
being rolled into the Soylent Processing Vat.
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/dead.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dead.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dead.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toturi
post Aug 28 2009, 08:46 AM
Post #42


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ Aug 27 2009, 11:38 AM) *
But an Elf with a 3 Charisma is just as looked down upon by other Elves as uncouth, as a Troll with a 5 Strength is looked down upon by other Trolls as being whimpy... They are the "runts" of the racial pool at that point...

Do dwarves with Willpower 6 look down on dwarves with Willpower 2? Do humans with Edge 6 look down on other humans with Edge 2? Is there a way for any given character to "know" the stats of other characters? Unless said Attribute put to the test, it is difficult to know if any character is smarter/stronger/tougher than another character. Even then, the vagaries of dice rolls has to be factored in. That tough guy could simply be having a bad day with his Body.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
McAllister
post Aug 28 2009, 01:31 PM
Post #43


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 509
Joined: 16-June 09
Member No.: 17,282



QUOTE (toturi @ Aug 28 2009, 04:46 AM) *
That tough guy could simply be having a bad day with his Body.

Jeez, Toturi, you might be a more gracious winner than I am, but when I beat someone at a physical competition (particularly someone I don't really like), my reaction is less "looks like you're having a bad day" and more "WHO'S MAH BITCH? YOU MAH BITCH!"

Then again, they tend not to pull guns/knives/fireballs on me in this neighborhood.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Aug 29 2009, 05:58 PM
Post #44


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (toturi @ Aug 28 2009, 02:46 AM) *
Do dwarves with Willpower 6 look down on dwarves with Willpower 2? Do humans with Edge 6 look down on other humans with Edge 2? Is there a way for any given character to "know" the stats of other characters? Unless said Attribute put to the test, it is difficult to know if any character is smarter/stronger/tougher than another character. Even then, the vagaries of dice rolls has to be factored in. That tough guy could simply be having a bad day with his Body.




Probably...
Do most people look down on the bum in the street?

The point is, once that stat is put to the test, they are definitely below average for the relevant metatype, and this will become obvious over time... and if the Dark Dystopian future is anything like TODAY (not saying that it is right, of course), then yes, those types of people (low stat) will indeed be looked down upon, regardless of metatype...

Now, granted, the human will probably not be able to reliably tell that the elf's charisma is below average, because the low end elf is still at least comparable with teh average human Charisma (assuming 3 is average of course)... but within each metatype, it will happen...

Have you ever watched kids on the playground pick apart the weaker children, or make fun of the child who is not as smart?... happens all the time in our society, what makes you think that it will be any different in the dystopian future?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toturi
post Aug 29 2009, 11:38 PM
Post #45


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ Aug 30 2009, 01:58 AM) *
Probably...
Do most people look down on the bum in the street?

The point is, once that stat is put to the test, they are definitely below average for the relevant metatype, and this will become obvious over time... and if the Dark Dystopian future is anything like TODAY (not saying that it is right, of course), then yes, those types of people (low stat) will indeed be looked down upon, regardless of metatype...

Now, granted, the human will probably not be able to reliably tell that the elf's charisma is below average, because the low end elf is still at least comparable with teh average human Charisma (assuming 3 is average of course)... but within each metatype, it will happen...

Have you ever watched kids on the playground pick apart the weaker children, or make fun of the child who is not as smart?... happens all the time in our society, what makes you think that it will be any different in the dystopian future?

Only if the kid actually feels the hit or cannot take making fun of. The weaker kid needs to be truly weaker in nearly all sense of the word. Ever see the small but agile kid dodge outta the way or the skinny but tough kid stand there and take it? Ever see the high Willpower or Charisma kid maintain his composure when made fun of by the smarter kids? The bullies (physical or intellectual) gain some measure of respect for them. Happens all the time in our societies, what makes you think it will be any different in the dystopian future?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Glyph
post Aug 30 2009, 03:49 AM
Post #46


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,116
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,449



QUOTE (toturi @ Aug 29 2009, 04:38 PM) *
Only if the kid actually feels the hit or cannot take making fun of. The weaker kid needs to be truly weaker in nearly all sense of the word. Ever see the small but agile kid dodge outta the way or the skinny but tough kid stand there and take it? Ever see the high Willpower or Charisma kid maintain his composure when made fun of by the smarter kids? The bullies (physical or intellectual) gain some measure of respect for them. Happens all the time in our societies, what makes you think it will be any different in the dystopian future?

Exactly. That ork with Strength: 3 who also has muscle augmentation: 2, 3 levels of martial arts, bone lacing, and hardliner gloves, along with augmented reflexes, won't have that many problems with other orks "disrespecting" him. Since it is impossible to have good Attributes across the board, there will be dump stats.

Karmagen made it easier to have more realistic Attributes (good at what you needed without having to be weak in other areas), but they're going to "fix" it now. The tentative fix (keep it at 750 Karma) bones awakened characters and technomancers completely, since special Attributes are included in that 375 Karma limit to Attributes. Which, with the new costs for improving Attributes, makes it actually harder to create things such as adepts in Karmagen, as opposed to build points.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Aug 31 2009, 02:10 AM
Post #47


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (toturi @ Aug 29 2009, 04:38 PM) *
Only if the kid actually feels the hit or cannot take making fun of. The weaker kid needs to be truly weaker in nearly all sense of the word. Ever see the small but agile kid dodge outta the way or the skinny but tough kid stand there and take it? Ever see the high Willpower or Charisma kid maintain his composure when made fun of by the smarter kids? The bullies (physical or intellectual) gain some measure of respect for them. Happens all the time in our societies, what makes you think it will be any different in the dystopian future?



Is that not what I was saying?

The weaker will be picked upon and the stronger will survive...

Next...

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toturi
post Aug 31 2009, 04:05 AM
Post #48


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ Aug 31 2009, 10:10 AM) *
Is that not what I was saying?

The weaker will be picked upon and the stronger will survive...

Next...

No. That is not what I was saying. Unless the weaker is so totally outclassed, he should have something that is better than the person bullying him, and he can use that edge to his advantage. So unless troll with low Str has all his other stats that are equal or worse than the high Str troll, the low Str troll is not in any danger of being "looked down" simply because he has low Str. My question (and the point) was whether most people would look down on another simply because that guy has one lower stat than themselves.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tyro
post Aug 31 2009, 04:36 AM
Post #49


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,768
Joined: 31-October 08
From: Redmond (Yes, really)
Member No.: 16,558



I have low BOD, low-medium STR, high AGI, high INT, low CHA and medium WIL. Trust me, being smart and fast isn't enough to keep from being looked down upon. Enough to avoid physical violence, perhaps, but not enough to avoid problems of that sort.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toturi
post Aug 31 2009, 07:12 AM
Post #50


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



QUOTE (Tyro @ Aug 31 2009, 12:36 PM) *
I have low BOD, low-medium STR, high AGI, high INT, low CHA and medium WIL. Trust me, being smart and fast isn't enough to keep from being looked down upon. Enough to avoid physical violence, perhaps, but not enough to avoid problems of that sort.

If someone wants to look down on someone else, he can find a multitude of ways to do so. It doesn't need to be because someone is fat, slow or stupid.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th July 2025 - 09:47 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.