IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Daylen
post Dec 13 2009, 05:39 PM
Post #1


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,424
Joined: 7-December 09
From: Freedonia
Member No.: 17,952



anyone ever come up with stats for the wonderful battle rifles like the m1 garand and the m14? or perhaps british empire double rifles that were used on dangerous game like the lion, cape buffalo or elephants?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jestercat
post Dec 13 2009, 10:36 PM
Post #2


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 51
Joined: 15-December 05
Member No.: 8,074



I know something similar to the british double rifles is in Arsenal. The M1 Garand is over 150 years old at this point and would be a museum piece. Ditto the m14, which while coming back in service now is still obsolete, and really has no place in SR4 outside a museum. Don't get me wrong, I especially love the M1 Garand, but this is 2070.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Chrysalis
post Dec 13 2009, 10:44 PM
Post #3


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,141
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Neverwhere
Member No.: 2,048



The book More Guns by BTRC had all the major past, present and future weapons modeled to Shadowrun 3 edition (or was it 2nd, I don't remember).

More than you need to know about boomsticks there.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Centy
post Dec 13 2009, 11:11 PM
Post #4


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: 29-July 09
Member No.: 17,441



QUOTE (Jestercat @ Dec 13 2009, 04:36 PM) *
I know something similar to the british double rifles is in Arsenal. The M1 Garand is over 150 years old at this point and would be a museum piece. Ditto the m14, which while coming back in service now is still obsolete, and really has no place in SR4 outside a museum. Don't get me wrong, I especially love the M1 Garand, but this is 2070.


Eh, my first inclination is to answer PCs requests with "Yes, but..." I'd certainly allow them to get ahold of one, but like you said, it's a museum piece and in SR ballistics research for a .30-06 cased ammo is going to raise a few eyebrows.

As to stats, I'd go with the Ruger 100 in the core. It's a semi auto sport rifle, which would be in the same vauge ballpark. The availability and price would have to be up to your discretion.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
EKBT81
post Dec 14 2009, 03:56 AM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 195
Joined: 7-July 08
From: Germany
Member No.: 16,124



QUOTE (Centy @ Dec 14 2009, 12:11 AM) *
Eh, my first inclination is to answer PCs requests with "Yes, but..." I'd certainly allow them to get ahold of one, but like you said, it's a museum piece and in SR ballistics research for a .30-06 cased ammo is going to raise a few eyebrows.

As to stats, I'd go with the Ruger 100 in the core. It's a semi auto sport rifle, which would be in the same vauge ballpark. The availability and price would have to be up to your discretion.


I think that's open to interpretation. IIRC SR4 only states that caseless ammo is more common. Old calibers die hard and isn't the .30-06 quite common in America as a hunting cartridge? I can easily imagine cased ammunition still being popular with parts of the hunting/sports shooting market, since I think loading your own ammo and experimenting with different charges and bullets would be easier than with caseless ammo. Maybe someone with more knowledge of firearms can comment on that, but wouldn't cased ammo also be preferable in break-action guns like those double rifles for sealing the breech?

The Ruger 100 might actually be a .30-06 rifle since SR doesn't mention calibers.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shrike30
post Dec 14 2009, 09:05 AM
Post #6


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,556
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle
Member No.: 98



If you're going to make a battle rifle, the best starting point I've found is the "rifle" configuration of the Steyr AUG-CSL; 7/-1, 20 round clip, and better range than an assault rifle. You can also spend 4 mod points to make it SA/FA, and burn up a whole magazine to do suppressive fire. It doesn't need to be a museum piece, either... carrying around a ShrikeTech CT "Hard Fall" in 8.2x47mm Caseless means you've got a cutting-edge weapon that, in a balls-out firefight, fits into essentially the same niche a 120 year old battle rifle would in 2070.

QUOTE
Don't get me wrong, I especially love the M1 Garand, but this is 2070.

The M1 Garand in particular I don't really see sticking around, but that's solely due to it having an obsolete and somewhat bizarre loading mechanism. The M1911 is coming up on its 100th birthday, and is still one of the most common designs of handgun made today. The one in my safe is from World War 1, still functions without issues, and I can buy ammo for it pretty much anywhere. There's a lot of small detail differences between what John Browning drew up in the early 1900s and what you can get built into a "racegun" 1911 now, but the basic working elements of the gun are the same.

The vast majority of Shadowrun's basic (i.e. non-Exotic) firearms are, in practical terms, identical to firearms you can buy today; once you get over the whole caseless ammo thing, the only ones that really stand out are the amphibious Water Carbine, the Ares Alpha's magic recoil-soaking chamber design, and the Thunderstruck rail gun. M14/AR-10/FAL/G3-type battle rifles all function pretty much the same way a 2070's M23 does... pick up the rifle, magazine goes in here, bolt cycles to load the round, bullet goes out the front, bolt cycles again, repeat ad emptium, ad reloadium, or add-more-bullets-to-'im. When people figure out that a particular cartridge/design/mechanism works, it sticks around.

The DSA-SA58C in my safe is a jet black carbine that's just a few years old. It's a muzzle-braked, rail-covered, foregripped and scoped monstrosity a buddy nicknamed the FrankenFAL, and most of the shooters I've met aren't able to guess what it started out as unless they spot the classic FAL carrying handle I just couldn't bear to remove. The bolt could be replaced with one from a half-century old Argentinian surplus rifle in about fifteen seconds. KelTec just started producing their RFB, which despite being a bullpup that spits the empties out the front end is still, in practical terms, the same type of rifle as the FAL that Saive and Vervier thought up 60 years ago; it can also share magazines with one. Bolt-action "sport rifles" exist in SR, and I'm willing to bet an awful lot of them have an action based on the late-1800s Mauser bolt, just like many built today.

The M4 and M16 rifles US troops carry today are descendants of the AR-15s that Stoner built over 50 years ago; some of the then-18-year-olds who carried them in Vietnam have grandchildren carrying the same basic rifle in Afghanistan. The M2HB and variants has been in use with the US military for about 75 years. The flintlock Land Pattern Musket was the standard issue rifle for the British Army for 116 years with the only significant modification being that they shortened the barrel a bit as time went on.

2070 is only about 60 years away. "No place outside a museum" just indicates a short attention span. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kliko
post Dec 14 2009, 12:26 PM
Post #7


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,817
Joined: 29-July 07
From: Delft, the Netherlands
Member No.: 12,403



Perhaps there is a link to Raygun's work somewhere? Looks pretty decent job to me (IMG:style_emoticons/default/love.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mercer
post Dec 14 2009, 12:36 PM
Post #8


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,326
Joined: 15-April 02
Member No.: 2,600



QUOTE
The M1 Garand is over 150 years old at this point and would be a museum piece.


Unless it's a replica. Muskets are even older but they still exist, mainly for things like reenactments. (Maybe the runners will be hired to kill someone at a WWII reenactment. Why not?) I statted out most of the WWII weapons in SR3 for my Shadowrun 1942 game, but I just kept them pretty close to the existing weapons in the book.

The weapon tables are by necessity pretty generic. I would just pick the closest one to what you are going for (the M1 I would treat as a Sport Rifle with an odd loading mechanism) and go with that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Medicineman
post Dec 14 2009, 01:43 PM
Post #9


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,748
Joined: 25-January 05
From: Good ol' Germany
Member No.: 7,015



the LeMat Revolver would be excelent for a Troll Char
http://home.hiwaay.net/~stargate/lemat.htm

HokaHey
Medicineman
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Daylen
post Dec 15 2009, 01:18 AM
Post #10


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,424
Joined: 7-December 09
From: Freedonia
Member No.: 17,952



musium only? shucks after coming up with how to do the m1 and m14 I looked at how to do a double rifle for large game; charging Elephants or trolls I'd like the same gun on the same premis 2 rounds better kill em. Unfortunetly it looked like SR3 did not have rules that would support such a rifle, at least in the custom rifle building section of cannon companion. So I was hopeing someone else though it would be a wonderful idea to have a short ranged rifle that can do base 14-16S with a fast followup round availible and found a way to do it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hero
post Dec 15 2009, 02:37 AM
Post #11


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 186
Joined: 30-January 03
From: Redlands, CA
Member No.: 3,996



QUOTE (Jestercat @ Dec 13 2009, 02:36 PM) *
I know something similar to the british double rifles is in Arsenal. The M1 Garand is over 150 years old at this point and would be a museum piece. Ditto the m14, which while coming back in service now is still obsolete, and really has no place in SR4 outside a museum. Don't get me wrong, I especially love the M1 Garand, but this is 2070.


Museum piece my ass, that thing still functions better then most rifles out there on the market today. The M1 and the M14 battle rifles form the bases for a good number of our sniper and designated marksman rifles, the SEALs still trust the M14 and they are damn picky about what they will use. The AK97 still looks and functions like its great great great great great grandfather did when it was conceived by a wounded officer, so is the AK97 not fit for the battlefield? The only draw back of the M14 is in automatic fire mode where it shoots all over the place, but nothing like heavy 7.62mm NATO to keep those slags hiding behind heavy cover. You would have to be a moron now and then to put off the M14 as a obsolete museum piece.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Daylen
post Dec 15 2009, 03:14 AM
Post #12


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,424
Joined: 7-December 09
From: Freedonia
Member No.: 17,952



who would WANT to fire a m14 in full auto? that is a big round and a light gun to do more than one at a time. I know my groups go from all in the black when I fire at a sane rate to barely on the paper when I fire close to full auto; and I have no barrel rise either (I love springfield muzzle brakes) it just jumps around a fair amount.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shrike30
post Dec 15 2009, 09:23 AM
Post #13


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,556
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle
Member No.: 98



Part of the problem with the M14 design is the amount of recoil... out of the "big 4" battle rifles (M14/FAL/G3/AR-10) only the G3 seems to kick harder, and I'm not sure why that is... might be layout, balance, weight distribution, or just the way the action works. But, as for who would want to fire it on full auto... there's a big difference between fighting at 100 yards and fighting inside a house.

In all honesty, the whole "is 5.56mm enough bullet for a combat weapon?" debate has been going on for decades, without conclusive evidence that it is, in fact, enough bullet. And that's before some humans goblinized into 10 foot tall, dermal-armored headstompers. I'm pretty sure battle rifles will still be in use in a lot of places.

And, again... if a player wants an M14, is it really such a big deal? It's a cinch to build a SA/FA, 20c, 7/-1 sport rifle... who cares if it's a modded AUG or an actual century-plus-old M14? On paper and with the dice, it'll be the same rifle.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
etherial
post Dec 15 2009, 02:19 PM
Post #14


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 266
Joined: 21-November 09
Member No.: 17,891



QUOTE (Shrike30 @ Dec 15 2009, 04:23 AM) *
And, again... if a player wants an M14, is it really such a big deal? It's a cinch to build a SA/FA, 20c, 7/-1 sport rifle... who cares if it's a modded AUG or an actual century-plus-old M14? On paper and with the dice, it'll be the same rifle.


Someone with Gremlins.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shrike30
post Dec 15 2009, 06:53 PM
Post #15


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,556
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle
Member No.: 98



I'm not sure the Gremlins care how old the rifle is (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Whipstitch
post Dec 15 2009, 06:56 PM
Post #16


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,883
Joined: 16-December 06
Member No.: 10,386



Yeah, it shouldn't really matter. Again, guns are a pretty stable technology at this point. Barring the addition of a smartlink, an AUG should be no more vulnerable to Gremlins than an M14. The book says Gremlins applies to "moderately sophisticated devices (late 20th century technology or later)," so you could make a case for an age cut off, but it'd be a pretty thin one considering that many old designs are still in service. By the same logic things like the F-4 Phantom II or Harriers would be immune. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/silly.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shrike30
post Dec 15 2009, 07:34 PM
Post #17


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,556
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle
Member No.: 98



Actually, by that wording, I'd probably allow most of the firearms in the book to avoid the problems with Gremlins. A smartgun link would make them susceptible to it, but something like a scoped, vented M23 with a foregrip on it is still pretty similar to weapons people were knocking together back in the early 1900s.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Whipstitch
post Dec 15 2009, 07:44 PM
Post #18


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,883
Joined: 16-December 06
Member No.: 10,386



Yeah, that was kind of my point.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ed_209a
post Dec 15 2009, 08:49 PM
Post #19


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 944
Joined: 19-February 03
Member No.: 4,128



Does anyone else remember the FN-HAR being a bigger hitter than the other assault rifles? I distinctly do, but I looked back through my stuff, and it has been just another assault rifle at least as far back as 2nd ed. Was it different in 1st ed?

I distinctly remember the FN-HAR being a repaint of the FN-FAL, just like the AK-97, the M-23 and Ingram Smartgun are repaints.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
explorator
post Dec 16 2009, 12:32 AM
Post #20


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 24
Joined: 21-August 09
Member No.: 17,528



In 1st ed we had the FN HAR and the AK97/98, and the stats were...pretty much the same. Same damage, and weight (FN HAR is like 1.5 times the size of the AK97). AK's were naked though, with no accessories and the FN HAR had laser sight and recoil2. FN HAR (1200) cost about about double the AK97(700). I guess that most people took them on that strength alone, because adding those same features to an AK97 would add 950 for a total of 1650. Ahhhhh the year 2050. Many 1st ed. players had strong character concepts even before the Street Samurai Catalog, so FN HAR's kind of became ubiquitous with many merc type characters.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shrike30
post Dec 16 2009, 01:05 AM
Post #21


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,556
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle
Member No.: 98



QUOTE (Whipstitch @ Dec 15 2009, 11:44 AM) *
Yeah, that was kind of my point.


I repeat things sometimes. Sorry 'bout that (IMG:style_emoticons/default/embarrassed.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Daddy's Litt...
post Dec 16 2009, 08:50 PM
Post #22


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 976
Joined: 16-September 04
From: Near my daughters, Lansdale PA
Member No.: 6,668



Raygun probably has some stuff. I think Snow_fox also has some early 20th centruy weapons done up. I can prod her to post here. As for old weapons in service, my husband and one brother do WW1 re-enactments and say people have working MG's and keep them in service with making/buying spare parts and not fully loading the mag's so they do not strain the springs.
For repo's I bet there are lots of movie props. The Brad Pitt WW2 film and band of Brothers have period weapons being fired and I doubt they are authentic MP40's.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shrike30
post Dec 17 2009, 07:30 AM
Post #23


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,556
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle
Member No.: 98



Why wouldn't they be authentic MP40s? That war was only about 60 years ago, and there were over a million MP40s made. Hollywood's been making movies about that war since the days when it was still going on... there's probably a pretty good stockpile of surplus weapons floating around in various armorers lockups just waiting for another war movie to get made.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Daddy's Litt...
post Dec 17 2009, 03:25 PM
Post #24


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 976
Joined: 16-September 04
From: Near my daughters, Lansdale PA
Member No.: 6,668



Do you want to risk Brad Pitt's face on metal fatigue on a nearly 70 year old weapon?
That and from my brother and husband I know they make repro machine gun weapons.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shrike30
post Dec 17 2009, 05:21 PM
Post #25


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,556
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle
Member No.: 98



QUOTE (Daddy's Little Ninja @ Dec 17 2009, 07:25 AM) *
Do you want to risk Brad Pitt's face on metal fatigue on a nearly 70 year old weapon?


Good point.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th May 2025 - 05:48 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.