IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Hand-E-Food
post Jul 20 2010, 05:04 AM
Post #26


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 104
Joined: 19-May 10
From: Melbourne, Australia
Member No.: 18,592



QUOTE (Doc Chase @ Jul 20 2010, 03:45 AM) *
Edited to amend. Can you kindly move on? You people are worse than my ex-wife. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)
QUOTE (Yerameyahu @ Jul 20 2010, 03:49 AM) *
I have an ex-wife. A smiley doesn't begin to compensate. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

Ha, StealthSigma, we'd see *lot* more Semi-Auto users!

I'm starting to think I should run from these boards before my lovely wife catches what your two had... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)

QUOTE (jimbo @ Jul 20 2010, 08:23 AM) *
How many of those in a combat round?

One free action each Initiative Pass. You could get in three per pass if you use your other actions to raspberry your pursuers from the back of a speeding vehicle.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wasabi
post Jul 20 2010, 11:56 AM
Post #27


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,251
Joined: 11-September 04
From: GA
Member No.: 6,651



Note that shotguns and heavy weapons like machineguns suffer -2 recoil penalty per point of UNCOMPENSATED recoil. So a machinegun modified to also fire BF firing a short burst would only require 2 pts of recoil compensation for its burst but if it had none it would be -4 to the shooting test.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BobChuck
post Jul 21 2010, 12:32 PM
Post #28


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 91
Joined: 6-July 10
Member No.: 18,795



Thank you fro the help. Distilled down, it seems to be:

Recoil Penalty = (Total Bullets Fired per Phase -1) - Recoil Compensation

where Recoil Penalty is doubled if using a Heavy Weapon, Shotgun, or other device so noted.

One final question: there is an optional rule somewhere in one of the splatbooks regarding strength and recoil, correct? where is this, and what does it do?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mäx
post Jul 21 2010, 12:58 PM
Post #29


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,803
Joined: 3-February 08
From: Finland
Member No.: 15,628



Arsenal page 163:
"A character with Strength of 6–9 has 1 point of recoil compensation, Strength 10–13 has 2 points, Strength 14–17 has 3 points, and Strength 18+ has 4 points."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BobChuck
post Jul 21 2010, 01:54 PM
Post #30


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 91
Joined: 6-July 10
Member No.: 18,795



awesome, thanks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Caadium
post Jul 21 2010, 06:35 PM
Post #31


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 604
Joined: 1-December 08
From: Sacramento, California
Member No.: 16,646



QUOTE (StealthSigma @ Jul 19 2010, 09:49 AM) *
Indeed, considering if recoil built up over a combat turn. Oh boy.

4 IPs....

Long/Short -5/-8
Long/Short -13/-15
Long/Short -20/-22
Long/Short -27/-29



QUOTE (Yerameyahu @ Jul 19 2010, 09:49 AM) *
Ha, StealthSigma, we'd see *lot* more Semi-Auto users!


Since using Combat Round instead of Initiative Pass is a house rule I use, I can tell you that I do see more Semi-auto and short burst. I also see a lot more normal weapons instead of every weapon every runner being tweaked for every bit of Recoil Compensation possible. I guess in my Shadowrun world there are a lot of elite, illeagal, unemployed gunsmiths; so be it.

However, as I've mentioned a number of times before, as part of the houserule, I do allow a character a chance to basically reset the recoil mid-round if they want. In my games, a take aim action has one of two affects: First is the one in the book (+1 dice pool), but the second overwrites the first. A take aim action removes all recoil previously earned in the round when someone takes a moment to take aim; but they do not get the +1 dice pool when this is used.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yerameyahu
post Jul 21 2010, 06:40 PM
Post #32


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



Krav Maga means I'd be okay with that, Caadium. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) Otherwise, that's a huge change to the SR setting. :/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Combat Mage
post Jul 21 2010, 06:42 PM
Post #33


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 419
Joined: 22-May 10
From: Germany
Member No.: 18,604



QUOTE (Caadium @ Jul 21 2010, 08:35 PM) *
Since using Combat Round instead of Initiative Pass is a house rule I use, I can tell you that I do see more Semi-auto and short burst. I also see a lot more normal weapons instead of every weapon every runner being tweaked for every bit of Recoil Compensation possible. I guess in my Shadowrun world there are a lot of elite, illeagal, unemployed gunsmiths; so be it.

However, as I've mentioned a number of times before, as part of the houserule, I do allow a character a chance to basically reset the recoil mid-round if they want. In my games, a take aim action has one of two affects: First is the one in the book (+1 dice pool), but the second overwrites the first. A take aim action removes all recoil previously earned in the round when someone takes a moment to take aim; but they do not get the +1 dice pool when this is used.


I suspect the Krav Maga quality that let's you take aim as a free action is pretty popular with your players? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Caadium
post Jul 21 2010, 06:54 PM
Post #34


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 604
Joined: 1-December 08
From: Sacramento, California
Member No.: 16,646



QUOTE (Combat Mage @ Jul 21 2010, 10:42 AM) *
I suspect the Krav Maga quality that let's you take aim as a free action is pretty popular with your players? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)


My players helped me come up with the rule over 10 years ago. Its a change even the very fast gun-bunny players like. It came from the simple idea that if a gun shoots x bullets in a 3 second period it recoils y amount. How come if the same gun shoots x times 3 or 4 bullets in the same 3 second period it doesn't recoil more, but instead recoils y amount a few times. I was the one that said we'd still reset it every round; some people thought we should just let it build till someone took a moment to re-aim.

I'm fortunate that I play with friends that don't feel a need to try to break the system at every opportunity. This means that sometimes they bring things to me before I even see it. So, to answer your question, no Krav Magra isn't taken at all for that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yerameyahu
post Jul 21 2010, 06:56 PM
Post #35


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



If your group likes it, great. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

Personally, the actual rules work fine. Automatic fire *is* awesome. Yes, it's insane if you worry about the logic (same gun firing faster if your reflexes are faster?). Oh well, that's SR. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Doc Chase
post Jul 21 2010, 06:58 PM
Post #36


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,179
Joined: 10-June 10
From: St. Louis, UCAS/CAS Border
Member No.: 18,688



QUOTE (Yerameyahu @ Jul 21 2010, 06:56 PM) *
Personally, the actual rules work fine. Automatic fire *is* awesome. Yes, it's insane if you worry about the logic (same gun firing faster if your reflexes are faster?). Oh well, that's SR. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)


That was the part that made me go 'there's no WAY it would reset every Initiative Pass; you're allowing fully automatic fire in the form of seamless seperate bursts!'
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yerameyahu
post Jul 21 2010, 07:06 PM
Post #37


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



You have to assume that all guns fire at least 40 rounds per 3 seconds to keep up with a Wires 3 person, yeah.

But, it's not like a burst from one pass carries over to the next. New burst, new target (even if it's the same person, you 'target' anew), new dice roll, after all.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Doc Chase
post Jul 21 2010, 07:09 PM
Post #38


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,179
Joined: 10-June 10
From: St. Louis, UCAS/CAS Border
Member No.: 18,688



Eh. An MP5K is capable of 15 rounds a second so it's doable, but all those gases have to go somewhere.

(And yes I know 'out the barrel' is somewhere) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yerameyahu
post Jul 21 2010, 07:12 PM
Post #39


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



Yeah, definitely doable, but it's just funny that Wires cause time compression (except for movement speed, thank god). But, this isn't a new observation. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Doc Chase
post Jul 21 2010, 07:13 PM
Post #40


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,179
Joined: 10-June 10
From: St. Louis, UCAS/CAS Border
Member No.: 18,688



QUOTE (Yerameyahu @ Jul 21 2010, 08:12 PM) *
Yeah, definitely doable, but it's just funny that Wires cause time compression (except for movement speed, thank god). But, this isn't a new observation. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)


I'll still shake my fist about it. Wired Reflexes should make Bullet Time, not Time Dilation. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)

(Oh that's right another Max Payne is coming out more bullet time hooray)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Jul 22 2010, 02:39 AM
Post #41


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (Yerameyahu @ Jul 21 2010, 01:06 PM) *
You have to assume that all guns fire at least 40 rounds per 3 seconds to keep up with a Wires 3 person, yeah.

But, it's not like a burst from one pass carries over to the next. New burst, new target (even if it's the same person, you 'target' anew), new dice roll, after all.


Lets see... 600 rounds/Minute... equates out to 10 Rounds/Second whcih equals 30 rounds/IP... not to shabby... pretty close to your 40 ROunds (Cyclic rate for an Assault Rifles varies from 500 - 800 Rounds per minute; so an average of 25 Rounds per IP to 40 Rounds per IP)...

Seems workable to me... with no actual assumptions needed, as the published cyclical rate for Assault Rifles falls into the range that you are looking for for a Wires 3 Person.

Just Sayin'
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yerameyahu
post Jul 22 2010, 02:53 AM
Post #42


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



Yeah, like Doc Chase said, it's not unreasonable. It's just amusing that someone without Wires fires their gun slower… even though they're both just holding down the trigger for 3 seconds. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Jul 22 2010, 02:56 AM
Post #43


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (Yerameyahu @ Jul 21 2010, 08:53 PM) *
Yeah, like Doc Chase said, it's not unreasonable. It's just amusing that someone without Wires fires their gun slower… even though they're both just holding down the trigger for 3 seconds. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)


Believe me, having witnessed some very interesting individuals in the Marine Corps (who had difficulty in just learning the basics of weapon techniques without hurting themselves, let alone any advanced techniques), I would have to say that nothing would ever surprise me about People and Firearms... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mäx
post Jul 22 2010, 06:41 AM
Post #44


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,803
Joined: 3-February 08
From: Finland
Member No.: 15,628



QUOTE (Yerameyahu @ Jul 22 2010, 04:53 AM) *
Yeah, like Doc Chase said, it's not unreasonable. It's just amusing that someone without Wires fires their gun slower… even though they're both just holding down the trigger for 3 seconds. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

It all about how it takes for them to aim, the wired guy can do that much faster, after all your not just pulling the rigger and shooting wildly.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yerameyahu
post Jul 22 2010, 12:38 PM
Post #45


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



No, I meant after the trigger is pulled back, when there's no more aiming and it's just a mechanical process. It's just a curiosity, don't worry about it. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dakka Dakka
post Jul 22 2010, 03:43 PM
Post #46


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,507
Joined: 11-November 08
Member No.: 16,582



QUOTE (Yerameyahu @ Jul 22 2010, 02:38 PM) *
No, I meant after the trigger is pulled back, when there's no more aiming and it's just a mechanical process. It's just a curiosity, don't worry about it. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
I can't find any section in the BBB denoting how much of the simple action is aligning the weapon with the target and how much time is spent actually putting rounds down range. The 3, 6 or 10 rounds IMHO always take the same time, no matter how wired the shooter is. It just takes longer for the unaugmented one to get to pulling the trigger.

@Shotgun Recoil: Note that by RAW only uncompensated recoil in Burst Fire Mode is doubled. FA Shotguns FTW (IMG:style_emoticons/default/silly.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Draco18s
post Jul 22 2010, 04:14 PM
Post #47


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,289
Joined: 2-October 08
Member No.: 16,392



QUOTE (Yerameyahu @ Jul 22 2010, 07:38 AM) *
No, I meant after the trigger is pulled back, when there's no more aiming and it's just a mechanical process. It's just a curiosity, don't worry about it. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)


Compare suppressive fire between an unaugmented character and a wired 3.

Suppressive fire really is "just holding down the trigger."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
biccat
post Jul 22 2010, 04:43 PM
Post #48


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 42
Joined: 29-August 02
Member No.: 3,195



Just so we're clear:

Ingram Smartgun X (without folding stock) has BF/FA and 2 recoil compensation.

1st IP:

As a simple action, Character fires a short burst (3 bullets) at a target and suffers -2 recoil (3 bullets - 1). Recoil compensation takes care of it, no penalties.

As his second simple action, Character fires another short burst (+3 bullets) at a target. Because that is 6 bullets this pass, he suffers a -5 (6 - 1) recoil. Recoil compensation takes care of 2, character suffers -3 dice to his Agility + Automatics skill test.

2nd IP:

Same as the first.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Caadium
post Jul 22 2010, 07:44 PM
Post #49


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 604
Joined: 1-December 08
From: Sacramento, California
Member No.: 16,646



QUOTE (biccat @ Jul 22 2010, 08:43 AM) *
Just so we're clear:

Ingram Smartgun X (without folding stock) has BF/FA and 2 recoil compensation.

1st IP:

As a simple action, Character fires a short burst (3 bullets) at a target and suffers -2 recoil (3 bullets - 1). Recoil compensation takes care of it, no penalties.

As his second simple action, Character fires another short burst (+3 bullets) at a target. Because that is 6 bullets this pass, he suffers a -5 (6 - 1) recoil. Recoil compensation takes care of 2, character suffers -3 dice to his Agility + Automatics skill test.

2nd IP:

Same as the first.


Seems like you are in fact clear.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yerameyahu
post Jul 22 2010, 07:58 PM
Post #50


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



See, Draco18s, that's just illustrating the 'problem' (which, as I said, is just a curiosity that I've seen mentioned more than once). (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

Yes, biccat.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th May 2025 - 10:17 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.