IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

9 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 7 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Karoline
post Oct 10 2010, 06:14 PM
Post #101


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,679
Joined: 19-September 09
Member No.: 17,652



QUOTE (Irion @ Oct 10 2010, 10:40 AM) *
@Karoline

I did not understand it like that. First off all, I dislike the idea of using manastatic to compensate voids.
Second as far as I understand it, domains just have "charged" mana. It is harder to use.
Third of all, it does not make sense to me. Why should more mana in itself be a problem for the mage casting the spell and less mana too? In the same way?
If less mana would have meant weaker spells and more mana would have lead to side effects, ok. But this way?

Alright, this was bound to be missunderstood. I just wanted to give one example for BC. I did not want to purport, that it would be enough for the hole building.

QUOTE
In mana ebbs and voids, this represents the scarcity of available
mana, making it more difficult to work magic. Though mana is
readily available in domains and mana warps, the intensity of
so much focused mana works against the magician in a similar
way, tainting any attempts to use magic

So yeah, the two would cancel each other out. This is exactly how they create usable mana areas in outer space, they cancel out some of the negative void with positive things (living things like plants and people mostly).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dakka Dakka
post Oct 10 2010, 09:22 PM
Post #102


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,507
Joined: 11-November 08
Member No.: 16,582



QUOTE (Irion @ Oct 10 2010, 05:40 PM) *
I was getting it from the explanations about space and magic and how to support magic in space. (If having plants makes it possible to cast spell in space, then having no plants on earth is going to make it harder. )
Well in space there is a lot more nothingness than in a city. I assume it is more than twelve times as much.

QUOTE (Irion @ Oct 10 2010, 05:40 PM) *
Was not the point, that it is "stupid" to play a non-awakend character?
I never made that point.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mordinvan
post Oct 10 2010, 09:32 PM
Post #103


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,444
Joined: 18-April 08
Member No.: 15,912



QUOTE (Irion @ Oct 10 2010, 04:19 AM) *
Well, I do not care to distinguish between + 1 and -1.
Every City is about -1 to -2, due to "lack of trees".

On the other hand, said prison would rank between 2 and 4.
So actually (if you use the mechanics given in streetmagic) every officebuilding would have a BC of +1. And since they do not cancel each other out you could easy argue for an effectiv BC from 2-3 to be standard.

No, since concentration camps where tens of thousands of people died are at a 3.....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tagz
post Oct 10 2010, 09:45 PM
Post #104


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 492
Joined: 28-July 09
Member No.: 17,440



QUOTE (Mordinvan @ Oct 10 2010, 09:32 PM) *
No, since concentration camps where tens of thousands of people died are at a 3.....

I think you're low-balling a bit. According to the sidebar that's more like a 5, 6 for the worst ones such as Auschwitz. I wouldn't think a death camp where thousands died would be less then 4.

Rating 3:
These domains are created by a significant event in the recent past (usually within the last century). The event may be long over, but the area still reflects the event in some way. Examples include the site of a major battle or the ruined land from an environmental accident. An important cathedral or monastery where a great spiritual event occurred also qualifies.

Rating 6:
These domains were created by historic events of epic scope that have significance to most of humanity. The blast sites of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are Rating 6 domains, as is the former Nazi death camp of Auschwitz and the Native American "Re-Education Center" at Abilene.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mordinvan
post Oct 10 2010, 10:08 PM
Post #105


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,444
Joined: 18-April 08
Member No.: 15,912



QUOTE (tagz @ Oct 10 2010, 02:45 PM) *
I think you're low-balling a bit. According to the sidebar that's more like a 5, 6 for the worst ones such as Auschwitz. I wouldn't think a death camp where thousands died would be less then 4.

Rating 3:
These domains are created by a significant event in the recent past (usually within the last century). The event may be long over, but the area still reflects the event in some way. Examples include the site of a major battle or the ruined land from an environmental accident. An important cathedral or monastery where a great spiritual event occurred also qualifies.

Rating 6:
These domains were created by historic events of epic scope that have significance to most of humanity. The blast sites of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are Rating 6 domains, as is the former Nazi death camp of Auschwitz and the Native American "Re-Education Center" at Abilene.


Sorry, my bad.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Karoline
post Oct 11 2010, 02:17 AM
Post #106


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,679
Joined: 19-September 09
Member No.: 17,652



QUOTE (Mordinvan @ Oct 10 2010, 06:08 PM) *
Sorry, my bad.

Still, there is a good point to be made from that. There are maybe... what, a dozen places in the world that would qualify for this level of BC? Based on that criteria anyway, there are more based on 'natural' ebb and flow, and various other things. If that's the case, I hardly think the 3-4 suggested earlier for a hospital seems reasonable. A normal hospital generates almost as much disturbance as things that were among the greatest (Big, not good) events in the last century?

It puts a bit of perspective on things.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sephiroth
post Oct 11 2010, 02:35 AM
Post #107


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,147
Joined: 2-May 10
Member No.: 18,539



Would Cherry Creek Lake near Denver, where Dunkelzahn's 12-hour interview by Holly Brighton took place, qualify as a Rating 6 BC, then? Or Mt. Fuji, where Ryumyo Awakened and officially started the Awakening?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Karoline
post Oct 11 2010, 02:42 AM
Post #108


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,679
Joined: 19-September 09
Member No.: 17,652



QUOTE (Sephiroth @ Oct 10 2010, 10:35 PM) *
Would Cherry Creek Lake near Denver, where Dunkelzahn's 12-hour interview by Holly Brighton took place, qualify as a Rating 6 BC, then?

I doubt it. While it was a fairly big event, I don't think it was of the same.... type as the others. It was big/important and perhaps even world changing, but I don't think it had the kind of emotional content required for a BC. Actually, because of the lower level of emotion, I wouldn't think it would even be a BC 1.

I think another contributing factor to this is the fact that not all that many people were actually at the lake. Most people who were highly emotional (Angry, happy, whatever) were sitting in their homes watching TV. Now, maybe if you had all the people who were mad at his apointment in a single place at a single time while watching that interview, you would likely get a BC of 2 or so (like the rock concert), but it wouldn't last past that time at all.

Edit: My SR history isn't the best, but night of rage was a specific spot right? I'd imagine that would be an exceptionally high BC. Likely 5. World Trade Centers would likely be a 4.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dahrken
post Oct 11 2010, 05:04 AM
Post #109


Moving Target
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 583
Joined: 1-October 09
From: France
Member No.: 17,693



QUOTE (Karoline @ Oct 11 2010, 04:17 AM) *
If that's the case, I hardly think the 3-4 suggested earlier for a hospital seems reasonable.

An hosptital is continuously generating an emotional load, that's why the background count stay high, it is replenished. If the hospital stopped it's activity the BG count would probably drop back to normal in no more than a few years, while the exemples given can persist for a century or even longer.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kzt
post Oct 11 2010, 05:34 AM
Post #110


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,537
Joined: 27-August 06
From: Albuquerque NM
Member No.: 9,234



QUOTE (Karoline @ Oct 10 2010, 08:17 PM) *
Still, there is a good point to be made from that. There are maybe... what, a dozen places in the world that would qualify for this level of BC? Based on that criteria anyway, there are more based on 'natural' ebb and flow, and various other things. If that's the case, I hardly think the 3-4 suggested earlier for a hospital seems reasonable. A normal hospital generates almost as much disturbance as things that were among the greatest (Big, not good) events in the last century?

It puts a bit of perspective on things.

I think 6 way too low.

The 3 major Reynhard action camps - Treblinka II, Sobibor, Belzec. Auschwitz. Basement of the Lubyanka, Katyn Forest, Solovetsk Special Camp, The Danube-Black Sea Canal, Kolyma camp, the Vorkuta Gulag death camps, Choeung Ek and S-21, ....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Karoline
post Oct 11 2010, 01:14 PM
Post #111


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,679
Joined: 19-September 09
Member No.: 17,652



Yeah, I have no idea what any of those are.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Doc Chase
post Oct 11 2010, 01:31 PM
Post #112


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,179
Joined: 10-June 10
From: St. Louis, UCAS/CAS Border
Member No.: 18,688



QUOTE (Karoline @ Oct 11 2010, 01:14 PM) *
Yeah, I have no idea what any of those are.


Various concentration/death camps where thousands upon thousands met their end. Spill enough blood in one place and the ground's going to become (un)hallowed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Karoline
post Oct 11 2010, 01:45 PM
Post #113


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,679
Joined: 19-September 09
Member No.: 17,652



Right, I kind of guessed that much at least, but it lacks a point. I don't see how 'list of deathcamps' is linked to '6 is way too low'. It requires some form of argument. Without that, all I can say is that those others are likely 5s.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Doc Chase
post Oct 11 2010, 02:02 PM
Post #114


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,179
Joined: 10-June 10
From: St. Louis, UCAS/CAS Border
Member No.: 18,688



QUOTE (Karoline @ Oct 11 2010, 01:45 PM) *
Right, I kind of guessed that much at least, but it lacks a point. I don't see how 'list of deathcamps' is linked to '6 is way too low'. It requires some form of argument. Without that, all I can say is that those others are likely 5s.


I don't think you're actually reading what's being put down, then.

You have a list of concentrated areas where literally thousands of people died in pain, misery and in many cases, pants-wetting fear. If a normal hospital rates a four at most, then these places - that are meant for nothing but death - would rank high above that.

Do you see the point now?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KarmaInferno
post Oct 11 2010, 02:12 PM
Post #115


Old Man Jones
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,415
Joined: 26-February 02
From: New York
Member No.: 1,699



Shadowrun ratings tend to scale up rapidly past rating 4, at least in descriptive effect. It's not linear.

Remember, a 4 in most things is "above average", where a 6 is "among the best or worst in the world".

Which, incidentally, would make ratings 7+ all that more "extreme".



-k
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Karoline
post Oct 11 2010, 02:16 PM
Post #116


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,679
Joined: 19-September 09
Member No.: 17,652



Not really, because I said that a hospital shouldn't rate a 4 because that is too high. They should be a 2 or maybe a 3 at most. The person who said they should be 4 was throwing out a rating 2-3 for an office building just because it is an office building. Besides, it seems to be kind of logarithmic about what is required to go from one rating to another.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Doc Chase
post Oct 11 2010, 02:44 PM
Post #117


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,179
Joined: 10-June 10
From: St. Louis, UCAS/CAS Border
Member No.: 18,688



QUOTE (Karoline @ Oct 11 2010, 03:16 PM) *
Not really, because I said that a hospital shouldn't rate a 4 because that is too high. They should be a 2 or maybe a 3 at most. The person who said they should be 4 was throwing out a rating 2-3 for an office building just because it is an office building. Besides, it seems to be kind of logarithmic about what is required to go from one rating to another.


Not much point in continuing, then.

@KarmaInferno - That's why I'm figuring the death camps and locations listed would have lasting 6's or 7's because of the sheer naughtiness that happened there.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sabs
post Oct 11 2010, 02:48 PM
Post #118


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,996
Joined: 1-June 10
Member No.: 18,649



If office buildings have 2-3 BC.. how do WageMages ever work?
Most of them don't have 8 Magic and Sorcery 6. They're modest Magic 3, sorcery 2-3 guys.

If an office building had a 3 BC, they basically would not be able to cast anything but the most minor of spells.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KarmaInferno
post Oct 11 2010, 02:52 PM
Post #119


Old Man Jones
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,415
Joined: 26-February 02
From: New York
Member No.: 1,699



The vast majority of office buildings shouldn't even register a change in background count. Even in the Shadowrun universe.

Perhaps a particularly draconian and oppressive office might score a 1. It should underscore just how bad a workplace it is, to even have that 1.




-k
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neraph
post Oct 11 2010, 03:05 PM
Post #120


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,542
Joined: 30-September 08
From: D/FW Megaplex
Member No.: 16,387



QUOTE (Doc Chase @ Oct 11 2010, 09:44 AM) *
Not much point in continuing, then.

@KarmaInferno - That's why I'm figuring the death camps and locations listed would have lasting 6's or 7's because of the sheer naughtiness that happened there.

R6, Aspected for Nazi-mages.

EDIT: If it were R7, it'd be a mana warp and be destructive to all magic in the area.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tagz
post Oct 11 2010, 10:41 PM
Post #121


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 492
Joined: 28-July 09
Member No.: 17,440



QUOTE (sabs @ Oct 11 2010, 02:48 PM) *
If office buildings have 2-3 BC.. how do WageMages ever work?
Most of them don't have 8 Magic and Sorcery 6. They're modest Magic 3, sorcery 2-3 guys.

If an office building had a 3 BC, they basically would not be able to cast anything but the most minor of spells.

Not that I'm arguing for an office to have 3 BC, that's silly, but magic aspect is a consideration of corporations. If they intend to use a wagemage they'll likely invest a little in making the area aspected, or brought back to nominal levels. Domains are easier to manipulate then ebbs/voids/warps/surges/storms.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KarmaInferno
post Oct 12 2010, 02:36 AM
Post #122


Old Man Jones
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,415
Joined: 26-February 02
From: New York
Member No.: 1,699



Well, on the other hand...

I recently played a mission where we ran into an office surrounded by a Background Count that kept getting worse as we got closer, up to like rating 4 right next to the building. Some seriously bad mojo was going on there.

But as soon as we actually got INTO the building, the background count vanished.

They had initiate mages with Cleansing on duty inside, you see.



-k
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cheops
post Oct 12 2010, 03:41 AM
Post #123


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,512
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 392



QUOTE (sabs @ Oct 11 2010, 03:48 PM) *
If office buildings have 2-3 BC.. how do WageMages ever work?
Most of them don't have 8 Magic and Sorcery 6. They're modest Magic 3, sorcery 2-3 guys.

If an office building had a 3 BC, they basically would not be able to cast anything but the most minor of spells.


Wuxing does exactly this with their buildings. Then they have their feng shui master come in and aspect the geomancy to the tradition of their wagemages. Now your Magic 3 wagemage is suddenly magic 6. This is why I don't like using background counts -- because now the team is suddenly facing Force 12 stunballs.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neraph
post Oct 12 2010, 04:09 AM
Post #124


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,542
Joined: 30-September 08
From: D/FW Megaplex
Member No.: 16,387



QUOTE (Cheops @ Oct 11 2010, 09:41 PM) *
Wuxing does exactly this with their buildings. Then they have their feng shui master come in and aspect the geomancy to the tradition of their wagemages. Now your Magic 3 wagemage is suddenly magic 6. This is why I don't like using background counts -- because now the team is suddenly facing Force 12 stunballs.

Wrong. He gets +3 Dicepool bonus for using Magic and +3 Dicepool for Drain, not +3 Magic. So he'd still only be able to overcast to 6, but it'd be way, way easier for him to do.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jakephillips
post Oct 13 2010, 01:47 AM
Post #125


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 172
Joined: 26-July 10
Member No.: 18,852



QUOTE (Neraph @ Oct 11 2010, 11:09 PM) *
Wrong. He gets +3 Dicepool bonus for using Magic and +3 Dicepool for Drain, not +3 Magic. So he'd still only be able to overcast to 6, but it'd be way, way easier for him to do.

yes sir you are correct!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

9 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 6th June 2025 - 12:02 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.