IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> HMHVV and Vampires
Gothic Rose
post Nov 16 2005, 01:07 AM
Post #26


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 355
Joined: 3-October 05
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Member No.: 7,803



QUOTE (Squinky)
....or a Sammy with platelet factory and BoneDensity 4....

In which case, you do your damndest to kill him, and have someone rip out all of those juicy chunks of nuyen...er...I mean, flesh-substitute.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FrankTrollman
post Nov 16 2005, 01:18 AM
Post #27


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Banned
Posts: 3,732
Joined: 1-September 05
From: Prague, Czech Republic
Member No.: 7,665



Of course, if someone regenerates, that doesn't necessarily mean that the only rational choice is to kill them with extreme violence. They could, for example, be a shapeshifting eagle or something.

But it does mean that they aren't human. So you can put a shaped charge on their backpack and say "Look, I need you to level with me... you aren't human are you?" And if they lie, or admit to being a vampire, or try to bite you, you blow them up. And then if they come up with something really weird like "I was actually born as a badger, I've only recently tried to pass myself off as a human." then you get a really weird look on your face and harrumph "Well, alright then." (and try to get your shaped charge back before he notices it).

Vampires are homocidal and dangerous to have around. Even if they never tap their evil powers once, they still have to kill about 2 people a year. And every time the pop somebody, there's a chance for more vampire attacks. It can go crazy really fast. A responsible person whois at all concerned about humanity as a whole has really no ethical choice but to kill all vampires. Even Insect Spirits and Toxic Shamans can be negotiated with, Vampires have a biological need to slaughter humans at an unacceptable rate.

Even if they agree to only prey upon bad people, it's still totally unacceptable, because then new vampires will be created who are templated on bad people. It's lose/lose no matter how you look at it.

-Frank
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Drace
post Nov 16 2005, 01:29 AM
Post #28


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 504
Joined: 8-November 05
From: North Vancouver, BC
Member No.: 7,936



Actually in SR, vamps can restrain their hunger, well more so than other meta-HMHVV-types, and like the book says, some only take off wiling subjects. So in fact they aren't homicidal maniacs, and actually I remember an old mission book made by FASA that had vamps in it, cant remember the name though

what need killing are the wendigos and Dzoo-noo-quas, those creepers have issues, they have to eat the flesh of people they kill, not take a bit of blood from people who live in the end.

And also, if anything that regens is hit and the damage is to the spine or head (say a grenade hits them, or any explosion really) they don't regenerate. And if they did right infront of you, I doubt they would let you come up to them and talk to them, plus they would notice the shaped explosive that would be put on them, so that probably wouldnt work.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Drac
post Nov 16 2005, 04:49 AM
Post #29


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 46
Joined: 6-October 05
From: Toronto
Member No.: 7,819



Yep, Shadowrun vamps are some of the relatively "nicest" in any Rpg around. They can suvive without killing at all. (btw what the hell is wrong with killing? this is Shadowrun!)

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blakkie
post Nov 16 2005, 05:52 AM
Post #30


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,718
Joined: 14-September 02
Member No.: 3,263



QUOTE (FrankTrollman @ Nov 15 2005, 07:18 PM)
Of course, if someone regenerates, that doesn't necessarily mean that the only rational choice is to kill them with extreme violence. They could, for example, be a shapeshifting eagle or something.

That kinda depends on the POV of the person choosing? Say someone interested in collecting bounties? :D
QUOTE
What evidence do we have that Vampires have any powers that are not magic driven? They can dismantle themselves at will into a fricking gas, and reassemble themselves at will. Just the fact that they have a shape is a magical effect.

You are really on top of your game today i see.

Mist Form is specifically described as a magical effect that converts the vamp into the mist form. A bit more of an extreme state change than say Shapechange or Turn to Goo and would require an additional Poltergiest/Levitate type effect for the locomontion. But not much outside the realm metahuman magic.

Further, Regeneration power (which is also magical in nature, note that the Magic attribute is used directly in it's mechanism) is halted from functioning when the vamp is exposed to an allergen. What happens when a vamp in Mist Form is exposed to an allergen? That's right the magic stops working and it returns to it's -whole- form. Odd that something that would generally disturb the magical effects would actually have one take stronger effect?

Of course it could be that the vampire is a collective of "germs" only held together by some magic force. It also could be that the earth is hollow with opennings at both poles, there is an entire civilization on the inside surface, and that the New World Order of the Scion has covered this up by having all obital photos doctored. But, you know, we might check out slightly more mundane explainations first before proclaiming things like vamps having a shape at all is a magical effect.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Oracle
post Nov 16 2005, 06:35 AM
Post #31


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 934
Joined: 26-August 05
From: Earth - Europe - AGS - Norddeutscher Bund - Hannover
Member No.: 7,624



[OFFTOPIC]Hey, the Hollow Earth theory has never been proven wrong! :D [/OFFTOPIC]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gothic Rose
post Nov 16 2005, 09:38 AM
Post #32


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 355
Joined: 3-October 05
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Member No.: 7,803



QUOTE (FrankTrollman)
Of course, if someone regenerates, that doesn't necessarily mean that the only rational choice is to kill them with extreme violence. They could, for example, be a shapeshifting eagle or something.

But it does mean that they aren't human. So you can put a shaped charge on their backpack and say "Look, I need you to level with me... you aren't human are you?" And if they lie, or admit to being a vampire, or try to bite you, you blow them up. And then if they come up with something really weird like "I was actually born as a badger, I've only recently tried to pass myself off as a human." then you get a really weird look on your face and harrumph "Well, alright then." (and try to get your shaped charge back before he notices it).

Vampires are homocidal and dangerous to have around. Even if they never tap their evil powers once, they still have to kill about 2 people a year. And every time the pop somebody, there's a chance for more vampire attacks. It can go crazy really fast. A responsible person whois at all concerned about humanity as a whole has really no ethical choice but to kill all vampires. Even Insect Spirits and Toxic Shamans can be negotiated with, Vampires have a biological need to slaughter humans at an unacceptable rate.

Even if they agree to only prey upon bad people, it's still totally unacceptable, because then new vampires will be created who are templated on bad people. It's lose/lose no matter how you look at it.

-Frank

So, Frank, should I take it you think the same of Krieger Infected Ghouls? After all, they have to eat 1% of their bodyweight in metahuman flesh every week (So basically, a Trollburger, maybe with a side of Elfries). This translates to about three and a half people a year.

And they can transmit the virus easier than vampires can - one bite or scratch is really all that's necessary, and the living person may become a ghoul.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Oracle
post Nov 16 2005, 09:48 AM
Post #33


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 934
Joined: 26-August 05
From: Earth - Europe - AGS - Norddeutscher Bund - Hannover
Member No.: 7,624



That's why I always voted for the extinction of all ghouls.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Grinder
post Nov 16 2005, 11:29 AM
Post #34


Great, I'm a Dragon...
*********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 6,699
Joined: 8-October 03
From: North Germany
Member No.: 5,698



Don't forget the bounty.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FrankTrollman
post Nov 16 2005, 05:01 PM
Post #35


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Banned
Posts: 3,732
Joined: 1-September 05
From: Prague, Czech Republic
Member No.: 7,665



QUOTE (Gothic Rose)
So, Frank, should I take it you think the same of Krieger Infected Ghouls? After all, they have to eat 1% of their bodyweight in metahuman flesh every week (So basically, a Trollburger, maybe with a side of Elfries). This translates to about three and a half people a year.

No, I think nothing of the sort for Ghouls. A Ghoul has no need for live flesh, and apparently according to some sourcebooks can eat cloned metahuman flesh as long as it's metahuman flesh.

Which means that Ghouls are not inherently in competition with humans at all. Humans die all the time. And since this isn't D&D, their bodies are useless once they are dead. Less than useless actually, because they are vulnerable to Shedim attack. As long as the Ghoul population is low, they are actually advantageous to have around if humanity would just swallow its pride and its desire to display human corpses in glass cases.

Human bodies in Shadowrun are a threat, so much so that failing to incinerate or consume a corpse is flat irresponsible. Ghouls up to the natural death rate could be sustained at a net benefit to the economy and civil safety. Ghouls beyond the natural death rate put a strain on our cloning facilities and are thus an economic drain like the handicapped.

---

So in a well managed wellfare state, vampires die, ghouls live.

-Frank
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blakkie
post Nov 16 2005, 05:20 PM
Post #36


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,718
Joined: 14-September 02
Member No.: 3,263



Previously not all ghoul tranformation resulted in, what Sir Topham Hatt would call in your senario, "really useful ghouls". Oddly enough that could be part of the nitch for a small number of, er, co-operative Vampires to exist in your [somewhat chilling] vision of a managed state. The gap, if it exists, between the lower boundry of Sapience and the lower boundry of being a "really useful ghoul".
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Xenith
post Nov 16 2005, 10:24 PM
Post #37


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 399
Joined: 27-May 04
Member No.: 6,361



I, personally, always envisioned SR vampires as alive. Altered on a basic level, but alive. Not only alive, but basically the exact same person as before with very very different instincts. Makes them more interesting than the classic "undead" creatures. The writers do not seem to take an easy out. Hell, even in other systems, vampires can still be "good" people. Both World of Darkness settings have that.

As for the homicidal maniacs, thats one extreme and not the whole picture. You go from an omnivorous being who has no base instinct to kill others of its kind (normally) to a new creature with all the urges and instincts of a wild, literally bloodthirsty predator. Lets not forget that to both the victim and the vampire the drinking of blood/essence feels real good. While a person of high moral standards and good willpower could likely stay more or less similar to how he was before, rather few of the people turned to vampires likely have this resolve.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Nov 16 2005, 11:32 PM
Post #38


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



Vampires and the like don't have to kill that many people. Reasonably, an average shadowrunner will kill more people in the course of an average job than a vampire will have to eat in a month.

A vampire wetwork specialist can get his fill without causing any net harm. As for the potential of the victims comming back as vampires, just leave them with a tenth a point of essence and cap them in the head.

Leave them with a tenth a point of essence
and cap them in the head

[Repeat to the turn of The Saints Go Marching In]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jaid
post Nov 16 2005, 11:42 PM
Post #39


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,089
Joined: 4-October 05
Member No.: 7,813



for that matter, vampires don't even have to actually kill anyone, iirc. they could just drain 1 point of essence from a lot of different people.

furthermore, you could use vampires to hunt other HMHVV infected critters that are causing problems =P

in fact, considering i've seen a houserule (caused by the essence hole/replacing cyberware situation) that essence come back, slowly, in any campaign with that rule vampires don't even cause permanent harm (ermmm... well, not necessarily at least).

however, that being said, i believe that in general vampires should probably be killed, as many of them probably aren't the kind of people you want to have around.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RunnerPaul
post Nov 17 2005, 01:29 AM
Post #40


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,086
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 364



QUOTE (hyzmarca)
Reasonably, an average shadowrunner will kill more people in the course of an average job than a vampire will have to eat in a month.

I don't know what kinds of jobs your runners take, but for a lot of shadowruns, the only "reasonable" bodycount is zero.

Just sayin'.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jaid
post Nov 17 2005, 11:44 PM
Post #41


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,089
Joined: 4-October 05
Member No.: 7,813



yes, well that assumes a run goes perfectly, pretty much.

like that's gonna happen all the time...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Drac
post Nov 18 2005, 01:37 AM
Post #42


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 46
Joined: 6-October 05
From: Toronto
Member No.: 7,819



It's not a real Shadowrun until somebody dies.

Just sayin'.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RunnerPaul
post Nov 18 2005, 05:03 AM
Post #43


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,086
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 364



Note I never said any shadowruns ever turned out reasonable.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Nov 18 2005, 05:58 AM
Post #44


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



For some shadowrunners, it is reasonable to level an entire city dlock in downtown Seatle killing hundreds. It all averages out.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Grinder
post Nov 19 2005, 11:42 AM
Post #45


Great, I'm a Dragon...
*********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 6,699
Joined: 8-October 03
From: North Germany
Member No.: 5,698



QUOTE (Gothic Rose)
So, Frank, should I take it you think the same of Krieger Infected Ghouls?  After all, they have to eat 1% of their bodyweight in metahuman flesh every week (So basically, a Trollburger, maybe with a side of Elfries). 

SR4 changed it a little bit, saying a Ghoul has
QUOTE (SR4 p.292)
... feed on the
necrotized flesh of metahumans along with that of other animals.


So they are no longer solely depending on killing metahumans or finding dead ones. They can easily live off animal flesh.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blakkie
post Nov 19 2005, 04:05 PM
Post #46


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,718
Joined: 14-September 02
Member No.: 3,263



"I wouldn't call it living...call it surviving."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gothic Rose
post Nov 19 2005, 05:06 PM
Post #47


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 355
Joined: 3-October 05
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Member No.: 7,803



QUOTE (Grinder)
QUOTE (Gothic Rose)
So, Frank, should I take it you think the same of Krieger Infected Ghouls?  After all, they have to eat 1% of their bodyweight in metahuman flesh every week (So basically, a Trollburger, maybe with a side of Elfries). 

SR4 changed it a little bit, saying a Ghoul has
QUOTE (SR4 p.292)
... feed on the
necrotized flesh of metahumans along with that of other animals.


So they are no longer solely depending on killing metahumans or finding dead ones. They can easily live off animal flesh.

They still need some metahuman flesh, just like in SR3. In SR3, a ghoul can eat the flesh of a dead cow - that's fine. Or a pig, or rats, or whatever. They simply have to have about 1% of their own body weight in metahuman flesh every week. SR3 outlined and defined the ghouls dietary requirements more than SR4, because they had rules to play said ghouls (I'm playing one in an SR3 game right now :P)

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FrankTrollman
post Nov 19 2005, 05:53 PM
Post #48


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Banned
Posts: 3,732
Joined: 1-September 05
From: Prague, Czech Republic
Member No.: 7,665



Indeed, Ghouls have:

QUOTE
Dietary Requirement (Metahuman Flesh)


I don't know whether it's going to remain 1% every week in this edition, the SR3 rules for characters were incapable of actually generating the "Ghoul" in the critters section no matter how well you rolled. But in any case, unless there has started being 300 weeks in a year without me noticing, that actually corresponds to about 1 metahuman body every 2 years, not 3 metahuman bodies every year.

-Frank
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blakkie
post Nov 19 2005, 06:28 PM
Post #49


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,718
Joined: 14-September 02
Member No.: 3,263



QUOTE (FrankTrollman)
Indeed, Ghouls have:

QUOTE
Dietary Requirement (Metahuman Flesh)


I don't know whether it's going to remain 1% every week in this edition, the SR3 rules for characters were incapable of actually generating the "Ghoul" in the critters section no matter how well you rolled. But in any case, unless there has started being 300 weeks in a year without me noticing, that actually corresponds to about 1 metahuman body every 2 years, not 3 metahuman bodies every year.

-Frank

That math is based on the assumption that 100% of the live weight of a metahuman body is "flesh" that's acceptable as ghoul food with no waste in serving. I doubt bones are. The actual number of bodies needed by any given ghoul probably depends a bit that ghouls palete is ok with tripe, sinew, kidneys, toenails, etc. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Drac
post Nov 19 2005, 07:26 PM
Post #50


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 46
Joined: 6-October 05
From: Toronto
Member No.: 7,819



I try to like ghouls, I really do. But the fact remains that they are basically walking plagues. All it takes is one drunk/drugged/pissed off ghoul to spread their contagion to anyone that looks at them funny. I'm amazed there hasn't been a George Romero zombie syle Ghoul Plague yet.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 11th May 2026 - 02:24 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.