![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 12 Joined: 10-September 04 Member No.: 6,649 ![]() |
Do ultrasound sights have a range limit, or an "effective" range limit? I'd think there would at least be some TN penalties beyond a certain distance from a target, due to lag since the signals only go at the speed of sound. Since ultrasound requires goggles like smartlinks, does that mean it would be incompatible with magnification scopes? I know that it reduces the TN modifiers for ruthenium by half(M&M114), but how would it stack up against invis and imp invis?.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,885 ![]() |
I'm not an expert, but my read is that the practical range is equal to sight, or at least equal to the range of whatever firearm you might use.
As for the smartlink, you can always use on or the other. If your goggles had Ultrasound and SL, then no problem to combine them, or if you have an internal SL with Cybereyes again, no problem. The Game Balance is that you cant use magnification and SL together. Now the last one, And Here I am without books again, but....The Ultra sound basically paints over everything that bounces sound. So invisibility is negated by it. There might be a slight TN mod because of the incongruos picture between the painted picture and the empty space. But on the other hand, a silence spell is the antithesis of ultrasound. The way I handle it is all sound is magically deadened so anything in or on the other side of the spell is invisible to Ultrasound. (Beyond it because the sound needs to go through or bounce back through it, so are killed) There may be more canon answers, but that is how I handle it. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|||||
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 12 Joined: 10-September 04 Member No.: 6,649 ![]() |
Yeah, but would ultrasound on its own be useable with magnification?
I know that Silence blocks ultrasound. My question was what would ultrasound do to the two invis spells. Thanks for trying. :) |
||||
|
|||||
![]()
Post
#4
|
|||
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 858 Joined: 25-August 03 From: Braunschweig, North German League, Allied German States Member No.: 5,537 ![]() |
Well, one should keep in mind that the speed of sound is only ~340m (1115') per second (at air temperature 20°C or 68F). So if you are using Ultrasound to aquire a target 100m away, the soundwaves will need .29 seconds for the distance to the target and another .29 seconds to come back to you. That means .58 seconds will pass until you get a picture of the target and are able to fire. Now imagine the target is moving and you are trying to hit it with a .58 seconds delay... (and a full combat round in SR is 3 seconds long) Calculate for yourself how short the distance has to be for the US to have the smallest delay... Sound of speed rises and falls with air temperature. US usage underwater would be far more effective as the sound of speed in this more dense medium is ~1480m/s at 20°C! |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,889 Joined: 3-August 03 From: A CPI rank 1 country Member No.: 5,222 ![]() |
There's only a .29 second delay for trying to fire, though. The only delay that matters there is for the reflected sound to return from the target to you. Where that sound originates from doesn't matter.
It still is a huge disadvantage, though. When sniping at long distances, you're talking about a delay of 1-3 seconds, which would make most shots impossible. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#6
|
|||
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 858 Joined: 25-August 03 From: Braunschweig, North German League, Allied German States Member No.: 5,537 ![]() |
I don't understand that. Where else should ultrasound of the right frequency come from for the US device to pick up? The way I understand it, SR's Ultrasound is an active device: It emits soundwaves and interprets the echo, like radar. It could pick up sound from other sources,too, but IMO the US device would listen to a specific frequency to avoid interferences. |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#7
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 400 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 825 ![]() |
He's saying that the travel time from the Ultrasound emitter to the target doesn't matter, it's only the time that the reflected sound takes to get back from the potential target that you count.
So, in your example, the .29 seconds for the sound to get to the other guy doesn't matter; that sound wave isn't carrying any useful information until it hits something and starts its way back to the receiver. When it bounces off the target is when you start the "delay clock". |
|
|
![]()
Post
#8
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,889 Joined: 3-August 03 From: A CPI rank 1 country Member No.: 5,222 ![]() |
Exactly. It doesn't matter where the target is at the moment the sound leaves the goggles, only where he is when the sound reflects off him and what happens between that moment and when the sound returns to the goggles.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#9
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 12 Joined: 10-September 04 Member No.: 6,649 ![]() |
If it's only the target reflection->receiver time that matters, how much of a delay would start screwing with aiming? .1 sec? .2 sec?
Would these be reasonable? +1 TN for every 0.2 seconds of delay, meaning no modifier for 0-0.19 or +1 for the first second, +2 for the second(+3 total), +3 for the third(+6 total), minimum +1 Again, would it be usable with image magnification? And if using it with thermo, would it cut the visibility mods after thermo in half, or cut the base modifiers, and then choose the lowest? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#10
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,889 Joined: 3-August 03 From: A CPI rank 1 country Member No.: 5,222 ![]() |
Everything beyond about 0.03 seconds would start screwing with your ability to hit a moving target.
+1 TN per 0.2 seconds seems reasonable. That's about equal to +1 per 70 meters. Whether you can use image magnification with it depends on how good you think the resolution is. I'm not even sure what I'd rule. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#11
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 400 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 825 ![]() |
Of course, that's all going to be completely variable depending on how fast and/or erratically the target is moving.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#12
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,889 Joined: 3-August 03 From: A CPI rank 1 country Member No.: 5,222 ![]() |
In the same way that fog shouldn't matter at all at very short range, but could make sniping at 600 meters completely impossible. Exactly how much several things affect your accuracy should really depend on a number of other variables, but that's extremely difficult to factor in in a pen & paper PG.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#13
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,073 Joined: 23-August 04 Member No.: 6,587 ![]() |
I would say a TN modifier between +1 and +6 should be applied at the GM’s discretion based on distance and movement. because the character can observe the effects that cause the penalty it is reasonable to tell the player what it will be. Aiming can only remove half this penalty. If US is not the only system in use ether the US penalty or the normal penalty whichever is lower
Usually there will be no penalty within 50m. (Changed to meters rather than seconds for game simplicity) Justification. It should never be as hard as blind fire. You can’t aim to counteract movement that changed after your image was taken but you can aim to correct for regular movement. Even at 2K (assuming it was loud enough) you should have no problem with a stationary target. Edward |
|
|
![]()
Post
#14
|
|||
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 12 Joined: 10-September 04 Member No.: 6,649 ![]() |
How about +1 per 50m for a standard(moving/walking) target, no extra mod for a stationary target, and +2 per 50m for a running target? That last one would be on top of the +2 for a standard running target.
That again brings up the question of ultrasound scanning range. How far would it be able to carry back and forth, and would it be affected by ambient sounds? Now that I think about it, the modifiers above might be able to account for that too. |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#15
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 81 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 2,030 ![]() |
The way I currently play it (I'm a GM) is the abovementioned +1 to TN per 50m of distance, with the maximum range determined by GM based on circumstances. The TN can suffer additional penalties in certain conditions, e.g. in a sandstorm (our characters *have* been in some).
All ultrasound systems in our game contain "combat mode" software that can filter the incoming signals and analyze it. The main result is that the TN for ranged attacks can almost never be higher than would be without the US system, because the signals with too low signal/noise ratio or with too high lag are filtered out in combat mode. About the only things that could raise the total vision modifier above +8 are sophisticated false signals, either from technology or from spells. A side effect of this is that the maximum base effective range of US systems in this mode is 200m under these rules. In the non-filtered (well, *relatively* non-filtered) mode the visibility TN modifier (both to shooting and to perception checks) can go higher than +8, so you have a chance to spot invisible characters even in bad conditions, but the downside is that sometimes the unfiltered signal makes it *harder* to hit the target because of the false information it feeds you. Switching modes is a free action for smartlinked weapons or DNI controlled systems, simple action for manual switches. Maybe not a realistic system, but relatively balanced and easy to use. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#16
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 12 Joined: 10-September 04 Member No.: 6,649 ![]() |
I'd handle it a little differently, only applying the +1/50m when shooting. This is more of a way to account for the sonic delay, after all. For perceiving I would only use the standard modifiers, as the lag doesn't matter when you only want to see if something is there, rather than shooting it.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#17
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,073 Joined: 23-August 04 Member No.: 6,587 ![]() |
I agree time delay doesn’t mean you can’t see it. The system would also have iconography indicating the approximate age of the image.
Edward |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 30th July 2025 - 04:16 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.