![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Decker on the Threshold ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,922 Joined: 14-March 04 Member No.: 6,156 ![]() |
The SR4 contact system at chargen is decent enough, but it has a massive flaw in it. Namely, it's far cheaper and more effective to throw all your contact points into a single contact who's both loyal and has far-reaching influence than getting lots of lower-level contacts spread over many different backgrounds. Even the Face archtype in the book bows to this pressure; it used to be that a good face had dozens of people he could get in contact with for a job, now he's far better off getting only one very loyal fixer contact and letting them FOF for you.
I think we can do better. So here's my first, very rough attempt at a patch: 1) Buy Contact Points rather like resources. You get 5 Contact Points for every Build Point you spend on contacts. 2) for formula for contact cost is changed to Connections^2 + Loyalty^2. Thus a Connections 3 Loyalty 2 contact would cost 3^2 + 2^2 = 9+4=13 points. Does that sound like it would be interesting? In this way low-level contacts would be much cheaper (you can get nearly 2.5 times as many now for your BP) but high-level ones will cost even more (Loyalty 6-Connections 6 would cost 14BP). |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|||
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,065 Joined: 16-January 03 From: Fayetteville, NC Member No.: 3,916 ![]() |
Interesting.
Edit 3:
The drawback being, the increased point cost requires a dedicated expenditure of BP. I'd suggest a slight increase in contact points for BP - say 2 contact points per Build Point. Possibly a higher point cost for Influence? -Siege Edit: For Code. Edit: Increasing costs and subsequently increasing CP simply adjusts the overall scale higher. |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 268 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Brisbane, Australia Member No.: 78 ![]() |
The thing to remember is that the amount and types of favours your contact will expect off of you in turn hangs on their rating. And if you have an Oyabun that is willing to take a bullet for you, you can expect that he'll be wanting some pretty hair raising favours from you in return
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,065 Joined: 16-January 03 From: Fayetteville, NC Member No.: 3,916 ![]() |
:grinbig:
I'd also draw the line at characters having a contact with major crime figures, but that's just me. -Siege |
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,718 Joined: 14-September 02 Member No.: 3,263 ![]() |
You don't need to have one of those defunct Flaws to balance them out, because you just paid 12BP for the privilage of being mostly ignored but on the occation you aren't ignored you are likely screwed.
You got to deal with [Bricktop]. You just got to make sure you don't end up owing him. Cause then you're in his debt. Which means, you're in his pocket. And once you're in that, you ain't ever coming out." - Turish, Snatch The only possibily good thing about that suggestion is a way try make contact less expensive overall. If you look through the contacts section to see what they give you, generally they buy you the privilage of paying more money. The best deals are likely around 7-8BP, but IMO even they are about maybe 60% over priced. What i'd likely do is push the contacts up a level, spacing out the 1 & 2 into 1, 2, & 3. What is currently listed as level 6 joins up with dragons, high level free spirits, AAA corp CEOs, etc. in the "You don't really want these people as friends, and we aren't going to let starting character commit suicide by taking them" catagory. Then change the BP cost for Contacts to (total off all Connections+Loyalties)/2. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#6
|
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,065 Joined: 16-January 03 From: Fayetteville, NC Member No.: 3,916 ![]() |
Making higher-level contacts a double-edged sword?
Doesn't that defeat the point of having a Loyalty rating? -Siege |
|
|
![]()
Post
#7
|
|
Shadowrun Setting Nerd ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 3,632 Joined: 28-June 05 From: Pissing on pedestrians from my electronic ivory tower. Member No.: 7,473 ![]() |
You'd think.
Personally, I just redid the entire Social Situation Modifiers table and have PCs make a Negotiations Test based on the apparent loyalty. Connections is a bit more complicated, but it works. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#8
|
|||
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 268 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Brisbane, Australia Member No.: 78 ![]() |
But they already are. Someone who is willing to take a bullet for you is going to expect a lot more of you than someone who is merely willing to listen to you speak. Someone who will put their life on the line for you expects you to in turn go out of your way for them, even if not quite to the same level |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#9
|
|||
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,718 Joined: 14-September 02 Member No.: 3,263 ![]() |
Absolutely not. It is a function of the loyalty. After all you don't the leave the Mob, the Mob leaves you...beaten limp and buried alive in an Indiana cornfield. Loyalty is expected to go both ways. Overall i like the changes to contacts, but think the chargen costs are a bit out of line in, strongly discouraging taking contacts. |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#10
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 261 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Massachusetts Member No.: 2,115 ![]() |
Consider "Face" as a character archetype, like Mage.
A good mage will spend about 90 points on stuff specific to being a mage like their magic attribute, buying spells, and having better mental attributes. If you were to spend 90 points on contacts, you could get 18 3/2 or 2/3 contacts - easily enough to get the "Face" flavor right. If you mixed it up a bit, that could be 5@3/2, 5@2/3, and 4@5/5. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#11
|
|||
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,718 Joined: 14-September 02 Member No.: 3,263 ![]() |
.... and no specialized Skills or Attribute? A crap face that would be. ;) Just jacking your Cha up a few points and 4 in the Influence Group (before other profession helpful skills and Attributes) sets you back at least 60 or 70 points. EDIT: Besides if they intended every PC to take a couple of contacts, well the current costs strongly work against that. |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#12
|
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,065 Joined: 16-January 03 From: Fayetteville, NC Member No.: 3,916 ![]() |
I gotta agree with Blak on this one - considering the pound-per-point exchange for BP and contact points, there's not a lot of mechanical incentive to acquire a large network of contacts.
Although it's amazingly useful to know all sorts to the inventive player. -Siege |
|
|
![]()
Post
#13
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,498 Joined: 4-August 05 From: ADL Member No.: 7,534 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#14
|
|||
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,718 Joined: 14-September 02 Member No.: 3,263 ![]() |
I noticed this mentioned offhand in a separate thread. That's not too bad a mechanism to get a couple of Contacts for each PC, and naturally a boost to face types.
|
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#15
|
|
Decker on the Threshold ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,922 Joined: 14-March 04 Member No.: 6,156 ![]() |
Hm. I wouldn't use the Attribute; attributes are too damn important already. How about something like Leadership x2 + (Skill) in BP for contacts, where (Skill) is any other CHA-linked social skill? I think good leaders should be able to attract more contacts.
But Serbitar's got a very impressive system there. That's really got to be posted somewhere important; it's SR4 BeCKS + SR4 Errata all in one neat little package! |
|
|
![]()
Post
#16
|
|||
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 355 Joined: 3-October 05 From: Ann Arbor, MI Member No.: 7,803 ![]() |
Nothing shows up for me - I've tried multiple times on multiple days, it always says I time out. Odd. |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#17
|
|
Prime Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 3,732 Joined: 1-September 05 From: Prague, Czech Republic Member No.: 7,665 ![]() |
I like Connections x Loyalty, with 3 'contact points' per Build Point. The 6/6 Uber Contact still sets you back 12 BPs, but everything else costs less.
-Frank |
|
|
![]()
Post
#18
|
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,065 Joined: 16-January 03 From: Fayetteville, NC Member No.: 3,916 ![]() |
Has anyone just put an arbitrary cap on "Influence" ratings?
No "Influence" rating over 4, for example. How often do characters have contacts that rate as having "Influence" over 4? -Siege |
|
|
![]()
Post
#19
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 268 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Brisbane, Australia Member No.: 78 ![]() |
I think perhaps a better cap is to cap the total, rather than any one score. Cap it at say 8, and then you can have an influence 6 contact for example, but you're still just his client, rather than a friend (6/2)
Or you can have a Gang Boss that is a good buddy (4/4), or a gang member that is willing to take a bullet for you(2/6), or an experienced shadowrunner who is willing to back you in a tough situation (3/5) |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th July 2025 - 04:32 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.