IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Analyze Device : Power Focus 1, Godhood in 3 easy steps
irinoxx
post May 26 2006, 02:18 PM
Post #1


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 24
Joined: 26-May 06
Member No.: 8,606



First of all, a little hello for everyone here, I've been a lurker for quite some time now. :)

Here's something I thought about, and I found this amusing so I wanted to share it with you. :D
Have an average mage with 2 spell sustaining foci (SSF1 and SSF2), and one low-level power focus.

Step 1: Cast Analyze Device on the Power Focus, therefore getting extra dice for any roll using this focus. Have this spell sustained in SSF1.
Step 2: Do the same, but a little bit better, and have that spell sustained in SSF2.
Step 3: Goto step 1 until slowly bored into godhood. :sleepy:

If this is too slow or too boring, you can certainly use a few spellcasting-aiding bound spirits.
Or whatever.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 24)
UndeadPoet
post May 26 2006, 02:28 PM
Post #2


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 158
Joined: 10-April 06
Member No.: 8,448



A magical articfact is, by no means, a technical device.
And if the focus would be(radio-power focus as an example), then you would only enhance the device itself, like having a clearer sound. You would not enhance the magic power stored within it.
The way you describe it, well, that would be like you buy new tires for your car and suddenly it can launch rockets.
No, sorry, no abuse possibility here.

Hi, by the way!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cang
post May 26 2006, 02:37 PM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 239
Joined: 16-December 05
From: new jack city
Member No.: 8,077



im not sure what you are trying to get at with this but i would think that everytime you cast the spell, it would be a new spell and wouldn't stack. It would be like having the adept power of mystic armor 2 and having it casted on you at 3.. you will just have the highest force.

ps. hi as well.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Serbitar
post May 26 2006, 02:47 PM
Post #4


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,498
Joined: 4-August 05
From: ADL
Member No.: 7,534



UndeadPoet got the point. Cang didnt. The point is not to stack but to get better an better with evry spell because of more dice with the power focus due to the spell.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Jopp
post May 26 2006, 02:51 PM
Post #5


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,925
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 948



Why do i have this image of a Hacker Mystic Adept with Analyze Device.

Improved Ability: Hacking skills
Analyze Device: Commlink

Might work.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
irinoxx
post May 26 2006, 03:12 PM
Post #6


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 24
Joined: 26-May 06
Member No.: 8,606



QUOTE (UndeadPoet @ May 26 2006, 09:28 AM)
A magical articfact is, by no means, a technical device.

Oh, but Analyse Device doesn't seem to be limited to technical devices. "Piece of equipment" is a pretty broad category.
And unlike Increase Attribute, this spell isn't explicitly non-stackable. :P

[EDIT] And BTW, it does't improve the device, but your skill at using it.

Anyway, I know it's silly, I just happen to like the idea of having in SR4 the same kind of bugs that plagued the Morrowind PC game. :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kanada Ten
post May 26 2006, 03:59 PM
Post #7


Beetle Eater
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,797
Joined: 3-June 02
From: Oblivion City
Member No.: 2,826



SR3 had the same issues (casting Decrease Attribute before casting Increase Attribute and then dropping the Decrease: NO!). But spells don't seem to stack. For instance, you can't cast Force 1 Armor 6 times and end up with an equivalent of a Force 6 Armor.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post May 26 2006, 06:03 PM
Post #8


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



There are other, more munchy, combinations. Analyze Device: Gun + Smartlink + Improved Ability: (Gun) + Enhanced Physical Atribute: Agility + Being an Elf = One fine shooter.

Recasting more more successes wouldn't work very well. You would suffer diminishing returns fairly quickly due to the fact that successes are limited by the force of the spell. Sure, you could get (Magic + Power Focus)X2 successes by repeatedly overcasting at maximum force but it is unlikely that you will max out your successes before killing yourself with drain.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jaid
post May 26 2006, 09:44 PM
Post #9


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,089
Joined: 4-October 05
Member No.: 7,813



QUOTE (Kanada Ten)
...spells don't seem to stack. For instance, you can't cast Force 1 Armor 6 times and end up with an equivalent of a Force 6 Armor.

i would allow it. keeping in mind that the person has either bought and bound enough focii to sustain it, or they're taking a -12 dice pool penalty to all actions =D

but i do agree that as a general rule it's not a good idea (though that one case wouldn't be a big deal... )

anyways, the real reason this won't work by the rules is that, iirc, you can't cast a spell of higher force into a sustaining focus than the rating of the focus. and you are limited in net successes to the force of the spell.

therefore, at some point your dual sustaining focus technique is going to hit the barrier of "my focus can't hold a spell strong enough to improve".

of course, if we're talking about what was intended in the rules, your trick simply doesn't work because that's not how analyse device was intended to work...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kanada Ten
post May 26 2006, 09:58 PM
Post #10


Beetle Eater
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,797
Joined: 3-June 02
From: Oblivion City
Member No.: 2,826



Cool, I guess I'll just have the army Quicken a few Force 12 Armor spells to a solider... :grinbig:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
phasmaphobic
post May 26 2006, 10:19 PM
Post #11


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 169
Joined: 13-December 05
From: Portland, OR
Member No.: 8,070



QUOTE (irinoxx)
First of all, a little hello for everyone here, I've been a lurker for quite some time now. :)

Here's something I thought about, and I found this amusing so I wanted to share it with you. :D
Have an average mage with 2 spell sustaining foci (SSF1 and SSF2), and one low-level power focus.

Step 1: Cast Analyze Device on the Power Focus, therefore getting extra dice for any roll using this focus. Have this spell sustained in SSF1.
Step 2: Do the same, but a little bit better, and have that spell sustained in SSF2.
Step 3: Goto step 1 until slowly bored into godhood. :sleepy:

If this is too slow or too boring, you can certainly use a few spellcasting-aiding bound spirits.
Or whatever.

Two rules immediately break this apart:

1. The maximum number of hits you can get from any single spell is equal to that spell's force.
2. The maximum force you can cast = 2x your Magic Rating.

To even begin to "approach godhood" with this spell, you'd have to already have a magic attribute through the roof.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
phasmaphobic
post May 26 2006, 10:21 PM
Post #12


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 169
Joined: 13-December 05
From: Portland, OR
Member No.: 8,070



QUOTE (Jaid)
[QUOTE=Kanada Ten,May 26 2006, 10:59 AM]
...and you are limited in net successes to the force of the spell.

Actually, you are limited in actual successes, not net successes.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ancient History
post May 26 2006, 11:16 PM
Post #13


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,748
Joined: 5-July 02
Member No.: 2,935



I don't suppose any of you see the limitation that operating a power focus is not governed by a skill, and thus the bonus die would not go toward anything?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Grinder
post May 26 2006, 11:19 PM
Post #14


Great, I'm a Dragon...
*********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 6,699
Joined: 8-October 03
From: North Germany
Member No.: 5,698



:rotfl:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
irinoxx
post May 27 2006, 08:52 AM
Post #15


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 24
Joined: 26-May 06
Member No.: 8,606



QUOTE (phasmaphobic)
The maximum number of hits you can get from any single spell is equal to that spell's force.

Oh cool, I hadn't noticed that!
The magic system isn't as broken as I thought then. :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
UndeadPoet
post May 27 2006, 09:37 AM
Post #16


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 158
Joined: 10-April 06
Member No.: 8,448



QUOTE (hyzmarca)
There are other, more munchy, combinations. Analyze Device: Gun + Smartlink + Improved Ability: (Gun) + Enhanced Physical Atribute: Agility + Being an Elf = One fine shooter.

No. Analyze device does not work on weapons/vehicles. I had the same idea, but got informed by people that it does not.

@Ancient History: Since the spell does not work on a power focus, why should one imagine what could stop this abuse if it did?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Edward
post May 27 2006, 10:21 AM
Post #17


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,073
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 6,587



Why would it not work on a gun or vehicle?

I just reread the spell. It states that “the spell allows the subject to analyze the purpose and operation of a device or piece of equipment within range of the sense.”

This would clearly include a gun or a vehicle including a drone (provided said drone was within range, force *magic meters)

It could even apply to a power focus (cant think of a good reason why not in the RAW) which brings up the very jaggy trick of bind high force spirit of man with analyze device spell, command it to cast analyze device (power focus) on you to the best of its ability and sustain the spell as a extended service. I have found that it isn’t too difficult to get a force 8 spell with 8 successes in this way. Your power focus would naturally be relatively natural in composition if you where to attempt this so OR 1. your force 1 powerfocus is now a force 8 powerfocus for the duration of the run, net cost, 4000 nuyen and the drain on summoning and binding a force 6 spirit.

Note, once you have done this once you summon and bind the next spirit while still under the influence of the spell, so you get the power focuses bonus dice to the summoning and binding tests.

My solution, house rule analyze device doesn’t work on magical foci. Of cause I will still be casting it on the team hacker before a dangerous matrix run, device is comlink and don’t think for a moment I wont have 6 or more successes.

Edward
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ancient History
post May 27 2006, 11:20 AM
Post #18


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,748
Joined: 5-July 02
Member No.: 2,935



I didn't say the spell wouldn't work, only that any bonus dice you receive would go toward the operation of the focus' form, not the enchantment.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Edward
post May 27 2006, 11:26 AM
Post #19


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,073
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 6,587



And what do you use to justify that. Especially when the focus has no other purpose (most of them done)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ancient History
post May 27 2006, 11:38 AM
Post #20


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,748
Joined: 5-July 02
Member No.: 2,935



You do not operate an enchantment. No skill governs it. You can't squeeze more dice out of a focus with this spell anymore than you could use it to fire more bullets from a gun.

That said, if your power focus happens to be an enchanted gun, you would obviously get the bonus dice for operating the gun. You just wouldn't get more power foci dice from it. Or bullets.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Edward
post May 27 2006, 01:10 PM
Post #21


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,073
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 6,587




Personally I agree that it makes little sense to apply it to magic foci, and the baleens issue is more than significant. But then it is also highly significant when cast with the hacker as a subject and his comlink as the target. +8 could be achieved quite easily buy a starting spellcaster. That’s a +50% on the best a hacker could start with, it would allow a computing and hacking unaware mage to pick up the hackers comlink and out perform him. (the hackers best is skill 6 + specialization, the mage has no skill but doesn’t take a penalty for that and has +8 for the spell)

If you take this spell to an extreme in any situation it will be broken. What are you going to do, ban the spell entirely.

Edward
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Edward
post May 27 2006, 01:15 PM
Post #22


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,073
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 6,587



As to the focus on the word operate, if you take that rout then you can’t use this spell for repairing vehicle. You don’t operate a tool, you use it, and you’re not operating the vehicle, that would be driving it.

Nether could you use it for disarming a bomb, bypassing a maglock or climbing a wall.

No matter what tools you might have to do these take (electronics and microtronics toolkits, maglock passkey and advanced climbing harness) you don’t operate any of those things. It effectively becomes useful only on vehicles, weapons and rare complex machinery.

Edward
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tarantula
post May 27 2006, 06:14 PM
Post #23


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,664
Joined: 21-September 04
From: Arvada, CO
Member No.: 6,686



Firstly, the commlink issue isn't too bad. As you must overcome the object resistance with your spell first, and computers are listed at threshold 4+ at best a starting magician could get 2 dice on defaulting to use a commlink. 4 for the threshold, +2 net hits beyond which are the only ones that are added as bonus dice.

As far as Edwards examples are concerned... Analyze the bomb, get bonus dice to demolitions skill, for arming, unarming, preparing or anything else you can do with a bomb. Analyze a passkey, get bonus dice for using it to bypass a maglock. Analyze the maglock and get extra dice for your electronics test to bypass it with a kit. Analyze your climbing harness, and get extra dice for climbing. Of course, the thresholds for all of these things would be 3-4+ and thusly, you probably are looking at 1-2 extra dice, if any.

Oh yeah, one more thing... definition for operate:
1 : to perform a function

Definition for use:
4 : to carry out a purpose or action by means of

Yes, they aren't the initial definitions, but they're the ones that fit the discussion we're having. For anyone interested, they're from www.m-w.com

Anyway, they're similar enough that operate and use could be interchanged in the sentence without any change of meaning. As far as the power foci arguement goes. It doesn't add to the magical abilities of the foci, just the physical properties, such as adding club skill if your power focus was a stick.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James McMurray
post May 27 2006, 08:29 PM
Post #24


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,430
Joined: 10-January 05
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Member No.: 6,957



QUOTE
You don’t operate a tool, you use it


http://thesaurus.reference.com/search?q=operate

Operate and use are synonyms. If you're using something then you're operating it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Edward
post May 28 2006, 02:23 AM
Post #25


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,073
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 6,587



Where in the RAW dose it say that it doesn’t help with magical foci.

I don’t think it should and would house rule against it but the RAW seems to let it past.

Edward
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 11th March 2025 - 08:04 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.