IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

JongWK
post Aug 16 2007, 01:34 AM
Post #1


Shooting Target
****

Group: Validating
Posts: 1,618
Joined: 29-January 03
From: Montevideo, Uruguay.
Member No.: 3,992



Hmm...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
4 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 82)
Fortune
post Aug 16 2007, 01:52 AM
Post #2


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



Strange
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Meriss
post Aug 16 2007, 02:33 AM
Post #3


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,696
Joined: 17-February 07
From: Middle Sized City, Ontario, Canada
Member No.: 11,025



How very, very, odd. Anybody know the release dates on 3.5?

Edit: Rpg.net semi confirmation. 4th ed D&D. You know they're just doing cause that's waht all the cool kids are doing. :grinbig:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Galedeep
post Aug 16 2007, 06:54 AM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 121
Joined: 21-July 07
Member No.: 12,325



Oh, good lord. They're about to piss off a lot of people.

*shrug*

Oh well.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fistandantilus4....
post Aug 16 2007, 07:10 AM
Post #5


Uncle Fisty
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,891
Joined: 3-January 05
From: Next To Her
Member No.: 6,928



Meriss - I think somewhere around 2000. I know I lived in San Jose at the time, and I moved from there in '02. Not the most technical means I'm sure, but that's what I recall. 'course I could try out my google-fu. But I just don't care enough.

Anyawy, as I recall, isn't 5-7 years kid of standard for an edition? 3,5 was kind of a fluke there.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ol' Scratch
post Aug 16 2007, 07:13 AM
Post #6


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Validating
Posts: 7,999
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,890



No, that's not standard at all in a genre where there are no standards. If it were, D&D should be at something ridiculous like the 8th Edition or something, for instance, and Shadowrun wouldn't be far behind.

I'm rather indifferent about the topic as I haven't played or even thought about playing D&D since, well, not long after 3rd Edition came out. Will be interesting to see what they consider a new edition, though, and to listen to them explain why it was needed considering the whole d20 System license bit.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fistandantilus4....
post Aug 16 2007, 07:18 AM
Post #7


Uncle Fisty
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,891
Joined: 3-January 05
From: Next To Her
Member No.: 6,928



QUOTE
and to listen to them explain why it was needed considering the whole d20 System license bit.
:D yeah that should be good!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fuchs
post Aug 16 2007, 07:51 AM
Post #8


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,328
Joined: 28-November 05
From: Zuerich
Member No.: 8,014



We still play 3E in our group. I'd say "I'll stick to it"; but I was sceptical when I heard of 3E, and I switched as soon as I read the PHB.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Grinder
post Aug 16 2007, 08:33 AM
Post #9


Great, I'm a Dragon...
*********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 6,699
Joined: 8-October 03
From: North Germany
Member No.: 5,698



EnWorld

Well, I don't care much for a 4th edition - I have all 3.5 books I need to run my Iron Kingdoms campaign. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ophis
post Aug 16 2007, 02:35 PM
Post #10


Mystery Archaeologist
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,906
Joined: 19-September 05
From: The apple tree
Member No.: 7,760



QUOTE (Doctor Funkenstein)
No, that's not standard at all in a genre where there are no standards. If it were, D&D should be at something ridiculous like the 8th Edition or something, for instance, and Shadowrun wouldn't be far behind.

I'm rather indifferent about the topic as I haven't played or even thought about playing D&D since, well, not long after 3rd Edition came out. Will be interesting to see what they consider a new edition, though, and to listen to them explain why it was needed considering the whole d20 System license bit.

Nah D&D would be be some 6-7th ed (original '74 33 years ago)

Shadowrun would be on 4th ('89 so 18 years)

Given the D&D/Ad&D thing those numbers seem right (as D&D had 4 editions (maybe 5) and AD&D is on 3.5 so far)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KarmaInferno
post Aug 16 2007, 04:35 PM
Post #11


Old Man Jones
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,415
Joined: 26-February 02
From: New York
Member No.: 1,699



There was a brief period yesterday where an admin board was left wide open for public viewing. It contained a full 4th Edition message board with a dozen or so starter topics for discussion.

It looked like they were prepping and getting the board ready, and forgot to lock it. It got shut down right when I was starting to post links.

Supposedly at GenCon this morning they made an official announcement.


-karma
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Grinder
post Aug 16 2007, 05:03 PM
Post #12


Great, I'm a Dragon...
*********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 6,699
Joined: 8-October 03
From: North Germany
Member No.: 5,698



Yeah.... forgot to lock it.... sure. :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zolhex
post Aug 16 2007, 05:47 PM
Post #13


Project Terminus: Soul Hunters
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,052
Joined: 6-November 03
From: Casselberry, Florida U.S.A.
Member No.: 5,798



Not that I have any real source of info to provide other than rumor but..... It was like a month age I heard that 4th was coming out soon. Also the rumor is they are going to stop the open game licence stuff as well.

As has been stated Gencon is the time to make official announcements so I guess we'll see.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Aug 16 2007, 07:27 PM
Post #14


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



QUOTE (Galedeep)
Oh, good lord. They're about to piss off a lot of people.

*shrug*

Oh well.

...damn straight. Personally I'm just disappointed, I like 3.5 the way it is but I don't play it all that often to warrant buying more than just the three core books, a couple of Forgotten Realms source books and Oriental Adventures.

However, got a couple of friends with pretty hefty investments in 3.5, and a lot of those books aren't cheap.

...I think I can hear them screaming and cursing now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Aug 16 2007, 07:40 PM
Post #15


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,012
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



With luck, it's a rebranded original D&D, so we can get rid of this ridiculous "class/race separation".

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
farrenj
post Aug 16 2007, 07:49 PM
Post #16


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 42
Joined: 25-July 07
Member No.: 12,367



I hope for something that looks similar to the new Star Wars rules.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ophis
post Aug 16 2007, 07:55 PM
Post #17


Mystery Archaeologist
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,906
Joined: 19-September 05
From: The apple tree
Member No.: 7,760



QUOTE (Kagetenshi)
With luck, it's a rebranded original D&D, so we can get rid of this ridiculous "class/race separation".

~J

Ah the heady days when Halfling was a class... with nothing going for it at all...

*Sits down and gets nostalgic about Red box D&D*
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fistandantilus4....
post Aug 16 2007, 08:42 PM
Post #18


Uncle Fisty
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,891
Joined: 3-January 05
From: Next To Her
Member No.: 6,928



QUOTE (farrenj)
I hope for something that looks similar to the new Star Wars rules.

Or the old ones. 8)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Meriss
post Aug 16 2007, 08:50 PM
Post #19


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,696
Joined: 17-February 07
From: Middle Sized City, Ontario, Canada
Member No.: 11,025



Less than 2 hours to go! Someone at Gen con sneak into the announcement hall!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KarmaInferno
post Aug 16 2007, 09:36 PM
Post #20


Old Man Jones
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,415
Joined: 26-February 02
From: New York
Member No.: 1,699



QUOTE (farrenj)
I hope for something that looks similar to the new Star Wars rules.

I dunno, the new SAGA edition has parts that feel awful sloppy to me.

I'll give an example. Under Creating Droid Heros, it tells you in the rules text that you get one form of movement for free, and that adding more forms costs an increasing extra price in credits.

Over on a chart there is another set of cost formulas for movement systems, different from the one in the text.

The rules text makes no mention of the formulas in the chart. None at all.

I can tell what they probably INTEND, that the formulas in the chart are the actual base price of each movement system, and the increasing price for extra movement systems beyond the first is tacked on top of that, but nowhere is this actually spelled out.

That's just sloppy.

The whole book has stuff like this, scattered about.

From what I understand, the guys who developed the SAGA edition were freelancers hired by WotC rather than their in-house staff, but it really could have stood to gone a few more rounds of playtesting and rules-proofing.


-karma
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
farrenj
post Aug 16 2007, 09:45 PM
Post #21


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 42
Joined: 25-July 07
Member No.: 12,367



While I will agree that there is some sloppiness and rules oversights, the class development is what I really like. I think it is a vast improvement over classes as DnD currently has them.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fistandantilus4....
post Aug 16 2007, 10:23 PM
Post #22


Uncle Fisty
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,891
Joined: 3-January 05
From: Next To Her
Member No.: 6,928



Agreed. The idea that you can be a 17th level ranger, and it can take you ages to learn the first thing (1st level) about being a fighter just makes no sense.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fistandantilus4....
post Aug 16 2007, 10:34 PM
Post #23


Uncle Fisty
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,891
Joined: 3-January 05
From: Next To Her
Member No.: 6,928



And here we are at the appointed time. I log in, and the screen saaaayyysss....

"Service Unavailable"

:rotfl:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ophis
post Aug 16 2007, 10:34 PM
Post #24


Mystery Archaeologist
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,906
Joined: 19-September 05
From: The apple tree
Member No.: 7,760



I never minded that, Fighter 1 isn't to bad a level...
More seriously as you get more skilled in one thing it becomes harder to learn new tricks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
farrenj
post Aug 16 2007, 10:36 PM
Post #25


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 42
Joined: 25-July 07
Member No.: 12,367



Aaaaaaannnnd

the timer finishes and wizards.com goes down.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ophis
post Aug 16 2007, 10:37 PM
Post #26


Mystery Archaeologist
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,906
Joined: 19-September 05
From: The apple tree
Member No.: 7,760



No I have something...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ophis
post Aug 16 2007, 10:38 PM
Post #27


Mystery Archaeologist
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,906
Joined: 19-September 05
From: The apple tree
Member No.: 7,760



Not completely working...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fistandantilus4....
post Aug 16 2007, 10:50 PM
Post #28


Uncle Fisty
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,891
Joined: 3-January 05
From: Next To Her
Member No.: 6,928



QUOTE (Ophis)

More seriously as you get more skilled in one thing it becomes harder to learn new tricks.

That was the point I was trying to make, yes.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Aug 17 2007, 12:10 AM
Post #29


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



QUOTE (farrenj)
Aaaaaaannnnd

the timer finishes and wizards.com goes down.

...and I wonder why.... :sarcasm:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ophis
post Aug 17 2007, 12:11 AM
Post #30


Mystery Archaeologist
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,906
Joined: 19-September 05
From: The apple tree
Member No.: 7,760



Evil pixies are part of the answer the rest is in SoLA...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wounded Ronin
post Aug 17 2007, 12:46 AM
Post #31


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,640
Joined: 6-June 04
Member No.: 6,383



QUOTE (Ophis)
QUOTE (Kagetenshi @ Aug 16 2007, 08:40 PM)
With luck, it's a rebranded original D&D, so we can get rid of this ridiculous "class/race separation".

~J

Ah the heady days when Halfling was a class... with nothing going for it at all...

*Sits down and gets nostalgic about Red box D&D*

The direct-tolkien-ripoff bonuses to hide were awesome because of how derivative they were. Hell, man, I really want to play 1st edition D&D again, but with a Bruce Lee Impersonator character class!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ophis
post Aug 17 2007, 12:48 AM
Post #32


Mystery Archaeologist
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,906
Joined: 19-September 05
From: The apple tree
Member No.: 7,760



The Mystic from the masters set (black box) like AD&Ds monk with more WAAAAAAH!!!! (or other bruce lee noise) 16th level, on shot everything...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wounded Ronin
post Aug 17 2007, 01:14 AM
Post #33


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,640
Joined: 6-June 04
Member No.: 6,383



QUOTE (Ophis)
The Mystic from the masters set (black box) like AD&Ds monk with more WAAAAAAH!!!! (or other bruce lee noise) 16th level, on shot everything...

I used to have the Rules Cyclopedia. I remember the Mystics. The picture for their class in the beginning of the book was ridiculous, too, featuring a woman in a formal Japanese-style kimono with a butterfly in her hair. Then she was doing the Shaolin hand-over-fist salute thing.

Damn, man, 1st edition was really all we needed!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fistandantilus4....
post Aug 17 2007, 07:31 AM
Post #34


Uncle Fisty
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,891
Joined: 3-January 05
From: Next To Her
Member No.: 6,928



12:30 AM: Update

QUOTE (http://announcement.wizards.com/)
Unfortunately, due to an extremely high load on our web servers, we have been unable to bring you our normal web content. We apologize for the inconvenience and ask that you please try again in a few hours! Our technical team is aware of the problem and working on it.
Thank you for your patience!


still :rotfl:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ol' Scratch
post Aug 17 2007, 07:53 AM
Post #35


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Validating
Posts: 7,999
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,890



It was a shocking development. I mean, they tease, build up suspense, then... act surprised when the server crashes?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ophis
post Aug 17 2007, 09:22 AM
Post #36


Mystery Archaeologist
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,906
Joined: 19-September 05
From: The apple tree
Member No.: 7,760



Well even at about 5 in the morning EST (I think) it's still dead teehee.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kalvan
post Aug 17 2007, 09:38 AM
Post #37


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 174
Joined: 21-May 06
Member No.: 8,583



Personally, I still think it's too soon for D&D Fourth Edition, by at least two years. The balance problems haven't gotten big enough, the mechanics still provide enough of a balance between quickness and simulation, and there are several area and organizational supplements they could put out before Fourth Edition (particularly for their campaign settigns) that they haven't yet.

If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Aug 17 2007, 11:37 AM
Post #38


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,012
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



But it is broke, and deeply so.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moon-Hawk
post Aug 17 2007, 02:54 PM
Post #39


Genuine Artificial Intelligence
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,019
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,715



Balance? Broken?
Look, they came out with the Complete Arcane, and then they came out with the Complete Wizard, as well as multiple books with alternate magic systems in them. If they want to keep selling rule books they either need to release the Really Really Complete Magicky Stuff This Time For Sure or they need a new edition.
It's about money. Most gaming companies struggle to maintain that healthy balance between income and love of the game. WotC has no such struggle.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ophis
post Aug 17 2007, 04:47 PM
Post #40


Mystery Archaeologist
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,906
Joined: 19-September 05
From: The apple tree
Member No.: 7,760



I wonder if the new edition will still cause cancer...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moon-Hawk
post Aug 17 2007, 05:27 PM
Post #41


Genuine Artificial Intelligence
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,019
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,715



We might need to come up with a new hilarious affliction.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fistandantilus4....
post Aug 17 2007, 06:25 PM
Post #42


Uncle Fisty
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,891
Joined: 3-January 05
From: Next To Her
Member No.: 6,928



jaundice. it'll turn your skin the same color as that horrible page was.

You know, before it turned to a white screen that said "Service Unavaialbe". 'Cause I think that would be E.D., nobody wants that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moon-Hawk
post Aug 17 2007, 06:51 PM
Post #43


Genuine Artificial Intelligence
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,019
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,715



QUOTE (fistandantilus3.0)
jaundice. it'll turn your skin the same color as that horrible page was.

You know, before it turned to a white screen that said "Service Unavaialbe". 'Cause I think that would be E.D., nobody wants that.

You bastard. You hilarious bastard.
Here I am, at my desk, browsing Dumpshock. My boss calls me on the phone, with nothing important to say, but damn, he sure does take the time to say it. So I'm clicking idly away, waiting for him to summarize his long, rambling nothing regarding unrequested details of a project completely unrelated to mine, and I wandered back in to this thread.
:rotfl:
I'm lucky, he just thought his dumb story was really funny. ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zolhex
post Aug 17 2007, 06:53 PM
Post #44


Project Terminus: Soul Hunters
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,052
Joined: 6-November 03
From: Casselberry, Florida U.S.A.
Member No.: 5,798



The link works now
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Aug 17 2007, 07:46 PM
Post #45


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



QUOTE (Ophis)
Well even at about 5 in the morning EST (I think) it's still dead teehee.

...should have used a preserve spell... :grinbig:

..wait, maybe that won't be available in 4th ed.

QUOTE (Ophis)
Evil pixies are part of the answer the rest is in SoLA...

..LMAO
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kalvan
post Aug 17 2007, 09:06 PM
Post #46


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 174
Joined: 21-May 06
Member No.: 8,583



QUOTE (Moon-Hawk)
Balance? Broken?
Look, they came out with the Complete Arcane, and then they came out with the Complete Wizard, as well as multiple books with alternate magic systems in them. If they want to keep selling rule books they either need to release the Really Really Complete Magicky Stuff This Time For Sure or they need a new edition.

They also came out with Complete Warrior and Heroes of Battle for big burly warrior types (not to mention Tome of Battle), Complete Adventurer, Complete Scoundrel, and Dungeonscape for skill monkeys and backstabbers, and Complete Divine and Complete Champion for religious types.

I personally don't think that secular spellcasters have been getting all or even a disporportionate share of the love.

I just think that it's just about a year or so too soon.

But, of course as always, YMMV.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Aug 17 2007, 09:21 PM
Post #47


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



QUOTE (Kalvan)
I just think that it's just about a year or so too soon.

Well, since it won't actually be out till next year, you can both be right. :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moon-Hawk
post Aug 17 2007, 09:23 PM
Post #48


Genuine Artificial Intelligence
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,019
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,715



Truely, you leave me speechless.
Was my point really that badly expressed?
Yes, there are books for fighters, and divine, and everything else. There are already several books for everything. That's the point. If they want to print more books, they need a new edition, 'cause they've already made them all for 3rd edition, several times.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fistandantilus4....
post Aug 17 2007, 09:33 PM
Post #49


Uncle Fisty
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,891
Joined: 3-January 05
From: Next To Her
Member No.: 6,928



QUOTE
You bastard. You hilarious bastard.


much love
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ol' Scratch
post Aug 17 2007, 09:36 PM
Post #50


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Validating
Posts: 7,999
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,890



QUOTE (Moon-Hawk)
It's about money. Most gaming companies struggle to maintain that healthy balance between income and love of the game. WotC has no such struggle.

Which is exactly why I don't play D&D any more, or knowingly purchase any WotC products.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nikoli
post Aug 17 2007, 11:33 PM
Post #51


Chicago Survivor
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,079
Joined: 28-January 04
From: Canton, GA
Member No.: 6,033



Yeah, this will kill my group buying WotC products.

Sure, it's a business, but damn, this just isn't necessary from a game standpoint.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Aug 18 2007, 03:55 AM
Post #52


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



...well, could always mean there may be a good market in used 3 - 3.5 stuff soon.

Been doing pretty well filling in my library of SRIII material since 4th ed came out.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KarmaInferno
post Aug 20 2007, 03:28 PM
Post #53


Old Man Jones
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,415
Joined: 26-February 02
From: New York
Member No.: 1,699



QUOTE (Nikoli)
Yeah, this will kill my group buying WotC products.

Sure, it's a business, but damn, this just isn't necessary from a game standpoint.

Are you kidding?

Have you seen the rules bloat in 3.0/3.5? The contradicting, confusing text? I've seen game sessions end up being half rules arguements instead of actually playing.

Hell, the D&D FAQ, which is purely a document clarifying and explaining the rules, has grown larger than some of the sourcebooks.

D&D is prime for a rules update right now.


-karma
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Aug 20 2007, 04:41 PM
Post #54


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



4.0 isn't going to fix that. the rules will start bloating again, probably with the first or second splatbook.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ol' Scratch
post Aug 20 2007, 06:27 PM
Post #55


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Validating
Posts: 7,999
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,890



From what I could gather from the site, they're not really interested in fixing rules bloating or anything of the sort. It's more of a delivery platform to celebrate some online tools they're trying to push, with a few minor upgrades to the system to actually facilitate even more rules bloat (like weapons having different and individual charactertics in combat).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TheMadDutchman
post Aug 20 2007, 08:06 PM
Post #56


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 104
Joined: 19-June 07
From: Florida
Member No.: 11,950



I'm just sick to death of classes and levels. I don't really ever want to run another level based game again.

I love fantasy games- treasure, castles, dragons, it's all good. But when level comes into play- it just kills it for me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Aug 20 2007, 08:18 PM
Post #57


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



QUOTE (Doctor Funkenstein)
From what I could gather from the site, they're not really interested in fixing rules bloating or anything of the sort. It's more of a delivery platform to celebrate some online tools they're trying to push, with a few minor upgrades to the system to actually facilitate even more rules bloat (like weapons having different and individual charactertics in combat)

...by that last statement, sounds like they got a couple of the old FGU guys working for them. Remember Chivalry & Sorcery- the fantasy game that makes the current Shadowrun chargen look like old AD&D (before Second Ed)?

QUOTE (TheMadDutchman)
I'm just sick to death of classes and levels. I don't really ever want to run another level based game again.

I love fantasy games- treasure, castles, dragons, it's all good. But when level comes into play- it just kills it for me.

...there is always Hero System's Fantasy Hero
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Aug 20 2007, 08:38 PM
Post #58


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,012
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



QUOTE (TheMadDutchman)
I'm just sick to death of classes and levels. I don't really ever want to run another level based game again.

I love fantasy games- treasure, castles, dragons, it's all good. But when level comes into play- it just kills it for me.

Take a level in Classic Roleplayer and you'll be ok with it again.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TheMadDutchman
post Aug 20 2007, 08:41 PM
Post #59


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 104
Joined: 19-June 07
From: Florida
Member No.: 11,950



QUOTE (Kyoto Kid)

...there is always Hero System's Fantasy Hero

Actually I'm currently sticking more to rules that were home brewed for freshness when it comes to fantasy games.

I've got a friend who cooked a up a great set of rules. Interestingly they're based on D20 but w/out levels or classes.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Aug 20 2007, 10:34 PM
Post #60


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



...come to think of it, didn't Runequest dispense with character levels as well? I vaguely remember rolling against skills used in an adventure to improve them instead of having blanket levels to increase your abilities. I know Call of Cthulu (not the D20 version) uses the same mechanic.

I think DragonQuest also used a similar system that allowed your character to go for training to increase your skills between adventures.

Man that was a more than a quarter century since I last played either RQ or DQ. Yikes! Has it been that long?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kzt
post Aug 20 2007, 11:16 PM
Post #61


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,537
Joined: 27-August 06
From: Albuquerque NM
Member No.: 9,234



QUOTE (Kyoto Kid)
...come to think of it, didn't Runequest dispense with character levels as well? I vaguely remember rolling against skills used in an adventure to improve them instead of having blanket levels to increase your abilities. I know Call of Cthulu (not the D20 version) uses the same mechanic.

Yes, they did. CoC used a simplified version of the RQ mechanics. When I discovered RQ I began to think about RPGs in a different way and to hate the concept of character classes and levels.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Aug 20 2007, 11:35 PM
Post #62


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



...yeah I really miss RQ, though I occasionally have the opportunity to play CoC now & then.

...but just like the biz of Computer OS & software, it seems the inferior product gets the biggest slice of the market pie over the better one.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Aug 21 2007, 12:29 AM
Post #63


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,012
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Many of D&D's more controversial features (levels, classes, arguably even alignment) make more sense if you reclassify the game as a tactical wargame. This is before the "role-playing" perversions, of course.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Aug 21 2007, 04:41 PM
Post #64


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



QUOTE (mfb)
4.0 isn't going to fix that. the rules will start bloating again, probably with the first or second splatbook.

QFT.

Actually, strangely enough, my entire reaction to 4e is pretty much: *shrug* "Where did I put my new copy of Savage Worlds?"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ophis
post Aug 21 2007, 09:05 PM
Post #65


Mystery Archaeologist
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,906
Joined: 19-September 05
From: The apple tree
Member No.: 7,760



Having thought long and hard about what disease 4th ed will cause i have realised that the disease will be quick, and efficent (or streamlined in designer speak). So I suspect 4th edtion D&D will cause Ebola.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Aug 26 2007, 11:59 PM
Post #66


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



QUOTE (eidolon)
QUOTE (mfb @ Aug 20 2007, 10:41 AM)
4.0 isn't going to fix that. the rules will start bloating again, probably with the first or second splatbook.

QFT.

Actually, strangely enough, my entire reaction to 4e is pretty much: *shrug* "Where did I put my new copy of Savage Worlds?"

...funny coincidence, I was sitting at the coffee shop today and there were two fellows at the table next to me with the Savage Worlds - Revised book.

@Ophis, I would think the disease would be more like spontaneous cranial arterial embolism followed by massive cerebral hemorrhaging after one's blood pressure went ballistic when they just learned the thousand+ $ in rules and sourcebooks they acquired over the last few years are now worthless. :grinbig:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cthulhudreams
post Aug 27 2007, 01:41 AM
Post #67


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,650
Joined: 21-July 07
Member No.: 12,328



QUOTE (Kyoto Kid)
QUOTE (eidolon)
QUOTE (mfb @ Aug 20 2007, 10:41 AM)
4.0 isn't going to fix that. the rules will start bloating again, probably with the first or second splatbook.

QFT.

Actually, strangely enough, my entire reaction to 4e is pretty much: *shrug* "Where did I put my new copy of Savage Worlds?"

...funny coincidence, I was sitting at the coffee shop today and there were two fellows at the table next to me with the Savage Worlds - Revised book.

@Ophis, I would think the disease would be more like spontaneous cranial arterial embolism followed by massive cerebral hemorrhaging after one's blood pressure went ballistic when they just learned the thousand+ $ in rules and sourcebooks they acquired over the last few years are now worthless. :grinbig:

The savage world rules are pretty weird.

I love weird probability action going on. If you have a d6 in shooting and I have a d4 in shooting.. and we are having a pistol duel I want us to take *ten* paces each not five so my chance of hitting is now 20% and yours is 16%!

/me has just started playing a game of deadlands.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Aug 27 2007, 01:56 AM
Post #68


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



Deadlands rocks! The original Pinnacle game is still my second favorite game of all time. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Aug 27 2007, 01:42 PM
Post #69


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



Deadlands is cool. I haven't played the SW version of it yet, but I know a few people that have played both and prefer the original.

KK, pick up the Explorer's Edition. $10, full rules, packed with awesome.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Aug 27 2007, 02:48 PM
Post #70


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



...pretty cool. have to check My FLGS this weekend.

Love Deadlands, just wish more people where I lived played it. A game right up my namesake's alley.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NightmareX
post Aug 28 2007, 06:28 AM
Post #71


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 831
Joined: 5-September 05
From: LAX, UCAS
Member No.: 7,687



Ebola - perfect! I love it! The mere announcement of 4th edition D&D has certainly killed any desire to continue buying WotC stuff in our group, especially considering that the two main GMs (myself included) are rather heavily invested in 3.5 (and Eberron in my case). Talk about alienating the fanbase :please:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NightmareX
post Aug 28 2007, 06:47 AM
Post #72


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 831
Joined: 5-September 05
From: LAX, UCAS
Member No.: 7,687



QUOTE (Hammer Of Tyr)
My GM just got ack from GenCon and described the atmosphere as "prison camp" like and that he was being "Force fed" 4e. The only ones excited with it were WoTC employees, and the other publishers that he spoke to (That he used to work for) don't think 4E is a good Idea. The game will run more like World of Warcrap and the "subscription" Idea is Wotc just absorbing WoW's business model.


Found this on the WotC boards. Given that WotC has flat out admitted to lying to their fanbase, I believe it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Aug 28 2007, 09:58 PM
Post #73


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



...almost makes 'ol Mr Gygax & TSR not seem all that bad anymore...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wounded Ronin
post Aug 28 2007, 10:42 PM
Post #74


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,640
Joined: 6-June 04
Member No.: 6,383



QUOTE (Kyoto Kid)
...almost makes 'ol Mr Gygax & TSR not seem all that bad anymore...

Hey, man, Gygax is cool. He's the Chuck Norris of RPGs. When you roll on the tables for random tavern encounters in your 1st edition D&D game and the result of the dice roll is that the level 1 torch bearer hireling is in fact a sociopath because that possibility is indeed on the table, it's everything you can do as the GM to bite your lip and not scream "CHUCK NORRIS!" at the top of your lungs.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BishopMcQ
post Aug 28 2007, 10:55 PM
Post #75


The back-up plan
**********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 8,423
Joined: 15-January 03
From: San Diego
Member No.: 3,910



QUOTE (NightmareX)
QUOTE (Hammer Of Tyr)
My GM just got ack from GenCon and described the atmosphere as "prison camp" like and that he was being "Force fed" 4e. The only ones excited with it were WoTC employees, and the other publishers that he spoke to (That he used to work for) don't think 4E is a good Idea. The game will run more like World of Warcrap and the "subscription" Idea is Wotc just absorbing WoW's business model.


Found this on the WotC boards. Given that WotC has flat out admitted to lying to their fanbase, I believe it.

Having been at GenCon, I don't recall any prison camp vibes. When I wasn't running games, I spent a lot of time in the dealer hall and walked through the WotC booth. They made the pronouncement that 4th Ed was coming, but given that they weren't answering many questions, I can't see how it would be described as force fed.

It was rather the opposite, I had to pry out teeth just to get admission on whether or not a D20 would still be rolled.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Aug 28 2007, 11:24 PM
Post #76


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



I believe the prison camp reference was only in relation to the 4e announcement (and the area in which it was made). I could be wrong.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fistandantilus4....
post Aug 28 2007, 11:30 PM
Post #77


Uncle Fisty
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,891
Joined: 3-January 05
From: Next To Her
Member No.: 6,928



QUOTE (Wounded Ronin)

Hey, man, Gygax is cool. He's the Chuck Norris of RPGs.

[thread tanget]Gives WR 1,250 Exp so he can reach 2nd level thief and kill the torch bearer.

Gygaz rules.[/thread tanget]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Trigger
post Aug 28 2007, 11:53 PM
Post #78


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,468
Joined: 5-December 06
From: Somewhere in the Flooding, CalFree
Member No.: 10,215



yeah, I just heard last night from a friend of mine, whose friend in Boston is one of the artists for something that has to do with 4th Edition. He said that is has something to do with a sort of MMO kind of game and gameplay, but also that R.A. Salvatore is one of the writer's for it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Aug 29 2007, 01:34 AM
Post #79


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



QUOTE (Wounded Ronin)
QUOTE (Kyoto Kid @ Aug 28 2007, 04:58 PM)
...almost makes 'ol Mr Gygax & TSR not seem all that bad anymore...

Hey, man, Gygax is cool. He's the Chuck Norris of RPGs. When you roll on the tables for random tavern encounters in your 1st edition D&D game and the result of the dice roll is that the level 1 torch bearer hireling is in fact a sociopath because that possibility is indeed on the table, it's everything you can do as the GM to bite your lip and not scream "CHUCK NORRIS!" at the top of your lungs.

...I actually miss those old NPC encounter tables :grinbig:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fistandantilus4....
post Aug 29 2007, 04:21 AM
Post #80


Uncle Fisty
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,891
Joined: 3-January 05
From: Next To Her
Member No.: 6,928



QUOTE (Trigger)
but also that R.A. Salvatore is one of the writer's for it.

Damn it. And I liked him. Now I have to throw those books away. :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Aug 29 2007, 04:25 AM
Post #81


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



Perhaps they'll just reissue 1e, exactly the same as it was, including the classic blue cover, and just call it 4e. That would be awesome.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zhan Shi
post Sep 5 2007, 03:55 AM
Post #82


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 609
Joined: 13-August 07
Member No.: 12,615



bleh. This is partly why I stopped playing "that other game"; they release a set of rulebooks, a year later "version x.5", a year after that "version x.x", etc. You're shelling out megabucks for ever more versions of core rules. But what do I know? They're still #1 in sales and popularity, so they must be doing something right.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
azrael_ven
post Sep 8 2007, 01:53 AM
Post #83


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 36
Joined: 21-December 06
Member No.: 10,417



QUOTE (fistandantilus3.0)
QUOTE (Trigger @ Aug 28 2007, 06:53 PM)
but also that R.A. Salvatore is one of the writer's for it.

Damn it. And I liked him. Now I have to throw those books away. :D

It happens to the best of us. I knew something was up when Salvatore joined with McFarlane and Schilling. Filthy Lucre, Filthy Lucre, Filthy Lucre!!!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th August 2025 - 08:21 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.