IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

theartthief
post Mar 27 2004, 08:17 AM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 125
Joined: 1-March 04
From: Gulf Coast
Member No.: 6,111



Hello there chummers...

I have never played a mage or shamman before and wanted to get a few pointers and some answers to questions.

1. Is there a good "how to" thread/website out there?

2. Why the optical vision mods? I know that they are required but I just don't see why. The cybereye has replaced the meat one; therefore, there is already an electronic-to-meat connection. What is one more step - eye to electronic vision mod to meat body? If nothing else, I guess that I am looking for an in-game reason.

3. If I cast a spell at Force 1 and it has no drain modifiers, does the spell have no drain or does it still have the minimum TN of 4?

4. Aspected vs. Full - I am still working on the background but this much I have: He is a former ganger (small amount of cyber) who lost people close to him and decided to go on the spiritual pilgramige (?) that he promised his grandfather he would go on (he is Native American). While out in the desert he his called by Coyote. This is all fine and well with him as he loves pranks and his grand-dad was a pre-Awakening shaman with an affinity to Coyote.

Looking for suggestions on aspected vs. full and background reasons.

5. Any other helpful info would be nice.

Thank you,

- theartthief
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 21)
Beast of Revolut...
post Mar 27 2004, 08:27 AM
Post #2


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 409
Joined: 9-March 04
Member No.: 6,140



The minimum TN for drain is 2, not 4. Drain will never be less than 2 regardless of force. Vision mods are useful because spells can have target number modifiers based on cover and distance, just like gunshots.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Glyph
post Mar 27 2004, 08:57 AM
Post #3


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,116
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,449



I think he was asking why cybereyes have to have optical magnification to work, and why electronic magnification doesn't work.

The best in-game reason that I can give you is that you can't target something except by seeing the original image. Cybereyes themselves let you see just like normal eyes; there is no alteration of the image. Optical magnification simply enhances line-of-sight, like mirrors and fiber-optics can. Electronic magnification, however, is essentially replacing the image of the target with a zoomed-in digitized image. It is like looking through a camera sensor or security vidscreen. It is not the original image, so it can't be used for targetting.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tisoz
post Mar 27 2004, 09:23 AM
Post #4


Free Spirit
*******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,950
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Bloomington, IN UCAS
Member No.: 1,920



I dislike aspected mages because they can't astrally project, which will save a future ton of karma by astral questing when learning more spells. Take invoking the first time you initiate, and you will spend your actions in combat directing your great form spirits and hardly casting a spell, but keeping your sorcery dice for spell defense.

Conceal is a form of invisibility you don't need to sustain, and Confuse either stops your opponent cold or adds the spirits force to his TN's. Those 2 powers alone are worth 5 build points at chargen, IMO.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
L.D
post Mar 27 2004, 10:39 AM
Post #5


Harlequin
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 331
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 861



As a GM, I've ruled that aspected mages can learn to atrally project as a Metamagic. You could always check to see if your GM would allow this. Otherwise, I vote for full magician.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
A Clockwork Lime
post Mar 27 2004, 01:49 PM
Post #6


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,616
Joined: 15-March 04
Member No.: 6,158



1. Not that I'm aware of, though magic questions come up often. The rules aren't really as complex as they seem. The only things you really need to focus on are a) what you need to do to cast a spell and summon a spirit appropriate to your tradition, b) learn how to determine the Drain Code for your spells and summonings, and c) learn how Drain affects the character (which is basically just Stun Damage under most circumstances).

2. This is one of those "what the hell were they smoking?" rules. They say that since you paid for your eyes with Essence, you can use them as if they were real. And despite the fact that you're seeing an electronic image to begin with, you can only use Optical Magnification to magnify it. <blank stare> In any case, don't worry about arguing the point. Sure, it takes up more Essence but it's cheaper. Just ignore the bizarre rules and move on. It's too minor to nitpick to your GM about it at this point. :) It doesn't really matter, either, since as far as I know, Vision Magnification has no (or at least very limited) rules-based effect on spellcasting ability anyway. Go figure. And on those rare cases you do need to see a target who's more than a hundred or so meters away, just pick up a pair of binoculars. They're even cheaper and cost no Essence whatsoever.

3. The minimum TN for any test is 2. So no matter what your Drain is, you're always going to be resisting at leastt 2L Drain when you cast a spell. Note that it's still good to keep your Drain Power down as wound modifiers and other target number modifiers can raise it up, so that -1M Drain code you have will still only be 2M if you have a Serious Wound.

4. Honestly, for someone new to the rules, I'd recommend playing an aspected Sorcerer to get the hang of the rules. Once you have Sorcery down pat, try either an aspected Conjurer or a full Magician. If you go full Magician straight out of the bag, you'll likely get overwhelmed by all your options and rules you have to memorize.

As far as Hermetic vs. Shamanic goes, I prefer Hermetic simply because it suits my mindset better. They're also "easier" to play since you don't have to worry about quasi-religious adherence to a totem's philosophy, and using the Elemental Mage rules in Magic in the Shadows, you can still gain a nice bonus when using a particular group of spells and elemental spirits just like a Shaman.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Thistledown
post Mar 28 2004, 05:53 AM
Post #7


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 236
Joined: 14-March 04
From: Cal Poly: SLO
Member No.: 6,155



QUOTE

As a GM, I've ruled that aspected mages can learn to atrally project as a Metamagic. You could always check to see if your GM would allow this. Otherwise, I vote for full magician.


Similarly, my old GM and I both rule that phys-ad's can save then use two metamagic techniques to get astral perception, instead of having it as a power. Just an idea to keep in mind.

But in general, I would agree that you should try an aspected conjurer. 35 spell points, and don't have to worry about summoning.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Crusher Bob
post Mar 28 2004, 07:12 AM
Post #8


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,598
Joined: 15-March 03
From: Hong Kong
Member No.: 4,253



The optical vs electronic difference only applies when you have not paid essence for it.

So as a sample, you can't cast spells through night vision goggles (which produce an 'electronic' image) but you can cast spells through optical binoculars.

Once you have paid essence for something, you can use it anyway (like the electronic magnification system in cyber-eyes).

If a mage is going to get and ware at all, cyber eyes are a must since any 'add on' low light or thermo system will produce an 'electronic' image that you can't cast spells through. (While optically based low light systems are possible, they are too big to wear on your head (think telescope)).

The aspected vs full debate is something of a toss-up. In part, it depends on how long you plan to play the character. The rules for an aspected character are simpler to pick up, but once you become familiar with them, you'll begin to miss the extra capability you would have had as a full mage.

In general, hermetics are a bit simpler to play. largely because their conjuring is simpler (no domains).

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Digital Heroin
post Mar 28 2004, 07:42 AM
Post #9


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,458
Joined: 22-March 03
From: I am a figment of my own imagination.
Member No.: 4,302



QUOTE (Thistledown)
Similarly, my old GM and I both rule that phys-ad's can save then use two metamagic techniques to get astral perception, instead of having it as a power. Just an idea to keep in mind.

What's the difference between this and spending the power points? I mean, you Initiate twice (to get two metamagic), and you gain enough power points to take it as a power anyway...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RedmondLarry
post Mar 28 2004, 08:38 AM
Post #10


Senior GM
***

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 1,406
Joined: 12-April 03
From: Redmond, WA
Member No.: 4,442



QUOTE (A Clockwork Lime @ Mar 27 2004, 05:49 AM)
it's still good to keep your Drain Power down as wound modifiers and other target number modifiers can raise it up, so that -1M Drain code you have will still only be 2M if you have a Serious Wound.

Target numbers for resisting drain and resisting damage are not affected by your wounds, vision penalties, movement penalties, or much of anything else.

Target numbers for resisting drain are affected by other spells you are sustaining.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Crusher Bob
post Mar 28 2004, 08:53 AM
Post #11


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,598
Joined: 15-March 03
From: Hong Kong
Member No.: 4,253



Also, shamanic modifiers (like owl) can effect your drain TNs.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RedmondLarry
post Mar 28 2004, 09:03 AM
Post #12


Senior GM
***

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 1,406
Joined: 12-April 03
From: Redmond, WA
Member No.: 4,442



Crusher Bob, as I look at Owl, I interpret that as a penalty to magical skill tests (like Conjuring and Sorcery), not to drain resistance, which is an attribute test. That's just my interpretation.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RedmondLarry
post Mar 28 2004, 09:35 AM
Post #13


Senior GM
***

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 1,406
Joined: 12-April 03
From: Redmond, WA
Member No.: 4,442



theartthief, regarding drain for a Force 1 spell. It will depend upon the spell.

Let's start with the most basic spell with the simplest drain code. Manabolt has a "+0(Damage Level)". If you cast a Force 6 Serious Damage Manabolt, you resist 3S drain. Here is how that is calculated: All spells have a base TN for drain resistance of half the force (round down). So a force 6 spell has a base drain TN of 3. The drain code for Manabolt indicates you add +0 to that, leaving it at 3. And the drain level is the same as the damage level you try to do to the opponent.

Consider Stun Ball, which is -1(DL+1) . The magician will have to roll 2 or better for his drain test for any force from 1 through 7 as long as he casts it at Serious base damage or less. Here's the calculation for Force 7: (Force / 2), round down, minus 1. That's 2 for the drain TN, and a Drain Level one higher than the damage he's trying to do to the target. So a 7S Stun Ball will have a 2D drain code. A 1S Stun Ball will have a -1D drain code, but you'll need eight 2s to resist it. If the drain code tries to be above Deadly, for each level it tries to go above deadly the TN is instead raised by 2. So a 7D stunball will have a 4D drain code, and a 3D stunball will have a 2D drain code. A 7S Stun Ball and a 3D Stun Ball both have the same drain code, 2D.

An example of a tough drain code is Increase Reflexes+3, with a +3D drain code. Cast at force 1 the drain is 3D. Cast at force 6, the drain is 6D. Ouch!

The worst drain code I've ever had on a character's spell was +2(DL+3), for a spell known at force 7. If he cast it at force 7, for light damage, he had to resist 5D drain. If he cast it at force 7, for deadly damage, he had to resist 11D drain. He's never done that. He has only cast that spell once in his career, at force 5, Light damage. The spell produces an ongoing hail storm in a circular area 180 meters in diameter. (If he withholds 1 die from his sorcery test, he can make it 182m in diamater. :) )
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
A Clockwork Lime
post Mar 28 2004, 11:23 AM
Post #14


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,616
Joined: 15-March 04
Member No.: 6,158



Are you sure that Drain Codes, being a unique type of "damage," are immune to wound penalties? I could have sworn there was a blurb somewhere that said otherwise. I just don't have my books handy at the moment to check.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lilt
post Mar 28 2004, 01:58 PM
Post #15


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,965
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Edinburgh, Scotland
Member No.: 2,032



I usually suggest taking a full mage/shaman to anyone, even 'n00bs'. It gives them a sample of all of the possible powers they could use if they went an aspected shaman of some form. It can take a few sessions to introduce them to the powers, after which the people I have played with have had no problem declaring that they're going to summon X spirit, have it conceal the team, use spell defense, project, ETC. They can then make informed decisions about what powers they want and what they can live without. If they were new and regretted going full mage then it's not a crime to let them redesign their character as a sorcerer/shamanist/conjurer/whatever.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Abstruse
post Mar 28 2004, 06:44 PM
Post #16


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,451
Joined: 21-April 03
From: Austin, TX
Member No.: 4,488



I have a question that was bugging me when I was creating a paranoid nutter of a shaman...what's the point in taking Detect Enemies at a high force other than dispelling? It seems like the same thing as Improved Reflexes to me in that the target number is set and the Force seems to have no effect on the spell's functions. Am I just missing something?

The Abstruse One
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lilt
post Mar 28 2004, 06:48 PM
Post #17


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,965
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Edinburgh, Scotland
Member No.: 2,032



You are forgetting the range, and the difficulty to resist.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post Mar 28 2004, 08:14 PM
Post #18


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



QUOTE
Are you sure that Drain Codes, being a unique type of "damage," are immune to wound penalties? I could have sworn there was a blurb somewhere that said otherwise. I just don't have my books handy at the moment to check.
Damage esistance rolls never suffer wound penalties. Drain rolls don't and neither do your body rolls to resist any kind of dmage, unless specifically noted otherwise.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sphynx
post Mar 28 2004, 08:33 PM
Post #19


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,222
Joined: 11-October 02
From: Netherlands and Belgium
Member No.: 3,437



QUOTE (Abstruse)
I have a question that was bugging me when I was creating a paranoid nutter of a shaman...what's the point in taking Detect Enemies at a high force other than dispelling? It seems like the same thing as Improved Reflexes to me in that the target number is set and the Force seems to have no effect on the spell's functions. Am I just missing something?

The Abstruse One

The problem, as with all Detection spells, is the resistance. You have a TN of 6 to notice people you don't see (how often does one need to know someone he can see is an enemy vs those you can't see?). They, on the other hand, have a TN equal to force. Detect Enemies is pretty useless unless you have it at Extended Range and Quickened, and then, for some reason most GMs decide to see how much they can screw you over for quickening a spell by having spiders and insects and a mad girlfriend all set it off instead of letting it act like a "Spider Sense". :P

Sphynx
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shockwave_IIc
post Mar 28 2004, 09:32 PM
Post #20


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,512
Joined: 16-August 03
From: Northampton
Member No.: 5,499



QUOTE (Sphynx)
The problem, as with all Detection spells, is the resistance.  You have a TN of 6 to notice people you don't see

Noticed that myself, not sure but couldn't you claim LOS without actually seeing them, assuming you didn't have to physically move from the spot.

ie. someone standing behind you. You techinally don't have an LOS to them, but it wouldn't take much to get one.

not los is someone in my living room (im upsatirs)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Thistledown
post Mar 28 2004, 10:10 PM
Post #21


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 236
Joined: 14-March 04
From: Cal Poly: SLO
Member No.: 6,155



QUOTE (Digital Heroin)
QUOTE (Thistledown @ Mar 28 2004, 05:53 AM)
Similarly, my old GM and I both rule that phys-ad's can save then use two metamagic techniques to get astral perception, instead of having it as a power.  Just an idea to keep in mind.

What's the difference between this and spending the power points? I mean, you Initiate twice (to get two metamagic), and you gain enough power points to take it as a power anyway...

The reason is that some players don't care about the other phys-ad metamagics, and this way they can spend their two power points on something else.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
theartthief
post Mar 30 2004, 07:35 AM
Post #22


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 125
Joined: 1-March 04
From: Gulf Coast
Member No.: 6,111



Thank you muchly for the help. :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th July 2025 - 01:43 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.