IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Big, Heavy, Large, Insane Amounts of Armor, Is there a limit
Apathy
post Mar 29 2004, 07:26 PM
Post #1


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,408
Joined: 31-January 04
From: Reston VA, USA
Member No.: 6,046



I've got pcs that want themselves and their vehicles to be undentable. With this in mind they layer on 8/8 or more in personal armor and ridiculously high amounts of vehicle armor on their trucks and drones (6 - 10 points hardened).

Is there any effective limit to what they can put on at chargen?

Also, if I remember correctly, the extra weight associated with adding armor makes handling tests more difficult. Is this correct, and what does it do exactly?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
3 Pages V   1 2 3 >  
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 24)
sidartha
post Mar 29 2004, 07:31 PM
Post #2


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 216
Joined: 27-January 04
Member No.: 6,025



I don't have R3.5 so I'm not exactly sure but I think in R3 there were rules under the customizations how armor affected handling. I do know that the Cargo and Load restrict how much armor you can have.
As far as people look in the main book under the equipment section as I remember most of the rules for personal armor being there.
Third thing, Load up the opposition with APDS rnds "Where's your armor now!!" :P
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Austere Emancipa...
post Mar 29 2004, 07:37 PM
Post #3


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,889
Joined: 3-August 03
From: A CPI rank 1 country
Member No.: 5,222



Every 6 points of Vehicle Armor (or part thereof) adds 1 to the Handling ratings of a vehicle. R3, p. 131 under Armor (Vehicle). Nothing serious, really.

Just remember that Grand Dragon ATGMs are dirt cheap and easy to get for anyone who really needs one. And against people with heavy armor but not that special Body, just use shotguns.

Curious: How did they get 8/8 armor on themselves without problems with the Quickness cap? Or are they all sammies/physads with extremely high QUIs?

Vehicle armor is indeed really fricken heavy, though, which should definitely be kept in mind. (Body^2) x 5 kilograms makes armoring trucks slightly problematic at times.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Apathy
post Mar 29 2004, 07:39 PM
Post #4


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,408
Joined: 31-January 04
From: Reston VA, USA
Member No.: 6,046



sidartha: Thanks, I hadn't thought about checking load ratings (doh!)

As far as the personal armor goes, I'll let them do that, and mainly punish it as a social issue ("I'm sorry sir, you can't come in like that. Would you mind visiting the coat check girl?")

APDS rounds wouldn't fit in for the recent runs (swarms of bug spirits), but they might come in handy later.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Apathy
post Mar 29 2004, 07:42 PM
Post #5


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,408
Joined: 31-January 04
From: Reston VA, USA
Member No.: 6,046



QUOTE
Curious: How did they get 8/8 armor on themselves without problems with the Quickness cap? Or are they all sammies/physads with extremely high QUIs?
  • They have high quickness (6+)
  • FFBA doesn't count against the quickness cap
  • You have to be 2 points above your quickness before it actually starts to effect you.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Austere Emancipa...
post Mar 29 2004, 07:49 PM
Post #6


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,889
Joined: 3-August 03
From: A CPI rank 1 country
Member No.: 5,222



Still, could I see the numbers? Just comparing to the numbers you usually see in the Armor Min/Max threads that seems a bit much. So either I'm missing out on some minmax goodness, or there might be a flaw somewhere.

You can also interpret the body armor rules in SR3 so that you only get protection from the 2 pieces of armor with highest ratings. Many do.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zazen
post Mar 29 2004, 07:54 PM
Post #7


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,685
Joined: 17-August 02
Member No.: 3,123



QUOTE
You have to be 2 points above your quickness before it actually starts to effect you.


If they're layering, then it only takes one point to give them a penalty to all quickness-related tasks (pistols, etc.) as well as a reduced movement rate.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shockwave_IIc
post Mar 29 2004, 08:00 PM
Post #8


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,512
Joined: 16-August 03
From: Northampton
Member No.: 5,499



But thats only ballistic no? still a point mind.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Austere Emancipa...
post Mar 29 2004, 08:11 PM
Post #9


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,889
Joined: 3-August 03
From: A CPI rank 1 country
Member No.: 5,222



So it seems, Ballistic only. Achieving 8 will require the total Ballistic rating for this purpose to be higher than 6, however, assuming there are more than 2 pieces of armor (which is probably the case, because I'm not aware of any legal canon armor with a Ballistic rating of 6).

Which is a non-issue if you limit it to the 2 highest ratings.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
A Clockwork Lime
post Mar 29 2004, 08:37 PM
Post #10


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,616
Joined: 15-March 04
Member No.: 6,158



I'm pretty sure armor is no different -- you always round down, so you have to beat Quickness by two points to get the penalty, not one.

In any case, since vehicle armor comes in ratings, you can apply the "max rating of 6" that all starting characters have to abide by. And they can only do it as a customization to a vehicle (designing a vehicle is technically a GM-only function in Rigger 3), so they have to make sure the vehicle has the available CF and Load for the armor. If they're not using Concealed Armor, they're also going to run into a lot of problems with the law if they go anywhere outside the Barrens. Who knew Lone Star would have a problem with an obviously heavily armored van rolling around Downtown?

And as others pointed out, a single Great Dragon ATGM will take down most heavily armored civilian vehicles. 20D Anti-Vehicular rockets tend to do that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Austere Emancipa...
post Mar 29 2004, 08:42 PM
Post #11


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,889
Joined: 3-August 03
From: A CPI rank 1 country
Member No.: 5,222



Great Dragons actually take down any and all vehicles they can hit, except perhaps the tanks in SOTA (don't have that book). Those things practically laugh at any armor of less than rating 20.

The QUI penalty for layering armor is calculated by adding together the total Ballistic ratings of all worn armor and comparing that to the char's QUI. For each point the total exceeds QUI, you get +1 on tests and all the other penalties. There's no division there, so even a single point above QUI gives you a penalty of 1.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
A Clockwork Lime
post Mar 29 2004, 08:53 PM
Post #12


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,616
Joined: 15-March 04
Member No.: 6,158



Unless there's errata that I'm unaware of, it's every 2 points it exceeds Quickness as per page 285 of Shadowrun 3rd Edition for the Combat Pool penalty, which is what I was meaning to point out. Sorry for not making that more clear.

And yeah, it will take out most vehicles. But military/police vehicles can more easily be bumped up to Armor 20 if they really need to, including Ares Roadmasters.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Austere Emancipa...
post Mar 29 2004, 08:57 PM
Post #13


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,889
Joined: 3-August 03
From: A CPI rank 1 country
Member No.: 5,222



Well, to be exact, you'd need an armor rating of 30 to make a real difference. 6D or above and a vehicle is pretty screwed DamRes-wise.

For the CP penalty, it is indeed per 2 points. You add up those parts of Ballistic and Impact ratings that exceed the char's QUI, divide it by two rounding down and reduce that from CP. Ball9/Imp7/QUI6 leads to a 2-point penalty in CP, as per the 10th corrected printing.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RedmondLarry
post Mar 29 2004, 09:04 PM
Post #14


Senior GM
***

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 1,406
Joined: 12-April 03
From: Redmond, WA
Member No.: 4,442



There are two different penalties here. One is sum of Ballistic vs. Quickness to determine penalties to Quickness and Quickness-linked skills. Every 1 point counts here. The other is the penalty to Combat Pool, every 2 full points of Ballistic AND Impact count there.

The characters only get benefit from the two pieces of armor with the highest Ballistic Rating (and only half benefit from one), and the two pieces of armor with the highest Impact Rating (again, only half benefit from one). Plus they add helmets and forearm guards and shields at full value. However they get penalties from all pieces of armor, at full value, with the exception of FFBA or other things that have special rules. Helmets and forearm guards do count at full value for determining penalties.

It's very hard for someone to have 8/8 armor, without also having lots of penalties AND looking like something that everyone should run away from screaming the "North Hollywood Bank Robbers are here!"

Apathy, can you describe how they get the 8/8 armor?

As far as the Vehicle armor goes, at some point they start to look like those old Armored Cars that would stop at banks and Jewelry stores. Luckily those went away when we shifted to electronic currency.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
A Clockwork Lime
post Mar 29 2004, 09:20 PM
Post #15


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,616
Joined: 15-March 04
Member No.: 6,158



Armor rating 30? How do you figure? Armor rating 20 or 21 (depending on how you want to read the rules) makes it completely immune to Great Dragon ATGMs. That's the perk of hardened armor. Anti-vehicular ammo doesn't change the fact that you still have to beat the Armor Rating to affect it, which is why loading up a Light Pistol with AV ammo isn't going to do you a lick of good on a vehcile with Armor 6.

Or is there (again) something I'm missing?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Austere Emancipa...
post Mar 29 2004, 09:22 PM
Post #16


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,889
Joined: 3-August 03
From: A CPI rank 1 country
Member No.: 5,222



Holy crap, really? I never thought of it like that.

Well, as they say: Not In My Game.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shockwave_IIc
post Mar 29 2004, 09:28 PM
Post #17


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,512
Joined: 16-August 03
From: Northampton
Member No.: 5,499



QUOTE ("Sr3 pg149")
the power of the AV munitions is reduced by half the armour rating(round down the armour ratingbefore calculating the power of the AV munitions attack) If the AV power rating does not exceed the reduced armour rating, the weapon does no damage


So a Ceska with AV ammo can hurt up to armour 11 vehicles. :D

damn my bad thought it did 7L, but no....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RedmondLarry
post Mar 29 2004, 09:33 PM
Post #18


Senior GM
***

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 1,406
Joined: 12-April 03
From: Redmond, WA
Member No.: 4,442



Due to Shockwave's change to his post, my post is unneeded, and is hereby removed.

This post has been edited by OurTeam: Mar 29 2004, 10:22 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Austere Emancipa...
post Mar 29 2004, 09:36 PM
Post #19


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,889
Joined: 3-August 03
From: A CPI rank 1 country
Member No.: 5,222



Well, so is this.

This post has been edited by Austere Emancipator: Mar 31 2004, 09:44 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RedmondLarry
post Mar 29 2004, 09:39 PM
Post #20


Senior GM
***

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 1,406
Joined: 12-April 03
From: Redmond, WA
Member No.: 4,442



Due to Shockwave's change to his post, my post is unneeded.

This post has been edited by OurTeam: Mar 29 2004, 10:22 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Austere Emancipa...
post Mar 29 2004, 09:41 PM
Post #21


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,889
Joined: 3-August 03
From: A CPI rank 1 country
Member No.: 5,222



And this one too.

This post has been edited by Austere Emancipator: Mar 31 2004, 09:44 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
A Clockwork Lime
post Mar 29 2004, 09:45 PM
Post #22


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,616
Joined: 15-March 04
Member No.: 6,158



Ah, in that case I guess it does require at least Armor 40-41 to stop a Great Dragon. Weird. I could have sworn that the entire point of AV ammo was that it didn't get manipulated by the fact that you were using it against a vehicle, unlike regular ammo. Stupid overcomplicated rules and piss-poor memory. :P :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zeel De Mort
post Mar 29 2004, 09:58 PM
Post #23


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 403
Joined: 27-August 02
From: Scotland
Member No.: 3,175



8/8 Armour:

Armour Jacket (5/3)
Armour Vest with plates (4/3)
Hard Hat (0/1)
Titanium Bone Lacing (1/1)
Dermal Sheath 3 (0/2)

For a total of 8/8. Okay you'd look like an idiot with a hard hat on, but you guys just wanted to know how to get 8/8. :) There's one way to do it then, there are plenty of others.

Obviously you need a pretty high quickness to get 8/8 without penalty.

Or you could go for..

Winterised Coverall (4/4)
FFBA 3 (4/1)
Hard Hat (0/1)
Titanium Bone Lacing (1/1)
Orthoskin 3 (1/2)

For 8/8 and minimal quickness, but you'd still look like a tit..


[Edit] If you can't take cyber/bioware, replace it with a Large Riot Shield (2/3) and lots of quickness. Again, see above about not looking so great while doing so though. :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TheOneRonin
post Mar 29 2004, 09:59 PM
Post #24


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,109
Joined: 16-October 03
From: Raleigh, NC
Member No.: 5,729



Actually, 8B is not that hard to get to, even if it is a little cheesy.

Armored Jacket (5/3) + FFBA (4/1) = 7/3. Then toss in Orthoskin lv 2 (+1B/+1I) or Titanium Bone Lacing (+1B/+1I). Throw in both of those mods, and you get 9/5 with no penalties for Qck of 5 or greater. I don't know if it says this in the book, but I would assume that the bonus ballistic points you get from Orthoskin and Bone lace do NOT count against your total ballistic rating for quickness penalties.

I'd appreciate it if you guys out there could check my math and mechanics, but I think I'm dead on.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shockwave_IIc
post Mar 29 2004, 10:04 PM
Post #25


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,512
Joined: 16-August 03
From: Northampton
Member No.: 5,499



I always thought you got a minimum of 1 pt off of a second layer (assuming it had a value to start with)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd January 2025 - 11:42 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.