 Avatars |
 Aug 16 2003, 05:20 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Not a Moderator  Group: Members Posts: 1,075 Joined: 26-February 02 From: BrizVegas, Australia Member No.: 904  |
Are Avatars enabled or disabled here? If enabled, can we import them?
|
 |
 
|
 |
Replies
(1 - 14)
|
Aug 16 2003, 05:29 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Keeper of the Rabid Woodchucks Group: Members Posts: 81 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Victoria BC Member No.: 2 |
Disabled. Chance of them ever being enabled: Zero.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 16 2003, 05:29 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 498 Joined: 31-May 02 From: All the way in the Back to the Left. Member No.: 2,800 |
:( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :(
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 16 2003, 05:31 AM
Post
#4
|
|||
|
Not a Moderator Group: Members Posts: 1,075 Joined: 26-February 02 From: BrizVegas, Australia Member No.: 904 |
That's cool - I was just asking, because it is still an option under My Controls. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
Aug 16 2003, 05:32 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 59 Joined: 10-March 02 Member No.: 2,315 |
That would explain why it would not register the avatar I had selected.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 16 2003, 05:50 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Keeper of the Rabid Woodchucks Group: Members Posts: 81 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Victoria BC Member No.: 2 |
SOMEONE who was asked to remove it didn't.
He is now being beaten. |
|
|
|
|
Aug 16 2003, 05:53 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Man In The Machine Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,264 Joined: 26-February 02 From: I-495 S Member No.: 1,105 |
And he is probely enjoying it as we type...
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 17 2003, 04:08 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 7 Joined: 15-June 03 Member No.: 4,742 |
How come we can't have them?
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 17 2003, 04:43 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 6,748 Joined: 5-July 02 Member No.: 2,935 |
Screws up the bandwidth. Unlike Bulldrek, they also crack down on pust-pumping, thank Gnu.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 23 2003, 12:58 PM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 731 Joined: 25-March 02 From: Rye, New York Member No.: 2,470 |
That and the one available were pretty lame. what about the user picture option? Andi f "never" why's it included?
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 23 2003, 07:00 PM
Post
#11
|
|||
|
the Coke in the Machine Group: Retired Admins Posts: 128 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Cascadia Member No.: 46 |
Because. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
Sep 27 2003, 08:19 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 897 Joined: 26-February 02 From: TIME OUT Member No.: 1,989 |
:( i like avatars, but if they mess with bandwith then, what are ya gonna do.
will postig pictures in posts ever be available? |
|
|
|
|
Jan 9 2004, 03:10 AM
Post
#13
|
|||
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 413 Joined: 20-November 03 Member No.: 5,835 |
What if you were to allow avatar images, but only if they were hosted OFF-SITE? Of course, this is still very abusable -- one person links in a 1280x1024 porn jpeg, and that couldbe trouble... though anyone that did that would probably be banned or suspended for a long time, lol. Most Dumpshockers seem to be people with a lot of cluons, though, so I don't think that would be much of a problem. (Cluons are those elementary particles that grant us clue-ful-ness -- as opposed to Bozons, which land us in the CLUE files.) |
||
|
|
|
||
|
Jan 9 2004, 03:27 PM
Post
#14
|
|
|
Manus Celer Dei Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,006 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
To do that effectively they'd have to review every picture before allowing it, and inevitably some people would choose "borderline" pictures that either get refused while the person involved insists that the pic is fine or that get passed and then someone gets offended and yells at people and...
Benefit for us: minor Cost to us: potential exposure to pictures we may dislike, also minor Benefit to admins: this thread goes away (minor) Cost to admins: dealing with problems outlined above plus more that I have no doubt failed to consider. High to very high depending on cluon/bozon ratio. Not gonna happen. ~J |
|
|
|
|
Mar 1 2004, 12:21 AM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 903 Joined: 11-December 02 From: The other end of your computer screen Member No.: 3,724 |
actually...I have avatars on my forum that are remotely linked and really I'm just thinking of cutting out the whole avatar side of things all together because that remote link idea really sucks. It really depends alot on the integrity of the server that the avatar is stored on and a clean connection with it. You can't always garantee that, as I'm finding out.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 2nd December 2024 - 03:09 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.