![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 750 Joined: 9-August 06 Member No.: 9,059 ![]() |
So I finally read the matrix rules for SR5 to see why everyone hates technomancers in this version and I don't get it. Here is a modest build proposal that makes them very useful.
Obviously the correct thing to do is build an elven technomancer with Exceptional Attribute Charisma, put 9 points in it, pay a mage to quicken a Force 9 Increase Charisma spell as soon as you can to boost that to 13, then start Submerging and take as Echos: Attack Upgrade (2), Resonance Decryption program, Resonance Biofeedback program, Resonance Hammer program, and Resonance Lockdown program. Your matrix DV will be 18(!!), or 24 if you bother to max out your marks first, and with lockdown and biofeedback you'll be sure to kill pretty much all spiders you can hit in 1-2 combat rounds. Even cold sim users will go down to the lock and stun overflow. The rare person who managed to jack out and not go into overflow after soaking the dumpshock will live as the rarest of matrix legends for surviving your wrath. Put all the rest of your karma (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rotate.gif) into Cybercombat skill buy a Cerebral Booster 3 and a Pain Editor. After you've maxed out Cybercombat skill and have 21 attack dice you can start putting some karma into Firewall echos and Willpower. You pansy. This is clearly a well balanced and reasonably achievable character who proves that contrary to the erroneous fantasies of Dumpshockers, deckers are actually quite obsolete compared to technomancers. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,076 Joined: 31-August 05 From: Rock Hill, SC Member No.: 7,655 ![]() |
So you're saying after putting (literally) hundreds of karma and thousands of nuyen into your one-trick pony he'll be AWESOME at that one thing he's focused on? Color me surprised! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/ohplease.gif)
People get so hung up on the "potentially limitless" advancement potential of Resonance and Magic after submersions that they put blinders on to how much karma is required to get up there. Do you really think that HUNDREDS OF KARMA is a reasonable timeline for advancement, to be good at a single thing? I ran a campaign for almost two years and the players got 150 total karma earned. Your character is advancing at a nearly glacial pace. Just a hint: if your character concept requires hundreds of karma to become good at one thing, then chances are it probably isn't all that smart a build. Technomancers are still crap, plain and simple. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
I am giving SlitheryD the benefit of the Doubt here... My guess is that he was being sarcastic, while pointing out that Technomancers were overly penalized in the transition to SR5. Could be wrong, though... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif)
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,076 Joined: 31-August 05 From: Rock Hill, SC Member No.: 7,655 ![]() |
Consider me suitably trolled, then, if that is the case. Technomancers are still a bit of a sore spot for me in regards to the new edition.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 ![]() |
i read that as being sarcastic as well.
perhaps if he were to spend a paragraph or two ranting about how obviously versatile this build is, that would help (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#6
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 750 Joined: 9-August 06 Member No.: 9,059 ![]() |
I thought it was pretty obvious I was joking. I do find it ironic, however, that the best way to be a technomancer is to largely ignore Resonance abilities and focus on magically boosted Attributes to have better Matrix Attributes than you can get with a cyberdeck.
After discussion on here I was prepared for high drain codes on threaded complex forms, but I didn't know they were going to be so...useless. What does Static Bomb do that a normal matrix Hide action doesn't, other than damage you in the process? Ditto for Editor CF vs. Edit File action. Resonance Spike is hilariously bad compared to a Data Spike action. Who would use this garbage even if the Fading cost was L-99? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#7
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,351 Joined: 19-September 09 From: Behind the shadows of the Resonance Member No.: 17,653 ![]() |
... Static Bomb doesn't generate OS, and affects multiple targets at once.After discussion on here I was prepared for high drain codes on threaded complex forms, but I didn't know they were going to be so...useless. What does Static Bomb do that a normal matrix Hide action doesn't, other than damage you in the process? Ditto for Editor CF vs. Edit File action. Resonance Spike is hilariously bad compared to a Data Spike action. Who would use this garbage even if the Fading cost was L-99? Editor has the advantage of not requiring a MARK. Resonance Spike... Yeah, Data Spike is likely gonna be better. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#8
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 750 Joined: 9-August 06 Member No.: 9,059 ![]() |
Meh, I'd rather just spam Cleaner at low level or permasustain Static Veil during long waiting periods to manage OS. I suppose I can see the use of multiple targets if you're being swarmed, but not at that Fading code.
For Editor, at that Fading code a single mark doesn't seem like much of an additional burden. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#9
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,351 Joined: 19-September 09 From: Behind the shadows of the Resonance Member No.: 17,653 ![]() |
Yeah, and if you don't need MARKs of your own there's an even easier way to hide yourself: Reboot, which not only cleans you of all marks but also resets your OS to zero.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#10
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 ![]() |
editor also edits things a heck of a lot faster than edit actions, because it gives you your net hits in edit actions.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#11
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,351 Joined: 19-September 09 From: Behind the shadows of the Resonance Member No.: 17,653 ![]() |
Editor also takes [Level] Combat Turns before it becomes permanent.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#12
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#13
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 129 Joined: 3-July 08 Member No.: 16,112 ![]() |
Well, actually the elven Attackomancer is the first specialist approach to a viable TM I have seen so far. You start with 9 or more probably 8 DV out of the box, which is actually a possible way to brick something reliably within just one action. With just Cybercombat and Computer, and none of the other skills you still can get marks, crash programs and devices, get the data, assist the actual decker, ...
Your primary focus would be Face, of course. Lowest TM prio is C, then either Elf B to get a lot of Edge, Attributes A, Skills D, Ressources E, which makes you a lucky amateur or Elf D, Attr A/B, Skills B/A, Ress. E again, which makes you an unlucky pro. There is also a lot of potential, spend your Karma on Face skills or submersions and your Nuyen on wares, as you don't actually need your Resonance. Still, a lot of investmest to be able to one-shot brick someone, which is not my favourite attack anyway. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#14
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 277 Joined: 19-November 06 From: Wagontown, PA Member No.: 9,903 ![]() |
I still find the best way to deal with TM changes for SR5 is to gently weep myself to sleep at night. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/twirl.gif)
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#15
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,076 Joined: 31-August 05 From: Rock Hill, SC Member No.: 7,655 ![]() |
I still find the best way to deal with TM changes for SR5 is to gently weep myself to sleep at night. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/twirl.gif) Sounds about right. After the epic fuck-up that is the technomancer rules for SR5, among other massive fails, I really have no faith or confidence in the current leadership and development of the Shadowrun line. If that sounds like a strong statement, well, yeah. It's meant to be. It's how I've felt ever since I digested the massive turd that is the SR5 rules. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#16
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,289 Joined: 2-October 08 Member No.: 16,392 ![]() |
After the epic fuck-up that is the technomancer rules for SR5, among other massive fails, I really have no faith or confidence in the current leadership and development of the Shadowrun line. If that sounds like a strong statement, well, yeah. It's meant to be. It's how I've felt ever since I digested the massive turd that is the SR5 rules. I agree. There are some things they did that worked well. And then there's everything else. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#17
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 750 Joined: 9-August 06 Member No.: 9,059 ![]() |
Other than the grenade/AOE defense fiasco, what else are you pissed about? I like most of the changes but no doubt haven't though through all of the implications enough to figure how they're secretly screwing some people.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#18
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,076 Joined: 31-August 05 From: Rock Hill, SC Member No.: 7,655 ![]() |
Technomancers.
Mysterious nanite-melting nonsense. Stupid economy. Half-assed Matrix rules with even more loop-holes than SR4's. Half-baked wireless bonus rules. I'm sure there's more, but that's all I can think of at the present moment, and I really don't want to derail the topic any more than it is already (let's get back to our Swiftian-style epic troll.) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#19
|
|
Douche ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 1,584 Joined: 2-March 11 Member No.: 23,135 ![]() |
Other than the grenade/AOE defense fiasco, what else are you pissed about? I like most of the changes but no doubt haven't though through all of the implications enough to figure how they're secretly screwing some people. If you consider that they seem to cling to the edition that is the least like all the other editions, I think you can come to the conclusion that Shadowrun just isn't a game they like. Nanite hives and technomancers and wi-fis are a pretty brief blip in the overall scheme of things. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#20
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,076 Joined: 31-August 05 From: Rock Hill, SC Member No.: 7,655 ![]() |
If you consider that they seem to cling to the edition that is the least like all the other editions, I think you can come to the conclusion that Shadowrun just isn't a game they like. Nanite hives and technomancers and wi-fis are a pretty brief blip in the overall scheme of things. This is some pretty presumptuous shit, here. I got into Shadowrun back in in Third Edition, ten years ago. I got into the game for the setting, not the rules (which had issues, but I worked through them.) SR4 was a huge step forward in many ways. I like the advancement of the setting, the metaplot, and the rules changes. I thought as a whole they worked rather well. Over time I even came to like the SR4 Matrix rules. But because I don't like the overall package of SR5, I must not like Shadowrun in general? To me, SR5 seems regressing, not moving forward. YMMV, of course, but overall I'll only play it if I don't have any other choice, and I sure as shit don't have to give CGL any more of my money. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#21
|
|
Douche ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 1,584 Joined: 2-March 11 Member No.: 23,135 ![]() |
This is some pretty presumptuous shit, here. I got into Shadowrun back in in Third Edition, ten years ago. I got into the game for the setting, not the rules (which had issues, but I worked through them.) SR4 was a huge step forward in many ways. I like the advancement of the setting, the metaplot, and the rules changes. I thought as a whole they worked rather well. Over time I even came to like the SR4 Matrix rules. But because I don't like the overall package of SR5, I must not like Shadowrun in general? To me, SR5 seems regressing, not moving forward. YMMV, of course, but overall I'll only play it if I don't have any other choice, and I sure as shit don't have to give CGL any more of my money. You're repeating what I said, just all angry and contrary. We could be having the same conversation about how D&D5 elves can't teleport like D&D4 elves and how that's a regression, but how you view it entirely depends on whether or not you thing it was a good progression in the first place. The SR4 setting changes are ultimately a spin-off of Shadowrun -- there's a lot in there that completely changes the game and the way you could expect the game to play going forward, but a whole lot of it has been pulled back for the new edition to bring it more in line with expectations from SR2 and SR3. SR4 is comparatively way out in left field at this point. RPGs are funny things, in that you can put the genie back in the bottle, and that's what they've done. If you think they shouldn't have, it means you didn't think it was too a shitty genie to begin with, and there's not much to say to you about it except that you like the spin-off more than the base game. There's no immutable law of the universe that says that anything that they said happened in a particular edition actually happened and they just have to forever work from those established premises like an undergrad trying to get his GPA back up after flunking calculus. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#22
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,962 Joined: 27-February 13 Member No.: 76,875 ![]() |
Spin-off is completely inaccurate - it was a progression, and one without which I very much doubt Shadowrun could have survived. Now you might think that the progression took away too much of the old, but destroying the new just to bring that back more of the old is a horrible choice.
And besides that, your particular point of comparison is HILARIOUSLY irrelevant, because it represents a completely different thing. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#23
|
|
Douche ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 1,584 Joined: 2-March 11 Member No.: 23,135 ![]() |
Spin-off is completely inaccurate - it was a progression, and one without which I very much doubt Shadowrun could have survived. Now you might think that the progression took away too much of the old, but destroying the new just to bring that back more of the old is a horrible choice. And besides that, your particular point of comparison is HILARIOUSLY irrelevant, because it represents a completely different thing. Nah. SR4 is the AfterMASH to SR3's movie and SR5's TV show. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#24
|
|
Douche ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 1,584 Joined: 2-March 11 Member No.: 23,135 ![]() |
Or maybe W*A*L*T*E*R.
Seriously, that was almost a thing? Wow. Not sorry I missed that one. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#25
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,962 Joined: 27-February 13 Member No.: 76,875 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#26
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,389 Joined: 20-August 12 From: Bunbury, western australia Member No.: 53,300 ![]() |
The speed ratings suck, hard, and a couple of things are half baked, but overall I like 5th.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#27
|
|
Douche ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 1,584 Joined: 2-March 11 Member No.: 23,135 ![]() |
Why? What makes that the case? Well, it's got some familiar players in familiar parts, but it's overall a completely different thing. I can keep carrying the comparison if that's what you're after. Bottom line is, though, all the HATEHATEHATE on the new edition for not being as way out there as the old edition is a little tiresome. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#28
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 ![]() |
Well, actually the elven Attackomancer is the first specialist approach to a viable TM I have seen so far. You start with 9 or more probably 8 DV out of the box, which is actually a possible way to brick something reliably within just one action. With just Cybercombat and Computer, and none of the other skills you still can get marks, crash programs and devices, get the data, assist the actual decker, ... Your primary focus would be Face, of course. Lowest TM prio is C, then either Elf B to get a lot of Edge, Attributes A, Skills D, Ressources E, which makes you a lucky amateur or Elf D, Attr A/B, Skills B/A, Ress. E again, which makes you an unlucky pro. There is also a lot of potential, spend your Karma on Face skills or submersions and your Nuyen on wares, as you don't actually need your Resonance. Still, a lot of investmest to be able to one-shot brick someone, which is not my favourite attack anyway. huh. i got some bad news for you. a chargen hacker can get a deck with 4/5/6/7 for stats. by placing the 7 as attack, choosing decryption (which the technomancer can't pick up without submerging) and thereby get 8 (matching what the technomancer can have at chargen). then, choosing another program (same situation as decryption), hammer will boost your damage by 2. meaning you're ahead of the technomancer on bricking already, and have made no sacrifices whatsoever in your build to do so. and, with the right programs, a hacker can also hit two targets at once. and make it link-lock. if they're willing to risk some more matrix damage, the hacker can also deal non-matrix damage to an actual person, not just a device. in short, the technomancer assassin is a joke. literally. it was presented as a "hey look how much it takes to get a technomancer to look scary" joke. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#29
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,962 Joined: 27-February 13 Member No.: 76,875 ![]() |
Well, it's got some familiar players in familiar parts, but it's overall a completely different thing. I can keep carrying the comparison if that's what you're after. Bottom line is, though, all the HATEHATEHATE on the new edition for not being as way out there as the old edition is a little tiresome. You're completely missing the actual complaints people are having. Technomancers, as they stand, are as horribly underpowered that they may as well not have been included. The structure of the Matrix changed in a way that notably nerfed them indirectly, and then the nerf bat was brutally taken to them in a way that makes them worse than deckers as Matrix specialists AND much less flexible. Now, it's fair to say that SR4 moved (at first) more towards a transhumanist feel, and that SR5 is moving things more to the cyberpunk angle, but that has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with this discussion. It's as irrelevant as it can get - the problem here is mechanical. I happen to think you're wrong about the differences, but I'm only willing to get into that distraction for so long. Hell, technomancers find their conceptual roots in SR3 to begin with, making this even less relevant (and, incidentally, it comes off as "I like SR3 better and if you like SR4 that's BadWrongRun!"). |
|
|
![]()
Post
#30
|
|
Douche ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 1,584 Joined: 2-March 11 Member No.: 23,135 ![]() |
You're completely missing the actual complaints people are having. Technomancers, as they stand, are as horribly underpowered that they may as well not have been included. The structure of the Matrix changed in a way that notably nerfed them indirectly, and then the nerf bat was brutally taken to them in a way that makes them worse than deckers as Matrix specialists AND much less flexible. Now, it's fair to say that SR4 moved (at first) more towards a transhumanist feel, and that SR5 is moving things more to the cyberpunk angle, but that has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with this discussion. It's as irrelevant as it can get - the problem here is mechanical. I happen to think you're wrong about the differences, but I'm only willing to get into that distraction for so long. Hell, technomancers find their conceptual roots in SR3 to begin with, making this even less relevant (and, incidentally, it comes off as "I like SR3 better and if you like SR4 that's BadWrongRun!"). The question was: Other than the grenade/AOE defense fiasco, what else are you pissed about? I like most of the changes but no doubt haven't though through all of the implications enough to figure how they're secretly screwing some people. And then of course there was all the generic blah blah hate hate hate. What thread were you reading? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#31
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,962 Joined: 27-February 13 Member No.: 76,875 ![]() |
Yes, and as far as technomancers go, the serious problems people are having are mechanical in nature. They've basically been nerfed into oblivion and lost huge swathes of capability.
In point of fact, most of the major points of contention I can think of are generally mechanical or elements that are truly new to SR5 (as in, seen in none of SR1-4, such as wireless bonuses). |
|
|
![]()
Post
#32
|
|
Douche ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 1,584 Joined: 2-March 11 Member No.: 23,135 ![]() |
Yes, and as far as technomancers go, the serious problems people are having are mechanical in nature. They've basically been nerfed into oblivion and lost huge swathes of capability. Not seeing it. The techno might not stand up persona vs persona, at least against 400,000 nuyen worth of gear, but you don't actually need the bitchinest persona for hacking, and sprites and complex forms are useful. What's the over-under on a decker versus a techno with a small horde of attack sprites anyway? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#33
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,389 Joined: 20-August 12 From: Bunbury, western australia Member No.: 53,300 ![]() |
Not seeing it. The techno might not stand up persona vs persona, at least against 400,000 nuyen worth of gear, but you don't actually need the bitchinest persona for hacking, and sprites and complex forms are useful. What's the over-under on a decker versus a techno with a small horde of attack sprites anyway? Whoever's done the math, don't forget to factor in Agent programs. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#34
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 651 Joined: 20-July 12 From: Arizona Member No.: 53,066 ![]() |
Most problems stem from the higher Fading costs & lower utility of the CF's making most CF's either too undesirable or too high a possible fading penalty over traditional methods of doing similar things.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#35
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,389 Joined: 20-August 12 From: Bunbury, western australia Member No.: 53,300 ![]() |
Honestly, if I were going to play a matrix character I would consider a technomancer only if my GM was INFAMOUSLY stingy with the nuyen handouts.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#36
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,962 Joined: 27-February 13 Member No.: 76,875 ![]() |
Not seeing it. The techno might not stand up persona vs persona, at least against 400,000 nuyen worth of gear, but you don't actually need the bitchinest persona for hacking, and sprites and complex forms are useful. What's the over-under on a decker versus a techno with a small horde of attack sprites anyway? Decker gets better dice pools over all, generally better limits, fewer skills and attributes to worry about, has leftovers from their primary priority that allow them to be an awesome decker and have a splash of something else, can afford Essence loss and thus get initiative boosters... The decker gets a bit of an edge in-Matrix while getting to be more flexible out of the matrix, making them strictly superior. Sprites can be good, but also took a SERIOUS hit for the most part (in fact, they're effectively harder to get than spirits and cause the same damage to you, but they're far less powerful). Technomancers don't stack up well against any comparable. Add to that the fact that Fading and Matrix damage are going to the same track for them and all the extra ways you get hit with Matrix damage, and it only gets worse. Then there's the completely out of line Fading codes on Complex Forms. Also, do keep in mind the various limitations on sprites. You wouldn't call it balanced if street sams could get the dice pools to operate but were flat out worse than an adept built for the same job, would you? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#37
|
|
Douche ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 1,584 Joined: 2-March 11 Member No.: 23,135 ![]() |
Decker gets better dice pools over all Doubtful, and too general a statement. Dice still come from skill + attribute, and programs might give one or two dice on defensive actions but nothing offensively. QUOTE generally better limits Doubtful, also largely irrelevant. If mimicking the Sony CIY-720's persona is your goal as a techno, you can do it. And just like the decker, you'll spend 75% of your priority A (resources for decker, attributes for techno) on doing it. Generally speaking, though, limits in the 6-8 range are things you grow into, and not a major concern for a starting character. QUOTE fewer skills and attributes to worry about Skills come with new abilities, and your priority sets you up for 2 of the 3 Resonance skills. Deckers still need Logic, Willpower, and Intuition at high levels. QUOTE has leftovers from their primary priority that allow them to be an awesome decker and have a splash of something else Just a splash money-wise. Being a technomancer sets you up pretty handily to pick up a support role in any of the mental or social skills. QUOTE , can afford Essence loss and thus get initiative boosters... Oddly, low Resonance doesn't interfere with your hacking. Cerebral Boosters are pretty sweet for Technos, especially at the minimal cost of one die on Resonance rolls. QUOTE The decker gets a bit of an edge in-Matrix while getting to be more flexible out of the matrix, making them strictly superior. That's a stretch. If everything is a smash-and-grab, deckers might do better because they can configure for it. Technomancers can handle subtle things way better, like snooping a comm line for 17 straight hours, or tracking a user in a host throughout his workday, which are things a decker would have a hard time with. QUOTE Sprites can be good, but also took a SERIOUS hit for the most part (in fact, they're effectively harder to get than spirits and cause the same damage to you, but they're far less powerful). And technomancers/otaku used to permanently fade by young adulthood. Not really interested in what they used to be, rather more interested in what they are. Fact is, a cheap-as-free Level 3 Crack Sprite can keep IC off the techno's back for 2 combat turns (~6 complex actions) , where a decker would have to fight/evade/flee. Fault sprites are monsters at higher levels -- Level 6 sprite with sustained Electron Storm for 6DV per action phase plus punching at Attack 9, while causing 2 extra Noise. You should probably register one during your downtime to call out in an emergency, it's probably worth the headache. QUOTE Technomancers don't stack up well against any comparable. Still don't see it. I keep hearing it, but most of the complaints aren't centered around being completely shown up at the table by the decker, and strikes me just as unimaginative bitching. QUOTE Add to that the fact that Fading and Matrix damage are going to the same track for them and all the extra ways you get hit with Matrix damage, and it only gets worse. Then there's the completely out of line Fading codes on Complex Forms. Also, do keep in mind the various limitations on sprites. It must suck to be a rigger, taking biofeedback while getting shot at, all on the same track. QUOTE You wouldn't call it balanced if street sams could get the dice pools to operate but were flat out worse than an adept built for the same job, would you? Depending on which day of the week it is, by some complaints, everything is better and/or worse than everything else at the same things. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#38
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,962 Joined: 27-February 13 Member No.: 76,875 ![]() |
Doubtful, and too general a statement. Dice still come from skill + attribute, and programs might give one or two dice on defensive actions but nothing offensively. Deckers will have an extra 2 dice from Cerebral Boosters, which is generally out of reach for technomancers, and makes them worse at what is supposed to make up for what they lose. Doubtful, also largely irrelevant. If mimicking the Sony CIY-720's persona is your goal as a techno, you can do it. And just like the decker, you'll spend 75% of your priority A (resources for decker, attributes for techno) on doing it. Generally speaking, though, limits in the 6-8 range are things you grow into, and not a major concern for a starting character. And as the decker grows, his limit advantage gets even larger. Plus he gets all the benefits of PAN/WAN functionality with those same attributes. Skills come with new abilities, and your priority sets you up for 2 of the 3 Resonance skills. Deckers still need Logic, Willpower, and Intuition at high levels. And a technomancer needs all three of those in addition to Charisma and Resonance. Just a splash money-wise. Being a technomancer sets you up pretty handily to pick up a support role in any of the mental or social skills. Having run the numbers, it's a very significant portion. Having the leftover skills for that is difficult for a technomancer. If you go A/B for Resonance and Attributes (in either combination), you're looking at 28/2 or 22/0 skills (probably). If you ignore Decompiling, you'll still want to spend the lion's share of that on Hacking, Electronic Warfare, Cybercombat, Computer, Software, and Hardware (Rating 4 of each being 24 points). Oddly, low Resonance doesn't interfere with your hacking. Cerebral Boosters are pretty sweet for Technos, especially at the minimal cost of one die on Resonance rolls. So... To match up in terms of dice pool alone, you have to diminish your Fading resistance and your facility with the abilities that are supposed to make up for everything you lose? That's a stretch. If everything is a smash-and-grab, deckers might do better because they can configure for it. Technomancers can handle subtle things way better, like snooping a comm line for 17 straight hours, or tracking a user in a host throughout his workday, which are things a decker would have a hard time with. Yeah, long run hacking like that isn't really in the core book (slated for Data Trails, called Deep Runs if I remember Bull's post right). Technomancers might be able to get around this in rare cases, but that sort of thing isn't really meant to be coming up for the moment - and really isn't making much of a difference on a run directly, other than perhaps starting you off with some extra damage that now cannot be healed by anything other than natural healing. And technomancers/otaku used to permanently fade by young adulthood. Not really interested in what they used to be, rather more interested in what they are. Fact is, a cheap-as-free Level 3 Crack Sprite can keep IC off the techno's back for 2 combat turns (~6 complex actions) , where a decker would have to fight/evade/flee. Fault sprites are monsters at higher levels -- Level 6 sprite with sustained Electron Storm for 6DV per action phase plus punching at Attack 9, while causing 2 extra Noise. You should probably register one during your downtime to call out in an emergency, it's probably worth the headache. And how do those compare against the most direct comparable (spirits whose Force is equal to the sprite's Level)? Very, very, very poorly. There's edge case usefulness for some sprites, Fault sprites can be used for basically one thing. They're not worth the Fading. Plus, that Level 3 sprite? You probably only get 2 services out of it due to the introduction of Limits to Compiling. Still don't see it. I keep hearing it, but most of the complaints aren't centered around being completely shown up at the table by the decker, and strikes me just as unimaginative bitching. Then you're not bothering to read at all closely. It must suck to be a rigger, taking biofeedback while getting shot at, all on the same track. If the Rigger's eating biofeedback, he's jumped in and thus his meat shouldn't be in a position to be getting shot at. Depending on which day of the week it is, by some complaints, everything is better and/or worse than everything else at the same things. That's not an answer. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#39
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,289 Joined: 2-October 08 Member No.: 16,392 ![]() |
If you consider that they seem to cling to the edition that is the least like all the other editions, I think you can come to the conclusion that Shadowrun just isn't a game they like. Nanite hives and technomancers and wi-fis are a pretty brief blip in the overall scheme of things. Because obviously I love SR4 in the area of my complaints as well. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sarcastic.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#40
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,389 Joined: 20-August 12 From: Bunbury, western australia Member No.: 53,300 ![]() |
I think the main reason we do it is that bitching and moaning is so therapeutic. It makes us feel a bit less of the hollow void inside that haunts our sleep and makes us hunger for the souls of the living...
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#41
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 129 Joined: 3-July 08 Member No.: 16,112 ![]() |
huh. i got some bad news for you. a chargen hacker can get a deck with 4/5/6/7 for stats. by placing the 7 as attack, choosing decryption (which the technomancer can't pick up without submerging) and thereby get 8 (matching what the technomancer can have at chargen). then, choosing another program (same situation as decryption), hammer will boost your damage by 2. meaning you're ahead of the technomancer on bricking already, and have made no sacrifices whatsoever in your build to do so. and, with the right programs, a hacker can also hit two targets at once. and make it link-lock. if they're willing to risk some more matrix damage, the hacker can also deal non-matrix damage to an actual person, not just a device. in short, the technomancer assassin is a joke. literally. it was presented as a "hey look how much it takes to get a technomancer to look scary" joke. I stand corrected. Indeed, I haven't looked into optimized Deckers that hard yet. Thank you for clearing it up (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Since I was already unmasked as having not much experience in this, maybe you can help me: One of my players wants to play a TM, because he likes them. But he is worried about balance, a feeling I share. One major issue seem to be the programs, so he suggested to buy programs as complex forms. I don't like that, because having all relevant programs active at the same time, seems to me like SR4 all over. I therefore offered the following three houserules: 1) TM have as many programs slots as resonance, under the same ruling as the Decker. Free choice from all programs, but not agents. The Resonance [Program] echo gives you an extra slot. Can be taken up to 3 times. 2) TMs are allowed to have WAN/PAN, just like a device. 3) TM are allowed one submersion at chargen at normal Karma costs. And, of course, they follow the same house rule as mages: 4) The limit for compiling is the social limit, not the Level of the sprite. From the list of grieviences compiled in this thread that should about cover it. The intent of the house rules is to make the game more fun for the TM, mostly in terms of meaningful gameplay options. I am okay with starter TM being somewhat weaker than starter Decker or Rigger, but the gap should not be as glaring. Same as a starter mage will probably not do as much damage as easily as a Sam. Still, as a rule of thumb, a specialist TM should be able to beat a normal Decker in his area of expertise and/or have some meaningful gameplay options, the other does not have access to. I am contemplating adding an equivalent to the Aid Sorcery service as a task, kind of like the old complex forms. 5) Costing a task and the next complex action from any normal un-registered sprite, it adds its Level to one matrix action's DP and limit, as long as they have the necessary skill. But that might be overdoing it. I feel compelled to make a lot of minor changes concerning this Drain code or that meaningless Sprite power, but I like my houserules to fit on one page for easier reference. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#42
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,289 Joined: 2-October 08 Member No.: 16,392 ![]() |
The limit for compiling is the social limit, not the Level of the sprite. Brilliant change! Somewhere in my sleep last night I pondered a better solution than [Force] for spirit summoning and never came to a conclusion (likely because the ponderances lasted about 3 minutes) but I definitely did not hit on that one. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#43
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,076 Joined: 31-August 05 From: Rock Hill, SC Member No.: 7,655 ![]() |
Brilliant change! Somewhere in my sleep last night I pondered a better solution than [Force] for spirit summoning and never came to a conclusion (likely because the ponderances lasted about 3 minutes) but I definitely did not hit on that one. I wrote some house rules a while back where I gave technos a new limit on various tasks, being either the higher of their social or mental inherent limits (sorta like astral limits are to magicians.) It has the benefit of being more directly tied to the character, but it does make it harder in the long run to achieve the higher levels of certain tasks due to the difficulty of raising those limits. Fix one thing, break another. That said I prefer using the new limit to pulling Level out of your ass and breaking certain mathematical probabilities over your knee. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#44
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,289 Joined: 2-October 08 Member No.: 16,392 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#45
|
|
Douche ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 1,584 Joined: 2-March 11 Member No.: 23,135 ![]() |
Deckers will have an extra 2 dice from Cerebral Boosters, which is generally out of reach for technomancers, and makes them worse at what is supposed to make up for what they lose. Marginally worse, to get better at what you're complaining they're not good at. Considering the number of arguments around here for putting 'ware in your mage or adept, why's it weird that you might want to do that to the techno? QUOTE And as the decker grows, his limit advantage gets even larger. Plus he gets all the benefits of PAN/WAN functionality with those same attributes. If you're not using most 'ware, you don't need to run a PAN/WAN. Also, the cost of a decker's upgrade is astronomical, as the next upgrade from best-out-of-chargen is over 500,000 nuyen. Technos can upgrade incrementally. QUOTE And a technomancer needs all three of those in addition to Charisma and Resonance. And Street Samurai need Body, Strength, Reaction, Agility, Willpower, and Intuition to excel at their roles. What's your point? QUOTE Having run the numbers, it's a very significant portion. Having the leftover skills for that is difficult for a technomancer. If you go A/B for Resonance and Attributes (in either combination), you're looking at 28/2 or 22/0 skills (probably). If you ignore Decompiling, you'll still want to spend the lion's share of that on Hacking, Electronic Warfare, Cybercombat, Computer, Software, and Hardware (Rating 4 of each being 24 points). Deckers run into the same issue of needing Resources A/B and probably attributes up there, leaving them in the same boat for skills. QUOTE So... To match up in terms of dice pool alone, you have to diminish your Fading resistance and your facility with the abilities that are supposed to make up for everything you lose? Yes. If you want to be as good as the decker where the skillset overlaps with the decker's, you'd have to diminish your ability to do the things the decker can't do. I think that's the overall point of 'balance' in a game -- you can't be the best at everything. If the technomancer could out-hack the decker off of pure persona and skill, there wouldn't be much point to the decker. QUOTE Yeah, long run hacking like that isn't really in the core book (slated for Data Trails, called Deep Runs if I remember Bull's post right). Technomancers might be able to get around this in rare cases, but that sort of thing isn't really meant to be coming up for the moment - and really isn't making much of a difference on a run directly, other than perhaps starting you off with some extra damage that now cannot be healed by anything other than natural healing. Archive hacking's not in the core book, but you're implying that it's not useful to spy on people or sites for extended periods, which is really a great strength of the technomancer. While everyone else is calling their contacts and bribing the cops, the technomancer can sit adjacent to a target's commlink and record all their phone calls, or track them with a Cookie to see what their matrix activities are. Hackers are brutal. Technos are insidious. QUOTE And how do those compare against the most direct comparable (spirits whose Force is equal to the sprite's Level)? Very, very, very poorly. There's edge case usefulness for some sprites, Fault sprites can be used for basically one thing. They're not worth the Fading. Plus, that Level 3 sprite? You probably only get 2 services out of it due to the introduction of Limits to Compiling. Sprites aren't spirits. Sprites are immensely better Agents. You can't directly compare two things that literally can't interact. QUOTE Then you're not bothering to read at all closely. It's all coming back down to "technos can't out-hack deckers" and ignoring all the extra things technos bring to the table. "Complex forms aren't good enough" and "sprites aren't good enough" and so on, which apparently means they're totally worthless. You yourself just wrote a paragraph on how sprites are terrible and primarily useless, etc. Because when it comes down to it, with people arguing about this damned game here, if there's no "I Win" button that comes with a character's abilities, it's trash. QUOTE If the Rigger's eating biofeedback, he's jumped in and thus his meat shouldn't be in a position to be getting shot at. Oh, right, because riggers only ever jump in from the safety of their fortresses of rigger solitude. QUOTE That's not an answer. It's the only answer. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#46
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 129 Joined: 3-July 08 Member No.: 16,112 ![]() |
I wrote some house rules a while back where I gave technos a new limit on various tasks, being either the higher of their social or mental inherent limits (sorta like astral limits are to magicians.) It has the benefit of being more directly tied to the character, but it does make it harder in the long run to achieve the higher levels of certain tasks due to the difficulty of raising those limits. Fix one thing, break another. That said I prefer using the new limit to pulling Level out of your ass and breaking certain mathematical probabilities over your knee. Oh cool, well, actually it is supposed to make high level sprites and spirits harder and harder to control. That was a result of the Angel Summoner thread a while back. It is, technically, a nerf, because it lowers the abusability. It also makes things more coherent on the low side as a side effect, but for house rules, I am usually worried about the high aspect. So what if Force 2 does not scale. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#47
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 ![]() |
I stand corrected. Indeed, I haven't looked into optimized Deckers that hard yet. Thank you for clearing it up (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Since I was already unmasked as having not much experience in this, maybe you can help me: One of my players wants to play a TM, because he likes them. But he is worried about balance, a feeling I share. One major issue seem to be the programs, so he suggested to buy programs as complex forms. I don't like that, because having all relevant programs active at the same time, seems to me like SR4 all over. I therefore offered the following three houserules: 1) TM have as many programs slots as resonance, under the same ruling as the Decker. Free choice from all programs, but not agents. The Resonance [Program] echo gives you an extra slot. Can be taken up to 3 times. 2) TMs are allowed to have WAN/PAN, just like a device. 3) TM are allowed one submersion at chargen at normal Karma costs. And, of course, they follow the same house rule as mages: 4) The limit for compiling is the social limit, not the Level of the sprite. From the list of grieviences compiled in this thread that should about cover it. The intent of the house rules is to make the game more fun for the TM, mostly in terms of meaningful gameplay options. I am okay with starter TM being somewhat weaker than starter Decker or Rigger, but the gap should not be as glaring. Same as a starter mage will probably not do as much damage as easily as a Sam. Still, as a rule of thumb, a specialist TM should be able to beat a normal Decker in his area of expertise and/or have some meaningful gameplay options, the other does not have access to. I am contemplating adding an equivalent to the Aid Sorcery service as a task, kind of like the old complex forms. 5) Costing a task and the next complex action from any normal un-registered sprite, it adds its Level to one matrix action's DP and limit, as long as they have the necessary skill. But that might be overdoing it. I feel compelled to make a lot of minor changes concerning this Drain code or that meaningless Sprite power, but I like my houserules to fit on one page for easier reference. those look like reasonable changes except that i would consider resonance in programs to be too much (a technomancer could start with 7 running when the best a decker could hope for is 4... i'd make it resonance divided by 2, round up, giving the same starting limit of 4 programs although the technomancer would need a quality for that), but i'd also consider lowering the fading on some of the complex forms too. puppeteer is level +4, most matrix actions are complex actions, so you're looking at 7 points of fading there (which can only be healed by natural healing), assuming you don't leave *any* room for the target to roll a single hit on defence. maybe take a look at some of the other complex forms, too, although puppeteer is certainly the worst offender. for comparison, 7 points of drain on a mind control spell will generally result in controlling average targets indefinitely (those with higher magic resistance will at least get to roll something, but if you're not throwing at least 7 dice on the test, it will never wear off, and that's for the multiple target version... if you make it single target, like puppeteer, you need more than 8 dice on magic resistance to ever break free of mind control, although for most magicians that will mean physical drain as opposed to stun). |
|
|
![]()
Post
#48
|
|
Douche ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 1,584 Joined: 2-March 11 Member No.: 23,135 ![]() |
those look like reasonable changes except that i would consider resonance in programs to be too much (a technomancer could start with 7 running when the best a decker could hope for is 4... i'd make it resonance divided by 2, round up, giving the same starting limit of 4 programs although the technomancer would need a quality for that), but i'd also consider lowering the fading on some of the complex forms too. puppeteer is level +4, most matrix actions are complex actions, so you're looking at 7 points of fading there (which can only be healed by natural healing), assuming you don't leave *any* room for the target to roll a single hit on defence. maybe take a look at some of the other complex forms, too, although puppeteer is certainly the worst offender. for comparison, 7 points of drain on a mind control spell will generally result in controlling average targets indefinitely (those with higher magic resistance will at least get to roll something, but if you're not throwing at least 7 dice on the test, it will never wear off, and that's for the multiple target version... if you make it single target, like puppeteer, you need more than 8 dice on magic resistance to ever break free of mind control, although for most magicians that will mean physical drain as opposed to stun). Of course Puppeteer can be used to do things like force a Decker to data spike his own persona. Which sucks if he's running in hot-sim with 7 Attack with Hammer and Biofeedback, since his automatic 4 marks on himself would have him doing 17DV to his deck and 17P to his brain (followed by an extra 6P of dumpshock when the deck crashes), which is probably a death sentence. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#49
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,962 Joined: 27-February 13 Member No.: 76,875 ![]() |
Marginally worse, to get better at what you're complaining they're not good at. Considering the number of arguments around here for putting 'ware in your mage or adept, why's it weird that you might want to do that to the techno? It would be very, very wrong for that to be the only way to play an effective technomancer. Just like it would be very, very wrong for that to be the only way to play an effective mage or adept. If you're not using most 'ware, you don't need to run a PAN/WAN. Also, the cost of a decker's upgrade is astronomical, as the next upgrade from best-out-of-chargen is over 500,000 nuyen. Technos can upgrade incrementally. And to get the same upgrade, a Technomancer would have to submerge 4 times. Meaning that they have to spend 70 Karma and advance in no other way in that time. The decker, meanwhile, gets to add a bunch of stuff with Karma - because unlike the technomancer the decker can advance with both nuyen and Karma. Technomancers actually have even less use for nuyen now than they did in SR4. And Street Samurai need Body, Strength, Reaction, Agility, Willpower, and Intuition to excel at their roles. What's your point? That the difference in needed attributes between deckers and technomancers contributes to the fact that technomancers have to spend more to be a technomancer. A street sam isn't really relevant to that point. Deckers run into the same issue of needing Resources A/B and probably attributes up there, leaving them in the same boat for skills. Actually, a decker has far less need for Attributes A/B. Attributes C is more workable for them than for technomancers due to needing fewer attributes - putting Skills A/B far more in reach. Yes. If you want to be as good as the decker where the skillset overlaps with the decker's, you'd have to diminish your ability to do the things the decker can't do. I think that's the overall point of 'balance' in a game -- you can't be the best at everything. If the technomancer could out-hack the decker off of pure persona and skill, there wouldn't be much point to the decker. Actually, you're still not as good as the decker, then - you're just sorta catching up in terms of dice pools. The decker still has several advantages. Archive hacking's not in the core book, but you're implying that it's not useful to spy on people or sites for extended periods, which is really a great strength of the technomancer. While everyone else is calling their contacts and bribing the cops, the technomancer can sit adjacent to a target's commlink and record all their phone calls, or track them with a Cookie to see what their matrix activities are. Hackers are brutal. Technos are insidious. The point your missing is that the system sort of pretends this activity just doesn't happen for now. And even if then, what you're actually saying is that in exchange for being worse on the run, you can have a bit of a boon to legwork - you can't tell me that doesn't sound like a bad deal to you. Add to that the completely out of line damage codes you're taking to do this sort of thing, and it just gets worse. Sprites aren't spirits. Sprites are immensely better Agents. You can't directly compare two things that literally can't interact. Actually, they ARE directly comparable because they use pretty much the exact same basic system, but spirits just have a whole bunch of extras added on that make them more useful. If sprites aren't meant to be comparable to spirits, they shouldn't use the same system and inflict the same damage to the character. The structure of the system makes it very clear that they're meant to be comparable to spirits. It's all coming back down to "technos can't out-hack deckers" and ignoring all the extra things technos bring to the table. "Complex forms aren't good enough" and "sprites aren't good enough" and so on, which apparently means they're totally worthless. You yourself just wrote a paragraph on how sprites are terrible and primarily useless, etc. Because when it comes down to it, with people arguing about this damned game here, if there's no "I Win" button that comes with a character's abilities, it's trash. Actually, it's "technomancers can't hack as well as deckers, while simultaneously being less versatile/powerful outside of the Matrix". If technomancers are going to be less versatile/powerful outside of the Matrix (which they very much are), then for the system to be balanced they actually HAVE to be more powerful in the Matrix (the other way to create a balanced environment would be for both types to be equally powerful/versatile in both the Matrix and the meat). Instead, they're worse in both. Oh, right, because riggers only ever jump in from the safety of their fortresses of rigger solitude. Ragdolling in the middle of a firefight is a pretty damn foolish thing to do if you don't take SOME kind of precautions. It's the only answer. No, actually, it's not an answer at all. I posed a hypothetical scenario, and asked if you would call that scenario balanced. You chose to ignore the hypothetical scenario, and thus did not in any way answer the question. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#50
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,962 Joined: 27-February 13 Member No.: 76,875 ![]() |
1) TM have as many programs slots as resonance, under the same ruling as the Decker. Free choice from all programs, but not agents. The Resonance [Program] echo gives you an extra slot. Can be taken up to 3 times. On this one, I've been rolling around the idea of a Complex Form that lets you emulate a number of programs based on your hits. For example, you could emulate Fork, Decryption, Armor, and Biofeedback when going into a Matrix fight - but as a result, you suffer the sustaining modifier to all your actions. the other thing you'll want to take a look at is Fading codes - they're generally completely out of line. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#51
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,389 Joined: 20-August 12 From: Bunbury, western australia Member No.: 53,300 ![]() |
I do miss machine sprites being able to rig a drone effectively. No gunnery or pilot skills means that they pretty much suck at it.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#52
|
|
Douche ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 1,584 Joined: 2-March 11 Member No.: 23,135 ![]() |
It would be very, very wrong for that to be the only way to play an effective technomancer. Just like it would be very, very wrong for that to be the only way to play an effective mage or adept. It's not. No one's actually demonstrated the ineffectiveness of the technomancer. QUOTE And to get the same upgrade, a Technomancer would have to submerge 4 times. Meaning that they have to spend 70 Karma and advance in no other way in that time. The decker, meanwhile, gets to add a bunch of stuff with Karma - because unlike the technomancer the decker can advance with both nuyen and Karma. Technomancers actually have even less use for nuyen now than they did in SR4. That gets back to the adept vs samurai argument of "the samurai can spend money and karma but the adept can only spend karma." Has that one been solved yet? QUOTE That the difference in needed attributes between deckers and technomancers contributes to the fact that technomancers have to spend more to be a technomancer. A street sam isn't really relevant to that point. They really don't. The decker with the 350,000 nuyen deck is already pretty close to the bleeding edge. Have you considered that the 100,000 nuyen deck is a little more in the ballpark for the common decker? QUOTE Actually, a decker has far less need for Attributes A/B. Attributes C is more workable for them than for technomancers due to needing fewer attributes - putting Skills A/B far more in reach. Attributes B means 2 3 3 1 6 5 5 3 (BARSWLIC) or so, which isn't bad for branching out, and gives you the base persona of the 215,000 nuyen deck. QUOTE The point your missing is that the system sort of pretends this activity just doesn't happen for now. And even if then, what you're actually saying is that in exchange for being worse on the run, you can have a bit of a boon to legwork - you can't tell me that doesn't sound like a bad deal to you. Add to that the completely out of line damage codes you're taking to do this sort of thing, and it just gets worse. No, it doesn't. The technomancer has specific tools for this sort of thing. I think you might be confusing this with archive hacking. QUOTE Actually, they ARE directly comparable because they use pretty much the exact same basic system, but spirits just have a whole bunch of extras added on that make them more useful. If sprites aren't meant to be comparable to spirits, they shouldn't use the same system and inflict the same damage to the character. The structure of the system makes it very clear that they're meant to be comparable to spirits. If spirits were used to pick locks and steal file folders, you might have a point, but just because they share a system doesn't mean that their general utility should be compared. QUOTE Ragdolling in the middle of a firefight is a pretty damn foolish thing to do if you don't take SOME kind of precautions. Deckers can get shot and take stun and physical damage in meatspace and get Biofeedbacked and take stun and physical damage in Matrix space, as well. Nothing new. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#53
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 750 Joined: 9-August 06 Member No.: 9,059 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#54
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 ![]() |
Of course Puppeteer can be used to do things like force a Decker to data spike his own persona. Which sucks if he's running in hot-sim with 7 Attack with Hammer and Biofeedback, since his automatic 4 marks on himself would have him doing 17DV to his deck and 17P to his brain (followed by an extra 6P of dumpshock when the deck crashes), which is probably a death sentence. and for a lower cost (fewer skills needed to be effective in their role, since technomancers need the hacking, cybercombat, electronic warfare, and computers, plus compile and register, while magicians pretty much only need sorcery, counterspelling, assensing and and summon/bind - although rituals can add a nice bonus as well, it isn't necessary, and even if it was that's still only equal... except that magicians get more free spells than technomancers get complex forms) a sorcerer can mind control as many people as fit in a 6 meter radius for an indefinite period of time to do whatever he wants until he either doesn't care to keep controlling them or until he goes unconscious/falls asleep (not even then if he also uses a focus, but at that point we're not looking at equal costs any more to be fair). in short, if the magician can see the decker, he can probably mind control the decker *and* all of his nearby friends into shooting each other in the head with real guns (probably starting with the decker, who will actually have dice to roll to break free against a "mere" force 6 spell most likely). i think that just *slightly* trumps controlling the decker's icon for 1 turn to brick itself (and probably kill the decker), as a general rule. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#55
|
|
Douche ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 1,584 Joined: 2-March 11 Member No.: 23,135 ![]() |
and for a lower cost (fewer skills needed to be effective in their role, since technomancers need the hacking, cybercombat, electronic warfare, and computers, plus compile and register, while magicians pretty much only need sorcery, counterspelling, assensing and and summon/bind - although rituals can add a nice bonus as well, it isn't necessary, and even if it was that's still only equal... except that magicians get more free spells than technomancers get complex forms) a sorcerer can mind control as many people as fit in a 6 meter radius for an indefinite period of time to do whatever he wants until he either doesn't care to keep controlling them or until he goes unconscious/falls asleep (not even then if he also uses a focus, but at that point we're not looking at equal costs any more to be fair). in short, if the magician can see the decker, he can probably mind control the decker *and* all of his nearby friends into shooting each other in the head with real guns (probably starting with the decker, who will actually have dice to roll to break free against a "mere" force 6 spell most likely). i think that just *slightly* trumps controlling the decker's icon for 1 turn to brick itself (and probably kill the decker), as a general rule. Magic's a different ballgame played on a different field. If it's all about being able to indescriminately deal damage, everyone's sub-par to the orbital thor shot station manager. Magic's limitations are typically range and line of sight, while technomancers can freewheel around the planet -- better than deckers, I might add, considering Resonance Channel. In the same vein, if anyone can actually see the decker, gunfire or a nice grenade will solve the issue pretty simply as well, and decks don't stop bullets too well. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#56
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 651 Joined: 20-July 12 From: Arizona Member No.: 53,066 ![]() |
they do if they are wireless enabled
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#57
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 ![]() |
Magic's a different ballgame played on a different field. If it's all about being able to indescriminately deal damage, everyone's sub-par to the orbital thor shot station manager. Magic's limitations are typically range and line of sight, while technomancers can freewheel around the planet -- better than deckers, I might add, considering Resonance Channel. In the same vein, if anyone can actually see the decker, gunfire or a nice grenade will solve the issue pretty simply as well, and decks don't stop bullets too well. right. so technomancy costs as much or more than magic, does a hell of a lot less stuff, and isn't even that great at what it does do, except for a few largely meaningless gimmicks (seriously, we're counting the ability to hack something on the other side of the planet as an important skill now?), and has the same large drawbacks that are supposed to help make magicians not so powerful. the one thing it does, it isn't even particularly good at, and it pays for that privilege by sucking at everything else. i dunno about you, but that sounds like flawed design to me. it isn't as good at hacking, it's special tricks are generally overpriced and make you bleed from your eyes, and the second you try to compensate for having to spend all your skills, attributes, and everything else on being this overpriced piece of crap by getting augmented (assuming you can even afford to, what with your resources likely being priority E because you need everything else as high as it will go), the special tricks you can do will probably now be doing physical damage (because to puppeteer anything even remotely difficult, you're going to *need* to thread it at rating 4-5, more likely 6, and that doesn't combine well with having less than 6 resonance because 10P damage that can't be healed except by rest is a massive problem, *especially* on a character that likely had to dump body). yes, they're pretty close to being as good in some areas as deckers. and they pay more for the privilege of being almost as good as the decker pays to be better. this isn't rocket science, here; pay more, get less good stuff, get more drawbacks. that's not how to balance a game. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#58
|
|
Douche ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 1,584 Joined: 2-March 11 Member No.: 23,135 ![]() |
right. so technomancy costs as much or more than magic, does a hell of a lot less stuff, and isn't even that great at what it does do, except for a few largely meaningless gimmicks (seriously, we're counting the ability to hack something on the other side of the planet as an important skill now?), and has the same large drawbacks that are supposed to help make magicians not so powerful. Again, what does magic have to do with anything? It's starting to sound like you're confusing game balance in an RPG with game balance in a board game. Game balance in an RPG is about providing routes for multiple players to cover necessary roles in proportion to standard challenges, not about making characters uniformly effective. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#59
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 277 Joined: 19-November 06 From: Wagontown, PA Member No.: 9,903 ![]() |
Again, what does magic have to do with anything? It's starting to sound like you're confusing game balance in an RPG with game balance in a board game. Game balance in an RPG is about providing routes for multiple players to cover necessary roles in proportion to standard challenges, not about making characters uniformly effective. Magic has an awful damn lot to do with it, as the mechanics of the two systems are almost identical. So for a cost that equates to 30 Karma more expensive at priority A or 29 Karma more expensive at priority B, you can have bonus points to two skills that provide a less flexible option for pets that you can compile/summon as opposed to the options of skills that a mage can choose for their free skill points. You can have access to less of the amalgam to spells (complex forms) that are useful in a narrower array of situations for a higher personal risk of damage for casting/threading. As many in this thread have stated, the main shortfall against TMs is in the mechanics. Mechanically in SR5 TMs are comparable to Mages not Deckers. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#60
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 129 Joined: 3-July 08 Member No.: 16,112 ![]() |
those look like reasonable changes except that i would consider resonance in programs to be too much (a technomancer could start with 7 running when the best a decker could hope for is 4... i'd make it resonance divided by 2, round up, giving the same starting limit of 4 programs although the technomancer would need a quality for that), but i'd also consider lowering the fading on some of the complex forms too. puppeteer is level +4, most matrix actions are complex actions, so you're looking at 7 points of fading there (which can only be healed by natural healing), assuming you don't leave *any* room for the target to roll a single hit on defence. maybe take a look at some of the other complex forms, too, although puppeteer is certainly the worst offender. for comparison, 7 points of drain on a mind control spell will generally result in controlling average targets indefinitely (those with higher magic resistance will at least get to roll something, but if you're not throwing at least 7 dice on the test, it will never wear off, and that's for the multiple target version... if you make it single target, like puppeteer, you need more than 8 dice on magic resistance to ever break free of mind control, although for most magicians that will mean physical drain as opposed to stun). You are right and I had originally written a version of the houserule exactly like you proposed. BUT Resonance is Device Rating and to say TM only get half the programs sounds to me about as arbritrary as saying they don't get any. TMs still have a lot of inherent disadvantages I did not fix: they can't shift their Matrix attributes, -> less flexibility / somewhat off-set by more programs they are stronger affected by Essence loss, -> lower dice pools, less options for branching out they need more skills OR they can't run agents, they are hunted individuals by definition, the only advantage that comes to mind are the +2 on matrix Perception, I don't count Complex Forms or sprite powers, because most of them suck (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) Fortunately, programs don't exactly stack, so I am not too worried about the abuse of having more. Just less micro management. A friend gave me his write-up on TM house rules. He has Lightning Bolt and various Illusions as Complex Forms, though both have to be channeled through suitable devices, e.g. a trid-projector. That looks like a whole different game, though a potentially fun one. Back on topic. I did consider something like a flat discount on drain of -1 or -2, but I haven't exactly playtested this yet and have no idea how that effects the game. For magic, I was worried about the high drain as well, but through various tricks (Orichalcum, Edge, ...) spells are rarely cast on high Force levels anymore, except those that give high benefit for high Force. Instead I get to see a lot of 2 drain spells. This is somewhat abusive on some spells and contrary to my original impression, I now consider to disallow such tricks on some spells e.g. Improved Reflexes to increase drain. It is weird that something as broken as the limit system feels the most broken, when it does not work properly. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#61
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
and for a lower cost (fewer skills needed to be effective in their role, since technomancers need the hacking, cybercombat, electronic warfare, and computers, plus compile and register, while magicians pretty much only need sorcery, counterspelling, assensing and and summon/bind - although rituals can add a nice bonus as well, it isn't necessary, and even if it was that's still only equal... except that magicians get more free spells than technomancers get complex forms) a sorcerer can mind control as many people as fit in a 6 meter radius for an indefinite period of time to do whatever he wants until he either doesn't care to keep controlling them or until he goes unconscious/falls asleep (not even then if he also uses a focus, but at that point we're not looking at equal costs any more to be fair). in short, if the magician can see the decker, he can probably mind control the decker *and* all of his nearby friends into shooting each other in the head with real guns (probably starting with the decker, who will actually have dice to roll to break free against a "mere" force 6 spell most likely). i think that just *slightly* trumps controlling the decker's icon for 1 turn to brick itself (and probably kill the decker), as a general rule. Not quite true, since a victim of most Mental Manipulations gets to roll another resistance roll vs. the Spell every Force Turns. So, 60 Seconds tops... Not indefinite. Influence/Alter Memories are a special case, but are also far more subtle than most Mental Manipulations tend to be. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#62
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,039 Joined: 23-March 05 From: The heart of Rywfol Emwolb Industries Member No.: 7,216 ![]() |
nm
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#63
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,289 Joined: 2-October 08 Member No.: 16,392 ![]() |
So, 60 Seconds tops... Not indefinite. 60 is more than long enough to get a group of hostiles to eliminate each other. That's 20 combat rounds. And even if they AREN'T shooting EACH OTHER, they sure as hell are going to be too preoccupied to be shooting at the MAGE and his friends. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#64
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
60 is more than long enough to get a group of hostiles to eliminate each other. That's 20 combat rounds. And even if they AREN'T shooting EACH OTHER, they sure as hell are going to be too preoccupied to be shooting at the MAGE and his friends. Keep in mind that that is a maximum of time. It may not last 10% that. Especially if the opposition has their own mages. I don't count on it past the initial Turn, personally. That way I am not disappointed. However, the Magician I play generally only uses emotion control and Influence (and not really a lot of that). No Control Thoughts/Actions or any variant, as he honestly does not care for such spells. They directly remove free agency, which his Mentor Spirit is heavily against. So, I may be a bit biased. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Also, the opposition that we tend to run up against does not give us the convenience of clustering up in groups for the mages to eliminate. Magic has been around for 50 years, and everyone knows that one of the best ways to defend against it is to not cluster up. Same way people do not cluster so that the grenade does not eliminate everyone. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#65
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 ![]() |
mind control spells reduce your dicepool to break free (but not the initial resist roll) by their force.
so a force 6 mind control spell takes 6 dice away from the target's defense. against an average person, that is going to be zero dice remaining (in fact, until you hit professional rating 4 opponents, only lieutenants have anything left against a force 6 spell looking at the default grunts in the book). so if you target a group of regular security guards, no there is not a practical limit of ~60 seconds. you own them until you don't feel like owning them any more, or until you fall asleep/go unconscious (or until some other magician frees them, but that assumes said magician isn't shot by them before (s)he can do so). |
|
|
![]()
Post
#66
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
mind control spells reduce your dicepool to break free (but not the initial resist roll) by their force. so a force 6 mind control spell takes 6 dice away from the target's defense. against an average person, that is going to be zero dice remaining (in fact, until you hit professional rating 4 opponents, only lieutenants have anything left against a force 6 spell looking at the default grunts in the book). so if you target a group of regular security guards, no there is not a practical limit of ~60 seconds. you own them until you don't feel like owning them any more, or until you fall asleep/go unconscious (or until some other magician frees them, but that assumes said magician isn't shot by them before (s)he can do so). Are we talking 5th Edition here? Because I wasn't. And even so, Spell Defense will give you resistance Dice. So no, They weill eventually break free (assuming some magical backup). And it WILL be in less than 60 Seconds. *shrug* |
|
|
![]()
Post
#67
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 ![]() |
Are we talking 5th Edition here? Because I wasn't. And even so, Spell Defense will give you resistance Dice. So no, They weill eventually break free (assuming some magical backup). And it WILL be in less than 60 Seconds. *shrug* why wouldn't we be talking 5th edition? the technomancer in question is 5th edition. if it was a 4th edition technomancer, i would be inclined to agree that the extra costs above what a decker pays are completely justified, because 4th edition technomancers are godlike in the matrix. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#68
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
why wouldn't we be talking 5th edition? the technomancer in question is 5th edition. if it was a 4th edition technomancer, i would be inclined to agree that the extra costs above what a decker pays are completely justified, because 4th edition technomancers are godlike in the matrix. My Mind wanders on occasion. I lost track. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/eek.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#69
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,039 Joined: 23-March 05 From: The heart of Rywfol Emwolb Industries Member No.: 7,216 ![]() |
nm
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#70
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
nm Really? That was a wide open, easy, shot... I am disappointed, Sendaz... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#71
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 750 Joined: 9-August 06 Member No.: 9,059 ![]() |
I just noticed that while SR5 sprites are indeed awful (OS running to give away your location if it hits 40 before you dismiss it, use up a task to register, use up a task to put a registered sprite on standby), there's no limit in the book on how many you can register.
Edit: Actually, there's a limit on page 98 when paying karma for registered sprites (why?!?) at character creation, just not in the main text. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#72
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 ![]() |
I just noticed that while SR5 sprites are indeed awful (OS running to give away your location if it hits 40 before you dismiss it, use up a task to register, use up a task to put a registered sprite on standby), there's no limit in the book on how many you can register. yeah, that's presumed to be an oversight (no pun intended). i would expect that to change. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#73
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,389 Joined: 20-August 12 From: Bunbury, western australia Member No.: 53,300 ![]() |
By all that is holy! I just went and reread the Technomancer rules. They SUCK!
I like the complex forms. There are some genuinely good tricks there, which would make Technomancers quirky but playable... if it wasn't for the insane fading values. One in particular stood out to me: Resonance Channel. Is this really the only way for Technomancers to reduce noise? Seriously? I might have missed something, but if not then that's just taking the piss. Pretty much everywhere is considered either a spam zone or a static zone, both of which can be crippling without noise reduction. I will say one nice thing though: Gremlins sprite power. I like the concept of the Technomancer's little helper making every smartgun that points at them spontaneously malfunction. In fact, it makes me sad that it would take one task per gun for this to happen, with the Technomancer actively directing the Sprite each time. For something with comparable Fading to a Spirit's drain, I'd have thought they'd be at least a little bit more useful (Particularly since unlike Spirits, they incur overwatch. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/frown.gif) ). Damn, just checked the Magic section. The LEAST draining complex forms (L-1) are on par with a flipping FIREBALL (F-1)! |
|
|
![]()
Post
#74
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,389 Joined: 20-August 12 From: Bunbury, western australia Member No.: 53,300 ![]() |
HOLD EVERYTHING!
Priority C Technomancers get resonance 3 and one complex form, while Mages and Mystic adepts of the same priority get 5 SPELLS?!? What is even the (Editors note: text continued for 15 pages of raving gibberish connecting this discrepancy to the Dunkelzahn assassination, Aztechnology, Deus, the price of miniature marshmallows in the middle east from 2055 to 2063, and the universal brotherhood. Be glad you didn't have to read it. Don't worry, he's had his meds now.) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#75
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,389 Joined: 20-August 12 From: Bunbury, western australia Member No.: 53,300 ![]() |
Oh. Technomancers are vulnerable to hot SIM addiction.
That's like Mages being vulnerable to SPELLCASTING ADDICTION! I... I need a minute. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#76
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
Deep Breath, FuelDrop... Deep Breath.
SR5 had some good ideas (and some really bad ones)... and really, REALLY poor implementation. Just do like me... Stay with SR4A. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#77
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
Rather than trying to alter the Double Post, which is impossible, one must instead realize the truth... There is no Double Post. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/eek.gif)
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#78
|
|
Skillwire Savant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,154 Joined: 5-April 13 From: Aurora Warrens, UCAS Sector of the FRFZ Member No.: 88,139 ![]() |
That's like Mages being vulnerable to SPELLCASTING ADDICTION! While there aren't any solid rules for it, one of the list of addictions has spell preparations on it, so Alchemists get screwed for some reason. Why the Hell is everything addictive now? Why not summoning addiction? Compiling addiction? Shooting a gun addiction? ...and then there's Skillwires. My skillwire-focused, not-all-that-powerful-due-to-chargen-limitations ork merc has joined my TM in the corner, both crying their eyes out. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#79
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 277 Joined: 19-November 06 From: Wagontown, PA Member No.: 9,903 ![]() |
HOLD EVERYTHING! Priority C Technomancers get resonance 3 and one complex form, while Mages and Mystic adepts of the same priority get 5 SPELLS?!? What is even the (Editors note: text continued for 15 pages of raving gibberish connecting this discrepancy to the Dunkelzahn assassination, Aztechnology, Deus, the price of miniature marshmallows in the middle east from 2055 to 2063, and the universal brotherhood. Be glad you didn't have to read it. Don't worry, he's had his meds now.) The 1 CF (4 Karma value) versus the 5 spells (25 Karma value) is actually a good deal, costing only 21 more Karma for the immensely overpowered Technomancer. Priority B is only slightly less unbalanced, with 2 CF (8 Karma) versus 7 Spells (35 Karma), making the mighty and game breaking TM cost a measly 27 more Karma at creation, with 2 free rating 4 skills that may be applied to your choice of 3 skills, as opposed to the Mage, who may only advance the same 2 free rating 4 skills from his choice of 12 skills. Priority A is possibly the best balance, with 5 CF (20 Karma) versus 10 Spells (50 Karma), costing the clearly superior Technomancer a mere 30 Karma more. The Mage still must choose from among 12 skills for his 2 rating 5 skills, leaving 11 skills that must be absolutely necessary for his class, that must be raised by spending skill priority or Karma. The TM clearly gets a pass with his 2 rating 5 skills as he only has a choice of 3 skills to spend them in and obviously doesn't rely heavily on any other skills in the game. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#80
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,076 Joined: 31-August 05 From: Rock Hill, SC Member No.: 7,655 ![]() |
The 1 CF (4 Karma value) versus the 5 spells (25 Karma value) is actually a good deal, costing only 21 more Karma for the immensely overpowered Technomancer. Priority B is only slightly less unbalanced, with 2 CF (8 Karma) versus 7 Spells (35 Karma), making the mighty and game breaking TM cost a measly 27 more Karma at creation, with 2 free rating 4 skills that may be applied to your choice of 3 skills, as opposed to the Mage, who may only advance the same 2 free rating 4 skills from his choice of 12 skills. Priority A is possibly the best balance, with 5 CF (20 Karma) versus 10 Spells (50 Karma), costing the clearly superior Technomancer a mere 30 Karma more. The Mage still must choose from among 12 skills for his 2 rating 5 skills, leaving 11 skills that must be absolutely necessary for his class, that must be raised by spending skill priority or Karma. The TM clearly gets a pass with his 2 rating 5 skills as he only has a choice of 3 skills to spend them in and obviously doesn't rely heavily on any other skills in the game. God, the sarcasm here is so thick and rich I could drizzle it on pancakes. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/love.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#81
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,962 Joined: 27-February 13 Member No.: 76,875 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#82
|
|
Skillwire Savant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,154 Joined: 5-April 13 From: Aurora Warrens, UCAS Sector of the FRFZ Member No.: 88,139 ![]() |
I believe that is called sarcasm.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#83
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,389 Joined: 20-August 12 From: Bunbury, western australia Member No.: 53,300 ![]() |
The 1 CF (4 Karma value) versus the 5 spells (25 Karma value) is actually a good deal, costing only 21 more Karma for the immensely overpowered Technomancer. Priority B is only slightly less unbalanced, with 2 CF (8 Karma) versus 7 Spells (35 Karma), making the mighty and game breaking TM cost a measly 27 more Karma at creation, with 2 free rating 4 skills that may be applied to your choice of 3 skills, as opposed to the Mage, who may only advance the same 2 free rating 4 skills from his choice of 12 skills. Priority A is possibly the best balance, with 5 CF (20 Karma) versus 10 Spells (50 Karma), costing the clearly superior Technomancer a mere 30 Karma more. The Mage still must choose from among 12 skills for his 2 rating 5 skills, leaving 11 skills that must be absolutely necessary for his class, that must be raised by spending skill priority or Karma. The TM clearly gets a pass with his 2 rating 5 skills as he only has a choice of 3 skills to spend them in and obviously doesn't rely heavily on any other skills in the game. The sarcasm! It's mmm... delicious! Painful though it is to have to pull away from the pure beauty that is that post, I have to ask: What noise reduction options (beyond a single complex form that reduced nose from distance)? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#84
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,389 Joined: 20-August 12 From: Bunbury, western australia Member No.: 53,300 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#85
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
I have severe BREATHING ADDICTION! Do you have any idea how hard people like you make it to quit a basic biological function?!? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) My Apologies... Carry on then. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/eek.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#86
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,039 Joined: 23-March 05 From: The heart of Rywfol Emwolb Industries Member No.: 7,216 ![]() |
I have severe BREATHING ADDICTION! Do you have any idea how hard people like you make it to quit a basic biological function?!? Have you tried the Breathing Patch? *Shows a big fluffy pillow* Just one of these administered by our trained staff after you go to sleep helps break that addiction in no time! |
|
|
![]()
Post
#87
|
|
Skillwire Savant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,154 Joined: 5-April 13 From: Aurora Warrens, UCAS Sector of the FRFZ Member No.: 88,139 ![]() |
Painful though it is to have to pull away from the pure beauty that is that post, I have to ask: What noise reduction options (beyond a single complex form that reduced nose from distance)? You can submerge for an echo that emulates Signal Scrub (+2 NR) I guess invest in a quality directional jammer and jam them before they can jam you? Good luck trying that against "society" in a spam zone. Now that you've pointed out this additional issue, I think an RCC echo would be even better if it gave you all of the awesome noise reduction capabilities RCCs have. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#88
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 ![]() |
honestly, i think they should just erase the entire technomancer section and try again. what they decided to do the first time obviously didn't work very well.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#89
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,039 Joined: 23-March 05 From: The heart of Rywfol Emwolb Industries Member No.: 7,216 ![]() |
honestly, i think they should just erase the entire technomancer section and try again. what they decided to do the first time obviously didn't work very well. So you are wanting a techno remix? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#90
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,962 Joined: 27-February 13 Member No.: 76,875 ![]() |
honestly, i think they should just erase the entire technomancer section and try again. what they decided to do the first time obviously didn't work very well. That really seems like the only real fix... And somewhere in there, they should probably switch them around to using Resonance or their Fading Attribute for most Matrix actions, simply because otherwise inter-stream balance will be truly and utterly screwed. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#91
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 750 Joined: 9-August 06 Member No.: 9,059 ![]() |
Something that occurred to me about sprites running up OS and giving your location away when they hit 40 and go "pop": so what? I mean, should the authorities necessarily do anything about it?
Summoning a sprite in itself isn't an illegal action, so what's GOD going to do after convergence with your location? Does convergence actually give GOD a list of things you did wrong, or does everyone just get the same blanket treatment? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#92
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,039 Joined: 23-March 05 From: The heart of Rywfol Emwolb Industries Member No.: 7,216 ![]() |
*points to the sign*
NO MATRIX LOITERING |
|
|
![]()
Post
#93
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,962 Joined: 27-February 13 Member No.: 76,875 ![]() |
Something that occurred to me about sprites running up OS and giving your location away when they hit 40 and go "pop": so what? I mean, should the authorities necessarily do anything about it? Summoning a sprite in itself isn't an illegal action, so what's GOD going to do after convergence with your location? Does convergence actually give GOD a list of things you did wrong, or does everyone just get the same blanket treatment? Regardless of how little sense it makes, the mechanics are pretty clear on that point. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#94
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
So you are wanting a techno remix? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif) Yep... I was right... No shame whatsoever. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/eek.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#95
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 ![]() |
on a side note, i do have to say i'm enjoying going through all these technomancer threads where people suddenly pop in and are like "hey wait, you guys weren't making this up... technomancers really got screwed in 5th edition".
but yes, i would like a techno remix (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#96
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 277 Joined: 19-November 06 From: Wagontown, PA Member No.: 9,903 ![]() |
The sarcasm! It's mmm... delicious! Painful though it is to have to pull away from the pure beauty that is that post, I have to ask: What noise reduction options (beyond a single complex form that reduced nose from distance)? :bows: You can always suck up the essence loss and use the wireless enabled ability of your direct connection enabling datajack for -1 noise. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/ohplease.gif) Also, as mentioned by Jack VII QUOTE You can submerge for an echo that emulates Signal Scrub (+2 NR)
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#97
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 129 Joined: 3-July 08 Member No.: 16,112 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#98
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,389 Joined: 20-August 12 From: Bunbury, western australia Member No.: 53,300 ![]() |
A quick and simple change which would make technomancers slightly less sucky would be swapping their number of complex forms with the Mystic Adept's number of spells.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#99
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 750 Joined: 9-August 06 Member No.: 9,059 ![]() |
I've belatedly realized that our Elven technomancer assassin also needs to make a spirit pact to obtain the regeneration power so that he can essentially ignore all Matrix damage (street name - Chumbawamba). The pain editor/platelet factory combo is a crutch.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#100
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 ![]() |
no good.
"Magical damage from weapon foci, combat spells, most critter or adept powers, or Drain likewise can’t be healed by Regeneration." if it won't work on drain, it's pretty much a shoe-in that it won't work for fading. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 29th July 2025 - 12:52 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.