![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,679 Joined: 19-September 09 Member No.: 17,652 ![]() |
So, I've seen it come up a couple times before, and was having trouble finding a thread on it (I'm sure there has been), so I figured I'd make a new thread to ask:
Can a blind mage target anything on the physical plane without touching it? Now, it seems like most people accept that a blind mage can target the physical plane without trouble while astrally perceiving. The problem I have with that is that an aura cannot be used to target something, and there is never anything which states that astral can target a spot on the physical plane by saying 'that spot right there but on the physical plane'. The closest I can find is QUOTE An astrally perceiving but it doesn't specify that you can use astral sight to target something, simply that it is possible to cast a physical spell while perceiving, which can be done via touch spells, or in the case of duel natured creatures, by viewing through their physical senses.(or otherwise dual natured) magician can cast spells on a target in either the physical world or in astral space. So, is there anything more concrete that says you can in fact use astral sight to target a spell on the physical plane? |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Old Man of the North ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 10,134 Joined: 14-August 03 From: Just north of the Centre of the Universe Member No.: 5,463 ![]() |
Not to be the stick-in-the-mud, but I still don't see an explanation anywhere about how the RAW that says 'can do both' contradicts the RAW that says 'can't do both at the same time'. Help me out, here.
I can chew gum. I can walk. But ..... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/frown.gif) OK, a better example: I can walk, and I can drive a car. I am capable of both as long as I am in the state of 'being awake'. Just not at the same time. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
Not to be the stick-in-the-mud, but I still don't see an explanation anywhere about how the RAW that says 'can do both' contradicts the RAW that says 'can't do both at the same time'. Help me out, here. I can chew gum. I can walk. But ..... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/frown.gif) OK, a better example: I can walk, and I can drive a car. I am capable of both as long as I am in the state of 'being awake'. Just not at the same time. You are not actually seeing both planes at the same time, while astrally perceiving, you are perceiving the astral world, however, since you are Physical (percieveing remember) and you can see the auras of both living and nonliving things, you can still establish that link required for spell casting (or whatever esle you may be doing like driving, though at a penalty) and that will allow you to cast your physically based spell on the physical plane, at the target you have chosen, even if you are preceiving Astral Space... Keep the Faith |
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 576 Joined: 6-May 10 From: Front Range Free Zone Member No.: 18,558 ![]() |
You are not actually seeing both planes at the same time, while astrally perceiving, you are perceiving the astral world, however, since you are Physical (percieveing remember) and you can see the auras of both living and nonliving things, you can still establish that link required for spell casting (or whatever esle you may be doing like driving, though at a penalty) and that will allow you to cast your physically based spell on the physical plane, at the target you have chosen, even if you are preceiving Astral Space... Keep the Faith You know, can you REALLY drive while astrally perceiving? You can't see through glass, so you won't be able to see through the windshield. I guess you can always stick your head out the window or shoot out the windshield. But you definitely won't be able to follow stop lights or make out signs. So it sounds like a really bad idea. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
You know, can you REALLY drive while astrally perceiving? You can't see through glass, so you won't be able to see through the windshield. I guess you can always stick your head out the window or shoot out the windshield. But you definitely won't be able to follow stop lights or make out signs. So it sounds like a really bad idea. Perhaps, but that is why you have a -2 Penalty to any physical action you would take... and driving my motorcycle, there is no glass to get in the way of my perception... but in cases like those, you can still follow the flow of the traffic around you, so even traffic lights are truly irrelevant, and if you are using gridguide, well, it would not matter anyways, as the system would handle all of that kind of crap... Anything else is really just semantics at that point... Keep the Faith |
|
|
![]()
Post
#6
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,748 Joined: 25-January 05 From: Good ol' Germany Member No.: 7,015 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#7
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 576 Joined: 6-May 10 From: Front Range Free Zone Member No.: 18,558 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#8
|
|
Prime Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,507 Joined: 11-November 08 Member No.: 16,582 ![]() |
Don't wear one. Helms are for chumps and will mess up the hair of the mage. You wouldn't want a mage to have bad hair would you? have you ever ridden a motorcycle at reasonable speed without eye protection? It is unpleasant to say the least.And unless the mage's hairstyle is "blown away by airstream" wearing a helmet doesn't mess up the hair any more than driving without one. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 8th March 2025 - 09:18 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.