IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> NSRCG (Should it be upgraded to version 4)?, For the users of NSRCG only please
Should NSRCG be upgraded to version 4?
You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Total Votes: 176
Guests cannot vote 
mcmackie
post Jan 22 2006, 11:50 PM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 243
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 774



For the users of NSRCG only please. Yes, I know that many very intelligent people don't need it :) but for those that do.
I need feedback if I'm to determine the demand and need for a version that supports SR4. As it stands now, I can finish up the work necessary to complete it (Complex Forms / Magical Allies) OR I can work on it. I've looked over the changes and unfortunately, SR3 Character Generation (CharGen) rules share very little with SR4 CharGen. This means any work would be from scratch.
Given this, is there a need for it or are the existing efforts (Excel spreadsheets, online generation) sufficient? Hence the poll. I wanted to find out if there is any support for this from the community.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- mcmackie   NSRCG (Should it be upgraded to version 4)?   Jan 22 2006, 11:50 PM
- - BishopMcQ   While playing SR3, I used NSRCG almost exclusively...   Jan 23 2006, 12:25 AM
- - Redshirt   One of the chief complaints I have heard is how ti...   Jan 23 2006, 01:27 AM
- - Aku   (slightly skewed viewpoint) I dont currently play...   Jan 23 2006, 01:41 AM
- - The Stainless Steel Rat   Please finish polishing the SR3 version first!   Jan 23 2006, 02:09 AM
- - hunter5150   I would have to agree with previous poster. While ...   Jan 23 2006, 02:17 AM
- - Vagen Karrde   Given the level of excellence that was acheived by...   Jan 23 2006, 02:35 AM
- - Kanati Synge   While I do believe the SR3 version does need to be...   Jan 23 2006, 03:33 AM
- - KeyMasterOfGozer   I have been using and modifying one of the Excell ...   Jan 23 2006, 06:26 AM
- - Brahm   SR4 please. SR3 Magical Allies means supporting a...   Jan 26 2006, 03:01 AM
- - Brahm   Oh, I just thought of one more karma only creation...   Jan 26 2006, 03:38 AM
- - fionn   I have been a faithful user of your product since ...   Jan 27 2006, 01:01 AM
- - Robotech Master   I think it should be, but I think that 3rd should ...   Jan 27 2006, 01:44 AM
- - omi_aoine   I think the NSRCG is a awesome piece of work, and ...   Jan 27 2006, 04:08 PM
- - Jrayjoker   I vote yes, if only from a GM's insane need to...   Jan 27 2006, 05:42 PM
- - Muerto8   Seriously, mcmackie, your work kicks much >...   Jan 29 2006, 04:27 PM
- - TinkerGnome   I'm newly back, but I have to say that I'm...   Jan 29 2006, 05:02 PM
- - Cyberserfer   I can understand the want of the people still play...   Jan 30 2006, 10:21 PM
- - ChuckRozool   as long as the SR3 version would still be availabl...   Feb 2 2006, 04:20 AM
- - langolas   As long as 3rd ed version will still be tweaked an...   Feb 2 2006, 01:16 PM
- - Solstice   NSRCG was a marvelous piece of work that I used ex...   Feb 3 2006, 02:26 AM
- - Dashifen   If it colors your decision, McMackie, you should k...   Feb 3 2006, 03:11 PM
- - Solstice   Well that is great. I just can't see how any p...   Feb 3 2006, 05:56 PM
- - Muerto8   QUOTE (Dashifen) The big difference between yours ...   Feb 5 2006, 06:57 PM
- - Dashifen   QUOTE We need a solid program that will run regard...   Feb 6 2006, 10:17 PM
- - TinkerGnome   Dash, one thing I could suggest is that the folks ...   Feb 6 2006, 10:43 PM
- - =Spectre=   I'm in the process of doing my first SR4 chara...   Feb 6 2006, 10:54 PM
- - Kid Kaide   Well I was asked by Drix to post up on here if NSR...   Feb 7 2006, 03:05 AM
- - Club   I want enough to promise another paypal donate (Ad...   Feb 19 2006, 12:03 PM
- - Solstice   QUOTE (Club) I want enough to promise another payp...   Feb 21 2006, 03:59 AM
- - Dashifen   QUOTE (TinkerGnome) Dash, one thing I could sugges...   Feb 22 2006, 03:03 PM
- - ronin3338   I love NSRCG. My players that are computer savvy ...   Feb 25 2006, 09:33 PM
- - Kyoto Kid   Same here. The Excel one works great for the ...   Mar 2 2006, 10:13 PM
- - Paul   Can the 4th Edition NSRCG-a program we use heavily...   Mar 5 2006, 04:36 AM
- - E in MD   If you need some help give me a ping. I'm a C#...   Feb 13 2009, 10:43 PM
- - gobogen   I LOVE NSRCG I used it all the time until I switc...   Mar 1 2009, 06:16 PM
|- - cryptoknight   QUOTE (gobogen @ Mar 1 2009, 12:16 PM) I ...   Mar 2 2009, 03:49 PM
- - Bai Shen   Heh. I guess I should get off my butt and make a ...   Mar 2 2009, 04:26 PM
- - Stahlseele   pity that old mcmackie doesn't post around the...   Mar 2 2009, 08:24 PM
- - JaronK   Well, I'm biased because I only play SR3, so I...   Mar 11 2009, 10:24 PM
- - tisoz   QUOTE (mcmackie @ Jan 22 2006, 06:50 PM) ...   Mar 11 2009, 11:25 PM
- - Stahlseele   and people still don't realize that it's b...   Mar 12 2009, 12:24 AM
- - JaronK   We can still dream!   Mar 12 2009, 07:42 PM
- - Stahlseele   ok, yes, i will give you that ^^   Mar 12 2009, 10:37 PM
|- - Bai Shen   I knew it was old. I was just commenting on the f...   Mar 13 2009, 08:55 PM
- - Stahlseele   if you can do it in the same quality that the NSRC...   Mar 13 2009, 09:25 PM
|- - Bai Shen   QUOTE (Stahlseele @ Mar 13 2009, 04:25 PM...   Mar 14 2009, 11:52 PM
- - blindfox   sorry to butt in on whats supposed to be NSRCG use...   Apr 26 2009, 08:43 PM
- - Stahlseele   yes, i can. look at my signature down there ^^   Apr 26 2009, 09:50 PM
- - 10gauge   Or look at mine.   Apr 27 2009, 02:13 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th February 2025 - 11:33 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.