Feb 3 2006, 10:08 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,925 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 948 |
Ok, first we need some basic defense...
Hidden mode Hidden mode buys time and makes sure that you are not instantly spotted by prying eyes. Encryption Encryption is your friend, especially if they DO find your hidden signal, now they have to decrypt the darn thing before they can even begin hacking. Data Bombs (now the fun begins) Data bombs can be attached to a specific FILE or DEVICE, but only 1 per device or file. Now we attach a databomb to the following devices & programs. Encryption (When they try to crack the encryption it goes BOOM (I assume they can scan the encryption first to try and FIND the databomb first.) Commlink (When they crack the encryption and try an exploit test it goes BOOM (unless they find it) Now, this might be a bit of a stretch but since the System/OS is listed as a program one could probably add a databomb to that one as well (this mainly be useful to protect a system from “Crash Program action” or at least just kick the hacker in the face a it goes down in flames. For a hacker with a good commlink it will take up 4 response slots (Encryption, databomb, databomb, OS databomb) yea, so you only have 1 response slot left, but you DO have a minefield. Of course this will not be used when doing actual hacking but it is a nice casual defense against snoopers and for datacarriers who wants to protect their data. Data Locks Even if a hacker might lack access to the data he would still be able to access the device, and thus add a databomb to the device. For added defense of sensitive data one can add 3 databombs to a data lock. 1.to the datalock itself 2.the encryption is a program and can therefore be loaded with a databomb. 3.the data itself can also be loaded with a databomb The last two databombs can only be added by the actual program owners who load the program into the data lock. |
|
|
|
The Jopp Defending your Commlink Feb 3 2006, 10:08 AM
BaronSameday Like the idea.
Then you could add another Commsli... Feb 3 2006, 01:18 PM
fistandantilus3.0 doesn't a databomb destroy the file that it... Feb 3 2006, 01:24 PM
Aku ok, heres a couple of questions ('m still tryi... Feb 3 2006, 01:40 PM
The Jopp I’d rule that IF you use another commlink to ”hack... Feb 3 2006, 01:48 PM
BaronSameday The above systems has lots of advantages and might... Feb 3 2006, 02:39 PM
Rotbart van Dainig You attach Data Bombs either to Devices or Files -... Feb 3 2006, 03:05 PM
BlackHat QUOTE (BaronSameday) The above systems has lots of... Feb 3 2006, 03:07 PM
nick012000 They will count against the devices you can have s... Feb 3 2006, 03:07 PM
Azralon QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig) You attach Data Bombs e... Feb 3 2006, 03:09 PM
Dashifen LOL! Honeypots in SR4. I love it.
Another... Feb 3 2006, 03:45 PM
BlackHat QUOTE (Dashifen @ Feb 3 2006, 10:45 AM) Anoth... Feb 3 2006, 03:52 PM
The Jopp QUOTE (BlackHat) If your wireless devices are subs... Feb 3 2006, 03:56 PM
The Jopp QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig) You attach Data Bombs e... Feb 3 2006, 04:04 PM
Brahm Not running Databomb, which is different. Why cou... Feb 3 2006, 04:08 PM
Brahm QUOTE (The Jopp) But programs are files, arent the... Feb 3 2006, 04:11 PM
hobgoblin QUOTE (fistandantilus3.0) doesn't a databomb d... Feb 3 2006, 05:11 PM
Rotbart van Dainig QUOTE (The Jopp) But programs are files, arent the... Feb 3 2006, 10:58 PM
Cain Sorry to dig up an old thread, but a new trick jus... Feb 27 2006, 07:09 PM
neko128 QUOTE (Cain) Sorry to dig up an old thread, but a ... Feb 27 2006, 07:19 PM
Cain QUOTE Well, first, define "all your shadow ge... Feb 27 2006, 09:39 PM
Kyoto Kid This is why if you are not a hacker or do not pose... Feb 27 2006, 10:00 PM
Rotbart van Dainig QUOTE (Cain) I can't see any flaws in this set... Feb 27 2006, 11:05 PM
hobgoblin absolute comlink security relies on it being at th... Feb 27 2006, 11:44 PM
Rotbart van Dainig Nah - to ultimately secury a commlink against hack... Feb 28 2006, 12:01 AM
Cain Another trick that I noticed when I read that page... Feb 28 2006, 10:17 AM
Rotbart van Dainig As the Jammer happens to be strongest in effect at... Feb 28 2006, 10:23 AM
neko128 QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig) As the Jammer happens t... Feb 28 2006, 03:49 PM
Rotbart van Dainig Sure, complete destructive interference is so much... Feb 28 2006, 03:59 PM
Brahm QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig @ Feb 28 2006, 10:5... Feb 28 2006, 04:12 PM
Rotbart van Dainig QUOTE (Brahm)But if the communication also went th... Feb 28 2006, 04:35 PM
Brahm The result would be a good thing, they would gain ... Feb 28 2006, 04:43 PM
neko128 QUOTE (Brahm) The result would be a good thing, th... Feb 28 2006, 04:53 PM
Brahm QUOTE (neko128 @ Feb 28 2006, 11:53 AM) QUOTE... Feb 28 2006, 04:59 PM
Aaron If I'm reading the rules right, if your commli... Feb 28 2006, 05:03 PM
Cain QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig) As the Jammer happens t... Feb 28 2006, 07:57 PM
neko128 QUOTE (Cain) QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig @ Feb ... Feb 28 2006, 08:42 PM
Rotbart van Dainig Sorry if I lacked further explanation:
Hidden Mod... Feb 28 2006, 08:44 PM
Shrike30 The benefit you'd get running a Hidden/Skinlin... Feb 28 2006, 09:48 PM
Kyoto Kid QUOTE (Shrike30)Nearly? Yeah. You know... Feb 28 2006, 10:02 PM
Shrike30 You know what else is fun? Seats rigged to connec... Mar 1 2006, 12:23 AM
The Jopp Hmm, databombs can be added to FILES and/or DEVICE... Mar 1 2006, 01:19 PM
Oracle I am under the impression, that the term file in S... Mar 1 2006, 01:23 PM
BlackHat I think a subscription list could.
Your commlink ... Mar 1 2006, 01:34 PM
Cain QUOTE Hmm, databombs can be added to FILES and/or ... Mar 1 2006, 05:24 PM
Brahm Only a link to the commlink in another node. At t... Mar 1 2006, 05:34 PM
Rotbart van Dainig QUOTE (Cain) QUOTE Hmm, databombs can be added to ... Mar 1 2006, 11:43 PM
hobgoblin crack the encryption, hack the firewall and then b... Mar 2 2006, 12:05 AM
The Jopp QUOTE (Brahm @ Mar 1 2006, 05:34 PM) Only a l... Mar 2 2006, 07:56 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th July 2026 - 10:39 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.