IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Sustaining Focus and Concentration
shadowbod
post May 23 2006, 08:57 PM
Post #1


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 40
Joined: 13-March 06
Member No.: 8,371



When a mage is sustaining a spell, the GM has the option of making them roll to keep sustaining when their concentration is broken, e.g. when they take damage (see step 7, p174 of the rulebook).

Do you think that the mage's player should still have to roll if they have had the mage cast the sustained spell through a sustaining focus?

The reason I ask is that there is a mage in the group I run and he likes to cast invisibility through a sustaining focus. I know that there are lots of ways around invis and also that the spell could be dispelled by another mage (or whatever) etc. I liked the fact that if he was sustaining the spell himself and was unlucky enough to get seen and shot, the spell might fail, but this doesn't appear to be the case when casting through a sus-focus as it is doing the work for him.

My preferred option at the moment is to say that although the sus-focus takes away the need to concentrate on the spell to sustain it, it is still the mage that is actually responsible for keeping it going and if he gets shot, he will have to roll for concentration.

What do you all think?

-edited for clarity-
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- shadowbod   Sustaining Focus and Concentration   May 23 2006, 08:57 PM
- - WyldKarde   To my mind, the whole point of a sustaining focus ...   May 23 2006, 09:01 PM
- - stevebugge   That's a take that I hadn't considered bef...   May 23 2006, 09:03 PM
- - stevebugge   QUOTE (WyldKarde) To my mind, the whole point of a...   May 23 2006, 09:10 PM
- - NightHaunter   Hummm.   May 24 2006, 01:12 PM
- - Moon-Hawk   QUOTE (stevebugge) Only death will break the bondi...   May 24 2006, 03:28 PM
- - stevebugge   QUOTE (Moon-Hawk) QUOTE (stevebugge @ May 23 ...   May 24 2006, 03:31 PM
- - NightHaunter   Can anyone confirm that consciousness is not a req...   May 24 2006, 03:37 PM
- - Butterblume   The rules don't list any such requirement. In...   May 24 2006, 03:59 PM
- - Aaron   QUOTE (NightHaunter) Can anyone confirm that consc...   May 24 2006, 04:11 PM
- - stevebugge   So does that mean an alarmclock is required for ac...   May 24 2006, 04:16 PM
- - Moon-Hawk   I would agree that consciousness is irrelevant. I...   May 24 2006, 04:17 PM
- - NightHaunter   Thanks for confirmation.   May 24 2006, 04:17 PM
- - shadowbod   So, to get the thread back on track... If the mag...   May 24 2006, 05:21 PM
- - Aaron   Waitaminute. Back up the monkey truck a second. ...   May 24 2006, 05:22 PM
- - Moon-Hawk   QUOTE (shadowbod) However, with the rules as writt...   May 24 2006, 05:31 PM
- - shadowbod   QUOTE (Moon-Hawk) No, AFAIK, per the RAW, they cou...   May 24 2006, 05:39 PM
- - Moon-Hawk   Oh, now I understand you. Yeah, that's pretty...   May 24 2006, 05:43 PM
- - stevebugge   QUOTE (Aaron @ May 24 2006, 09:22 AM) Waitami...   May 24 2006, 06:14 PM
- - Butterblume   QUOTE (shadowbod)Do you think that the mage should...   May 24 2006, 06:25 PM
- - -X-   Not really anything to do with the RAW one way or ...   May 24 2006, 06:59 PM
- - Moon-Hawk   Didn't SOTA64 introduce some aura glassess or ...   May 24 2006, 07:03 PM
- - -X-   Kirlean photography is supposed to be able to take...   May 24 2006, 07:05 PM
- - stevebugge   Pheromone detectors, echo locattion, bio-electric ...   May 24 2006, 07:06 PM
- - Moon-Hawk   What about FAB strain 1 gas grenades?   May 24 2006, 07:07 PM
- - FrankTrollman   Not only would a magician not have a chance of los...   May 24 2006, 07:11 PM
- - Butterblume   QUOTE Drones with non-visual but pinpoint accurate...   May 24 2006, 07:18 PM
- - James McMurray   I would say that death of the subject would end th...   May 24 2006, 07:43 PM
- - shadowbod   QUOTE (FrankTrollman) Destroy the Focus itself. ...   May 24 2006, 09:03 PM
- - -X-   QUOTE (Butterblume) QUOTE Or a mystic SOTA advance...   May 24 2006, 09:03 PM
- - Geekkake   QUOTE (shadowbod) QUOTE (FrankTrollman) Destroy ...   May 24 2006, 09:11 PM
- - Butterblume   QUOTE That probably wouldn't do the job since ...   May 24 2006, 09:39 PM
- - James McMurray   QUOTE (Butterblume) I think this is the only way t...   May 24 2006, 09:43 PM
- - -X-   QUOTE (Butterblume) QUOTE That probably wouldn...   May 24 2006, 09:51 PM
- - Shrike30   It's really a pain in the ass to get a high en...   May 24 2006, 09:58 PM
- - FrankTrollman   QUOTE (shadowbod) QUOTE (FrankTrollman) Destroy ...   May 24 2006, 11:39 PM
- - Aaron   QUOTE (FrankTrollman) So you can use astral attack...   May 25 2006, 12:46 AM
- - NightHaunter   QUOTE (Geekkake) QUOTE (shadowbod @ May 24 20...   May 25 2006, 12:24 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th April 2026 - 11:18 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.