Aug 28 2006, 09:46 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 40 Joined: 3-December 02 Member No.: 3,676 |
Ok, so I see, and have read, the previous thread and it doesn't seem to come to a conclusion.
To me, "Every point of Magic invested in mana-based abilities grants the character one point to use with Magic-based skills." explains it. But the next parts, "For all other purposes, including the determination of the maximum level for adept powers, the character’s full Magic attribute is used. Such a character will not have as many adept powers as most other adepts, nor will they be able to cast spells with the same skill as true magicians." really throw it for a loop. Yes, I understand it's the GM's call, but a maximum force of 2 and 12 really do not compare. (1 and 6 w/out overcasting) And it says "can not cast spells with the same skill..." Is that literaly skill or not? For some background, the character in question is a (cool concept) antimagic mystic adept, and his only spell is Mana Static, which relies on successes(which is dependent on force) and a ruling one way can change everything the other way. I just want to get some clear logic(or if there has been an official ruling? I feel like this is hackmaster now, heh). But also, is the Mystic Adept with a Magic of 1 for spellcasting weakened enough with his max force being based off of his total attribute and missing a few dice on the rolls, or not? This, of course, barring an official ruling. I don't want to make the character not fun to play(although he swears left and right he'll change it if he needs to). Thanks everyone, it's been forever since I've been on the forums! |
|
|
|
bahwi Mystic Adept/Maximum Force Aug 28 2006, 09:46 PM
FanGirl Here's what it says right above the text you q... Aug 28 2006, 10:07 PM
Samothrake QUOTE (bahwi)"Such a character will not have ... Aug 28 2006, 10:20 PM
bahwi QUOTE (FanGirl) What this means (unless I'm ve... Aug 28 2006, 10:27 PM
bahwi QUOTE (Samothrake) I read that line in a totally d... Aug 28 2006, 10:29 PM
Slithery D So what's at issue is what it means to say ... Aug 28 2006, 10:30 PM
bahwi QUOTE (Slithery D) I have to think your total Magi... Aug 28 2006, 10:33 PM
Demerzel To sum up:
So we know Mystic Adepts get (Magic - ... Aug 28 2006, 11:05 PM
Cabral When I played in the SR Tourney, with, I believe a... Aug 29 2006, 12:33 AM
Demerzel Well I'm not sure I'm going to take much f... Aug 29 2006, 01:34 AM
bahwi QUOTE (Demerzel) I do think however that the sampl... Aug 29 2006, 03:18 AM
Glyph At this point, a GM could rule either way. I woul... Aug 29 2006, 03:35 AM
Jaid someone emailed this question in a while back. i t... Aug 29 2006, 03:38 AM
Cabral QUOTE (Demerzel) Well I'm not sure I'm goi... Aug 29 2006, 03:51 AM
Demerzel Well, then if that is the case then this needs to ... Aug 29 2006, 04:40 AM
Jaid if you don't like it and don't want to do ... Aug 29 2006, 04:57 AM
bahwi Thanks for the links, very informative.
Now I... Aug 29 2006, 05:09 AM
Demerzel Bahwi, don't take Jaid's statement persona... Aug 29 2006, 01:44 PM
bahwi Yeah, sorry, didn't mean to make it sound like... Aug 29 2006, 05:03 PM
Demerzel In your playtesting it will matter a lot how you p... Aug 29 2006, 05:52 PM
bahwi Yeah, definately. Something I need to think about.... Aug 29 2006, 09:58 PM
Moon-Hawk Perhaps in this case it would be better to just us... Aug 29 2006, 10:03 PM
Demerzel I got the impression from his other trheads that h... Aug 29 2006, 10:10 PM
bahwi Yeah, he's doing counterspelling IIRC on the c... Aug 29 2006, 10:11 PM
Moon-Hawk An antimagic adept could make an interesting tradi... Aug 29 2006, 10:20 PM
Demerzel Well, this is going way off topic, but the Mystic ... Aug 29 2006, 10:31 PM
Moon-Hawk Good call. Probably a more elegant solution. Aug 29 2006, 10:34 PM
lorechaser Mountain.
+2 to counterspelling, +2 to earth spir... Aug 30 2006, 12:42 AM
Cabral Alternatively, you could write it up as an Aspecte... Aug 30 2006, 12:43 AM
lorechaser I'd say it's a -5 for mystic adepts, and -... Aug 30 2006, 01:11 AM
Cabral That isn't really fitting with the way they wo... Aug 30 2006, 01:15 AM
Mekalus Ok I am the aforementioned character. Thought I wo... Sep 3 2006, 11:56 AM
lorechaser You're actually -10 on Qualities, based on thi... Sep 3 2006, 04:25 PM
Demerzel You're short changing yourselfo n knowledge sk... Sep 3 2006, 05:53 PM
Mekalus Ah whoops sorry left Aptitude out and thanks for t... Sep 4 2006, 05:59 AM
Demerzel Edit: Nevermind. Sep 4 2006, 04:12 PM
Jaid SINner is an adept power? Sep 4 2006, 04:32 PM
lorechaser You haven't seen all the recent references to ... Sep 4 2006, 04:55 PM
Demerzel Very little downside except that it's not what... Sep 4 2006, 05:49 PM
Demerzel 25 (Dwarf) + 195 (Attributes) + 158 (Skills) = 378... Sep 4 2006, 05:52 PM
lorechaser Lost ability to initiate? Sep 4 2006, 06:00 PM
Demerzel You can initiate, but now you can't use that a... Sep 4 2006, 06:03 PM
Jaid QUOTE (Demerzel) You can initiate, but now you can... Sep 4 2006, 06:46 PM
lorechaser That's pretty much my argument, yeah.
You can... Sep 4 2006, 06:58 PM
Mekalus OK editted once more and added in the things I lef... Sep 8 2006, 07:46 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 11th May 2026 - 01:14 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.