IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Force-independent spells
Phasma Felis
post Oct 29 2003, 09:45 PM
Post #1


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 42
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,985



After the discussion about the Improve Reflexes spells, I decided to look and see which spells functioned the same regardless their of Force. (Except for things like ease of dispelling and so forth that affect all spells.) From the main book, the only Force-independent spells I could identify were:

Improve Reflexes +(X)
Oxygenate
Entertainment
Trid Entertainment

Am I correct on these? Are there any others (from the BBB) that I may have missed?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Phasma Felis   Force-independent spells   Oct 29 2003, 09:45 PM
- - Sphynx   Most of the illusion spells, like Invis/Mask. I b...   Oct 29 2003, 09:52 PM
- - Phasma Felis   QUOTE Most of the illusion spells, like Invis/Mas...   Oct 29 2003, 10:03 PM
- - Rev   That is correct.   Oct 29 2003, 10:07 PM
- - ialdabaoth   So really, it's just Improve Reflexes, and Ent...   Oct 29 2003, 10:36 PM
- - Wish   Near as I can tell, Ice Sheet is also force indepe...   Oct 29 2003, 11:27 PM
- - John Campbell   QUOTE (ialdabaoth @ Oct 29 2003, 05:36 PM) Pe...   Oct 29 2003, 11:31 PM
- - Rev   So entertainment does not have the max sucesses = ...   Oct 29 2003, 11:43 PM
- - Kanada Ten   Isn't Entertainment an Area Affect spell?   Oct 29 2003, 11:45 PM
- - Andvare   The illusion spell Camo is a "force-indi...   Oct 30 2003, 01:28 AM
- - mfb   no, it's not. as was mentioned above, all illu...   Oct 30 2003, 02:14 AM
- - Glyph   Increase Reflexes, Oxygenate, Entertainment/Trid E...   Oct 30 2003, 03:05 AM
- - ialdabaoth   QUOTE (John Campbell) QUOTE (ialdabaoth @ Oct...   Oct 30 2003, 04:40 AM
- - TinkerGnome   QUOTE (ialdabaoth) 2D6? Sounds about right for...   Oct 30 2003, 04:52 AM
- - John Campbell   QUOTE (ialdabaoth) 2D6? How many dice do YOU usual...   Oct 30 2003, 05:09 AM
- - Sphynx   QUOTE (mfb) no, it's not. as was mentioned abo...   Oct 30 2003, 08:38 AM
- - mfb   oops, right. i was getting the effects of Camo and...   Oct 30 2003, 10:03 AM
- - Spookymonster   I think the argument could still be made that illu...   Oct 30 2003, 02:40 PM
- - Spookymonster   Oh, and a few more Force-independent spells: Fash...   Oct 30 2003, 02:45 PM
- - Rev   QUOTE (Kanada Ten) Isn't Entertainment an Area...   Oct 30 2003, 06:38 PM
- - TinkerGnome   QUOTE (Spookymonster) Fashion (actually, semi-depe...   Oct 30 2003, 06:53 PM
- - Slacker   QUOTE (Phasma Felis) I had thought that the indire...   Oct 30 2003, 06:58 PM
- - Spookymonster   The resistance test is to determine whether or not...   Oct 30 2003, 07:54 PM
- - The Frumious Bandersnatch   QUOTE I'm basing my estimates on my current so...   Oct 30 2003, 10:14 PM
- - Kanada Ten   MitS makes it clear that those "observing...   Oct 31 2003, 03:43 AM
- - mfb   hmm. the subject of an invis spell can still see h...   Oct 31 2003, 04:26 AM
- - Kanada Ten   IIRC, The rules for Invisibility (or Indirect Illu...   Oct 31 2003, 04:30 AM
- - tisoz   QUOTE (Kanada Ten) IIRC, The rules for Invisibilit...   Oct 31 2003, 07:12 AM
- - Vanguard   QUOTE (mfb) so, i wonder how feasible it'd be ...   Oct 31 2003, 09:18 AM
- - Spookymonster   QUOTE (Kanada Ten @ Oct 30 2003, 11:43 PM) Mi...   Oct 31 2003, 12:40 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th April 2026 - 04:10 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.