IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> 4e rules in a 3e world?, pardon the length...
ThePolo
post Nov 27 2007, 07:19 PM
Post #1


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 26
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Buffalo, Yo!
Member No.: 1,940



Sorry about the length, but I've got a bit to cover:

So, my gaming group and I usually switch off time between D&D and SR... been doing it that way since college (as a side note, it's nice and easy for me... by the time I run something it's got plenty of cannon support to go with it). As the current d20 campaign is winding down, the players are looking at me to start gearing up for some Shadowrun. We're thinking of picking up almost exactly where the last campaign left off (shortly after Survival of the Fittest, moving towards the Crash 2.0 to start dropping adventure seeds after a few months of play).

Our last campaign ended on a down note... almost a TPK deep in the heart of a Saeder-Kruup facility in Frankfurt Germany. One character was conscious and surrendered to security forces rather than be put down... The players want to pick up right there, as news of their demise makes it back to the shadow community. We use a character tree type system, with each player having access to multiple characters, so keeping the overlying story going is simple (even with a whole team missing). However, since we last played SR4 has been released, which brings me to my dilemma... can I/should I run a 2063-2065 "System Failure" based campaign using the SR4 rules?

I've read the SR4 book cover to cover, and I'm really looking forward to some of the simplifications and changes (even if my players aren't), but I'm also looking at this campaign as a chance to put the SR3 rules to bed... warts and all.

Now, as a long time player of the game (playing SR since the day the first blue book was available), I know that the rules are really secondary to the story, but there's been a lot of rule changes from 3e to 4e... more so than any of the previous editions. Some things just aren't covered any more, and some things are totally changed.

Any opinions? Is it so damn good that I should jump into it right away? Can 'old school' decking be handled under the new rules? Is there a compromise? Can I shoehorn in a few rules here and there to end up with a comfortable hybrid that will ease my players into 4e?

Hopefully I can find some opinions here... thanks in advance...

-polo
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- ThePolo   4e rules in a 3e world?   Nov 27 2007, 07:19 PM
- - MaxHunter   of course you can!!! I am gming three ...   Nov 27 2007, 07:53 PM
- - Ravor   Like MaxHunter said, sure. For the most part the r...   Nov 27 2007, 07:59 PM
- - Fuchs   We do the same - play in a SR3 world, sort of, usi...   Nov 27 2007, 08:24 PM
- - Synner667   Go for it. Maybe the questions should be, if you...   Nov 27 2007, 08:56 PM
- - ThePolo   QUOTE The Matrix 2.0 will need house ruled, but ev...   Nov 27 2007, 10:01 PM
- - Kyoto Kid   ....actually considered retooling a 3e campaign to...   Nov 27 2007, 10:04 PM
- - Narse   You might want to check out some of the 'Livin...   Nov 28 2007, 04:41 AM
- - MaxHunter   @thePolo... hey thanks! Now I am really motiva...   Dec 1 2007, 02:51 PM
- - MaxHunter   one of the stranded players -who posts in a differ...   Dec 1 2007, 02:53 PM
- - ThePolo   It's a pure research facilty. Mainly branches ...   Dec 1 2007, 10:39 PM
- - cndblank   I'm doing the same thing. I ran a 10 year lon...   Dec 2 2007, 08:28 PM
- - ThePolo   cndblank, that was exactly the info I was looking ...   Dec 3 2007, 05:41 PM
- - Kyoto Kid   ...with the elimination of the old dice pools, the...   Dec 3 2007, 07:04 PM
- - cndblank   Yeah, I still have riggers, but I like the idea of...   Dec 5 2007, 01:15 AM
- - Kyoto Kid   ...I would think using 4e for a 3e setting also me...   Dec 5 2007, 01:27 AM
- - Yoan   Sorry to go OT, but echoing MaxHunter: any notes/i...   Dec 5 2007, 02:52 AM
- - cndblank   QUOTE (Kyoto Kid)...I would think using 4e for a 3...   Dec 5 2007, 05:53 AM
- - ThePolo   Well, if I ran something 2063, I'd need to use...   Dec 5 2007, 07:58 PM
- - Yoan   How did they 'figure out' that the SK ware...   Dec 5 2007, 08:03 PM
- - ThePolo   QUOTE How did they 'figure out' that the S...   Dec 5 2007, 08:31 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 10th May 2026 - 11:55 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.