IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Expendable Foci, Overpriced?
Moonstone Spider
post Dec 4 2003, 12:43 AM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 665
Joined: 20-November 03
Member No.: 5,834



I was looking at the price of expendable spell foci when building a character recently. It struck me that the Foci was way out of bounds in price relative to it's usefulness. Instead of buying a single extra die, for a single spell, I could get:

An ingram valiant. Sure Mages can cast combat spells but dishing out a serious 10 round burst from one of those and doing 17D damage is worth a lot more than an extra die on one combat spell that's gone forever afterwards.

OR

Lvl 6 fire resistance, insulation, or shock resistance for my armor (Actually this is an understatement as those cost a lot less but we're talking a starting player).

OR

Enough IPE grenades to take out a Dragon (Okay, not a dragon but at least a HTR team).

OR

If you want to go magical, 3 additional force points on your shamanic lodge or a rating 4 hermetic circle for each type of elemental.

I think the expendable foci is overpriced compared to the other gear you could get, it's just a single die after all. I'd see it's price as more reasonable if it were 50-100 nuyen per point of force, possibly on a curved scale to make the really high-end foci more expensive per point.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Moonstone Spider   Expendable Foci   Dec 4 2003, 12:43 AM
- - Doctor Funkenstein   I would have preferred it if they simply kept it l...   Dec 4 2003, 01:50 AM
- - Lilt   The way it stands: Expendable foci are useful but ...   Dec 4 2003, 02:42 AM
- - Anymage   My biggest problem with expendable foci comes from...   Dec 4 2003, 08:13 AM
- - Sphynx   I think it's underpriced actually. As Lilt st...   Dec 4 2003, 09:16 AM
- - Doctor Funkenstein   I still prefer the way they used to be handled.   Dec 4 2003, 12:59 PM
- - Lilt   Hey: I allow expendable fetishes anyway. I also me...   Dec 4 2003, 01:51 PM
- - spotlite   We use them regularly. They're expensive, but ...   Dec 4 2003, 06:05 PM
- - Moonstone Spider   QUOTE (spotlite) We use them regularly. They'r...   Dec 5 2003, 05:17 AM
- - Fortune   Most definitely. You could even stack two Power Fo...   Dec 5 2003, 05:38 AM
- - moosegod   Excellent.... Mitsuhama Unit 13 just got a whole ...   Dec 5 2003, 05:42 AM
- - Sphynx   I just want to point out that, by Canon, they...   Dec 5 2003, 09:00 AM
- - spotlite   Well, I'd say you've hit it on the head wi...   Dec 5 2003, 04:29 PM
- - Fortune   QUOTE (Sphynx) I just want to point out that, by C...   Dec 5 2003, 10:45 PM
- - Saintgrimm   If it is an Exclusive action to use the focus, doe...   Dec 5 2003, 10:51 PM
- - Doctor Funkenstein   It's an Exclusive action to use it to cast a s...   Dec 5 2003, 10:53 PM
- - Saintgrimm   Ha! See. I was just an idiot. Gah! I need...   Dec 5 2003, 10:55 PM
- - Catsnightmare   Personally I think they are too expensive, the onl...   Dec 6 2003, 02:32 AM
- - Fortune   QUOTE (Catsnightmare) Personally I think they are ...   Dec 6 2003, 02:52 AM
- - Sphynx   QUOTE (Doctor Funkenstein) It's an Exclusive a...   Dec 6 2003, 09:15 AM
- - Doctor Funkenstein   QUOTE (Sphynx) Which would mean you couldn't u...   Dec 6 2003, 02:41 PM
- - Sphynx   QUOTE (Doctor Funkenstein) Too bad the fact that i...   Dec 6 2003, 07:15 PM
- - Doctor Funkenstein   You mean like these blatantly obvious quotes that ...   Dec 6 2003, 07:22 PM
- - Sphynx   Quite right on Sustaining Focus, I was definitely ...   Dec 6 2003, 07:35 PM
- - moosegod   Post? What post?   Dec 6 2003, 07:35 PM
- - Doctor Funkenstein   Read the second paragraph under Quickening. The Q...   Dec 6 2003, 07:38 PM
- - Sphynx   I read that paragraph, and I don't get your in...   Dec 6 2003, 07:48 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 11th March 2025 - 02:22 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.