Dec 4 2003, 12:43 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 665 Joined: 20-November 03 Member No.: 5,834 |
I was looking at the price of expendable spell foci when building a character recently. It struck me that the Foci was way out of bounds in price relative to it's usefulness. Instead of buying a single extra die, for a single spell, I could get:
An ingram valiant. Sure Mages can cast combat spells but dishing out a serious 10 round burst from one of those and doing 17D damage is worth a lot more than an extra die on one combat spell that's gone forever afterwards. OR Lvl 6 fire resistance, insulation, or shock resistance for my armor (Actually this is an understatement as those cost a lot less but we're talking a starting player). OR Enough IPE grenades to take out a Dragon (Okay, not a dragon but at least a HTR team). OR If you want to go magical, 3 additional force points on your shamanic lodge or a rating 4 hermetic circle for each type of elemental. I think the expendable foci is overpriced compared to the other gear you could get, it's just a single die after all. I'd see it's price as more reasonable if it were 50-100 nuyen per point of force, possibly on a curved scale to make the really high-end foci more expensive per point. |
|
|
|
Moonstone Spider Expendable Foci Dec 4 2003, 12:43 AM
Doctor Funkenstein I would have preferred it if they simply kept it l... Dec 4 2003, 01:50 AM
Lilt The way it stands: Expendable foci are useful but ... Dec 4 2003, 02:42 AM
Anymage My biggest problem with expendable foci comes from... Dec 4 2003, 08:13 AM
Sphynx I think it's underpriced actually. As Lilt st... Dec 4 2003, 09:16 AM
Doctor Funkenstein I still prefer the way they used to be handled. Dec 4 2003, 12:59 PM
Lilt Hey: I allow expendable fetishes anyway. I also me... Dec 4 2003, 01:51 PM
spotlite We use them regularly. They're expensive, but ... Dec 4 2003, 06:05 PM
Moonstone Spider QUOTE (spotlite) We use them regularly. They'r... Dec 5 2003, 05:17 AM
Fortune Most definitely. You could even stack two Power Fo... Dec 5 2003, 05:38 AM
moosegod Excellent....
Mitsuhama Unit 13 just got a whole ... Dec 5 2003, 05:42 AM
Sphynx I just want to point out that, by Canon, they... Dec 5 2003, 09:00 AM
spotlite Well, I'd say you've hit it on the head wi... Dec 5 2003, 04:29 PM
Fortune QUOTE (Sphynx) I just want to point out that, by C... Dec 5 2003, 10:45 PM
Saintgrimm If it is an Exclusive action to use the focus, doe... Dec 5 2003, 10:51 PM
Doctor Funkenstein It's an Exclusive action to use it to cast a s... Dec 5 2003, 10:53 PM
Saintgrimm Ha! See. I was just an idiot.
Gah! I need... Dec 5 2003, 10:55 PM
Catsnightmare Personally I think they are too expensive, the onl... Dec 6 2003, 02:32 AM
Fortune QUOTE (Catsnightmare) Personally I think they are ... Dec 6 2003, 02:52 AM
Sphynx QUOTE (Doctor Funkenstein) It's an Exclusive a... Dec 6 2003, 09:15 AM
Doctor Funkenstein QUOTE (Sphynx) Which would mean you couldn't u... Dec 6 2003, 02:41 PM
Sphynx QUOTE (Doctor Funkenstein) Too bad the fact that i... Dec 6 2003, 07:15 PM
Doctor Funkenstein You mean like these blatantly obvious quotes that ... Dec 6 2003, 07:22 PM
Sphynx Quite right on Sustaining Focus, I was definitely ... Dec 6 2003, 07:35 PM
moosegod Post? What post? Dec 6 2003, 07:35 PM
Doctor Funkenstein Read the second paragraph under Quickening. The Q... Dec 6 2003, 07:38 PM
Sphynx I read that paragraph, and I don't get your in... Dec 6 2003, 07:48 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th February 2026 - 04:32 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.