Oct 14 2008, 09:12 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 66 Joined: 6-February 08 Member No.: 15,650 |
Hi all
Nice to see DS is back now. I'd like to use you guys as a sounding board - opinions on the house-rule below please: When being possessed by a spirit (of a possession tradition), the armour that the spirit grants you for free (double that spirit's force by default) does not stack with your worn armour for damage resistance tests. You use whichever of the two armour scores (your worn armour, or the spirit's granted armour) is highest for actually making DR tests. What do people think? Am I going crazy, am I missing something fundamental, was this already the rules/how it was supposed to work? Sunday, I was GMing a game and a possession-based mage had a F6 spirit possess himself to powerup for a fight, and then tried to roll 36 dice for a DR test (this was based on Impact armour, not Ballistic): 12 from the spirit (and of course, I had to do him 13 damage in one hit to just breach his Immunity) 2 from Form Fitting Armour 4 from his worn armour 2 from PPP add-ons 10 from his adjusted body of 4+6 6 from Edge (argh, and it wasn't even his edge, it was the spirit's egde) I thought this was just a touch over the top, especially compared with the power levels of the rest of the team. So - opinions? I am aware that he is also abusing his ability to keep summoning lots of spirits too - so don't worry. I am going to cover that angle with spirits starting to demand services from his character, and also every now and then a spirit might just use its edge to oppose being summoned (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) |
|
|
|
ToreadorVampire Personal Possession & Armour Oct 14 2008, 09:12 PM
Muspellsheimr QUOTE (ToreadorVampire @ Oct 14 2008, 02... Oct 14 2008, 09:36 PM
pbangarth Yes, only the EDGE part was wrong. See the follow... Oct 14 2008, 10:15 PM
ToreadorVampire So - I always thought that summoned spirits had th... Oct 15 2008, 09:55 AM
Ryu The immunity to normal weapons that spirits have i... Oct 15 2008, 10:23 AM
ToreadorVampire QUOTE (Ryu @ Oct 15 2008, 11:23 AM) The i... Oct 15 2008, 10:30 AM
Ryu Ok, I thought the German page numbers are identica... Oct 15 2008, 10:52 AM
ToreadorVampire QUOTE (Ryu @ Oct 15 2008, 11:52 AM) Ok, I... Oct 15 2008, 11:03 AM
Ryu Thanks Toreador. Oct 15 2008, 11:20 AM
Sir_Psycho Ways to balance this player without shitting off t... Oct 15 2008, 11:36 AM
Chrysalis Hi,
I am the tank of that group. Quite honestly I... Oct 15 2008, 12:48 PM
Fuchs If a character is unbalancing the game, and render... Oct 15 2008, 01:01 PM
Ryu I would strongly suggest to go at the cause, rathe... Oct 15 2008, 01:31 PM
Karaden Not too familiar with the possession rules and don... Oct 15 2008, 02:58 PM
Tarantula If he doesn't have invoking, then he has to us... Oct 15 2008, 03:13 PM
pbangarth QUOTE (Tarantula @ Oct 15 2008, 08:13 AM)... Oct 15 2008, 03:53 PM
Tarantula QUOTE (pbangarth @ Oct 15 2008, 08:53 AM)... Oct 15 2008, 03:59 PM
ToreadorVampire QUOTE (Tarantula @ Oct 15 2008, 04:59 PM)... Oct 15 2008, 04:19 PM
Tarantula Which really isn't that much worse. Since eit... Oct 15 2008, 04:29 PM
ToreadorVampire QUOTE (Tarantula @ Oct 15 2008, 05:29 PM)... Oct 15 2008, 04:35 PM
Tarantula And? The problem with this is what? If they are ... Oct 15 2008, 04:40 PM
Chrysalis So about me hijacking that deltaware clinic with a... Oct 15 2008, 05:02 PM
Muspellsheimr Possession is not really any more powerful than Ma... Oct 16 2008, 06:22 PM
masterofm You gave the man the Voodoo tradition? What where... Oct 16 2008, 06:49 PM
ToreadorVampire QUOTE (masterofm @ Oct 16 2008, 07:49 PM)... Oct 16 2008, 07:42 PM
Tarantula Its 10 + (3xgrade initiating to). That means 13 k... Oct 16 2008, 07:57 PM
Eryk the Red Quick 2 cents: Isn't the rule that a spirit po... Oct 16 2008, 07:58 PM
Tarantula No, it actually specifically says that possessing ... Oct 16 2008, 08:05 PM
Eryk the Red I misunderstood the example. I thought it was abou... Oct 16 2008, 08:10 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 07:58 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.