May 19 2012, 07:28 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 16 Joined: 13-April 12 Member No.: 51,661 |
So- was hoping the Dumpshockers could help me.
Short form, my GM decided (maybe after a bit of whining on my part >.>) that the effects of Shock Gloves as described in RAW really didn't make a lot of sense. Somehow, the effects of my huge Trollish PhysAd punching someone magically disappeared when he hit someone with the Shock Gloves active? When the description clearly says that they're activated by, well, punching someone? Uh... So, he houseruled that the Shock Gloves simply added their damage to the punch. This will probably have unforeseen consequences down the road (it always does. Murphy is alive and well in 2070, and does not take kindly to being taunted. Or at least gets far too much amusement out of it), but for the moment, I'm happy with it. Only difficulty is, we're still kind of struggling with how to apply the damage, exactly. Slightly less than half my damage (5/11s) ignores half armour. Thus far he simply ruled that the damage is applied separately, re-using the net hits from my initial Unarmed roll and doing two damage resistance tests (so if I got five net hits, then the punch would do 11P/S depending on whether I decided to use Killing Hands or not, and then 10S(e) for the Shock Gloves, minus whatever hits were rolled on the opposing test). I'm pretty sure this is breaking something rather badly and giving me an unfair advantage, and, more importantly (especially as this is a trial run for the system for my gaming group), it's bogging down the game pretty badly, especially since my character is the only one to get multiple initiative passes. Can any of the math geeks out there sort out how to streamline the '5/11s of your damage bypasses half armour' into a single roll while keeping it mathematically consistent? Thanks in advance- TeChameleon out. |
|
|
|
TeChameleon Hoping for some maths help- May 19 2012, 07:28 PM
BishopMcQ I'd say to apply the net hits to one side or t... May 19 2012, 07:50 PM
Stahlseele Well, the 2 times damage resistance sounds like a ... May 19 2012, 08:06 PM
TeChameleon The problem is, rolling them separately is slowing... May 19 2012, 08:09 PM
pbangarth Seems to me that if you wanted to have the advanta... May 19 2012, 08:23 PM
Stahlseele i still don't see why you are going for the sh... May 19 2012, 08:28 PM
Whipstitch Doesn't really seem like there'd be much i... May 19 2012, 08:55 PM
pbangarth Well, maybe after the next bump in Magic and conco... May 19 2012, 08:29 PM
TeChameleon Hrm...
H'okeh... @Stahlseele- re. your first ... May 19 2012, 08:40 PM
Stahlseele Aaah, okay, that's a reason then . .
Also: ho... May 19 2012, 08:43 PM
TeChameleon Heh- sorry. That's not 'per target', ... May 19 2012, 08:56 PM
BishopMcQ To do it as a single roll here's how'd I d... May 20 2012, 12:45 AM
thorya Okay, so trying to capture the dynamics of it coun... May 20 2012, 01:13 AM
TeChameleon 'Close enough' is more than good enough fo... May 20 2012, 06:16 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th November 2025 - 09:31 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.