 Physical Mages in 2nd/1st Ed, Did they exist, and how did they work? |
 Apr 25 2004, 07:01 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Moving Target  Group: Members Posts: 309 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,548  |
I finally found a use for the topic description line ;).
Anywho, one complaint I've always had about magician's way adepts is that they're adepts first, mages second...and what I'm wondering is, did they work differently in earlier editions, maybe in a fashion more to my liking? Thanks. |
 |
 
|
Posts in this topic
Kakkaraun Physical Mages in 2nd/1st Ed Apr 25 2004, 07:01 PM
Talia Invierno They were introduced in Awakenings (late 2nd editi... Apr 25 2004, 07:05 PM Kakkaraun Shite. Oh well. Looks like sustaining foci and I... Apr 25 2004, 07:08 PM blakkie QUOTE (Kakkaraun) Shite. Oh well. Looks like sus... Apr 25 2004, 07:31 PM Kakkaraun I wanted to build a very fast mage, that's the... Apr 25 2004, 07:41 PM Herald of Verjigorm Gecko crawl. At force 6 with 6 successes and natu... Apr 25 2004, 07:52 PM blakkie QUOTE (Kakkaraun) I wanted to build a very fast ma... Apr 25 2004, 08:36 PM Kakkaraun 7 Q, 6 Int. Increase Reflexes +3 makes the initia... Apr 25 2004, 09:33 PM tisoz QUOTE (Kakkaraun) Okay, as long as we're on th... Apr 26 2004, 11:41 AM mfb a neat trick i'm working on is anchoring an in... Apr 26 2004, 12:46 PM Kakkaraun Here's a foci question. I can't seem to r... Apr 26 2004, 03:13 PM TinkerGnome If you deactivate a sustaining focus, the spell di... Apr 26 2004, 03:19 PM Kakkaraun Oi.
But hey, you do need LOS to dispell a foci, r... Apr 26 2004, 03:30 PM TinkerGnome Neither. You just have to be able to see the targ... Apr 26 2004, 04:10 PM
blakkie QUOTE (Kakkaraun) Oi.
But hey, you do need LOS to... Apr 26 2004, 04:12 PM  |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 11th July 2025 - 03:37 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.