 Magic and the Law 2064, Magic and the Law 2064 |
 Sep 28 2004, 11:25 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Moving Target  Group: Members Posts: 288 Joined: 3-December 03 From: Boston, Mass Member No.: 5,874  |
Okay I've got a bit of a disagreement (with a player in my campaign) on the law and magic? I don't have the books handy so I'm curious to see what people remember? With magic ect. what kind of restrictions are there in on say combat spells, mind reading spells and stuff like that? As I remember you needed license to cast high powered magic? Something 9+, the average human getting hit by a force 9 fireball with a body of 3 is going to probably not come out of such an event in one coherent piece. What does everyone remember about law and magic? The specifics ellude me so I wanted to hear what everyone thought?
ooops I posted this in the wrong area...A reader responded that offhand the unregulated max level for a spell is 3? Sounds good to me but I can't remember off hand? Oh yeah before I forget, if you know the specifics (pages) then why the hell are you not a Shadowrun Commando? |
 |
 
|
Posts in this topic
kryton Magic and the Law 2064 Sep 28 2004, 11:25 PM
Shadow IIRC Spells above force 3 are tightly regulated.
... Sep 28 2004, 11:28 PM grendel Yes, spells above force 3 require permits. This g... Sep 28 2004, 11:32 PM kryton Where's that listed MITS or a 2nd Editions boo... Sep 28 2004, 11:35 PM Herald of Verjigorm Anything magical of force 3 or above requires a pe... Sep 28 2004, 11:40 PM Necro Tech BBB page 305 under Magical Equipment. Sep 28 2004, 11:51 PM Belle Anderson MitS page 11 States that in the UCAS and CAS any S... Sep 28 2004, 11:59 PM kryton Dude you guys freaking rock. My player is a rules ... Sep 29 2004, 12:04 AM Backgammon Specifically, the index at the back of MiTS states... Sep 29 2004, 12:24 AM kryton Interesting. I'll have to look that up when I ... Sep 29 2004, 01:06 AM Zenmaxer I hate rules lawyers. If I'm ever in boston, I... Sep 29 2004, 02:24 AM Kagetenshi QUOTE (Backgammon) Specifically, the index at the ... Sep 29 2004, 03:19 AM BitBasher that depends on what your players like in the game... Sep 29 2004, 03:20 AM Eyeless Blond Right, and police are lax about different things i... Sep 29 2004, 03:33 AM Accel QUOTE (Zenmaxer) it's prolly not a good idea t... Sep 29 2004, 09:30 AM toturi I doubt you can sue someone for trying to save ano... Sep 29 2004, 09:38 AM Da9iel In fact, she's probably risking greater lawsui... Sep 29 2004, 09:56 AM Edward There have been several cases of people suing some... Sep 29 2004, 11:43 AM Kagetenshi Are you kidding? That'd probably be treated li... Sep 29 2004, 01:16 PM Canid13 If a liscenced doctor slapped a force 6 heal spell... Sep 29 2004, 02:02 PM Kagetenshi It’s an incorrect interpretation, but a case can b... Sep 29 2004, 02:23 PM kryton One of the problems with out legal system is that ... Sep 29 2004, 02:26 PM Moon-Hawk I'm not sure what book this is from, I think A... Sep 29 2004, 02:33 PM Canid13 Agreed, it says that in MITS also. And MITS also s... Sep 29 2004, 03:35 PM Zenmaxer :: nods :: this is correct. I was just noting dow... Sep 29 2004, 04:20 PM spotlite note - that not being admissible thing only counts... Sep 29 2004, 04:35 PM
Kagetenshi QUOTE (Zenmaxer) :: nods :: this is correct. I wa... Sep 29 2004, 07:56 PM  |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st April 2026 - 01:32 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.