IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> A couple of Questions
GentlemanLoser
post Feb 7 2005, 09:35 AM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 128
Joined: 28-January 05
Member No.: 7,029



Hi All!

I’m getting back into Shadowrun and am trying to get up to speed with the 3rd edition rules. I’ve browsed these forums for a little while and found some great information, but I’ve a couple of questions (I’m sure there’ll be more to come!) that I can’t find answers for and hope you could help.

What use are Smart Goggles? I’m assuming that Smart Goggles can’t be used in conjunction with a Laser Sight (although the rules use the term SmartLink, which might only apply to the cybernetic version…). Both options give a -1 TN, but Smart Goggles cost at least 4 times as much as a laser sight, not including the cost of modifying the gun itself! I also assume that Smart Goggles can’t be used to eject a Smartgun clip as a free action, unlike the cybernetic version. What reason is there to use Smart Goggles over a Laser Sight? If I’ve assumed incorrectly, and Smart Goggles can be used with Laser Sights (I’m at work atm and don’t have the books to hand, I think the rules state that laser sights can’t be used with smartlink systems) what is the justification for this? If you already have a sight appearing in your vision highlighting the point the gun is targeting (from the Goggles) what additional help is a red dot appearing on the target going to provide?

Second question. In M&M I remember the entry for Smartlink (where describing the individual components used to create a smarlink) offering the idea of installing a second induction pad to allow the use of two smartguns. Doesn’t this contradict the two weapon rules given in the combat section of the main rulebook that states that when using two pistols (for example) reductions to TN’s from Smartgun Links, Goggles and Laser Sights aren’t applied? Or is this cyberware option only given so that someone could hold two smart weapons, and only use one at a time? On a related note, I’ve seen ambidexterity mentioned here, sometimes as a special skill and sometimes as an edge, but I’ve not found it in the rule books we have at the moment (Core Rules, SOTA:65? - Latest one, MITS, M&M, SR Companion), is this a house rule, or does it appear in another sourcebook (Cannon Companion maybe?)? How does it work?

I hope this all makes sense and thanks!

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- GentlemanLoser   A couple of Questions   Feb 7 2005, 09:35 AM
- - JaronK   Well, Smartlink-2 smartgoggles would help you out ...   Feb 7 2005, 09:52 AM
- - GentlemanLoser   I don't remember seeing an option for Smarlink...   Feb 7 2005, 10:05 AM
- - JaronK   I believe there's SL-2 Goggles, but not entire...   Feb 7 2005, 11:04 AM
- - Fortune   The Ambidexterity Edge is detailed in Cannon Compa...   Feb 7 2005, 12:22 PM
- - GentlemanLoser   Thanks. That makes sense. So it's an Edge an...   Feb 7 2005, 12:29 PM
- - Fortune   There's also an 'Off-Hand Weapon' skil...   Feb 7 2005, 12:51 PM
- - U_Fester   QUOTE (JaronK) I believe there's SL-2 Goggles,...   Feb 7 2005, 02:40 PM
- - tisoz   Another advantage of smartlink goggles over laser ...   Feb 7 2005, 04:45 PM
- - GentlemanLoser   "A previous edition said use of smartlink cou...   Feb 7 2005, 07:06 PM
- - tisoz   Haven't had it come up. Even the mages either...   Feb 7 2005, 09:22 PM
- - Nikoli   The friendly fire stuff requires an add on and tar...   Feb 7 2005, 09:26 PM
- - Crimsondude 2.0   It was in SR2 and SR3, too. QUOTE (SR3 @ 112...   Feb 7 2005, 09:35 PM
- - Nikoli   Sweet. Though, I also remember a warning about th...   Feb 7 2005, 09:39 PM
- - James McMurray   QUOTE (Nikoli) The friendly fire stuff requires an...   Feb 7 2005, 09:41 PM
- - tisoz   Ok, I looked in my SR3 and didn't see it menti...   Feb 7 2005, 11:53 PM
- - Zeel De Mort   The Safe Target System still exists as well. p33 ...   Feb 8 2005, 12:00 AM
- - tisoz   QUOTE (Zeel De Mort) The Safe Target System still ...   Feb 8 2005, 01:45 AM
- - Kanada Ten   A laser sight also takes up a "slot" on ...   Feb 8 2005, 02:15 AM
- - Necro Tech   As no one has said it the laser sight has no probl...   Feb 8 2005, 06:49 AM
- - Edward   There are times when it is useful to have the gogg...   Feb 8 2005, 08:29 AM
- - Xirces   I'm pretty sure that the STS is in CC, but the...   Feb 8 2005, 10:33 AM
- - GrinderTheTroll   100 Karma to the first person to figure out how Ge...   Feb 8 2005, 05:11 PM
- - GentlemanLoser   RE: A couple of Questions   Feb 8 2005, 05:13 PM
- - NightHaunter   Former nobility turned shadowrunner.   Feb 8 2005, 05:18 PM
- - GentlemanLoser   LOL! Not quite the origin of the name...   Feb 8 2005, 05:20 PM
- - Demosthenes   Ask Automatic Jack   Feb 8 2005, 05:27 PM
- - GrinderTheTroll   C'mon now...someone *has* to know... PS - So...   Feb 8 2005, 05:34 PM
- - GentlemanLoser   Bahh!   Feb 8 2005, 05:37 PM
- - Garland   C'mon people, Burning Chrome... Is it because...   Feb 8 2005, 06:06 PM
- - GentlemanLoser   A quick web search would even end this!   Feb 8 2005, 06:09 PM
- - Garland   A person could even read it for themselves...   Feb 8 2005, 06:18 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th August 2025 - 05:59 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.