IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Matrix 2.0, good or bad, Deckers vs Hackers aside
Lilt
post Apr 19 2005, 10:20 PM
Post #1


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,965
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Edinburgh, Scotland
Member No.: 2,032



There's a fair bit of discussion about the loss of 'decks' and, theoretically, decking.

What I've not really seen is a discussion of what the new matrix 2.0 would be like, and wether or not it's a good idea.

As they say it's going to be an augmented reality, is remote access still possible with it? (the overwatch decker) If not, to encourage on-site decking, is that a good thing or is it a bit unrealistic in what's supposed to be primarily a telecommunications network.

Is it going to be possible to project one's senses in a similar manner to astral projection? Are there matrix-free zones and similar, or does everywhere have at-least satelite backup?

Who has access to the Matrix 2.0? Is it anyone with a jack or does it still require some form of extra hardware like a deck (or the cyber equivalent).

I once ran a game with something similar. It went rather well and, although I didn't intentionally make it as an alternative to the matrix, had a system which possibly bore a resemblance to The Matrix 2.0.
[ Spoiler ]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 8th August 2025 - 05:18 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.