Jun 27 2005, 01:38 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,088 Joined: 8-October 04 From: Dallas, TX Member No.: 6,734 |
Before anyone asked, yes I've done a search...but if I've missed something because my search-fu is weak, point me at 'em.
A couple questions got raised in the group regarding drones. A) The Medusa has mixed armor (4 points normal, 4 points ablative). How is this resolved in melee and ranged combat? The ablative rules are a little confusing...and which armor would be resolved first? The ablative (which isn't hardened, but is on the outside) or the normal (which is hardened and on the inside)? I found the previous thread where this was brought up, but it was never really answered. B) It says in Brainscan that all physical spells except elemental manipulations have a target number of OR+Body (in the case of Medusas, it's 10+3=13). The group did NOT like the fact that you had to roll 13+ to levitate a Medusa - is this the proper ruling? It's according to the book, I think...but the rules are wierd. The relevant quote in BBB is under Vehicles and Spells, where it says the same. The argument against is the magic fingers, where in the spell description it says it's ideal for bomb disposal...but how "ideal" is that if your target number is 8-10? The argument for is that they already don't get a magic resistance...so 1 success and you have a Medusa play toy (which is exactly what happened in my campaign...3 medusas levitated, one used as a pinata by called shots to bypass armor) I have no problem with a Medusa play toy, as long as it's difficult to do it. :) [BTW, if anyone is curious to read the run posts for my group, it's here at Ghosts of Dallas] |
|
|
|
DocMortand A couple miscellaneous questions Jun 27 2005, 01:38 AM
Edward The way I would like to rule spell target numbers ... Jun 27 2005, 03:05 AM
LinaInverse Full disclosure; I'm one of the players in Doc... Jun 27 2005, 04:20 AM
Edward Where things get really confusing is when you cast... Jun 27 2005, 04:37 AM
Vaevictis Well, according to the SR3 book I'm reading, t... Jun 27 2005, 04:44 AM
DocMortand QUOTE (Vaevictis @ Jun 26 2005, 11:44 PM) Wel... Jun 27 2005, 05:58 AM
Vaevictis QUOTE Unfortunately that does not apply to vehicle... Jun 27 2005, 06:59 AM
Edward QUOTE (DocMortand) Edit: also the bullet example i... Jun 27 2005, 07:30 PM
Kelson I too am in Doc's campaign, so take this for w... Jun 27 2005, 09:15 PM
Apathy Not trying to approve or disapprove of anyone... Jun 27 2005, 09:50 PM
Kelson That's where the distinction between living an... Jun 27 2005, 10:12 PM
Vaevictis QUOTE (Apathy @ Jun 27 2005, 04:50 PM)If we t... Jun 27 2005, 10:13 PM
Herald of Verjigorm It does roll against a base TN of 4 for living tar... Jun 27 2005, 10:14 PM
LinaInverse QUOTE (Apathy)Not trying to approve or disapprove ... Jun 27 2005, 10:15 PM
DocMortand Any book-ninjas want to comment? I already know m... Jun 28 2005, 05:37 AM
tisoz QUOTE (DocMortand) (4 points normal, 4 points abla... Jun 28 2005, 10:23 AM
Kelson That's just.....insane. Jun 28 2005, 10:38 AM
Kelson QUOTE (LinaInverse @ Jun 27 2005, 05:15 PM) T... Jun 28 2005, 10:41 AM
Apathy QUOTE (Kelson) Here is how I view Levitate to work... Jun 28 2005, 11:30 AM
LinaInverse QUOTE (Kelson) QUOTE (LinaInverse @ Jun 27 20... Jun 28 2005, 02:32 PM
Apathy QUOTE Umm...no. Levitating a living being uses a T... Jun 28 2005, 02:45 PM
Herald of Verjigorm It's to give albino gnome deckers a way to avo... Jun 28 2005, 03:21 PM
Eyeless Blond QUOTE (Vaevictis @ Jun 26 2005, 10:59 PM) Can... Jun 28 2005, 03:41 PM
Modesitt QUOTE A) The Medusa has mixed armor (4 points norm... Jun 28 2005, 08:09 PM
Edward QUOTE ( Kelson)
It makes no sense at all to have a... Jun 28 2005, 08:16 PM
Kagetenshi QUOTE (Modesitt) 0. It can't have 4 levels of ... Jun 28 2005, 05:50 PM
Kelson QUOTE (LinaInverse) Umm...no. Levitating a living... Jun 28 2005, 06:00 PM
tisoz QUOTE (Modesitt @ Jun 28 2005, 02:09 PM) QUOT... Jun 28 2005, 11:08 PM
DocMortand I didn't catch the description of the ablative... Jun 29 2005, 12:00 AM
Herald of Verjigorm There is no argument about the TN for Levitate. I... Jun 29 2005, 12:15 AM
DocMortand QUOTE (Herald of Verjigorm) There is no argument a... Jun 29 2005, 12:20 AM
Kelson Oh the joys of rule muddying.
Personally, I... Jun 29 2005, 12:45 AM
LinaInverse QUOTE (DocMortand @ Jun 28 2005, 06:00 PM) By... Jun 29 2005, 01:34 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 14th June 2026 - 03:08 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.