IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

30 Pages V  « < 19 20 21 22 23 > »   
Closed TopicStart new topic
> CGL Speculation #8, Put on your asbestos underwear
Bob Lord of Evil
post Jun 8 2010, 05:18 PM
Post #501


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 425
Joined: 27-May 09
From: Evil's Nexus
Member No.: 17,207



QUOTE (Dread Moores @ Jun 8 2010, 04:35 PM) *
These are still products living under the shadow of the former freelancers work, most particularly when the accusations of copy/paste are flying about.
Edit: Corrected, based off Jason's statement.


Mark Twain said, "The most outrageous lies that can be invented will find believers if a man only tells them with all his might."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
deek
post Jun 8 2010, 05:28 PM
Post #502


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,706
Joined: 30-June 06
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Member No.: 8,814



Oh, I'm sure that the former freelancers can continue to make claims on some ideas for many more books to come. I mean, I would expect in such a small freelance pool as this has been, that there have been a lot of discussions on a myriad of topics.

The ones that are left, get to finish writing.

It only takes one person to suggest the work is copied to cast a shadow. If I were in Bobby's shoes, I would distance myself from Shadowrun and make a name for myself writing for something else. Or perhaps waiting it out until different management is in charge wanting to leverage his knowledge again.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ancient History
post Jun 8 2010, 05:34 PM
Post #503


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,748
Joined: 5-July 02
Member No.: 2,935



I'd like to clarify that there is exactly one instance - the Mitsuhama profile - which I feel was actually copied, and even that was altered and expanded. Jason (I really presume it was Jason, since I don't see Brandie ever knowingly doing this) left enough behind that it was pretty obvious it was based on my original profile. I'm not accusing anybody of plagiarism, I'm accusing them of very sloppy editing. I know why it was done, I just don't know why such a hash was made out of it that I can still recognize it as what I wrote.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Lord of Evil
post Jun 8 2010, 05:34 PM
Post #504


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 425
Joined: 27-May 09
From: Evil's Nexus
Member No.: 17,207



QUOTE (deek @ Jun 8 2010, 05:28 PM) *
Oh, I'm sure that the former freelancers can continue to make claims on some ideas for many more books to come. I mean, I would expect in such a small freelance pool as this has been, that there have been a lot of discussions on a myriad of topics.

The ones that are left, get to finish writing.

It only takes one person to suggest the work is copied to cast a shadow. If I were in Bobby's shoes, I would distance myself from Shadowrun and make a name for myself writing for something else. Or perhaps waiting it out until different management is in charge wanting to leverage his knowledge again.


A very reasonable line of thought.

It isn't like he couldn't start up an e-publishing company and come out with his very own game system and run it how he sees fit. Better to channel one's energies into something productive instead of letting frustration fester.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fuchs
post Jun 8 2010, 06:13 PM
Post #505


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,328
Joined: 28-November 05
From: Zuerich
Member No.: 8,014



The question is not what he can and can't do, it's whether or not there was sloppy editing. Trying to make it personal won't change that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Catadmin
post Jun 8 2010, 06:24 PM
Post #506


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 174
Joined: 16-March 10
Member No.: 18,299



QUOTE (Ancient History @ Jun 8 2010, 01:34 PM) *
I'd like to clarify that there is exactly one instance - the Mitsuhama profile - which I feel was actually copied, and even that was altered and expanded. Jason (I really presume it was Jason, since I don't see Brandie ever knowingly doing this) left enough behind that it was pretty obvious it was based on my original profile. I'm not accusing anybody of plagiarism, I'm accusing them of very sloppy editing. I know why it was done, I just don't know why such a hash was made out of it that I can still recognize it as what I wrote.


Okay, final post on this specific issue. Let me make myself absolutely clear.

While the profile did indeed go through the editing process by SEVERAL people, *I* am the one who wrote it.

Quit dragging my work into your personal feud with Jason.

EDIT: If you'd actually given me any time to respond to your accusations before you posted, you wouldn't be beating a dead horse that doesn't exist.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ancient History
post Jun 8 2010, 06:30 PM
Post #507


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,748
Joined: 5-July 02
Member No.: 2,935



Okay, if you wrote it and not Jason, then the parallels are just bizarre.

[/edit] I mean, you've seen the side-by-side comparison, right? You can understand why I would see that and go "Well, looks like Jason missed a spot." I know why I made those changes in the first place, I just don't know why you...waitaminute. You got that from the wiki, didn'tcha? And I didn't copy that to the wiki, but somebody could have copied it from my draft to the wiki. Hmm.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fuchs
post Jun 8 2010, 06:43 PM
Post #508


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,328
Joined: 28-November 05
From: Zuerich
Member No.: 8,014



QUOTE (Ancient History @ Jun 8 2010, 08:30 PM) *
Okay, if you wrote it and not Jason, then the parallels are just bizarre.

[/edit] I mean, you've seen the side-by-side comparison, right? You can understand why I would see that and go "Well, looks like Jason missed a spot." I know why I made those changes in the first place, I just don't know why you...waitaminute. You got that from the wiki, didn'tcha? And I didn't copy that to the wiki, but somebody could have copied it from my draft to the wiki. Hmm.


Copied from a copy?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dr.Rockso
post Jun 8 2010, 06:48 PM
Post #509


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 583
Joined: 6-November 09
From: MTL
Member No.: 17,849



http://wiki.dumpshock.com/index.php?title=...;action=history

I don't see any recent revisions. But I have heard that the wiki could be doing better, maintenance wise.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
deek
post Jun 8 2010, 06:54 PM
Post #510


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,706
Joined: 30-June 06
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Member No.: 8,814



I guess I'm confused. Why wouldn't the profile of the same company look similar, almost identical no matter who was doing the writing? You have the same derived sources and those aren't going to change...its not like this stuff is a bunch of fiction that was copied, these are kind of like Shadowrun facts, are they not?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fuchs
post Jun 8 2010, 06:56 PM
Post #511


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,328
Joined: 28-November 05
From: Zuerich
Member No.: 8,014



QUOTE (deek @ Jun 8 2010, 08:54 PM) *
I guess I'm confused. Why wouldn't the profile of the same company look similar, almost identical no matter who was doing the writing? You have the same derived sources and those aren't going to change...its not like this stuff is a bunch of fiction that was copied, these are kind of like Shadowrun facts, are they not?


AH mentioned that he invented subdivisions which have not been mentioned before. And those seem to be present in the "header", but not the (rewritten) actual text entry.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ancient History
post Jun 8 2010, 06:58 PM
Post #512


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,748
Joined: 5-July 02
Member No.: 2,935



QUOTE (deek @ Jun 8 2010, 07:54 PM) *
I guess I'm confused. Why wouldn't the profile of the same company look similar, almost identical no matter who was doing the writing? You have the same derived sources and those aren't going to change...its not like this stuff is a bunch of fiction that was copied, these are kind of like Shadowrun facts, are they not?

Because some of those changes were not derived directly from previous sources. This is the heart of the issue. Stuff like the percentage ownership of MCT that Toshiro Mitsuhama has are understandable - we were following the same plot logic, the math worked out the same. The slogan and the major divisions are braintwisters though.

For reference, we're not talking about the public wiki (well, at least I'm not), we're talking about the freelancer wiki, which is not public.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Demonseed Elite
post Jun 8 2010, 07:05 PM
Post #513


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,078
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 67



QUOTE (Dr.Rockso @ Jun 8 2010, 02:48 PM) *
http://wiki.dumpshock.com/index.php?title=...;action=history

I don't see any recent revisions. But I have heard that the wiki could be doing better, maintenance wise.


There's a freelancer wiki. Or at least there used to be.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lehesu
post Jun 8 2010, 07:09 PM
Post #514


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 49
Joined: 3-April 10
Member No.: 18,407



I'm just not convinced that it couldn't possibly be a case of convergent (parallel?) development.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dr.Rockso
post Jun 8 2010, 07:10 PM
Post #515


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 583
Joined: 6-November 09
From: MTL
Member No.: 17,849



Open foot. Insert mouth. Completely slipped my mind. Too eager to help, i suppose....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fuchs
post Jun 8 2010, 07:27 PM
Post #516


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,328
Joined: 28-November 05
From: Zuerich
Member No.: 8,014



QUOTE (lehesu @ Jun 8 2010, 09:09 PM) *
I'm just not convinced that it couldn't possibly be a case of convergent (parallel?) development.


Past a certain point, coincidence becomes too unlikely.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JM Hardy
post Jun 8 2010, 07:29 PM
Post #517


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 595
Joined: 12-May 05
Member No.: 7,392



I've spent part of the day looking at it, and here's what happened: Bobby's version of the Mitsuhama chapter had already been laid out before he terminated his contracts. When the new material was sent to layout, some of the material in the Corporate Profile box was not omitted that should have been.

The Corporate Divisions paragraph has been removed from from the electronic versions currently on sale. It will not be in the printed versions. If you bought the PDF already, you should be able to get a free updated version.

Jason H.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
otakusensei
post Jun 8 2010, 07:31 PM
Post #518


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 695
Joined: 2-January 07
From: He has here a minute ago...
Member No.: 10,514



QUOTE (lehesu @ Jun 8 2010, 02:09 PM) *
I'm just not convinced that it couldn't possibly be a case of convergent (parallel?) development.

Not word for word. Even the order of the sections are the same. If Catadmin didn't have AH's docs on hand and opened them at some point, the likelyhood of the finished product including the same sections in the same order are astounding. Assuming that he had read them at some point, it's still doesn't look good.

Not a wholesale copy job, but not a clean break from AH's material either. The whole thing wouldn't stand in a court of law, but it doesn't look very good on Jason and IMR. Of course, that's a shit pile a mile high at this point so you might just be able to make this nugget out at the top if you use some binoculars.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fuchs
post Jun 8 2010, 07:36 PM
Post #519


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,328
Joined: 28-November 05
From: Zuerich
Member No.: 8,014



I just wonder why such stuff happens when AH did all he could to prevent it. And why some people still try to blame him.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lehesu
post Jun 8 2010, 07:50 PM
Post #520


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 49
Joined: 3-April 10
Member No.: 18,407



QUOTE (Fuchs @ Jun 8 2010, 03:36 PM) *
I just wonder why such stuff happens when AH did all he could to prevent it. And why some people still try to blame him.

His use of the forums to air grievances best discuseed in private might have something to do with it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fuchs
post Jun 8 2010, 07:54 PM
Post #521


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,328
Joined: 28-November 05
From: Zuerich
Member No.: 8,014



QUOTE (lehesu @ Jun 8 2010, 09:50 PM) *
His use of the forums to air grievances best discuseed in private might have something to do with it.


Transparency is a good thing. It prevents people from putting too much blame on the innocent. And others from simply ignoring said grievances.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lehesu
post Jun 8 2010, 08:04 PM
Post #522


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 49
Joined: 3-April 10
Member No.: 18,407



QUOTE (Fuchs @ Jun 8 2010, 03:54 PM) *
Transparency is a good thing. It prevents people from putting too much blame on the innocent. And others from simply ignoring said grievances.

Suffice it to say that I find transparency a poor excuse for being too wrapped up in your own tragedy to act with decorum.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ancient History
post Jun 8 2010, 08:18 PM
Post #523


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,748
Joined: 5-July 02
Member No.: 2,935



QUOTE (JM Hardy @ Jun 8 2010, 08:29 PM) *
I've spent part of the day looking at it, and here's what happened: Bobby's version of the Mitsuhama chapter had already been laid out before he terminated his contracts. When the new material was sent to layout, some of the material in the Corporate Profile box was not omitted that should have been.

The Corporate Divisions paragraph has been removed from from the electronic versions currently on sale. It will not be in the printed versions. If you bought the PDF already, you should be able to get a free updated version.

Jason H.

Thank you. It's a little thing given the scope of the book, but I think "honest mistakes" like this accurately illustrate why I had concerns earlier.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
otakusensei
post Jun 8 2010, 08:18 PM
Post #524


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 695
Joined: 2-January 07
From: He has here a minute ago...
Member No.: 10,514



QUOTE (lehesu @ Jun 8 2010, 04:04 PM) *
Suffice it to say that I find transparency a poor excuse for being too wrapped up in your own tragedy to act with decorum.

Jason did the same thing when AH released his self proofed drafts. Jason asked if the drafts were the ones that were edited by himself and other CGL staff. AH clarified that these were older drafts, edited by himself as he originally stated. Jason backed down.

Now AH calls Jason on using his original drafts in the publication of a book and Jason admits that's what happened and made a change to the PDF.

Who's acting without decorum?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DireRadiant
post Jun 8 2010, 08:23 PM
Post #525


The Dragon Never Sleeps
*********

Group: Admin
Posts: 6,924
Joined: 1-September 05
Member No.: 7,667



All these accusations going back and forth by everyone are inflammatory. Please consider before making them, and especially consider that these boards are not the appropriate venue for some of these matters.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

30 Pages V  « < 19 20 21 22 23 > » 
Closed TopicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd November 2024 - 03:58 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.