 The Commlink Response Spiral of Doom |
  |
 Sep 27 2005, 06:43 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Moving Target  Group: Members Posts: 238 Joined: 18-August 05 Member No.: 7,569  |
So... say you have a Response 5, System 5 commlink running 5 programs (the limit on the number you can run without affecting your Response). You load another program, taking you to 6. Your Response drops by 1. Your System is limited to a max of your Response, so it also drops by 1. So you're now running 6 programs on a Response 4, System 4 commlink. You load another, which is fine, taking you to 7 on a 4/4. You load another, taking you to 8 on a 4/4. This causes another decrease to your Response, and likewise your system. You're now running 8 on a 3/3. Let's load another. 9 on a 3/3. Drop those by 1. So, 9 on a 2/2. Wait, now you're running 9 on a 2/2, which is more than 4 times your System. So drop it by another 1. So, 9 on a 1/1. Well, no wait, now it drops again to 0/0.... crap, my commlink just crashed.
So, either the limits on programs is based off your "original" system, or else there's a problem. Because it states that you if you run 10 programs with a System of 5, you take a -2 Response Penalty. Well, as I just showed, you in fact take a -5 penalty if it's iterative. Calypso |
 |
 
|
|
Sep 27 2005, 06:48 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,251 Joined: 11-September 04 From: GA Member No.: 6,651 |
p213 BBB, "A System program is limited by the Response rating of the device it is on; a System run on a device with a lower Response rating functions at the Response rating instead."
This means the EFFECTIVE System rating goes down, but not the actual base System rating. Its not iterative. |
|
|
|
|
Sep 27 2005, 06:50 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,718 Joined: 14-September 02 Member No.: 3,263 |
A thread already exists on this, and it was generally concluded that it doesn't itertate into a downward spiral. That your lowered cap only is in regards to limiting the program ratings, not the total number of programs.
EDIT: Damn, too slow and without a direct quote. :P |
|
|
|
|
Sep 27 2005, 06:52 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 238 Joined: 18-August 05 Member No.: 7,569 |
Yeah, I assumed any reasonable GM would rule that it wasn't iterative, but I found it moderately amusing that the ambiguity existed at all. :D
Calypso |
|
|
|
|
Sep 27 2005, 06:55 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Hoppelhäschen 5000 Group: Members Posts: 5,807 Joined: 3-January 04 Member No.: 5,951 |
It wouldn't even reduce your Program ratings, as they are limited by System, not by Response - reducing System would result in that 'spiral of doom'.
So running too many Programs is a real PitA in Cybercombat, Initative, Decryption or any other direct use of Response, but not so bad otherwise... |
|
|
|
|
Sep 27 2005, 06:56 PM
Post
#6
|
|||
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 238 Joined: 18-August 05 Member No.: 7,569 |
Wouldn't your programs be running at your "effective" System level, which is reduced along with your Response? |
||
|
|
|
||
|
Sep 27 2005, 07:01 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Hoppelhäschen 5000 Group: Members Posts: 5,807 Joined: 3-January 04 Member No.: 5,951 |
The fine point is - if you bother with an 'effective' System limiting the Ratings of Programs, you just reduced the number of Programs you are allowed to run, or the possible Subscriptions, too...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 29th April 2024 - 04:46 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.