IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> House rule Qualities, Anyone added more?
Dark Scrier
post Sep 28 2005, 04:08 AM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 196
Joined: 1-August 02
From: The land of unforgiving doom
Member No.: 3,052



I'm churning out as many characters as humanly possible, and I'm stuck for some ideas.

Anyone tried converting some of the older edges or flaws, or had ideas for new ones?

I didn't mind that burned out idea posted earlier, as one of the characters I was looking at was a burnout.

Fire away people, inspire me!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
warrior_allanon
post Sep 28 2005, 06:44 AM
Post #2


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 775
Joined: 31-March 05
From: florida
Member No.: 7,273



already worked on that and pending GM approval you get/costs you 5bp for every edge/flaw point.....most of them convert that way, and you know how editions differ slightly

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Space Ghost
post Sep 29 2005, 07:04 AM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 129
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 400



i've been thinking of a quality that lessens or completely removes the -2 penalty on physical actions while astrally perceiving, as well as negative version that increases the penalty. Can't decide on the cost though, since it would might make all other vision enhancers obsolete. On the other hand, different GMs allow different levels of detail while using astral sight, and i don't think you can see through glass and other transparent objects.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Sep 30 2005, 04:25 PM
Post #4


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



QUOTE (Space Ghost)
... and i don't think you can see through glass and other transparent objects.

According to canon, objects like barriers (partially) maintain their intent on the Astral. A window (or other clear object) is transparent, while a wall is not.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eyeless Blond
post Sep 30 2005, 05:34 PM
Post #5


Decker on the Threshold
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,922
Joined: 14-March 04
Member No.: 6,156



I was thinking of making a second Incompetent-ish Flaw.

Inept (Bonus: 3pt/level): Though you are well-trainned in a particular Active skill, somehow you still manage to screw up when actually using it. You take a -2 dice pool modifier for any use of the skill per level of this Flaw. You cannot have more levels in this Flaw for any individual skill than you have ranks in that skill. You cannot specialize in a skill you are Inept at.

Example: Joe the mage has the Conjuring skill group at 3 ranks, but has Inept level 2 for Binding. He takes a -4 dice pool modifier whenever attempting to use his Binding skill.

Sound balanced, or should it be lowered to 2pts/level?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nikoli
post Sep 30 2005, 05:35 PM
Post #6


Chicago Survivor
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,079
Joined: 28-January 04
From: Canton, GA
Member No.: 6,033



I think that is how incompetent could have been written better.
Mainly because it covers use with skill wires where RaW doesn't.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eyeless Blond
post Sep 30 2005, 05:45 PM
Post #7


Decker on the Threshold
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,922
Joined: 14-March 04
Member No.: 6,156



That's a good point. I mainly thought of it to give a legit use for the Flaw, rather than being the completely free BPs or hamstringing your char choice that you have with Incompetent.

So how about the value? Is 3/level too good?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fionn
post Oct 2 2005, 07:21 AM
Post #8


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 28
Joined: 25-June 05
Member No.: 7,463



freeby idea roof runner ala parkour. A roof entry specialist that doesn't use ropes, just jumps from roof top to roof top and comes in that way. high athletics and enhanced agility and other magic augs.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th April 2024 - 07:45 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.