IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Eyeless Blond
post Oct 9 2005, 06:33 PM
Post #1


Decker on the Threshold
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,922
Joined: 14-March 04
Member No.: 6,156



The SR4 contact system at chargen is decent enough, but it has a massive flaw in it. Namely, it's far cheaper and more effective to throw all your contact points into a single contact who's both loyal and has far-reaching influence than getting lots of lower-level contacts spread over many different backgrounds. Even the Face archtype in the book bows to this pressure; it used to be that a good face had dozens of people he could get in contact with for a job, now he's far better off getting only one very loyal fixer contact and letting them FOF for you.

I think we can do better. So here's my first, very rough attempt at a patch:

1) Buy Contact Points rather like resources. You get 5 Contact Points for every Build Point you spend on contacts.
2) for formula for contact cost is changed to Connections^2 + Loyalty^2. Thus a Connections 3 Loyalty 2 contact would cost 3^2 + 2^2 = 9+4=13 points.

Does that sound like it would be interesting? In this way low-level contacts would be much cheaper (you can get nearly 2.5 times as many now for your BP) but high-level ones will cost even more (Loyalty 6-Connections 6 would cost 14BP).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Eyeless Blond   Rehashing Contacts   Oct 9 2005, 06:33 PM
- - Siege   Interesting.The GM should always have absolute vet...   Oct 9 2005, 07:05 PM
- - NightRain   The thing to remember is that the amount and types...   Oct 9 2005, 08:01 PM
- - Siege   I'd also draw the line at characters having a ...   Oct 9 2005, 08:23 PM
- - blakkie   You don't need to have one of those defunct Fl...   Oct 10 2005, 12:32 AM
- - Siege   Making higher-level contacts a double-edged sword?...   Oct 10 2005, 12:52 AM
- - SL James   You'd think. Personally, I just redid the ent...   Oct 10 2005, 01:24 AM
- - NightRain   QUOTE (Siege) Making higher-level contacts a doubl...   Oct 10 2005, 01:31 AM
- - blakkie   QUOTE (Siege @ Oct 9 2005, 06:52 PM) Doesn...   Oct 10 2005, 02:13 AM
- - Chandon   Consider "Face" as a character archetype...   Oct 10 2005, 02:50 AM
- - blakkie   QUOTE (Chandon @ Oct 9 2005, 08:50 PM) Consid...   Oct 10 2005, 04:59 AM
- - Siege   I gotta agree with Blak on this one - considering ...   Oct 10 2005, 05:05 AM
- - Serbitar   House Rules My house rule is: rating x loyalty. T...   Oct 10 2005, 07:37 AM
- - blakkie   I noticed this mentioned offhand in a separate thr...   Oct 10 2005, 03:05 PM
- - Eyeless Blond   Hm. I wouldn't use the Attribute; attributes a...   Oct 10 2005, 09:43 PM
- - Gothic Rose   QUOTE (Serbitar) House Rules My house rule is: ra...   Oct 10 2005, 10:12 PM
- - FrankTrollman   I like Connections x Loyalty, with 3 'contact ...   Oct 10 2005, 10:27 PM
- - Siege   Has anyone just put an arbitrary cap on "Infl...   Oct 17 2005, 07:36 AM
- - NightRain   I think perhaps a better cap is to cap the total, ...   Oct 17 2005, 07:57 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th June 2025 - 07:19 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.