 Possession, Discrepancy in power description |
  |
 Oct 11 2005, 03:56 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Moving Target  Group: Members Posts: 745 Joined: 26-July 03 From: Montréal, QC, Canada Member No.: 5,029  |
I checked the FAQ already and couldn't find what I was looking for.
In Magic in the Shadows, in the "Spirits" chapter, it says: "If the victim is killed or knocked unconscious, the spirit is unharmed, but it is driven back into astral form." Meanwhile on page 13 of Critters, it simply says that "if the victim is incapacitated (suffers Deadly Physical damage) by Physical damage, the spirit is unharmed but driven back into astral form." So does Deadly Stun damage drive a possessing spirit out of its victim? My gut tells me that MitS takes precedence over Critters, but I was wondering what you all thought. |
 |
 
|
|
Oct 11 2005, 05:08 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,718 Joined: 14-September 02 Member No.: 3,263 |
What Critters says doesn't really directly invalidate what MitS says.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 11 2005, 05:09 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 745 Joined: 26-July 03 From: Montréal, QC, Canada Member No.: 5,029 |
No, it doesn't. However, the implication is that only Physical Damage "evicts" a spirit.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 11 2005, 05:16 PM
Post
#4
|
|||
|
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,718 Joined: 14-September 02 Member No.: 3,263 |
What i'm saying is that is weak. There are other equally valid reasons for the omission, such as the author brainfarted and forgot about someone being knocked out. Or it never occured to them. If the intention was to exclude knocking out it would be reasonable to assume that they would be at least a bit explicit about it. EDIT: Note that it does not use the word "only" or any other related qualifier. P.S. I don't have Critters so i can't really talk about the context. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
Oct 11 2005, 05:24 PM
Post
#5
|
|||
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 745 Joined: 26-July 03 From: Montréal, QC, Canada Member No.: 5,029 |
Of course it would be reasonable to presume that, but take a look at the thread on bioware and the 'Bio-Rejection' Flaw to see why I'm asking this question. :) (In a nutshell, even though 'Bio-Rejection' doesn't explicitly mention bioware--and the FAQ doesn't have any info--it turns out that a character with that Flaw can only ever get cultured bioware. The Flaw is written ambiguously and I only got a straight answer by e-mailing 'info@shadowrunrpg.com') Like I said, my gut tells me that what's written in MitS is probably accurate, but I wanted to know if anyone else had any input on it. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
Oct 11 2005, 07:08 PM
Post
#6
|
|||
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 8 Joined: 30-September 05 From: Göttingen, Germany Member No.: 7,792 |
Just wanted to point out that the 3rd Ed. GM Screen and the Critters mini-sourcebook are free downloads to be found on the SR site. As to the original question, normally I would go with the MitS since it the primary source for this kind of info, but it seems awfully easy to get rid of a possessing spirit. "Sorry, Joe, I just had to beat you up. Thought you were being possessed." :P |
||
|
|
|
||
|
Oct 11 2005, 07:18 PM
Post
#7
|
|||
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 745 Joined: 26-July 03 From: Montréal, QC, Canada Member No.: 5,029 |
That was my thinking as well, although depending on the spirit, this may be more difficult: "replace all [of the victim's] Mental Attributes with the spirit’s." (Critters, p. 13) With a high-Force spirit, it could be quite difficult to knock the target unconscious. Even then, it's still easier than dealing enough physical damage to "kill" the target, considering that the possessing spirit adds its Force to the victim's Body. So yeah, no matter what it's easier to knock the victim unconscious. :) |
||
|
|
|
||
|
Oct 11 2005, 09:06 PM
Post
#8
|
|||
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,408 Joined: 31-January 04 From: Reston VA, USA Member No.: 6,046 |
If it boots the spirit from the body unharmed, and the spirit intent on using that body, it could just wait around holding its action until the PC woke up (already having a serious stun) and possess him in a single combat phase. ...and do we really want to force PCs to kill each other because they're not sure if the mage is possessed or not? |
||
|
|
|
||
|
Oct 12 2005, 06:16 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 611 Joined: 21-October 03 From: Yorkshire Toxic Zone Member No.: 5,752 |
I'm with Blakkie on this one.
On general principle I'd say that MITS takes precedence anyway. But even though MITS specifically states either will do it, from a rational basis I think knocking the possessee out would force the spirit out. Spirits aren't immune to stun damage iirc, they just take it as disruption damage and if they get to deadly stun or physical damage they are disrupted. I reckon that would be an equivalent of getting bumped out of the body. |
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 14th January 2026 - 10:29 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.