![]() ![]() |
Oct 11 2005, 07:48 PM
Post
#26
|
|||||
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,651 Joined: 23-September 05 From: Marietta, GA Member No.: 7,773 |
A cursory search of SR4 doesn't show anything about holes left, but IIRC they were in SR3. At least, we played with them. SR4 doesn't say anything about how to get implants outside of chargen, for that matter. I've griped about that in another thread. :please: |
||||
|
|
|||||
Oct 11 2005, 07:56 PM
Post
#27
|
|||
|
Prime Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 3,732 Joined: 1-September 05 From: Prague, Czech Republic Member No.: 7,665 |
That's the way it has always worked in every previous edition ever. Once you lose Magic (or Essence), it's gone. Undoing whatever it was that made it go away does not bring it back. Now in previous editions there was this complicated system of "transimplant surgery", where you could trade your essence loss from one piece of 'ware for another set of equal or lesser value. In all probability this is going to be replaced with a rule that is much much easier to understand and implement when Augmentation comes out. I personally suggest that Essence should just come back when cyberware is removed and that each Magic Loss be a triggered one-time event on the road to being a burnout (note that after your sixth magic loss you can't even initiate your way out in SR4, because your grade can't be raised higher than your magic attribute). The current rules, however, don't have any rules at all for regaining Magic or Essence. This is a serious problem for the RAW vampire, who loses a point of Magic every month and can only regain them with Karma expenditure. -Frank |
||
|
|
|||
Oct 11 2005, 08:02 PM
Post
#28
|
|||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 286 Joined: 5-September 05 Member No.: 7,688 |
Essence hole? So if someone captures a mage, they can forcibly install a datajack for 500n on that character, making him permanently lose a point of Magic? Or how about just burn him out by installing 59 datajacks across his body? Afterall, it only costs 6 BP of nuyen to erase 75 (50 + 15 quality) BP of stats. |
||
|
|
|||
Oct 11 2005, 08:05 PM
Post
#29
|
|||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 238 Joined: 18-August 05 Member No.: 7,569 |
Yeah? And it only takes 2 :nuyen: worth of ammo to erase 400 BP. What's your point? |
||
|
|
|||
Oct 11 2005, 08:11 PM
Post
#30
|
|||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 141 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Austin, TX CAS Member No.: 1,097 |
IIRC, essence lost from the Essence Loss weakness doesn't lower their magic rating permanantly. It just lowers its effective rating until the creature gets its essence back up. At least, thats how I read it. |
||
|
|
|||
Oct 11 2005, 08:25 PM
Post
#31
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 286 Joined: 5-September 05 Member No.: 7,688 |
Ignoring the fact that the 2n of ammo has to be fired by a weapon that costs reasonably more, weld by a character who is traditionally a bit more skilled and experienced, and so on (afterall it was just a silly example), I find the idea of an removeable implant permanently destroying your essence/magic/soul to be a bit ludicrous.
So a person goes through normal life (perhaps installing minor cyberware like a datajack), then one day finds out he is Awakened. That's the gist I got out of how Magic comes to people from the blurb in the History chapter: "Out of the blue, some people were now able to incinerate others with a thought (even if it knocked them on their keisters afterward)." If they gained the Magician quality at this time, they'd begin with a Magic rating of 1. They then go through life building up Karma to improve said rating, or pretending like it didn't exist. Of course, then those who installed a datajack would gain the Trait, suddenly having a Magic rating of 1. Of course, their 0.1 essence loss equates to a point loss of Magic, so it instantly reverts back to 0, they lose the trait, and are burned out. Joe Blow then leaves to get a bite to eat at the Stuffer Shack. He would never have the opportunity to improve Magic, because as soon as he gains Magician quality, he loses it again. Potential spoiler from "Never Deal With a Dragon": [ Spoiler ] So I figure he had to have gained Magician, the essence loss dropped his Magic rating to a temporary 0, and as soon as he spends the karma (roleplay/drama-wise, unknowingly to the character!) to raise the "real stat" to 2, his temporary 0 becomes a 1 and voila, he can cast magic. |
|
|
|
Oct 11 2005, 08:30 PM
Post
#32
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 141 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Austin, TX CAS Member No.: 1,097 |
In the section about acquiring positive qualities through gameplay it specifies the Adept, Mystic Adept, and Mage qualities should NOT be giving out as awards or available via karma. It also says, GMs can pass them out if they so choose (if they really really want to) but players should never be able to purchase them after chargen.
|
|
|
|
Oct 11 2005, 08:42 PM
Post
#33
|
|
|
Mr. Johnson ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,587 Joined: 25-January 05 From: Berkeley, CA Member No.: 7,014 |
@blakkie: In this case, Frank Trollman is correct. You don't purchase Magic with Karma based on the pre-reduced value. You purchase increases with Karma based on the current value. This paradoxically makes cybered mages/adepts easier to build up to their maximum Magic attribute.
@Veggiesama: If your essence is ever reduced, then it cannot be regained unless you are a critter with the Essence Drain power. This is one of the many core concepts of Shadowrun, and it is listed explicitly on SR4 p61, 2nd column: "Lost Essence can never be regained (short of the Essence Drain critter power)". This may result in Magic Loss, this is true (and under the current rules, the critters with the Essence Loss weakness will effectively become burnouts very quickly... I suspect this will be fixed later on, because it makes no sense as it is). |
|
|
|
Oct 11 2005, 08:43 PM
Post
#34
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 286 Joined: 5-September 05 Member No.: 7,688 |
Edit (me too slow):
Superbum: Yeah, I'm not saying they're given as rewards or bought with karma. They arise spontaneously, or at least you're generally not born with it. Either way, it still says the Magic attribute starts at 1. I guess you could read it as time pauses for that split second when you receive the quality through divine will, you spend your conveniently available karma to raise it above your essence loss threshold, all done a split second before essence loss deals its ugly blow. hahnsoo: I'm not saying installing cyberware is lost essence. My interpretation is that it's temporarily suppressed until you remove it, assuming it's not something irrevocably invasive (cyberarm?). I figure the more invasive, the longer it would take for the body to heal itself mentally and physically, possibly taking months or years. Yes, though the text on p61 says otherwise (even if cyber/bioware curiously only "reduces Essence" rather than the stronger terminology "lose Essence"), it still sounds like to me that having to pay the same amount of karma for raising a stat from 2 to 3 (after being reduced from 4 from essence) and from 2 to 3 (no essence loss) seems stupid. Shouldn't the cyberjunkie have to pay more karma? |
|
|
|
Oct 11 2005, 08:48 PM
Post
#35
|
|||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 238 Joined: 18-August 05 Member No.: 7,569 |
Or perhaps people Awaken with a Magic higher than 1? Or you don't Awaken if you would immediately burn out? Who says that people that Awaken automatically have a Magic of 1? Yes, you have to pay for the priveledge of having a Magic greater than 1. But that doesn't mean it wasn't always that way. You could just be inherently gifted. You still have to pay for it. Calypso |
||
|
|
|||
Oct 11 2005, 08:54 PM
Post
#36
|
|||||||||
|
Prime Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 3,732 Joined: 1-September 05 From: Prague, Czech Republic Member No.: 7,665 |
No.
So as long as your Vampire friend keeps their Essence above 6, they are good. Once it dips below 6, their Magic drops permanently every month until they get their Essence back up above 6. -Frank |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
Oct 11 2005, 08:58 PM
Post
#37
|
|||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 829 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 770 |
Er...the character wasn't written with SR4 rules in mind... It used to be that if you were a mage, you automatically got magic = essense at creation. |
||
|
|
|||
Oct 11 2005, 09:12 PM
Post
#38
|
|||
|
Mr. Johnson ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,587 Joined: 25-January 05 From: Berkeley, CA Member No.: 7,014 |
According to the rules, it is. The "reduced" and "loss" nomenclature are used interchangably, if you are going through that nitpick rules-lawyering route (see SR4, p84, where "cost" "reduced" and "loss" are all used to describe what happens to your body if you implant 'ware). More than that, it's a central concept of SR... when you lose Essence, there's practically no way (barring some of the information in the novels, which conflict greatly with SR rules at times) to get it back, even if you remove the 'ware. |
||
|
|
|||
Oct 11 2005, 09:35 PM
Post
#39
|
|||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 286 Joined: 5-September 05 Member No.: 7,688 |
And according to my rules, it isn't. *shrugs* I'm not saying the rules are on my side, but I was just making a few parenthetical notes. I just think the rules are flawed mechanics-wise and should be changed. It's kind of a silly idea that some part of your "soul" is lost when you stick a datajack on your forehead, but I can accept that for the sake of the game. But IMHO, it's an even sillier idea to think that it's permanently lost, even if you remove the datajack. I just find it to be a total underestimate of the body and mind's ability to mend its own "fabric", or however New Agers would put it. edit: Besides, the rules don't say anything about this "refillable essence pool" that someone mentioned earlier, but you must accept that or no one would ever be able to upgrade their cyberware unless they remained "cyber-celibate" (oi.) until they could get the best of the best. |
||
|
|
|||
Oct 11 2005, 10:45 PM
Post
#40
|
|
|
Mr. Johnson ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,587 Joined: 25-January 05 From: Berkeley, CA Member No.: 7,014 |
It's been that way for 4 editions of Shadowrun. If you want to run things as a house rule in your own games, then feel free to do so, but also preface your forum posts that it is a house rule to avoid unnecessary confusion.
|
|
|
|
Oct 11 2005, 10:50 PM
Post
#41
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 355 Joined: 3-October 05 From: Ann Arbor, MI Member No.: 7,803 |
An SR GM I gamed with used a rule that was:
For every year spent with a hole in your essence, reduce the hole by .1 essence. So this meant that if a sammie retired and wanted to live a normal life, he could get rid of his 'ware, and his essence would SLOWLY regenerate. Of course, a sammie with .019 essence left will take SIXTY YEARS to be whole (metaphysically) again. |
|
|
|
Oct 11 2005, 11:08 PM
Post
#42
|
|||||||||||
|
Midnight Toker ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,686 Joined: 4-July 04 From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop Member No.: 6,456 |
One quote says critter the other says character. The two are not the same. |
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Oct 11 2005, 11:21 PM
Post
#43
|
|||
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,718 Joined: 14-September 02 Member No.: 3,263 |
Ah, RL gives way.... Anyway now i remember, the relavent quotes are on page 62 and page 264. On page 264 it gives the cost for raising the natural attribute, on page 62 it mentions the penalty imposed by having essense below 6. So it is a penalty to Magic/Resonance applied against the natural attribute value. This also provides the explaination for Vampires since their essense loss is temporary, unlike BTL/'ware loss, so when the essense loss goes away so does the penalty. Unfortunately this is not expressed explicitly as it should be, like a lot of other things in SR. Ah well, the sacrifice of having SR4 out by Gencon, and squeezing as much territory into the BBB as they did. *sigh* However in the RAW the Vampire is still humped if Initiated and essense drops low enough that the penalty caused Initiate Grades to be lost, because the text there isn't talking about a penalty to them. But instead that the Grade is flat out gone. Of course such a Vampire either did not purchase Magic to the maximum allowed by the Initiate Grade(s), or they are at zero essense and have only days to live. P.S. Regarding loss of [use of] Magic paid for during chargen.
|
||
|
|
|||
Oct 11 2005, 11:59 PM
Post
#44
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 135 Joined: 30-July 04 From: Orebro, Sweden Member No.: 6,523 |
Yup, and my question was if you applied the Essence lost rules after you have finished buying your Magic attribute or not.. And from what I read the discussion here, and with some RL buddies, we in RL agree that it is applied _after_ you have bought the Magic Attribute with BP..
What happens with essence lost during gaming the book is quite clear on. |
|
|
|
Oct 12 2005, 04:12 AM
Post
#45
|
|
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,718 Joined: 14-September 02 Member No.: 3,263 |
Yes, the post script is the section talking about your original question because that is directly from in the Cyberware/Bioware portion of chargen.
The rest of the post is just talking about the tangent that the thread headed off on, explaining why if you bought Magic to 5, then had 1 point of essense worth of 'ware put in, reducing your effective Magic to 4, that once in play you'd have to pay 6*3=18 karma to raise the effective Magic to 5. |
|
|
|
Oct 12 2005, 05:55 AM
Post
#46
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 399 Joined: 27-May 04 Member No.: 6,361 |
So many obvious holes in the rules... makes my head hurt... the errata might be as long as the book itself... :(
|
|
|
|
Oct 12 2005, 02:36 PM
Post
#47
|
|||
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,718 Joined: 14-September 02 Member No.: 3,263 |
It isn't so much a "hole" as that it requires very close reading to notice, and thus a place where a misunderstanding could easily happen. I knew it was around somewhere and it took me reading through those two page 3 times just to notice it. :( |
||
|
|
|||
Oct 12 2005, 03:27 PM
Post
#48
|
|||
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,651 Joined: 23-September 05 From: Marietta, GA Member No.: 7,773 |
You have the right to play with or without the RAW as you see fit, of course. If you see it as silly or not, it's still canon. Essence loss is a mechanic built in to prevent people from becoming cybermages who can walk two "paths" at once without penalties. A character generation you decide if your particular path to power is one of three methods: implants, magic, or neither. Essence loss is permanent to enforce the dedication to one of those paths. Sure, you can houserule whatever you want to negate that fundamental concept. Tell people that they can remove implants and spend karma to raise their Essence back up if you like. Heck, tell people they don't even have to remove the implants and their Essence will heal back up like Stun or Physical damage. Toss the whole Essence cost thing out the window for all the rest of us care. :) |
||
|
|
|||
Oct 13 2005, 10:44 AM
Post
#49
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 280 Joined: 21-April 03 From: Singapore Member No.: 4,487 |
Veggiesama, as Mr. Unpronoucable has mentioned, the character to which you refer from the novel wasn't written with SR4 rules as a guideline. In fact, IIRC, that novel came out during the reign of SR2?
Anyway, prior to SR4, once you Awakened, you automatically received a Magic rating of 6, reduced by whatever hits you'd taken from Essence loss. If you had a character who started off as a sammie with a drekload of cyber/bioware and had a remaining Essence of, say, 0.65, you'd still end up a burned-out mundane before your magic career took off. In this way, there is but a small difference between those rules and SR4. I guess for SR4, the developers just wanted to enforce the life paths a character chooses, as someone else has mentioned. If you wanted to play a character who Awakens late in life, that's still perfectly possible. You simply would have create a mage, buy up the Magic attribute and work out with the GM when your Awakening happens - you both agree on when it happens or you may leave it to the GM to "surprise" you. If you want to be "realistic", you'd take whatever cyber/bioware you feel your character would have up till the time the campaign begins - when you Awaken, you start off with the reduced Magic. Perhaps he's a hacker and a Man Of Science © all his life and now has to deal with his Manifest Destiny © on the Mystical Path ©. Or a bodyguard who now welcomes the chance to learn new abilities and adapt them to his work. Whatever the case, I guess this game mechanic can also serve to explain why the population of magicians is so low in the world. There might be more magicians out there if not so many people had cyber/bioware installed beyond their Magic ratings. |
|
|
|
Oct 13 2005, 01:37 PM
Post
#50
|
|||
|
Immoral Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 |
First edition, actually. :) |
||
|
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 8th February 2026 - 08:44 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.