![]() ![]() |
Nov 4 2005, 08:41 PM
Post
#26
|
|||||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 177 Joined: 21-October 05 From: In a Starbucks™ café near you Member No.: 7,870 |
Game balance is the whole reason behind the existence of multiple Amnesia flaws with varying costs. |
||||
|
|
|||||
Nov 4 2005, 08:57 PM
Post
#27
|
|
|
Man In The Machine ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,264 Joined: 26-February 02 From: I-495 S Member No.: 1,105 |
If a player TRULY wants to take multiple "Evil backstory" flaws, go for it, just be ready for a living hell, and quite possibly a dieing one as well. HMVV carrier + cutter nanites + hunted by 3 different AA/AAA corps. Been there, seen it happen.
And common sense isnt really twinkish at all, its to prevent people from doing monumentaly stupid things, like walking into the lobby of the Ritz packing anything bigger then a slingshot. |
|
|
|
Nov 4 2005, 09:19 PM
Post
#28
|
|||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 292 Joined: 24-September 04 Member No.: 6,701 |
If you read it carefully, Firearms/Magic/Decking/etc are not "forbidden", just "not recommended" for Aptitude. |
||
|
|
|||
Nov 4 2005, 09:20 PM
Post
#29
|
|||||
|
Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet; ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 6,548 Joined: 24-October 03 From: DeeCee, U.S. Member No.: 5,760 |
It's forbidden for firearms? I thought it was highly recommended you not take it, which isn't quite the same. In melee combat, it could be a serious game breaker. |
||||
|
|
|||||
Nov 4 2005, 09:21 PM
Post
#30
|
|||||||
|
Chrome to the Core ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,152 Joined: 14-October 03 From: ::1 Member No.: 5,715 |
Highly recommended. GM discretion. Not forbidden, but told to the GM to not allow it unless there's a damn good reason and it won't unbalance the game. Big difference between that and forbidden, but they basically end up meaning the same thing. |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
Nov 4 2005, 09:49 PM
Post
#31
|
|||
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,168 Joined: 15-April 05 From: Helsinki, Finland Member No.: 7,337 |
One character I play is actually a troll with a severe allergy to soy. He also has Symbiotes:3. Needless to say, this character's lifestyle costs are insane(+% for the symbiotes, and then the GM tacks on extra to make up for the fact he must buy 100% real food, all the time.). Ration bars even, I must get in the 'non soy' versions. This allergy comes up often, needless to say. I think it was even a bit MORE in lifestyle, cos some of this food has to be custom ordered to make sure no traces of soy is in it. I made the troll albino tho, so I thought this would be an interesting flaw for him(what with the sensitive systems some albinos have.) Distinctive Style is a good flaw as long as it's RPd. For one extra point(or+5 under the BecKs rules), its not too broken, and its great to fit some characters. I have another character(a young man who is ex Military but now looks like a total heavy metal guy), who is rarely seen in anything but camo pants, massive boots, and random sleeveless death metal shirts(just look at some of the album covers for Cannibal Corpse and stuff.), a big leather jacket, hair long as hell and speaks Polish as his native language(english at a 3.) Also standing about 200cm tall and human. Needless to say, he's not hard to spot "hey, there was this one dude...he was really big, talked with a thick accent, wore camo and had this shirt with a flayed cow' ''right over there, man!'' *point* But don't allow distinctive style for someone who says 'my character wears a Polo jacket.' ''My character is a man who runs around dressed like a member of Slipknot'' on the other hand, would be ok I think. I guess Aptitude can be broken, but you can control it(dont allow it for combat or vehicle, or computer skills.). A character with Aptitude: B/R Pistols actually isn't so bad. I dunno what the most broken is. A clever GM can come up with all sorts of things for stuff. Or just not allow stuff like 'Severe Phobia: King Tut's Mummy". I find Impulsive get a bit abused at times...Ive seen it taken very well, and ive also seen it not followed, in this case the GM should just keep reminding the player 'no, I think your character really likes the idea of jumping into the middle of those Halloweeners...' |
||
|
|
|||
Nov 4 2005, 09:57 PM
Post
#32
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 668 Joined: 15-February 05 From: Ontario, Canada Member No.: 7,086 |
Edges/Flaws that strike me as munchkin..
Sensitive System (Awakened). Same cost as bio rejection for awakened. Amnesia? I love it. Great excuse for roleplay, and for setting up lots of hooks that are both good and bad. And really -- you don't get to avoid a backstory. They've got gear. They've got a home. They've got all the little things around said home. They just don't know why they have those things. They don't know who it is in the pictures. And they've got all the stuff that's gone on since their amnesia. Especially when you know someone is out to get you.. but you don't remember why. |
|
|
|
Nov 4 2005, 10:01 PM
Post
#33
|
|
|
Bushido Cowgirl ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,782 Joined: 8-July 05 From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats Member No.: 7,490 |
Sometimes these "munchkin" flaws actually do work well in certain contexts.
Take Dark Angel for example, She has the following combination of flaws. all which come out of her background. I worked with the GM on her design during Chargen. Some of her "unknown" background I outlined while the GM fleshed in many of the other details. I play her totally disconnected from my (player) knowledge of her history except when certain "memories" surface. Dark Secret - She is a fallen Angel from The Seraphim Amnesia (2) - She has slotted so many aliasofts during her career that she doesn't quite remember who she really is. At the current time she is believes she is actually her last covert Identity, a teenage sleuth named "Laura Mars" (OK I kinda borrowed that from a certain TV show). Incomplete Deprogramming (SOTA 2064) - This is somewhat related to the above and boy does the GM have fun with this one. Normally she's an electronics wiz but then she thinks she's the sharpshooter assassin, or maybe the group's interrogator, or maybe....You get the picture. Dossier on File (Sota 2064) - Yeah ol' Lucien has the entire skinny on her real identity. Keeps her looking over her shoulder from time to time when the GM says "you get an odd feeling of something familiar nearby" (with her reaction boosting she is a bit of a "twitch"). This also made for some real Bon Temps during the New Orleans segment of Brainscan. Sensitive Neural Structure (4) - This also stems from the constant Programming/Deprogramming and use of aliasofts during her career with the Seraphim. She has a 3 slot chipjack, Headware memory (100 mp), and induction datajack. because of her skill in computers, often times the other characters ask her to play the team's decker. This was also real fun during the BTL den scene in Brainscan. Her edges: Friends in High places Blandness Good Rep 2 Friendly Face Human Looking (elf) Bonus Attribute - Quickness (next to her Charisma - her one claim to fame) Yeah, the girl is pretty messed up, but that is what makes her so fun to play |
|
|
|
Nov 5 2005, 12:50 AM
Post
#34
|
|
|
Canon Companion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,021 Joined: 2-March 03 From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG Member No.: 4,187 |
Amnesia at 5 points is not munchkin but Amnesia at 4 is. Why? Because(by the book) only at 5 does the GM have control over the PC's chargen sheet. Otherwise, it is business as usual. (And combining it with Dossier on File and Friends in High Places to get the complete low down on yourself)
Various Allergies and Phobias are also useful for munchkining. But if you stick to those named Allergies and Phobias(and so playing by canon, since other allergies and phobias do not exist in canon), then the munchkin factor drops like a rock. Aptitudes are over-rated even for the "recommended" ones. I'd rather have Perceptive being "recommended". |
|
|
|
Nov 5 2005, 01:00 AM
Post
#35
|
|||
|
Midnight Toker ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,686 Joined: 4-July 04 From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop Member No.: 6,456 |
That's just asking for Survivor: Egypt - now with 20% more Shedim. |
||
|
|
|||
Nov 5 2005, 01:13 AM
Post
#36
|
|||
|
Bushido Cowgirl ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,782 Joined: 8-July 05 From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats Member No.: 7,490 |
Keep in mind, she has the 2pt Amnesia, meaning she remembers little or nothing of her background. My GM also house ruled Amnesia to give him increasing control on the character's background as the point bonus increases. According to the description, a Dossier on File is something that the character never sees. Night angel is played totally unawares that there even is one on her. It also can take the flavour of a hunted at GM's discretion. Angel's contacts that fall under the "Friends in High Places" (most of which are pretty paranoid themselves being in the espionage business) have divulged almost nothing to her about her background. When they do so she usually has a very hard time believing it and thinks their daft for saying such things. |
||
|
|
|||
Nov 5 2005, 01:43 AM
Post
#37
|
|
|
Canon Companion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,021 Joined: 2-March 03 From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG Member No.: 4,187 |
While the PC may know little about his background, it doesn't mean the player cannot seal off any potential hooks for the GM. Since your GM isn't playing by the book(ie house ruling), then there is little left to discuss.
Moreover, Dossier on File doesn't say that the PC does not get access to it. It merely states that attempting to erase a Dossier should be the basis of a major adventure. |
|
|
|
Nov 5 2005, 01:47 AM
Post
#38
|
|
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,065 Joined: 16-January 03 From: Fayetteville, NC Member No.: 3,916 |
I'll rephrase - how many flaws couldn't be abused by a creative player?
-Siege |
|
|
|
Nov 5 2005, 02:12 AM
Post
#39
|
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,278 Joined: 15-April 05 Member No.: 7,336 |
Allergy/Phobia are prretty bad. I don't ban them in spite of seeing them abused frequently. But a common mild or uncommon moderate goes a long way in the edge department.
Aptitude is absolutely terrifying -- especially when characters take it for sorcery without telling you. I am so glad that character is retired. Its an unspoken assumption in my group that the GM will write an amnesiacs backstory. I think it really adds to the PC experience to be completely in the dark that way. That said, amnesia 5 is banned simply for the inconvenience of it all. For example: how do you manage combat pool with amnesia 5? |
|
|
|
Nov 5 2005, 02:14 AM
Post
#40
|
|
|
Canon Companion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,021 Joined: 2-March 03 From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG Member No.: 4,187 |
Honest answer? I don't know. Just because I've not seen someone creative enough to abuse a certain Flaw, it doesn't mean you won't.
|
|
|
|
Nov 5 2005, 02:40 AM
Post
#41
|
|
|
Resident Legionnaire ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,136 Joined: 8-August 04 From: Usually Work Member No.: 6,550 |
I'm a big fan of Aptitude>Small Unit Tactics
|
|
|
|
Nov 5 2005, 02:56 AM
Post
#42
|
|||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 276 Joined: 29-September 02 Member No.: 3,348 |
So why do you feel it's a good idea to steal a Lone Star vehicle/ |
||
|
|
|||
Nov 5 2005, 03:23 AM
Post
#43
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 177 Joined: 21-October 05 From: In a Starbucks™ café near you Member No.: 7,870 |
To pick up babes with, obviously.
|
|
|
|
Nov 5 2005, 03:33 AM
Post
#44
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 475 Joined: 17-June 02 From: Concord University, Athens, WV Member No.: 2,880 |
I pretend Common Sense doesn't exist. I have a system of my own for that. The first part is simply letting the players point out each other's stupid ideas. But the second only works in live games.
I have a well-known "sadistic" grin. My players quickly learn that when they see this, I'm about to have a lot of fun at their expense. They tend to reconsider their actions. This same tactic also makes Amnesia a very unpopular flaw in my groups. Edit: Oh yeah. And I restrict Aptitiude to specializations. And can still only be taken once. This post has been edited by Sahandrian: Nov 5 2005, 03:36 AM |
|
|
|
Nov 5 2005, 03:37 AM
Post
#45
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 184 Joined: 22-September 05 Member No.: 7,770 |
I've got an elf with the human looking edge and amnesia. He woke up the first morning and couldn't determine his own species. His I.D. was no help, being fake.
|
|
|
|
Nov 5 2005, 04:07 AM
Post
#46
|
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,116 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,449 |
I don't think any of the Edges are unbalancing, although I would follow the recommendation for the Aptitude Edge (not allowing it for decking, combat, or magical skills).
The Flaws all have game mechanic disadvantages. They can be abused, but my simple rule for allowing or disallowing them would be: if it's not an actual disadvantage, it's not worth points. For example, Sea Madness in a land-locked game, or Bad Karma for a one-shot game. For potential abuse, though, Infirm can be munchy. For three points, what's the penalty? That your Attributes max out at 6 instead of, potentiallly, 9? For a lot of character types, that would not ever even come up. Even a lot of sammies would probably rather boost one of their combat skills, rather than spend Karma on the expensive task of raising an Attribute past the Racial Modified Limit. I would look at that Flaw very closely, especially if the character has relatively "normal" physical Attributes despite the Flaw. The 5-point version of Amnesia is fun - you get to create a character that's different than anything they've played before, and get to watch them try to figure out what they can do, and what's going on. The two-point version lets them create a character normally, but I wouldn't let it excuse a player from having a backstory. If they have gear, contacts, etc., then obviously some time has elapsed since the character woke up unconscious and bleeding in a dumpster. So, how did the character find out what he/she could do? How did he/she meet those other people, or find an apartment, or get an Ares Alpha assault rifle? Has the character tried finding out about his/her past? Have there been any clues? Any strange people asking questions about the character? |
|
|
|
Nov 5 2005, 04:10 AM
Post
#47
|
|||
|
Bushido Cowgirl ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,782 Joined: 8-July 05 From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats Member No.: 7,490 |
In Angel's case, it is inaccessible. Both due to where it is kept and her current confused, personafixxed, reprogrammed/deprogrammed state of mind. |
||
|
|
|||
Nov 5 2005, 06:09 AM
Post
#48
|
|||
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 38 Joined: 25-October 05 Member No.: 7,892 |
The finest "5-point amnesia" story I could imagine would be "The Bourne Identity". Doesn't know who he is, doesn't know what he can do, all kinds of funky backstory that screws with his life. A GM could be proud to pull that off in game. |
||
|
|
|||
Nov 5 2005, 06:21 AM
Post
#49
|
|
|
Man In The Machine ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,264 Joined: 26-February 02 From: I-495 S Member No.: 1,105 |
Last time I checked, arnt ALL charcters subject to GM approval?
And Kyoto, there is a reason that there is a recommended limit to the number of edges/flaws you can take. If my memory serves me, you have 10 edge points right there. Balanced with 10 points in flaws. Sheesh. |
|
|
|
Nov 5 2005, 07:38 AM
Post
#50
|
|||
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,718 Joined: 14-September 02 Member No.: 3,263 |
:rotfl: If either you or caramel frappuccino were players at a table i was GMing, or even just a playing at, i'd be reaching for the Rules Lawyer foamy bat if you tried that slide that one past. The reasoning given for the Gamemaster creating the character sheet is so the "player character" doesn't know about any of the stuff that the -5 level says they aren't suppose to. Well guess what the character doesn't know about for -2? All of their past including who they are (EDIT: though usually they'll know some recent days or weeks or maybe even months depending just to make it easier to mesh them into the team). I suspect that not mentioning the Gamemaster writing up the character sheet for -2 is that there really isn't any space for "past"/background on the character sheet. The closest thing is the Contacts, but someone with an Amnesia PC picking out and having listed Contacts that have anything other than an extremely short history with the PC? :wobble: Of course it's just worded as a strong suggestion, "should". So the GM may choose to pass on it. But i sure wouldn't, it's the little perks like that that can make all the hassle, work, and grief of being a GM worth it. :evil: P.S. Oh, and for the -3 and -4 options? Well it doesn't actually say what amounts of memory loss they are suppose to represent. I've never actually seen someone select them. |
||
|
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th May 2026 - 06:56 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.