IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Just how heavy are Shadowrun's Heavy Pistols?, Ares Predator? Et al?
ShadowDragon8685
post Nov 14 2005, 06:41 AM
Post #1


Horror
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,322
Joined: 15-June 05
From: BumFuck, New Jersey
Member No.: 7,445



Okay, so me and a friend got into a 'heated discussion' (read: blazing row) over this.

What, exactly, is the caliber of Shadowrun's guns? My friend insists that the Predator is a 10mm, I don't know where he got that figure. But it's the perrinial heavy pistol in Shadowrun, and 10mm just is not that impressive. I think that's roughly .39?

I always figured that the Ares Predator was a big, heavy, LOUD thunderstick, like the Desert Eagle .50 AE. Only engineered with 100% less suck, and about 50% more BLAM.

So what is it? The Ruger Super Warhawk is only 1 power code above the Pred. It's confusing, I figured that the Super Warhawk was like Magnum Research's "Biggest, Finest Revolover," which fires a full-on rifle round.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siege
post Nov 14 2005, 06:45 AM
Post #2


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,065
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Fayetteville, NC
Member No.: 3,916



Ye gods - there have been nigh-endless debates over that question.

-Siege
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Arethusa
post Nov 14 2005, 06:47 AM
Post #3


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,901
Joined: 19-June 03
Member No.: 4,775



http://forums.dumpshock.com/index.php?act=Search&f=7
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon8685
post Nov 14 2005, 06:54 AM
Post #4


Horror
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,322
Joined: 15-June 05
From: BumFuck, New Jersey
Member No.: 7,445



I guess there's nobody at FanPro or WizKids or whoever who can just say "The Predator? Yeah, it's like .48 magnum or something like that. Pretty close to a 2060s idea of a Desert Eagle."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Nov 14 2005, 06:56 AM
Post #5


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



There is a 10mm version of the Predator IV, certainly. That's the caliber that's stamped on the side of the display model.

http://img440.imageshack.us/img440/6960/pr...edatoriv9xe.jpg

I'd imagine that a pistol damage code covers a range of calibers. 9M includes 10mm. I'd imagine that 10M is more like the .50 AE or the .454 Casull.

Also notice that the predator has a huge barrel. Longer barrel = higher muzzle velocity.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Arethusa
post Nov 14 2005, 07:24 AM
Post #6


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,901
Joined: 19-June 03
Member No.: 4,775



I fucking hate you all. Especially you, ShadowDragon8685, but all of you too, but especially you, ShadowDragon8685.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Crusher Bob
post Nov 14 2005, 07:56 AM
Post #7


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,598
Joined: 15-March 03
From: Hong Kong
Member No.: 4,253



Sometimes I think that Underground had something going for it, with it's 20mm and 30mm 'handguns'. It avoided all these stupid arguments.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon8685
post Nov 14 2005, 08:55 AM
Post #8


Horror
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,322
Joined: 15-June 05
From: BumFuck, New Jersey
Member No.: 7,445



Wow... Where... Did that picture come from, Hyz?

And Arethusa? I love you too, baby. Call me!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Austere Emancipa...
post Nov 14 2005, 09:45 AM
Post #9


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,889
Joined: 3-August 03
From: A CPI rank 1 country
Member No.: 5,222



QUOTE (Crusher Bob)
Sometimes I think that Underground had something going for it, with it's 20mm and 30mm 'handguns'. It avoided all these stupid arguments.

But did it say what was the projectile weight and muzzle velocity of those guns?

QUOTE (ShadowDragon8685)
[...] Magnum Research's "Biggest, Finest Revolover," which fires a full-on rifle round.

Out of the 13 caliber choices available for the BFR, 5 were designed for rifles (and one for a shotgun). With common loadings, the ones designed for handguns are actually more powerful, topping out with the .500 S&W.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon8685
post Nov 14 2005, 10:51 AM
Post #10


Horror
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,322
Joined: 15-June 05
From: BumFuck, New Jersey
Member No.: 7,445



o.0

Ow. Why not just put your wrist under a jackhammer?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Nov 14 2005, 11:43 AM
Post #11


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



QUOTE (ShadowDragon8685)
I guess there's nobody at FanPro or WizKids or whoever who can just say "The Predator? Yeah, it's like .48 magnum or something like that. Pretty close to a 2060s idea of a Desert Eagle."

Hahahahahahah.

Most of them would go "guns? eww!" if you asked them, I'm certain.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ancient History
post Nov 14 2005, 11:52 AM
Post #12


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,748
Joined: 5-July 02
Member No.: 2,935



Raygun would know.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lindt
post Nov 14 2005, 02:57 PM
Post #13


Man In The Machine
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,264
Joined: 26-February 02
From: I-495 S
Member No.: 1,105



Good god... .50 colt? I have landed FISH smaller then that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Grinder
post Nov 14 2005, 03:46 PM
Post #14


Great, I'm a Dragon...
*********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 6,699
Joined: 8-October 03
From: North Germany
Member No.: 5,698



QUOTE (Critias)
Most of them would go "guns? eww!" if you asked them, I'm certain.

At least they learned their lessons and get rid of weight for gear in SR4. ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Reaver
post Nov 14 2005, 04:01 PM
Post #15


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 518
Joined: 24-February 03
From: Tucson
Member No.: 4,153



Given real life experience, I would think heavy pistols range from 10mm to .50 AE. The popular would probably .40 and .45 caliber.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Reaver
post Nov 14 2005, 04:03 PM
Post #16


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 518
Joined: 24-February 03
From: Tucson
Member No.: 4,153



QUOTE (Grinder @ Nov 14 2005, 08:46 AM)
QUOTE (Critias @ Nov 14 2005, 12:43 PM)
Most of them would go "guns?  eww!" if you asked them, I'm certain.

At least they learned their lessons and get rid of weight for gear in SR4. ;)

Yea, because we all know in real life you don't have to worry about the weight of the gear you're carrying. ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cray74
post Nov 14 2005, 06:55 PM
Post #17


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,428
Joined: 9-June 02
Member No.: 2,860



QUOTE (Crusher Bob)
Sometimes I think that Underground had something going for it, with it's 20mm and 30mm 'handguns'. It avoided all these stupid arguments.

Now there's a game. I love Underground's gear books. As I recall, 25mm hit a nice sweet spot when it came to designing pistols. Almost usable by high end norms, controllable accuracy penalty, and a nice range.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hasaku
post Nov 14 2005, 07:06 PM
Post #18


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 282
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 197



QUOTE (Reaver)
QUOTE (Grinder @ Nov 14 2005, 08:46 AM)
QUOTE (Critias @ Nov 14 2005, 12:43 PM)
Most of them would go "guns?  eww!" if you asked them, I'm certain.

At least they learned their lessons and get rid of weight for gear in SR4. ;)

Yea, because we all know in real life you don't have to worry about the weight of the gear you're carrying. ;)

Not that we never worried about it, we just never bothered to track it in absolute terms. It's pretty easy to look at someone's character sheet and decide if they're encumbered or not. Lots of gear and no harness? Going for the awkward and heavy look, huh? Reduce your running multiplier, blah blah blah. We always winged it with crap like that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RunnerPaul
post Nov 14 2005, 07:07 PM
Post #19


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,086
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 364



QUOTE (Reaver)
QUOTE (Grinder @ Nov 14 2005, 08:46 AM)
QUOTE (Critias @ Nov 14 2005, 12:43 PM)
Most of them would go "guns?  eww!" if you asked them, I'm certain.

At least they learned their lessons and get rid of weight for gear in SR4. ;)

Yea, because we all know in real life you don't have to worry about the weight of the gear you're carrying. ;)

Personally, I admire a game line that has the strength to admit that "We've gone through 16 years and two companies, and we haven't been able to get gear weights right yet; at this point we should just stop trying, and leave it up to the individual GMs."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Nov 14 2005, 07:12 PM
Post #20


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



QUOTE (Reaver)
QUOTE (Grinder @ Nov 14 2005, 08:46 AM)
QUOTE (Critias @ Nov 14 2005, 12:43 PM)
Most of them would go "guns?  eww!" if you asked them, I'm certain.

At least they learned their lessons and get rid of weight for gear in SR4. ;)

Yea, because we all know in real life you don't have to worry about the weight of the gear you're carrying. ;)

No, it's because their gear weights were absolutely ridiculous. In many cases, the listed weights are over twice that of the listed equipments real-world equivalent.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Nov 14 2005, 09:22 PM
Post #21


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



QUOTE (RunnerPaul)
Personally, I admire a game line that has the strength to admit that "We've gone through 16 years and two companies, and we haven't been able to get gear weights right yet; at this point we should just stop trying, and leave it up to the individual GMs."

I disagree with admiration for that line of reasoning, but considering that I've never seen nor heard of an RPG weight system that doesn't suck I suppose I can't fault them for it.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lindt
post Nov 15 2005, 03:41 AM
Post #22


Man In The Machine
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,264
Joined: 26-February 02
From: I-495 S
Member No.: 1,105



I have never seen a gear weight list thats right. So honestly, removing then weight and just the GM saying "Yeah, those 3 assult cannons are way to much for your pasty white decker ass."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon8685
post Nov 15 2005, 04:26 AM
Post #23


Horror
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,322
Joined: 15-June 05
From: BumFuck, New Jersey
Member No.: 7,445



Just because you have a triggerless DNI dosen't mean you can be careless with your firearm. First, it won't fire unless your hand is on it, and it is drawn (IE: Not in contact with a holster.) Secondly, having a wireless DNI does not excuse you from firearms safety; in this case, do not point the weapon at anything you do not intend with deliberate thought to shoot.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Nov 15 2005, 05:14 AM
Post #24


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



QUOTE (ShadowDragon8685)
Just because you have a triggerless DNI dosen't mean you can be careless with your firearm. First, it won't fire unless your hand is on it, and it is drawn (IE: Not in contact with a holster.) Secondly, having a wireless DNI does not excuse you from firearms safety; in this case, do not point the weapon at anything you do not intend with deliberate thought to shoot.

I'm thinking this post belongs in the Guns thread. ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon8685
post Nov 15 2005, 07:35 AM
Post #25


Horror
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,322
Joined: 15-June 05
From: BumFuck, New Jersey
Member No.: 7,445



QUOTE (Fortune)
QUOTE (ShadowDragon8685 @ Nov 15 2005, 03:26 PM)
Just because you have a triggerless DNI dosen't mean you can be careless with your firearm. First, it won't fire unless your hand is on it, and it is drawn (IE: Not in contact with a holster.) Secondly, having a wireless DNI does not excuse you from firearms safety; in this case, do not point the weapon at anything you do not intend with deliberate thought to shoot.

I'm thinking this post belongs in the Guns thread. ;)

Errr, yup. I totally cross-posted that bizzitch. Shows what happens when you have two windows open to different Dumpshock threads.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th September 2025 - 11:37 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.