![]() ![]() |
Nov 28 2005, 05:43 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 256 Joined: 24-October 04 Member No.: 6,784 |
I searched but got allot of hits about imp invis v. Sec cameras, but not this.
Say A Mage has a Street Sam brother who like melee combat. They trust each other explicitly, so the mage gives his brother a sustaining focus to sustain imp invis on him, and his brother knows not to loose it (he duct tapes it to his chest to be safe), and the mage keeps on himself. They have a beef with the halloweeners and, safely under the effect of improved invis, decide to knock off some halloweener lieutenants who are hanging out on Their street making trouble. The particularly bloodthirsty Sammie wants to cut the gangers to ribbons with his trusty katana, himself, and asks his brother to hold back watch his hide. The gangers are largely mooks, and none pierce the illusion as the sammie walks up and casually starts cutting them down, so I have begun to wonder if the surviving gagers should get additional resistance tests (if so, how often?) and a lower TN (if so, how much?) because the illusion is "harder" to believe/sustain. You just can't ignore the evidence, your 3 buddies just got slashed apart, but if you fail the first resistance test, is that it? You are forever fooled by the illusion sans some other magical intervention? I think I'm going to rule that if someone (who has resisted the illusion) points out to you that you are being fooled by an illusion you get another chance to resist it, and perhaps at a lower TN if the illusion is becoming harder to believe (ie, your 3 friends got chopped open in a way surprisingly reminiscent of an Ork with a Katana). |
|
|
|
Nov 28 2005, 05:58 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Midnight Toker ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,686 Joined: 4-July 04 From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop Member No.: 6,456 |
There is a difference between knowing that someone is using invisibility and seeing someone who is. They'll know that an invisible something is killing their friends and be able to react accordingly but they won't be able to see it. They will, however, be able to utilize searching and suppresie fire against it.
|
|
|
|
Nov 28 2005, 09:53 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,073 Joined: 23-August 04 Member No.: 6,587 |
I agree with hyzmarca. Knowing somebody is invisible, even touching them, will not allow you to see them. You can however act knowing they are there, this could include searching and suppressive fire or (if your smart) running away
Edward |
|
|
|
Nov 28 2005, 09:56 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 61 Joined: 17-November 05 Member No.: 7,977 |
What you are proposing is some sort of "I DISBELIEVE" knee-jerk reaction to an illusion.
Something invisible attacked me once. I started shooting like crazy, making my best guess as to the source. "Blind Fire" it is called, someone give me a modifier here. +8? As for an attempt to actually peirce through the illusion and see the sammie, you'd have to make a willpower save or some shit and this game don't got none of those, chummer. Doesn't matter how hard you squint- you can't see mana. I'd say blind fire modifiers all around! Blind fire modifiers for everyone! Merry christmas! P.S. What's the target number to shoot yourself in the head? Called shot. Blind fire. +12? |
|
|
|
Nov 28 2005, 05:48 PM
Post
#5
|
|||
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,718 Joined: 14-September 02 Member No.: 3,263 |
Unless you have to be able to "squint" hard enough to see on the astral. Then it's Aura Reading (and +2 TN on retries?) for Christmas! :) |
||
|
|
|||
Nov 28 2005, 07:16 PM
Post
#6
|
|||
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,219 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Lofwyr's stomach. Member No.: 1,320 |
Don't be silly. You CAN perceive your head. It's not like you don't know where it is. |
||
|
|
|||
Nov 28 2005, 07:17 PM
Post
#7
|
|||
|
Running, running, running ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,220 Joined: 18-October 04 From: North Carolina Member No.: 6,769 |
i donno about that, sometimes i'm confused where it's at... |
||
|
|
|||
Nov 28 2005, 07:18 PM
Post
#8
|
|||||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 511 Joined: 24-March 05 From: On a ledge between Heaven and Hell Member No.: 7,226 |
Don't forget stationary target, and aim modifiers. |
||||
|
|
|||||
Nov 29 2005, 10:07 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Bushido Cowgirl ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,782 Joined: 8-July 05 From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats Member No.: 7,490 |
ahhh...
This is why they make sealed security armour & & gas grenades. Just pull the pin & drop it at your feet. |
|
|
|
Nov 29 2005, 11:42 PM
Post
#10
|
|||||
|
Decker on the Threshold ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,922 Joined: 14-March 04 Member No.: 6,156 |
Well it'd be pretty automatic actually. Even the Illusion spell glows on the astral, so it's not like there's any particular difficulty figuring out exactly where the spell is being cast, and thus where the invisible person is standing. I think it's kinda silly really. Spells made specifically for the purpose of concealment should ought to be concealed on the astral as well, in my opinion. Then again I also don't like how invis is so all-or-nothing on the physical plane; I'd rather make it something like adding Force+2xnet successes to the TN to spot the person (or in SR4 just add Force+net successes to the perception Threshold), both on the physical and the astral. |
||||
|
|
|||||
Nov 30 2005, 04:45 AM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 256 Joined: 24-October 04 Member No.: 6,784 |
It does seem kinda bizzare to me. This makes Invis even more powerful than I thought. It also seems out of place in a system that prides itself on degrees of success, nearly any spellcaster should be throwing many more dice at a TN 4 than any average person could even hope to use to resist.
Am I conceptualizing this wrong, or do the Gangers in my example have simply No chance? |
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 06:00 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 143 Joined: 28-August 05 Member No.: 7,631 |
There are ways of dealing with invisible people. Ultrasound scopes being one of the more expedient, vehicle sensors (which include ultrasound and radar) being another. Improved Invisiblity is hardly an automatic win. Especially when grenades and other area-effect explosives are so easily available.
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 06:16 AM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 256 Joined: 24-October 04 Member No.: 6,784 |
True, but as often as you can use a confined space to limit the invisible character, that same character will be positioning himself to act in open spaces and maximize his advantage. For someone not important enough for major magical security, who must eventually leave their enclave, how can they deal with an invis asassin? It seems for situations like a streetfight or barbrawl, invis is a huge advantage.
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 06:37 AM
Post
#14
|
|||||||
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,283 Joined: 17-May 05 Member No.: 7,398 |
Unless the spell's being masked by a suitably powerful initiate, in which case you'll be completely invisible on both planes. |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
Nov 30 2005, 07:01 AM
Post
#15
|
|||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 184 Joined: 22-September 05 Member No.: 7,770 |
And it should be. A powerful magician should have a great advantage in these situations. Plus, the sam could probably take out the street scum even without the invisibility. In a game I was part of as PC and GM, one of the mages used invis to sneak up and stab a ganger on an apartment porch. However, the mages strength was low and stabbity skill also low, the ganger managed to stage most of the damage down each melee. With the example given, I completely understand how it would seem gamebreaking. But, just like other tricks and tactics; I see no reason to disallow them. Just remember, the high level enemies can pull them off too. |
||
|
|
|||
Nov 30 2005, 07:36 AM
Post
#16
|
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,073 Joined: 23-August 04 Member No.: 6,587 |
You can’t mask your existence. Only your nature
If you masked the invis spell you would be invisible on the material and look like a normal person on the astral, this inconsistency creates the conclusion that you are an invisible initiate with masking. Edward |
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 07:46 AM
Post
#17
|
|||
|
Freelance Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 7,324 Joined: 30-September 04 From: Texas Member No.: 6,714 |
Yeah, imagine that. No one being able to see you helps out in a fight. Craziness! |
||
|
|
|||
Nov 30 2005, 10:04 PM
Post
#18
|
|||
|
Bushido Cowgirl ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,782 Joined: 8-July 05 From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats Member No.: 7,490 |
Also, Olfactory Booster, Thermo Sense, and Spatial recognisor implants. Invisibility does nothing to hide scent. body heat, or sound. That's why it's so fun to see the expression on the invisible mage's face when he's set upon by a Hellhound or pack of Worgs. Other good things are dust & powders - the invisible character still leaves footprints unless they are also levitating (and adding modifiers for sustaining). Of course, this is coming from the mundane point of view. Yeah, we don't have Astral Perception, but there are a lot of effective (and fairly affordable) countermeasures. BTW, Grenades? My favourite toys...(see earlier post this thread) One of my characters carries around a couple of dye grenades. *Poof* and there is now a solid blue target where no one seemed to be standing before. For security systems, pressure plates will still register the character's weight, Dusts or powders can be released on the floor (some that are only visible in certain light/sensor spectrums). Then there is the old Ultracound sensors and air "Sniffers" (I'm sure that most people breaking into an installation would be sweating just a bit). Paranoid corps may have these and other nasty little ways of detecting invisible intruders. |
||
|
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 12th June 2026 - 10:28 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.