![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 6,748 Joined: 5-July 02 Member No.: 2,935 ![]() |
The Ancient Files, as they stand, are languishing from neglect. Due to recent developments (4th edition, ED splitting, etc.) and less free time on my own part, I am now sorely behind (4 gamebooks and three novels). Further, my lack of technical skills have left the site rather bare, and in places difficult to use.
One possible suggestion forwarded to me, and one which I think has the greatest possible merit, is to translate the website into a Wiki format, similar to the Sixth World Wiki. While I have been self-aggrandizing and self-promoting in my management of the Ancient Files, the truth is they are only as useful as they are thanks to the many corrections, comments, and advice given by those who have visited the site and given me feedback on it. I have always intended the website as a resource for fans of Shadowrun and Earthdawn. Not to belittle the attempts of others, but a large part of that was keeping the site current. I have no desire for it to become another languishing dinosaur, abandoned and left 'til it becomes worthless. With the good, however, I will also note the bad. As the caretaker for the Ancient Files, I could act as a filter for all the comments regarding the site, a necessity when you consider the massive amounts of material you have to be aware of for many of the files. As a Wiki, it would fall to you, the fans, to be aware of your own limitations with regards to the material, and keep a sharp eye out for the errors of others. In other words, with greater freedom comes the responsibility to police yourself and correct the mistakes of others. I look forward to your response and debate, Ancient History |
|
|
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Validating Posts: 1,618 Joined: 29-January 03 From: Montevideo, Uruguay. Member No.: 3,992 ![]() |
I answered "yes" because it's better than seeing it cancelled. However, I'd rather see you getting some extra hands to deal with the issue. Use yor Street Rep, chummer!
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
Uncle Fisty ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 13,891 Joined: 3-January 05 From: Next To Her Member No.: 6,928 ![]() |
I say 'nay' becuase I like the page for one, and I like it under the direction and mind of one perosn instead of a mess of other people's interpretations. Perhaps nor fair to you AH, sorry, but it's a quality thing really. Besides, people here tend to be much more patient with you and updates than with say.... book release dates. :)
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 401 Joined: 7-June 02 From: Living with the straw sheep. Member No.: 2,850 ![]() |
I think making it a Wiki is a good idea - especially if you keep overall editorial control of what is going on.
So far, I've found the Ancient Files to be an extremely useful resource - I'd like that usefulness to carry over into the newer stuff as well, and as you say, there's only so much one person can do. (Incidentally, as far as I can see, "so much" has turned out to be "a hell of a lot") :) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 114 Joined: 27-April 05 From: Summoning a spirit of the land Member No.: 7,362 ![]() |
I said 'yea' but only because I really really like Wikis :)
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#6
|
|
Great, I'm a Dragon... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Retired Admins Posts: 6,699 Joined: 8-October 03 From: North Germany Member No.: 5,698 ![]() |
I'm for "yea", as long as the quality level remains the same (high). Would be a shame if the page would be flooded by entries of poor quality.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#7
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,088 Joined: 8-October 04 From: Dallas, TX Member No.: 6,734 ![]() |
I'd say nay for that exact same reason. I prefer to keep the quality up, and I can be very patient with what you already got up, AH.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#8
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 908 Joined: 31-March 05 From: Georgia Member No.: 7,270 ![]() |
What if instead of a full out wiki open to everyone, You took on a Cadre of super-friends to add to making posts. Than the files would remain high quality, with people who know what they are talking about?
really i was just looking for an excuse to say "cadre of super-friends", but its my :nuyen: 2 |
|
|
![]()
Post
#9
|
|
Uncle Fisty ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 13,891 Joined: 3-January 05 From: Next To Her Member No.: 6,928 ![]() |
cadre of super-friends. Right on
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#10
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,453 Joined: 17-September 04 From: St. Paul Member No.: 6,675 ![]() |
Far be it from me to disagree with another member of the Drop Bear Conspiracy (but I do outrank f...3.0). I am all for the wiki-zation. With one qualifier, AH has to ride herd and be able to lock a page if it gets out of control.
my 2 :nuyen: |
|
|
![]()
Post
#11
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 745 Joined: 26-July 03 From: Montréal, QC, Canada Member No.: 5,029 ![]() |
I think I agree with Jray -- can't it be a moderated wiki? Part of what separates the Ancient Files is the quality and accuracy of the information, guaranteed by AH's all-seeing eye.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#12
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 39 Joined: 22-September 04 From: 9th Circle of Hell Member No.: 6,692 ![]() |
I voted "yea", but I have mixed feelings on this.
I would want strong editorial control to maintain the accuracy of the site. Under the one voice of AH, there is total control on the accuracy of the information. Under a wiki, is it possible to have it moderated to maintain control? Also, would it be necessary to maintain daily backups to restore information that may have been vandalized? It's not that simple. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#13
|
|
Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet; ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 6,546 Joined: 24-October 03 From: DeeCee, U.S. Member No.: 5,760 ![]() |
I wouldn't mind a wiki add-on, but I'd prefer my AH stuff to be unadulterated.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#14
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 34 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Paris, France Member No.: 6,074 ![]() |
I vote no because quality is more important and if lots of people can modify the wiki, its quality will seriously decrease...
i'm very happy with the current content, keeping the files updated is the only thing necessary (and for that only a few people is needed) because otherwise it will stop being THE reference for Shadowrun |
|
|
![]()
Post
#15
|
|
Decker on the Threshold ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,922 Joined: 14-March 04 Member No.: 6,156 ![]() |
I vote no because, well, there already *is* a Sixth World Wiki. We don't need a second one; we need people to contribute to the first.
I think AH should keep his site independent. There's quality stuff there, and it would be annoying to have to sift it from the dross. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#16
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 617 Joined: 28-May 03 From: Orlando Member No.: 4,644 ![]() |
I voted no as well. Too many cooks spoil the soup. I can see it becoming an example of some of the more heated discussions here on the boards and too too many conflicting POV's. AH I truly believe that you are the ONLY one of us who can keep this together.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#17
|
|||
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 207 Joined: 3-November 05 From: KCMO Member No.: 7,922 ![]() |
I'm in the same position. I voted "yea," but I have some doubts. I guess the question for me becomes, Is it possible for AH to add any help on his site? I'd like the AF to stay as & where they are, if AH can get some help. If he has to continue to maintain on his own, it would probably work out better as a WIKI... |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#18
|
|
Shadowrun Setting Nerd ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 3,632 Joined: 28-June 05 From: Pissing on pedestrians from my electronic ivory tower. Member No.: 7,473 ![]() |
Yes, that makes perfect sense. Look at how chaotic and crappy Wikipedia is with it's nearly 700,000 registered users/editors from around the world.
I do agree though that since there is a Sixth World Wiki you should put it there anyway. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#19
|
|
Ain Soph Aur ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,477 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Montreal, Canada Member No.: 600 ![]() |
I have some sort of vague fear of Master Shake coming by and re-writing most of the Wiki...
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#20
|
|
Shadowrun Setting Nerd ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 3,632 Joined: 28-June 05 From: Pissing on pedestrians from my electronic ivory tower. Member No.: 7,473 ![]() |
And? That's like Sony saying they're going to fuck their paying customers in the ass if they play a CD on their computer because someone might trade it to an Internet already full of ripped copies taken from Sony or the producers months earlier.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#21
|
|||
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,453 Joined: 17-September 04 From: St. Paul Member No.: 6,675 ![]() |
Oh, sweet Lord, that is priceless. :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#22
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 68 Joined: 9-October 04 Member No.: 6,738 ![]() |
While I support the idea of a team of Ancient Files writer's, editors, etc, is it plausible.
Who is willing to work on it? Who would AH feel comfortable working with? Are these the same people? Would this team write like AH does, or would they summarize stuff so AH wouldn't have to read everything? Or would it be the above discussed Wiki? How would AH/or DS members determine who was qualified? And finally, would this actually solve the problem, or would the process of creating this team just mean AH Files stay outdated but with more stress for all involved? If we can't answer these questions, then I see the only option to leave the Files as they are or go to a full Wiki. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#23
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 494 Joined: 19-February 05 From: Amazonia Member No.: 7,102 ![]() |
I voted yes, if for no other reason than i think i mentioned that to him. (and, if not, i was going to at one point, i don't remember if i actually did :P)
but, anyway. For the record. If someone went in and changed everything, that's not a problem. Wiki comes with a history for exactly that reason. You can roll back pages to any point. And, while i agree that AH knows more about that stuff than myself and most of the other people on here, why do you assume that EVERYONE who posts on the wiki will undoubetdly be wrong? if you think something is wrong, look it up in the book that it references. if it's wrong, change it. And, yes, you can Ban ip addresses from the wiki. So, if someone id just being annoying, you CAN ban them. I think that it would be alot easier to do if you had to wign up to change anything on the wiki. even if you let anyone sign up. just so that you know who did it. But, i'm not sure i've heard of that feature being in a wiki. I, or others, can probibly add it though, if necessary. So, yeah, that's what I think about the Wiki. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#24
|
|
ghostrider ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Retired Admins Posts: 4,196 Joined: 16-May 04 Member No.: 6,333 ![]() |
Another no to wiki here. I don't wish an utter lack of free time on you, but I don't want to see the quality go south either.
That said, do whatever you need to do man. One time around as they say. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#25
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 626 Joined: 1-March 04 Member No.: 6,112 ![]() |
Keep the original Ancient Files as is, use the Ancient Files as a seed for a new AF wiki.
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 31st May 2025 - 12:27 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.