[Duels] Eye of the Dragon, New Duels fiction on the WizKids site |
[Duels] Eye of the Dragon, New Duels fiction on the WizKids site |
Sep 30 2003, 05:34 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 296 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Usually under a cat Member No.: 864 |
Heya,
Just a plug for Eye of the Dragon, a new serial story told in Shadowland postings and appearing on the Shadowrun Duels website. The first installment's up now, with more to follow shortly. Bull, Shapcano, Lady Anaka, and I worked on this (along with several good folks from WizKids) and it was a lot of fun to put together. Check it out! |
|
|
Sep 30 2003, 09:51 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 100 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 389 |
Not just WizKids, but Dumpshock too (I also had a hand in working on The Eye of the Dragon, and yes, if any of you are also on the WK Forums, I'm -that- Roadspike too). So yeah, read, comment, I'm interested to hear what people think.
|
|
|
Oct 2 2003, 09:07 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Grumpy Old Ork Decker Group: Admin Posts: 3,794 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Orwell, Ohio Member No.: 50 |
Err, Ditto. Was much the fun to work on :]
Tell them how much you loved it so they'll let us write more! Bull |
|
|
Oct 2 2003, 10:10 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Beetle Eater Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 4,797 Joined: 3-June 02 From: Oblivion City Member No.: 2,826 |
Hard to judge much from the small amount posted. I kind of liked it; it flowed well, and the characters are each unique.
It seems odd in the sense of "Shadowland posting," as it read more like transduced journals. |
|
|
Oct 20 2003, 11:13 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 9 Joined: 26-February 02 From: USS John F Kennedy Member No.: 1,491 |
This post was kept open while I read it, so these are my impressions pretty much in order.
Who wrote Karkhov? Hagakure is a nice touch. Silver Max's impressions are conspicuously lacking from the meet with the J. Discriminating agin da rigga's mon? gawd this is shadows 101. Karkhov again with the good details. bull mastif bravo. Ok the complexity kicked up a notch in 1.3 and continued to improve in 2.1 |
|
|
Oct 20 2003, 11:41 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Grumpy Old Ork Decker Group: Admin Posts: 3,794 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Orwell, Ohio Member No.: 50 |
With as many characters as are involved in the story (Wait for it, more come into play soon :)), it was impossible to do the story from everyone's viewpoints. I would have liked to have seen Max get some airtime (And write for him as well :)), but... We were limited to prevent this from getting too out of hand :]
Bull |
|
|
Oct 21 2003, 12:12 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Beetle Eater Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 4,797 Joined: 3-June 02 From: Oblivion City Member No.: 2,826 |
Why does it switch from 1.3 to 2.1 for the end of the run?
I'd think 1.4 would make more sense... I like how it developed, a little light on the security details but fast paced. My favorite line: "You barge in on a run uninvited and have the gall to call me unprofessional?" |
|
|
Oct 21 2003, 03:06 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 76 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 873 |
*bounce*
That was me, that was me! Somebody liked it!!!! *grin* Okay, now back to my regularly scheduled professionalism.... |
|
|
Nov 18 2003, 10:38 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,359 Joined: 25-June 02 From: Vancouver, B.C., Canada (go Canucks!) Member No.: 2,904 |
Well, I must say, I'm enjoying this little story...though it's becoming bigger than I thought it would. How many more "X.1-3's" are there gonna be?
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th April 2024 - 04:37 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.