IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> designing vehicles and guns?
Mordrid Soud
post Dec 11 2005, 11:22 PM
Post #1


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 37
Joined: 15-April 04
Member No.: 6,248



just wondering how difficult would it be to come up with a system for designing fire arms, and vehicles in 4th. i ask since you could do it with 3rd (though the vehicle design wasn't exactly for the feint of heart).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Backgammon
post Dec 12 2005, 12:34 AM
Post #2


Ain Soph Aur
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,477
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Montreal, Canada
Member No.: 600



How difficult? That's a strange question. It's not difficult, it just has to be done. Future sourcebooks will explain how. For now, just make stuff up and run in by your GM.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jervinator
post Dec 12 2005, 02:09 AM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 178
Joined: 4-September 05
Member No.: 7,682



As a GM, I have decided to spend a little free time comparing SR3 weapons to SR4 weapons and come up with my own conversion for the Cannon Companion stuff in the interim. The way I see it, it will be a few months before I can lay my grubby mitts onan OFFICIAL SR4 book for it.
So far, I think I have decrypted quite a bit of it, though I am somewhat perplexed that Holdouts and Light pistols both have a DV/AP of 4/-0 whereas in SR3 they were 4L and 6L. Also, it used to be that MGs went 7S,9S,10S; an MMG was 2 points better than an LMG and 1 point worse than an HMG. In SR4, they go 6P/-1, 6P/-2, 7P/-3, making the MMG is one point better than an LMG and 2 points worse than the HMG.
If anybody is interested, I might post my findings upon completion.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kev
post Dec 12 2005, 03:53 AM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 113
Joined: 11-December 05
From: Philadelphia, UCAS
Member No.: 8,063



QUOTE (jervinator)
making the MMG is one point better than an LMG and 2 points worse than the HMG.

I don't think that's so hard to believe, since HMGs are .50 caliber while MMGs... well... aren't? MMGs would be mounted for vehicle-on-vehicle or vehicle-on-infantry combat, while HMGs are mounted for ground-to-aircraft combat. The HMGs should be noticeably more powerful.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jervinator
post Dec 12 2005, 04:35 AM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 178
Joined: 4-September 05
Member No.: 7,682



Honestly, yes. I personally feel that the SR4 stats are more correct than the SR3 ones. I see the LMG as an M249 type gun, easilly portable 5.56mm, the MMG as an M60, technically hip-firable 7.62mm, but better as a light vehicle mount weapon, and the HMG as an M2; a Troll might be able to hip-fire it but lesser beings shouldn't bother trying to handle the 12.7mm beast.
It's merely that a change like that makes conversion rules a little trickier to draw up.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lagomorph
post Dec 12 2005, 07:58 PM
Post #6


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 834
Joined: 30-June 03
Member No.: 4,832



In general here's what I did for converting SR3 weapons to SR4.

So an old gun:
Ares MP III laser, 15M with Sniper ranges

D = DV 9 or 10
S = DV 7 or 8
M = DV 5 or 6
L = DV 3 or 4

So on that chart I'd probably give it a 5 to help balance out the AP which follows.

And with a TN of 15, I equated that pretty closely with the AP value. Since an AP of 15 is in general going to be better than an equivalent M damage gun with apds ammo, I'd give it a -5 or -6 AP.

So in the end, Ares MP III laser in a quick and dirty conversion, is a DV5(-5) weapon with sniper or long rifle ranges. If you feel it should be more powerful, make it a DV6(-6).

For vehicles, double or nearly double the armor and body, keep other options about the same. A good comparison is the Patrol-1 from both SR3 and SR4.

In general, as long as you have the reference books for the SR3 material, it shouldn't be terribly difficult to convert items over, as long as your GM takes a careful look at the converted item.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jervinator
post Dec 13 2005, 01:45 AM
Post #7


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 178
Joined: 4-September 05
Member No.: 7,682



What I've got is a little more involved. For weapons with an SR3 power of 14 or less, you take ( (Power +1) / 2 ), subtract 5, and then add 1 per damage level above Light. Invert the sign to get the base AP; it should be between 0 and -4.

For the DV, divide the SR3 power by 3 and round up, then add ( 2 - AP ). In some cases, like Sniper Rifles, that part may be a positive number; that's my intent. Then you add a modifier for weapon type:

0 : Holdout pistol, Light pistol, Machine pistol
1 : Heavy pistol, SMG
2 : Assault Rifle, LMG
3 : Shotgun, Sport Rifle, Sniper rifle, MMG
4 : HMG

This allows the 9M pistols to be 5P/-1 and 10M Ruger to be 6P/-2, and converts the rest nicely.

Too bad that Sakura is a Light Pistol and not a Machine Pistol. And what is up with the 4-round bursts? Why not 3 like other BF weapons??
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Blaze
post Jan 15 2006, 10:41 AM
Post #8


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 94
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Loughborough, UK
Member No.: 1,321



QUOTE (jervinator)
Too bad that Sakura is a Light Pistol and not a Machine Pistol. And what is up with the 4-round bursts? Why not 3 like other BF weapons??

Out of interest, where does it say the Sakura Fubuki fires four-round bursts?

Also, has anyone looked at high-velocity weapons yet? I ended up spending my lunch break thinking about this a while back, and here's what I came up with:

Previously SR's HV weapons have put a lot of near-uncontrollable lead into the air, sacrificing accuracy for sheer damage. However, the new long burst and narrow/wide rules sort of negate their bonuses a little. Therefore, I took a leaf out of the real-life P90 and MP7- rather than the wall-of-lead approach they fire higher-velocity rounds at standard rates, lowering the effective recoil impulse. Damage is reduced as the smaller and lighter bullets cause a smaller wound cavity, however this is made up for as the small, fast bullets penetrate armour easier.

Rules:
Hypervelocity weapons are available as machine pistols, SMGs, Assault Rifles and Machine Guns. They receive -1DV and -1AP in comparison to an average weapon in their class (eg. an Assault Rifle would be, taking the FN HAR as a base, 5P with -2AP). Short bursts may only be narrow, and take recoil as per SA (ie. -1 for second shot in a pass). Long bursts take only -2/-3 recoil penalties, full auto takes -5. No barrel-mounted accessories are allowed. Cost is roughly double that of a comparable regular weapon.

The net result is that while HV weapons don't have the raw DV, they make up for it with improved handling and better performance against armour out of the box. Their other downside is the lack of barrel mods- you can't silence them (making the bullets subsonic defeats the purpose) and it's difficult to cram a lot of recoil compensation onto them. A HVAR will still be outperformed by an Alpha with Gas Vent III and a shock pad.

Any suggestions?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Austere Emancipa...
post Jan 15 2006, 04:18 PM
Post #9


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,889
Joined: 3-August 03
From: A CPI rank 1 country
Member No.: 5,222



QUOTE (Blaze)
Their other downside is the lack of barrel mods- you can't silence them (making the bullets subsonic defeats the purpose) [...]

Most sound suppressors attached to the muzzle of a small arms will not slow down the bullet at all. In fact, they often end up increasing the velocity slightly, since they give the propellant gases a bit more time and space in which to push the bullet forward.

You can suppress firearms which fire supersonic projectiles -- the purpose is not so much to evade detection altogether, since the projectile ripping through the air will probably be heard, but to hide your own position by reducing/eliminating the *crack* of firing a weapon (and replacing it with a less loud and less obvious noise) and the muzzle flash.

If you're at all interested in how sound suppressors work, I suggest reading Raygun's excellent article on them.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CrimsonHawk
post Jun 3 2006, 05:48 PM
Post #10


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 31
Joined: 22-April 06
Member No.: 8,493



:( well I finally figured out whats going on with my GM his thoughts is bringing the 3rd edition history over to 4th edition so for instance (Guns are HIGHLY illegal and theres a major crack down on them) which I guess explains the 5x to 10x the book cost for them. so being a drone runner I guess I need to keep all the guns I kill from my missions and incorporate them into my drones because I cant see putting a gun that cost me 19k in a 2k drone.


I asked about designing a gun for instance if I got the scemats from the WWW and reverse engineer a gun only suited for drones IE no stock exec... he informed me it would triple or more the price for that gun to me (5x to 10x already) so I guess i'm stuck in a catch 22 D if I do and D if I don't.

since I don't see anything in RAW to counter this atm


:( let me know your thoughts thx
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Austere Emancipa...
post Jun 3 2006, 05:55 PM
Post #11


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,889
Joined: 3-August 03
From: A CPI rank 1 country
Member No.: 5,222



If your GM really hates firearms that much, just make yourself a spandex-wearing, mullet-sporting, Dikoted katana-wielding 80s ninja. Apparently that and mages is all your GM wants to see in his game.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shrike30
post Jun 5 2006, 07:50 PM
Post #12


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,556
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle
Member No.: 98



If your GM is charging that much for guns, one of the first things you should do is have your group mage thump a couple of beat cops (or rentacops, or corporate cops... someone with guns) and arm the rest of the group. 5-10x the listed cost for guns is ridiculous if you're not in a Bug City scenario.

For the record, even at 10x cost, the L36 (IIRC... whatever the supercheap light pistol is) still only costs you 1500 :nuyen: ... not a stupidly expensive piece compared to the rest, at that point.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
booklord
post Jun 5 2006, 08:01 PM
Post #13


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 502
Joined: 14-May 03
From: Detroit, Michigan
Member No.: 4,583



"Six men came to kill me one time. The best of 'em carried this. It's a Callahan full-bore autolock, customized trigger, double cartridge, thorough-gage. This is my very favorite gun....I call her Vera." -Jayne
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shadow
post Jun 5 2006, 10:47 PM
Post #14


Why oh why didn't I take the blue pill.
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,545
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Gloomy Boise Idaho
Member No.: 2,006



:notworthy:


Now that was a nice rifle.

In reality building a gun is just not that easy. You just can't sit down with a pen and paper, whip out a design, and then run over to kinkos and have them run one off for you. You need a full on machine shop with precision parts.

The only reason I can think to even make a gun as a Runner would be to have a completely untraceable gun. In the sense that it was never ID'd or coded, or sold. Other than that, there are plenty of off-the-shelf guns that do the job very well.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shrike30
post Jun 5 2006, 11:53 PM
Post #15


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,556
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle
Member No.: 98



Building a high-quality gun requires precision parts. You could build a WW2 Sten-type submachinegun in a high-school metal shop class, if you had the know-how.

There's actually some pretty interesting stuff out there on how to build your own firearms. It's not as difficult as you might think. Getting it to be as accurate and reliable as one of the existing manufacturers is another story, but you can put together something that goes "bang" repeatedly without a stupid amount of effort...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon8685
post Jun 6 2006, 05:34 AM
Post #16


Horror
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,322
Joined: 15-June 05
From: BumFuck, New Jersey
Member No.: 7,445



It dosen't have to be a perfect gun, or even a good gun.


It just has to be good enough to let you kill someone who has a good gun so you can take his good gun.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kronk2
post Jan 11 2007, 11:51 AM
Post #17


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 490
Joined: 29-August 06
From: Texas
Member No.: 9,245



is there any real difference for vehicles? and what the heck do I do with the cf and load stats?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adam
post Jan 11 2007, 03:13 PM
Post #18


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 3,929
Joined: 26-February 02
From: .ca
Member No.: 51



QUOTE (CrimsonHawk)
:( well I finally figured out whats going on with my GM his thoughts is bringing the 3rd edition history over to 4th edition so for instance (Guns are HIGHLY illegal and theres a major crack down on them) which I guess explains the 5x to 10x the book cost for them.

I'm not sure where your GM is getting this, but I wouldn't call firearms "highly illegal" in the Sixth World -- certainly not in the typical settings that most 3rd Edition material was published for.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Jan 11 2007, 03:31 PM
Post #19


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



Ha. I had a post written to answer the OP before I thought to check the time hacks. Oops!

Kronk2, you might have better luck getting specific answers if you create a new post for your question. Not that there's anything wrong with trying to fit it into an existing thread, but this one's kinda old and reading through the whole thing might keep people from focusing on what you need.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Jan 11 2007, 09:36 PM
Post #20


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



QUOTE (Blaze)
Out of interest, where does it say the Sakura Fubuki fires four-round bursts?

In the BBB under the weapon's description. it can only fire a narrow burst in this mode though & has the recoil of a normal Semiautomatic (-1) for the second burst.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moon-Hawk
post Jan 11 2007, 09:46 PM
Post #21


Genuine Artificial Intelligence
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,019
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,715



QUOTE (SR4 pg 307)
The “Cherry-blossom Storm�
is the flagship for Yamaha’s new
line of electronic weapons that feature
no moving parts. Rather than
a standard magazine, the bullets
are stacked in-line in each of the
four barrels, allowing the firing of
ultra-fast short bursts. The Fubuki
may only fire narrow bursts (not wide), but burst recoil is
handled like SA recoil (–1 Recoil on the second burst each
Action Phase only). Includes an integral folding stock.


I don't think that necessarily says what you say it says. ;-)

So your interpretation of that passage is that each time the weapon is fired it fires one bullet from each of the four barrels? Is that what you're saying?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Butterblume
post Jan 11 2007, 09:50 PM
Post #22


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,150
Joined: 19-December 05
From: Rhein-Ruhr Megaplex
Member No.: 8,081



That's plainly wrong. A burst from the Sakura Fubuki is still 3 rounds. There is no evidence whatsoever to even indicate otherwise.

In fact, previous discussions have concluded that each burst comes from the same barrel.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moon-Hawk
post Jan 11 2007, 09:55 PM
Post #23


Genuine Artificial Intelligence
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,019
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,715



That was my understanding of it as well, Butterblume.
Still, I wish they had made each barrel hold either 9 or 12 rounds, rather than 10. Things just would've been simpler.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Butterblume
post Jan 11 2007, 10:12 PM
Post #24


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,150
Joined: 19-December 05
From: Rhein-Ruhr Megaplex
Member No.: 8,081



So true.

I allowed one of my players to use custom barrels with 12 shoots each, for a little premium, and he seems quite happy with it :D.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moon-Hawk
post Jan 11 2007, 10:16 PM
Post #25


Genuine Artificial Intelligence
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,019
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,715



That's cool. Did you hit him with a concealability penalty for it, or let that slide?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 03:25 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.