IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
How does art in the SR4 book compare?
You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Total Votes: 81
Guests cannot vote 
mdynna
post Jan 30 2006, 09:41 PM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 371
Joined: 10-January 06
From: Regina
Member No.: 8,145



Has anyone else found SR art in general disappointing? I find that it is generally too cartoony and bears not much resemblance to descriptions. Or it is too abstract (what is that supposed to be?).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FrankTrollman
post Jan 30 2006, 09:54 PM
Post #2


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Banned
Posts: 3,732
Joined: 1-September 05
From: Prague, Czech Republic
Member No.: 7,665



You should probably have an extra couple of categories there. I liked the art in Man and Machine much more than I like the art in SR4. But there are still some good pictures now and again. So while I am able to categorically say that SR4 art is "worse", I wouldn't go as far as putting an exclamation mark after expressing my hatred.

-Frank
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Azralon
post Jan 30 2006, 09:57 PM
Post #3


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,651
Joined: 23-September 05
From: Marietta, GA
Member No.: 7,773



Ah, how I long for the days of Tim Bradstreet's gritty and realistic style.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rotbart van Dain...
post Jan 30 2006, 10:40 PM
Post #4


Hoppelhäschen 5000
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,807
Joined: 3-January 04
Member No.: 5,951



QUOTE (mdynna @ Jan 30 2006, 11:41 PM)
Or it is too abstract (what is that supposed to be?).

Hardly - the proportions and anatomy of some pictures are simply off.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Brahm
post Jan 30 2006, 10:48 PM
Post #5


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,635
Joined: 27-November 05
Member No.: 8,006



Ya, not all artists take pictures and then run them through digital filters and touch them up.

At least that was my understanding of how Bradstreet does some of his work. Not to say that it the result isn't nice, because it definately is. Or to imply he is a no talent bum. But keep in mind that not all styles are intended to be photorealistic.

I find the SR4 art a mixed bag by my tastes. Some good, some bad, a lot of ok. Unfortunately I don't really think I can point to one particular piece and say it rocks my world. That is usually what I judge art in a book by. It can be mostly blah, but if there is one piece that I really like then it makes the book.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mdynna
post Jan 30 2006, 11:00 PM
Post #6


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 371
Joined: 10-January 06
From: Regina
Member No.: 8,145



For some unknown reason, I find the art in the books that Steven Kenson had a big hand in to be the best. Perhaps he picks different artists?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Space Ghost
post Jan 31 2006, 01:55 AM
Post #7


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 129
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 400



My main gripe is with the cover art. The color work is good, but i think the original concept wasn't. Meaning, the things depicted were well drawn, but i don't like those things to begin with. Like the sammie's handblade. Or his coat for that matter. Does it look like wicker to anybody else? The whole scene looks kind of relaxed, too. Like these guys are yawning through a milk run or something.

A lot of the art inside the book is good though.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tanka
post Jan 31 2006, 02:12 AM
Post #8


Chrome to the Core
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,152
Joined: 14-October 03
From: ::1
Member No.: 5,715



The only good art was stuff that was drawn for previous editions, most notably that from Cybertechnology, a book in 2nd Ed. Anything new was shit. Pure and total shit. (For reference: Page 68. What the hell is that?!)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Squinky
post Jan 31 2006, 04:30 AM
Post #9


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,479
Joined: 6-May 05
From: Idaho
Member No.: 7,377



I did prefer the feel of previous editions with the likes of Bradstreet, Prescott, and the great Laubenstien, but I dig most of the art in the new book.

That page 68 one is okay to me, 133 and 136 are examples of pictures that I don't quite appreciate. One thing to keep in mind though is the pictures do convey the the message they are meant to convey, even if you don't like the art.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nick012000
post Jan 31 2006, 04:57 AM
Post #10


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,283
Joined: 17-May 05
Member No.: 7,398



QUOTE (tanka)
The only good art was stuff that was drawn for previous editions, most notably that from Cybertechnology, a book in 2nd Ed. Anything new was shit. Pure and total shit. (For reference: Page 68. What the hell is that?!)

p. 68 is an illustration depicting the player using the Hand of God.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Brahm
post Jan 31 2006, 05:01 AM
Post #11


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,635
Joined: 27-November 05
Member No.: 8,006



QUOTE (nick012000)
QUOTE (tanka @ Jan 30 2006, 09:12 PM)
The only good art was stuff that was drawn for previous editions, most notably that from Cybertechnology, a book in 2nd Ed.  Anything new was shit.  Pure and total shit.  (For reference: Page 68.  What the hell is that?!)

p. 68 is an illustration depicting the player using the Hand of God.

:rotfl:

Ah, it is all making sense now. Yes, I can make out the crucifix in the background midpicture.

Ya, I'm ok with that picture.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ophis
post Jan 31 2006, 10:13 AM
Post #12


Mystery Archaeologist
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,906
Joined: 19-September 05
From: The apple tree
Member No.: 7,760



I really like the chapter start pictures (except the equipment chapter)
There is some excellent art and some utter shit, but then again that is par for the course in a book. Since Fanpro have taken over the art quality has dropped a little in general but the really good piccies have got better.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_MK Ultra_*
post Jan 31 2006, 10:29 AM
Post #13





Guests






Wow, You know, I have waited forthis thread ever since SR4 came out... (only had too much univerity-stuff to do, to put it on my selfe, so I did only bitch about SR4-Art whenever the topic came about as a sideline).

I realy HATE most of the artwork!!! Very little is good (some of the archetypes are actually quiet cool, I think, others -like the ganger- are rather bad though), some is ok (mostly stuff from old books IIRC), most is quiet bad and not that little is realy shitty IMHO (p. 65, 112 and 260 are probably my most hated, but thats hard to decide with such a large pile of crap :( ).

I could surely do better than most of the disprportional pictures, but that doesn´t matter, even if I couldn´t, cuz I´m not payed for it! I´d actually have payed extrabucks for an "unspecial" edition with most of the artworke removed, even without replacement.

Many of the illustrations look like fanwork, and bad fanwork compared to other stuff I´ve seen!

I am really disappointed about the artwork, though I like the rules and the layout. Problem is, that I´m really visual, so bad art detracts horrendously from my rpg-experiance and I probably have more of a problem to get the mood of SR4, than I would have had without this craptacular junk :S

I know this is much about personal experiances, but there are some objective criteria, like bodyproportions of Norms, that are not correct in many cases.

Oh, man I really can´t tell how dissapointed I am, withoug being rude, but the length of my post probably says enough.

Guess what I voted for :sleepy:

Edit: I allso agre with Ophis
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Grinder
post Jan 31 2006, 11:24 AM
Post #14


Great, I'm a Dragon...
*********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 6,699
Joined: 8-October 03
From: North Germany
Member No.: 5,698



There are some awesome pics in the BBB, but way too much crappy ones )like the race examples).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_MK Ultra_*
post Jan 31 2006, 11:43 AM
Post #15





Guests






QUOTE (Grinder)
There are some awesome pics in the BBB, but way too much crappy ones )like the race examples).

You name it, I was utterly shocked, when they were first presented on the web :eek:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
runefire32
post Jan 31 2006, 02:03 PM
Post #16


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 68
Joined: 26-January 06
Member No.: 8,201



I would have voted but there wasn't a choice for 'I liked some of it, but some of it was god awful horrible...'
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tanka
post Jan 31 2006, 03:35 PM
Post #17


Chrome to the Core
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,152
Joined: 14-October 03
From: ::1
Member No.: 5,715



QUOTE (nick012000)
QUOTE (tanka @ Jan 30 2006, 09:12 PM)
The only good art was stuff that was drawn for previous editions, most notably that from Cybertechnology, a book in 2nd Ed.  Anything new was shit.  Pure and total shit.  (For reference: Page 68.  What the hell is that?!)

p. 68 is an illustration depicting the player using the Hand of God.

I'm not saying "What does it represent?" More like "Who the hell calls that good art?"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mdynna
post Jan 31 2006, 04:14 PM
Post #18


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 371
Joined: 10-January 06
From: Regina
Member No.: 8,145



On a positive note, although I consider Shadowrun art sub-par at best, Shadowrun fiction has been excellent. In my opinion, the exceptional fiction that is ever-present in Shadowrun books counter-balances the exceedingly disappointing artwork. The whole idea of writing entire sourcebooks in-character is nothing short of brilliant, in my mind.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Azralon
post Jan 31 2006, 05:30 PM
Post #19


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,651
Joined: 23-September 05
From: Marietta, GA
Member No.: 7,773



I'm comfortable with different art styles getting used, and actually like the variety.

The Tir Tairngire sourcebook had some great black-and-white art over a whole range of styles. Even the cartoony stuff served its purpose (such as the customs officer firing a full burst while quietly saying "Stop.").

I gotta say that Jeff Laubenstein never did anything for me (except make me sick of seeing people with little swirls tattooed on their faces).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Jan 31 2006, 05:32 PM
Post #20


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



Still think the art in SR3 looked more finished. Too much of the interior art in 4 (save for the sample characters and two realy good street scenes) looks like pencil roughs or first drafts.

Favourite art of all time:

Theres a picture from Cannon Companion (pg 60 or 80 I think). The one with the soldier in the tank looking down at the rocket about to impact on the turret. The expression on his face says it all. Priceless
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adam
post Jan 31 2006, 06:04 PM
Post #21


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 3,929
Joined: 26-February 02
From: .ca
Member No.: 51



QUOTE (mdynna)
For some unknown reason, I find the art in the books that Steven Kenson had a big hand in to be the best. Perhaps he picks different artists?

Authors generally have no say in which artists work on any particular book.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
warrior_allanon
post Feb 1 2006, 12:36 AM
Post #22


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 775
Joined: 31-March 05
From: florida
Member No.: 7,273



some was good most was horrible, i mean, come on, all you have to see is the troll that looks like a klingon with horns, and that rastafarian ork and say "Ugh"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
P.P.Lemonade
post Feb 1 2006, 07:50 AM
Post #23


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 26
Joined: 10-September 05
Member No.: 7,726



I just wish the art styles were more consistent. Have the same artist do all of the critter pictures. Same for contacts and such.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JongWK
post Feb 1 2006, 03:24 PM
Post #24


Shooting Target
****

Group: Validating
Posts: 1,618
Joined: 29-January 03
From: Montevideo, Uruguay.
Member No.: 3,992



QUOTE (warrior_allanon)
some was good most was horrible, i mean, come on, all you have to see is the troll that looks like a klingon with horns, and that rastafarian ork and say "Ugh"

I thought the ork was out of a Battlefield: Earth remake. :P
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Brahm
post Feb 1 2006, 04:59 PM
Post #25


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,635
Joined: 27-November 05
Member No.: 8,006



QUOTE (P.P.Lemonade)
I just wish the art styles were more consistent. Have the same artist do all of the critter pictures. Same for contacts and such.

They had all the sample characters done in the same style.

I think anyone that does not see those sample pictures as good or at least fair is coming in with unreasonable expectations. If you can't get past your taste in style to see the workmanship you aren't judging quality at all.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 30th May 2025 - 09:23 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.