IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> A matter of posting on topic...
Do you?
You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Total Votes: 70
Guests cannot vote 
Pendaric
post Feb 2 2006, 08:01 PM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 993
Joined: 5-December 05
From: Crying in the wilderness
Member No.: 8,047



I am resurrecting this poll, for there have been many like it in the past, as a guide to the newer members and reminder to the older ones. I place myself in both categories.

After all this is a public forum, the majority of the SR community who benefit from it don't post/are members, so lets aim to be relevant and inspiring.

Dumpshock has come a long way (in the seven and some years since I encountered it) and I am sure we all appreciate the general mood, hopefully it can continue and perhapes improve.

Thank for your participation.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Stainless St...
post Feb 2 2006, 08:08 PM
Post #2


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 257
Joined: 25-May 05
Member No.: 7,414



Phys-Ad.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DocMortand
post Feb 2 2006, 08:12 PM
Post #3


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,088
Joined: 8-October 04
From: Dallas, TX
Member No.: 6,734



I had to vote for one of the lines.

Never, ever seperate poll questions with lines.

Normally I read completely through before replying. *shrug*
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevebugge
post Feb 2 2006, 08:12 PM
Post #4


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,026
Joined: 23-November 05
From: Seattle (Really!)
Member No.: 7,996



Didn't vote, because honestly my approch changes dependent on the length of the thread and when and where I am posting from. 1-5 posts I'll read carefully, 6-20 I'll read, skim, read the last and post. 2-3 pages I'll porbably just read the last 3-5 posts and answer from there. 4 or more pages and I may not even look at the thread much less try to post in it, with one notable exception being the Holy Scriptures of The Drop Bear Conspiracy.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DocMortand
post Feb 2 2006, 08:14 PM
Post #5


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,088
Joined: 8-October 04
From: Dallas, TX
Member No.: 6,734



QUOTE (stevebugge)
Didn't vote, because honestly my approch changes dependent on the length of the thread and when and where I am posting from. 1-5 posts I'll read carefully, 6-20 I'll read, skim, read the last and post. 2-3 pages I'll porbably just read the last 3-5 posts and answer from there. 4 or more pages and I may not even look at the thread much less try to post in it, with one notable exception being the Holy Scriptures of The Drop Bear Conspiracy.

Gah-good point - if you're a newbie, and you enter the Drop Bear thread, you MUST read all the way through once so your brain can bleed from your ears. THEN respond. ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Feb 2 2006, 08:39 PM
Post #6


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Unless something in the middle of a thread really grabs me by the throat and screams "reply to me!", I make it a point never to post in a thread I haven't read entirely. As a result, I tend to end up not reading threads that are longer than about forty posts by the time I first see them.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Calvin Hobbes
post Feb 2 2006, 10:26 PM
Post #7


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 204
Joined: 27-October 05
From: Waterloo, ON
Member No.: 7,900



I voted line. It was the least biased of the possible answers.

FOREGO YOUR LIMITED FORUM UNDERSTANDING.

A: Because it breaks the logical causality between question and answer.
Q: Why is blog posting bad?

Phys Ad that can cast sorcery.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FrankTrollman
post Feb 2 2006, 11:17 PM
Post #8


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Banned
Posts: 3,732
Joined: 1-September 05
From: Prague, Czech Republic
Member No.: 7,665



Physads with Sorcery are worse than street sams or adepts. You spend points on being crappy at spellcasting, and end up with a character who is neither gooc at magic nor at ass-kicking.

Personally, I've always found Street Samurai to be better than Adepts whether the game is long or short. The adept has theoretically unlimited expansion potential, but even characters of mine played for multiple editions never managed to hit the extensibility wall of the street sam hard enough for the adept to catch up. There's a lot you can do with Beta Grade Cyber.

-Frank
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Blaze
post Feb 2 2006, 11:35 PM
Post #9


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 94
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Loughborough, UK
Member No.: 1,321



*Laughs* I think that's the fastest I've ever seen a thread go off-topic, here or anywhere else.

On the question in hand, I've voted option-1. I've been around here about five or six years now, and the vast majority of the time I only post when I feel I have something valuable to advance to the discussion, a new idea that I would like honest and objective feedback on, or a question I would like a well-thought-out answer to. If I'm lucky, sometimes I get what I'm after. ;) I've no interest in debating whether adepts or street samurai prod more buttock than the other- in either case the choice is secondary to the construction of the psyche, history and consciousness of a character. You can do some sick and wrong things with either (gods know I have done in the past), but for me the biggest question is not magic or wetware, it's whether you build the character's personality first, or his/her stats. I find the former provides a more entertaining RP experience, but your mileage may vary.

I get the feeling I may have taken this even further OT- sorry, Pendaric...

-JH.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_MK Ultra_*
post Feb 3 2006, 12:30 AM
Post #10





Guests






1 or 2 mostly

Have to second Blaze on the off-topic discussion, though I often start the process by visualizing the upcoming pc (not its stats).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Feb 3 2006, 02:37 AM
Post #11


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



QUOTE (Blaze)
You can do some sick and wrong things with either (gods know I have done in the past), but for me the biggest question is not magic or wetware, it's whether you build the character's personality first, or his/her stats. I find the former provides a more entertaining RP experience, but your mileage may vary.

Maybe you're better at conceptualizing in tune to the SR3 ruleset than I am. I always find that the characters I've come up with a full personality for first end up being played weakly, because I inevitably have to make sacrifices to build the character according to the rules and in a way that will be fun to play (remember kids, crippling flaws are only fun in stories where you can write around them at dramatically appropriate moments). On the other hand, the characters where I do most of the numbers first take on a life of their own.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wounded Ronin
post Feb 3 2006, 02:58 AM
Post #12


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,640
Joined: 6-June 04
Member No.: 6,383



Well, I think that physads are better for a number of reasons. Bear in mind that I haven't touched SR4, so I'm talking about SR3.

1.) They're a lot easier to create at chargen. I can whip up a physad very quickly, whereas making a sammie is usually a lot slower because you have to purchase more 'ware with highly detailed and variable prices.

I realize that this dosen't impact in-game power, but personally I think it's worth a lot if I can make a new character quickly. Like, let's say my character I've been using in a campaign dies, and I need to make a new one. Am I going to waste a few hours making an ultimate sammie, or am I going to whip up a new physad and get back into the action?

This is one aspect of the physad that I think is a positive aspect, but which hasn't been brought up that much.

2.) Next, I'll just reahash the old argument that the physad, through theoretically unlimited initiation, is a better long term choice than the sammie, who faces diminishing returns due to his Essence.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Brahm
post Feb 3 2006, 03:26 AM
Post #13


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,635
Joined: 27-November 05
Member No.: 8,006



Yes.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Brahm
post Feb 3 2006, 03:26 AM
Post #14


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,635
Joined: 27-November 05
Member No.: 8,006



I hate those dashed lines.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Feb 3 2006, 04:04 AM
Post #15


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



Combo of one and two, depending on the thread/topic.

Depends on the karma level at start of game. A lot? Physad all the way. None? Whichever fits the team better.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fistandantilus4....
post Feb 3 2006, 05:58 AM
Post #16


Uncle Fisty
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,891
Joined: 3-January 05
From: Next To Her
Member No.: 6,928



perhaps the thread wouldn't have drifted if Frank head read the whole topic and all the replies carefully, then thought out and carefully type , cross-referenced, and spell checked his reply. :D

In general, I try to read through everything , then go back to the points that caught my attention the most, where I wanted to make a reply. That way I don't have to waste time posting, then going back and editing my post to include "Oops, Jray already said that.", and feel like a dope. But hey, some times you feel like a dope...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PiXeL01
post Feb 3 2006, 06:09 AM
Post #17


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 175
Joined: 15-July 04
From: Imperial Japan
Member No.: 6,483



Looks like the dots are in a good second place at the moment. I did vote for number two though ...

And on the half rerailing .. I prefer Street Sams. To me they seem easier to compile into something you like faster than a PhysAd. I havent played an adept after SotA64 so ...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Feb 3 2006, 07:08 AM
Post #18


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



----------------------- for the win.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Brahm
post Feb 3 2006, 07:22 AM
Post #19


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,635
Joined: 27-November 05
Member No.: 8,006



The -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I voted for is in 2nd to last place, just ahead of #4. :( Now I really hate them.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pendaric
post Feb 3 2006, 01:10 PM
Post #20


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 993
Joined: 5-December 05
From: Crying in the wilderness
Member No.: 8,047



And history repeats itself. Or at least rhymes.
Any bets on the line to win? 2:1 on line 1.....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dog
post Feb 3 2006, 01:23 PM
Post #21


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 903
Joined: 7-February 03
Member No.: 4,025



I try to take a look at who's posting. There are a certain few names, that if I see them every second or third post, I know it's probably just "nuh uh!" and "uh huh!" so I skip it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nick012000
post Feb 3 2006, 02:52 PM
Post #22


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,283
Joined: 17-May 05
Member No.: 7,398



Line #1 for teh win. :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Feb 3 2006, 02:57 PM
Post #23


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,548
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



I like that a quarter of all respondents voted "-----------------------" It's like swordfish mustardball, but longer!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Brahm
post Feb 3 2006, 03:00 PM
Post #24


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,635
Joined: 27-November 05
Member No.: 8,006



Swordfish mustardball?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Feb 3 2006, 05:54 PM
Post #25


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



*wooooooooooooooosh*

That's the sound a joke makes, flying over Brahm's head.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st April 2026 - 04:54 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.