 THIS is why ---, the matrix will not be wireless |
  |
 Mar 28 2006, 02:06 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Running Target  Group: Members Posts: 1,095 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Ontari-airee-o Member No.: 1,115  |
http://www.cellantenna.com/CJAM/cjam_1000.htm
I was looking at trying to buy one of these 6 months ago. You need to be a government agency really, but having one of these puppies an really cause some headaches for companies/facilities. If I bought one I would drive around with it, just to piss of the morons with cellphones that cannot pay attention when they drive. |
 |
 
|
|
Mar 28 2006, 02:12 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Ain Soph Aur Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,477 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Montreal, Canada Member No.: 600 |
That's really cool. Especially how you can jam certain areas and not jam others. It always pissed me off how SR jammers are blind AOE communications bombs.
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 28 2006, 03:25 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Creating a god with his own hands Group: Members Posts: 1,405 Joined: 30-September 02 From: 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1 Member No.: 3,364 |
hah. you can build one of those with 20$ worth of parts from an electronics surplus store. (not radio shack, they're worthless)
it might not have the power/features, but it will get the job done. what I'm doing now is working on a Wifi jammer. |
|
|
|
|
Mar 28 2006, 03:44 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,095 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Ontari-airee-o Member No.: 1,115 |
if you get the schematics done let me know ... I will but a huge aerial so I can jam the phones/wifi on my block. I have 6 signals beaming into my house. Till I get my tinfoil siding I am just going to make their lives miserable.
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 28 2006, 04:38 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 305 Joined: 2-March 03 Member No.: 4,188 |
If my knowledge of physics is correct, jamming the signal doesn't prevent it from entering your brain. Maybe the useful "manchurian" data is lost, but then you're just getting scrambled orders from your master.
Why not just piggyback on them instead? |
|
|
|
|
Mar 28 2006, 04:45 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,095 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Ontari-airee-o Member No.: 1,115 |
it doesn't stop it from entering my brain, but it makes it completely unusable. which means after a month, people will have given up, and I can turn it off.
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 28 2006, 04:49 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 305 Joined: 2-March 03 Member No.: 4,188 |
Why do you object to them having those signals? Does it interfere with anything?
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 28 2006, 04:51 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,095 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Ontari-airee-o Member No.: 1,115 |
Yes I object to having these signals pollute my household environment. I do not have wireless devices in my house. The research is still inconclusive, on whether so much bombardment is safe. I prefer to err on the side of caution. I also have young kids which it has been suggested are more vulnerable.
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 28 2006, 05:06 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Man In The Machine Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,264 Joined: 26-February 02 From: I-495 S Member No.: 1,105 |
Im going to wire one into my car... right next to my rader spoofer.
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 28 2006, 05:21 PM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 5,889 Joined: 3-August 03 From: A CPI rank 1 country Member No.: 5,222 |
Get rid of low levels of potentially harmful EM wave pollution by using a vastly more powerful transmitter of your own. That's brilliant.
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 28 2006, 05:24 PM
Post
#11
|
|||||
|
Manus Celer Dei Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,010 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
Have you read the MIJI rules? They're nothing of the kind, though the brute-force approach is of course available.
Ignoring the fact that the research is not inconclusive at all, merely incomplete, what you would be doing is making the problem worse. Your method is a guarantee that every device in the radius, including your jammer, will be operating at full power. At best, that means you've got one more device pumping EM radiation into you (and this one with a source far closer to you, unless you've got a plot of land away from your house), at worst you increase the total amount of EM activity. ~J |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
Mar 28 2006, 05:27 PM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 305 Joined: 2-March 03 Member No.: 4,188 |
I can see the logic.
A month of EM jamming might bring a few years of EM silence. I have a feeling the property law will quickly come into the modern age if more people do this. They can certainly show suffering damage by signals leaving your property. Your only counter will be to try to show that you suffered damage by their signals entering your property. |
|
|
|
|
Mar 28 2006, 05:32 PM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Man In The Machine Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,264 Joined: 26-February 02 From: I-495 S Member No.: 1,105 |
Oh I dont care about EM fields, Im sure the orage juice I drink will give me cancer faster anyway. And if that dosent, Im SURE the coffee I drink will.
I just wanna turn off peoples cell phones on the highway. |
|
|
|
|
Mar 28 2006, 06:13 PM
Post
#14
|
|||
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,028 Joined: 9-November 02 From: The Republic of Vermont Member No.: 3,581 |
Tin foil is a lot cheaper and easier to set up. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
Mar 28 2006, 06:27 PM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Midnight Toker Group: Members Posts: 7,686 Joined: 4-July 04 From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop Member No.: 6,456 |
It is also far less likely to get you arrested (or killed by a FCC SWAT team).
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 28 2006, 07:15 PM
Post
#16
|
|||||||
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,095 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Ontari-airee-o Member No.: 1,115 |
it would be in the back yard and I can shield the side facing my house.
You are telling me stripping off all the brick, putting several layers of tinfoil then replacing the brick can be cheaper this unit. ? Not to mention labour.
well .I am not in the US so I think I am safe, we do things a little differently up here. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
Mar 28 2006, 07:51 PM
Post
#17
|
|||||
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,174 Joined: 13-May 04 From: UCAS Member No.: 6,327 |
Or putting it up behind your drywall/interior which is easier. up here? Sounds like you're a canuck possibly. If that's the case, just wait till we absorb your country. There's UCAS for a reason. ;-) Actually do you even know what your laws are in regards to the transmissions? As the others have said, you're really delusional to think that EM from cellphones are more harmful than the jammer running at full blast and you'll stop it by just shielding one side of your home? What about when you have to go out? I guess you don't care about the people living near you, how thoughtful of ye. If you set it up, they might sue you for the health problems that you say is caused by the cell phones and are now causing it on them by deluging them with your jammer waves because you certainly believe there's health problems that stem from it. Depending on the range of the transmitter, if they are living nearby and are losing signals because of it, they may have a cause of action against you to stop using that jammer since your waves are intruding upon their space (depending on canadian property law and such). Also you have to worry about the power cost, the monthly bill to have the jammer on all the time. Isn't it cheaper, one time cost to line the interior of your abode with tinfoil? Not the brick, but the interior which is much, much cheaper, unless you live in some sort of dwelling that has brick on the interior too. |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
Mar 28 2006, 07:55 PM
Post
#18
|
|||||
|
Manus Celer Dei Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,010 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
You clearly underestimate the long arm of the FCC. ~J |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
Mar 28 2006, 07:59 PM
Post
#19
|
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,095 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Ontari-airee-o Member No.: 1,115 |
well ... it would still be alot more expensive to strip all the drywall then put tin, then rehang and pain drywall.
I would not do a whole face of the house ... I would just put shielding on the side of the box at most it would take 1/2 a square meter. As for the invasion, it is going to happen, and we are stockpiling. I am wondering how many attrocities the US can wrack up in the name of freedom. I can hear your president now, "Well they were a democratic country and an alliy, but I heard there was a terrorist with a weapon of mass destruction in there so, it justifies invading them" |
|
|
|
|
Mar 28 2006, 08:05 PM
Post
#20
|
|||||||
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,095 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Ontari-airee-o Member No.: 1,115 |
Well 1, I would expect the rcmp woud intervene, but that would only happen if planes start experiencing problems, so I would need to shield the top as well. No one in the neighbourhood I live in would be able to figure it out. The power draw would not be too bad, it is not broadcasting in the megawatt range. I think you underestimate our laws. Remember file sharing is not still not illegal up here. Our RCC takes its time. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
Mar 28 2006, 08:06 PM
Post
#21
|
|
|
Manus Celer Dei Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,010 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
<Edited>
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 28 2006, 08:07 PM
Post
#22
|
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,095 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Ontari-airee-o Member No.: 1,115 |
<bahh edited out since K pulled his>
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 28 2006, 08:12 PM
Post
#23
|
|||||
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,028 Joined: 9-November 02 From: The Republic of Vermont Member No.: 3,581 |
I was thinking more the ever-popular and stylish hat. |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
Mar 28 2006, 08:16 PM
Post
#24
|
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,174 Joined: 13-May 04 From: UCAS Member No.: 6,327 |
Once can never beat the stylish hat. But if one is really into protecting their family jewels from harmful waves, a new line is coming out with tinfoil boxers and jockstraps... ;-)
edit: sorry, had to edit the 'hate' to 'hat'. Hehe. ooops. that wouldn't have made sense. |
|
|
|
|
Mar 28 2006, 08:20 PM
Post
#25
|
|
|
Horror Group: Members Posts: 5,322 Joined: 15-June 05 From: BumFuck, New Jersey Member No.: 7,445 |
Hatred is always stylish.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th May 2025 - 09:33 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.