Have you read the MIJI rules? They're nothing of the kind, though the brute-force approach is of course available.

Ignoring the fact that the research is not inconclusive at all, merely incomplete, what you would be doing is making the problem worse. Your method is a guarantee that every device in the radius, including your jammer, will be operating at full power. At best, that means you've got one more device pumping EM radiation into you (and this one with a source far closer to you, unless you've got a plot of land away from your house), at worst you increase the total amount of EM activity.

~J

Tin foil is a lot cheaper and easier to set up.

it would be in the back yard and I can shield the side facing my house.

You are telling me stripping off all the brick, putting several layers of tinfoil then replacing the brick can be cheaper this unit. ? Not to mention labour.

well .I am not in the US so I think I am safe, we do things a little differently up here.

Or putting it up behind your drywall/interior which is easier.

up here? Sounds like you're a canuck possibly. If that's the case, just wait till we absorb your country. There's UCAS for a reason. Actually do you even know what your laws are in regards to the transmissions?

As the others have said, you're really delusional to think that EM from cellphones are more harmful than the jammer running at full blast and you'll stop it by just shielding one side of your home? What about when you have to go out?

I guess you don't care about the people living near you, how thoughtful of ye. If you set it up, they might sue you for the health problems that you say is caused by the cell phones and are now causing it on them by deluging them with your jammer waves because you certainly believe there's health problems that stem from it. Depending on the range of the transmitter, if they are living nearby and are losing signals because of it, they may have a cause of action against you to stop using that jammer since your waves are intruding upon their space (depending on canadian property law and such).

Also you have to worry about the power cost, the monthly bill to have the jammer on all the time. Isn't it cheaper, one time cost to line the interior of your abode with tinfoil? Not the brick, but the interior which is much, much cheaper, unless you live in some sort of dwelling that has brick on the interior too.

You clearly underestimate the long arm of the FCC.

~J

Well 1, I would expect the rcmp woud intervene, but that would only happen if planes start experiencing problems, so I would need to shield the top as well. No one in the neighbourhood I live in would be able to figure it out. The power draw would not be too bad, it is not broadcasting in the megawatt range. I think you underestimate our laws. Remember file sharing is not still not illegal up here. Our RCC takes its time.

I was thinking more the ever-popular and stylish hat.

Nah, why bother invading. With the proximity to Canada and your unprotected borders we can have a strike team at your abode during the night, kick down your door, throw a flashbang to confuse you, shoot you with <lethal or nonlethal weaponry>. And then be back over the border in time for breakfast. If we chose to take ye, we'll just put ye up in a nice Carribean bungelow where our intelligence officers can work ye over...

See, no invasion needed.

It's right down there... 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Big white building, you can't miss it. Need torches? Gasoline? Fuel-air explosives?

No fair, they have a head start. Where the heck is the PM's mansion for Canada? Heck, what is there capital? Does anybody care?

I have a better idea actually .... and I would really like to see this ... a flash mob of about 500 people throw plain white packages over the fence... then bolt.

You get 2 Karma for knowing we had a Prime minister.

Huzzah, I'll spend that into knowledge skill: Canadian Politics. Gawd knows, I need to know all those different parties since you operate under parliament system with your forming different governments through wooing multiple smaller parties and such, as opposed to a two-party system...

I think I'll just stick with what I learned as a history minor on French and British colonization of Canada instead. So much simpler.

It's somewhere in Canada.

At least untill Alachia, in the guise of Queen Elizibeth III, all Commonwealth constitutions and declares her rule to be absolute sometime in in the early 2100s.

Wow, I can only imagine how many people *that* stunt might get killed...